JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM : Specifications and Opinions

The Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2017. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1967 €;

45 users have given it an average vote of 9.3 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Sony E: this lens is compatible with mirrorless fullframe and APS-C Sony.

Specifications
Focal lenght	16-35 mm
Angle of view	107.1 - 63.5°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.8
Aperture blades	11
Lenses/Groups	16 elements in 13 groups
Min. focus distance	0.28 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.19x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	No
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	82 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	680 g
Dimensions	89 x 122 mm
Buy
Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM, buy on Ebay

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 232000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Seo Photo

sent on May 27, 2023

Pros: GMaster quality, construction, speed

Cons: If I really have to find one, no stabilization

Opinion: GMaster lens wonderful and sharp at all focal lengths, I was skeptical for those who criticized the sharpness at the edges but I can confirm that it is absolutely reliable and sharp at all apertures and focal lengths. Also excellent on important sensors such as A7RIII, it returns all the detail you look for in such a sensor. The cost is not indifferent but the quality is really up to par. Even the af, as much as it may be worth on such a perspective, does not disappoint and is very precise. Tropicalized to be able to shoot in all conditions. In short, the top. Rating: 10

Floki Vilgerdarson

sent on July 16, 2022

Pros: Quality, sharpness, tropicalization

Cons: Nothing, maybe the price

Opinion: I have owned it for about two years, I consider it one of the best lenses in the Sony house (and perhaps unbeatable in the wide-angle category, nothing to envy to canon or Nikon). I shoot there of any category (dayscape, night landscape, astrophotography/aurora, etc.) and it never disappointed me. I combine it with the A7R IV (light noises, but it is for 61MP of A7R IV, there is, correctable in Adobe, in question the optics have nothing to do with it). I love her. It costs, yes, but we are talking about a very high quality. I will not go into details because others, here in the reviews, have already talked about it. I associate them. Take it and you will not regret it. I will probably take the Sony 14 1.8 to match this 16-35 2.8 for greater aperture (mm and aperture).

Just_Peppe_Proto86

sent on December 29, 2021

Pros: The wide angle par excellence

Cons: Good stuff costs!

Opinion: Of the Sony lenses I own and those I owned, this is by far what I love deeply, more than its older brother 24-70GM. An exceptional lens both for its compact size and for the build quality. The use of this jewel is not only for landscape photography, it is a lens that has exceptional versatility in any photographic situation (ceremonial, travel, street, architecture, portraits). The sharpness levels are very high and holds up well even with mirrorless like the a7R3 and R4, always sharp from the center, at the corners it is a soft hair but the yield levels are high, even at closed apertures f11/13. the various defects are well contained, obviously greater eye to the 16mm focal length where it distorts and vignettes in an evident way but it manages well, The chromatic aberrations hold well, The only defect is the tightness of the flares (especially a Rainbow flare). It has good bokeh great for portraits and other various contexts. Of all that I wrote the real flaw is the price, but basically the good stuff costs! Mistake?

Okpj

sent on February 21, 2021

Pros: Weight, resolution, flexibility, blurry, build quality, lampshed, effective tropicalization

Cons: Important price, front width

Opinion: I'm enjoying the 16-35 GM for a year and a half. I took everything: morning landscapes, architecture, milky way but also portraits set thanks to the excellent blurry that the 11 slats create at 35mm. It produces a good star at f/16 and the solvence is excellent at all focal points, even at 35mm. is the smallest and lightest 16-35 f/2.8 on the market. Nevertheless, it has a slightly conical shape that causes the end part to be a little too wide. The diameter of the filters is still 82mm (like the other 16-35 2.8) so you can find all brands and types. The construction quality is excellent, very nice the lampshon with velvety interior and unlock button. The excellent resolution on the canvas side allows you to avoid the purchase of a "bridge" lens: I traveled through Italy, Peru, Jordan, Ireland, France, Holland with the 16-35 combined with an 85mm (which I only recently replaced with a 70-180 f/2.8 for an even more versatile combo) and I never felt the lack of something that filled the gap. It handles the A7RIV's 60mpx great and I've tested its tropicalization on a couple of occasions, brilliantly passing the test. I don't see a single reason to prefer it to the f/4 model unless you have to save money at all costs, or you've had an unmissable opportunity, or you still don't have an extra cm of space in your bag. Or if you only take a closed diaphragm.

