|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Andrea Biagiolini www.juzaphoto.com/p/AndreaBiagiolini  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM S Pros: Optical quality, at all focal lengths; Safe and accurate af even without dock sharpening ; The metal lens hood is excellent, sturdy as is the whole lens. Excellent colors and detail, visible more than from my images among those of the GOOD authors, which you can find here galore. Cons: Slow weight and stretch, which at a distance forced me reluctantly to give it up... with great regrets. It is better to use it with a monopod or alternatively good biceps. Lack of cap, but given the diameter of the lens it would have cost a kidney only that. Opinion: Great lens, really; pioneered today's tele zooms, so Canikon/Sony can thank Sigma... and also Tamron, although with clear superiority of the previous one. Finding it second-hand, it's an absolute must-have. It will satisfy and excite you by forgiving it weight and bulk: excellent both for wandering birdlife and, even better, for stalking with tripod or support. sent on November 22, 2023 |
 | Nikon AF 105mm f/2 D DC Pros: Colors and of course the blurred ... Cons: The blurred in defocus unmanageable, not having fully understood it in use Opinion: Purchased in the remote 1996 and used both on the 90X and on the F5, I could not make me like it in its specificity of use: I always ended up using it without correction (distortion, better) and therefore smooth was a decent 105 but at the price of a rank lens. Light, well made, a Nikon as expected. To make me reconcile, the thieves took care of it and took it away. Amen. sent on September 05, 2023 |
 | Canon EF 300mm f/2.8 L IS USM Pros: General quality, detail also at TA, natural colors... everything, come on. Cons: Perhaps, several years after the purchase, the weight: it is true, however, that a lot of time has passed. Opinion: Purchased on occasion but practically new with top case in 1999, initially used in analog with EOS 1VHS gave pappina to the 300 f.2,8 Nikon contemporary, had and exchanged with this (for my use