Sout87

sent on October 27, 2020

Pros: Construction, Optical Yield, Distortion, Star, Screw Filters

Cons: Clutter, price on the new ("the good stuff costs")

Opinion: Taken used to replace the tamron 17-28 that did not satisfy me both in terms of excursion and optical yield... well I have to say I made the best purchase ever. I also read reviews on other platforms that find it little engraved at 35mm... I honestly find it a blade in all contexts! already at F4 you reach a sharpness equal to some fixed. It returns faithful colors and an excellent microcontrasto.... on the other hand, just look at the MFT. It solves all 42Mpixels of my RIII very well. At closed diaphragms it returns an unparalleled star. I don't know what else to say... I find it great. Great for those who, like me, were often on out-of-the-door trips to constantly change the lens between 35mm and wide angle. Now I have one less lens and so much more quality!

There are 5 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM

Cloud caress at Giau Pass

by Giovanni Azzi
133 comments, 13398 views [editors pick]

Lonely

by Matteo Visconti
98 comments, 12423 views [editors pick]

State of beauty

by Andrea Burla
184 comments, 9941 views [editors pick]

Trondheim's evening

by Giovanni Azzi
98 comments, 8942 views [editors pick]

The Dancing Northern Lights

by Marco_capitanio46
96 comments, 8766 views [editors pick]

Mysterious sunrise

by Lazza80
53 comments, 3985 views [editors pick]

HI RES 42.2 MP

Five Towers

by Marco_capitanio46
80 comments, 7716 views [editors pick]

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

The spectre of Segla

by Mario Vigo
57 comments, 4340 views [editors pick]

HI RES 6.8 MP

Early Autumn Day

by Francesco Ciardi
53 comments, 8893 views

Sunrise in Madeira

by Lespauly
41 comments, 5775 views [editors pick]

HI RES 4.4 MP

Light Bridge, New1001

by Andrea Burla
91 comments, 4386 views [editors pick]

Pacentro

by Maurizio Verdecchia
89 comments, 4560 views

Baikal lake' mood

by Nangi
42 comments, 4073 views

HI RES 5.4 MP

Black Lake

by Andnol
105 comments, 1834 views

HI RES 9.0 MP

Thunderstorm

by Marco_capitanio46
36 comments, 3010 views

Plitvice in autumn

by Luciano Leuzzi
62 comments, 2745 views

Between Lights and shadows

by Francesco Ciardi
46 comments, 3119 views

Little Jerusalem

by Andrea Burla
112 comments, 3712 views

The city that never sleeps..

by Gianlucasimonella
77 comments, 4581 views

Amazing sunset

by Francesco Ciardi
36 comments, 5094 views

Metamorphosis

by Stefano Campo
42 comments, 2444 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

The mists of dawn

by Mario Vigo
48 comments, 1396 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Clivo Argentario - Rome

by Maurizio Verdecchia
39 comments, 1879 views

The Flowers

by Marco_capitanio46
60 comments, 3966 views

Autumn reflected

by Giannuzzi Andrea
47 comments, 1543 views

Green Explosion

by Marco_capitanio46
31 comments, 3103 views

Long Lake. Lakes of Sopranes

by Andnol
88 comments, 1902 views

HI RES 16.2 MP

Mirror

by FrancescoPuglisi
34 comments, 1243 views

Dark lake

by Andnol
72 comments, 1370 views

HI RES 21.1 MP

The Dawn of Bled Part 2

by Giovanni Azzi
38 comments, 2164 views

Midnight sun

by Mario Vigo
28 comments, 1954 views

HI RES 6.8 MP

Saent Waterfalls

by Andnol
87 comments, 1894 views

HI RES 24.0 MP

Frozen, New10

by Andrea Burla
29 comments, 2028 views

Cles Castle

by Andnol
106 comments, 1700 views

HI RES 22.2 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Aresenale, Venice

by Paola Zirattu
50 comments, 1490 views

Hamburg by sunset

by Mada1991
68 comments, 2840 views

HI RES 12.0 MP

The Rock in the Ice, Baikal 2020

by Nangi
28 comments, 2306 views

HI RES 5.4 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Sony » Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM

Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM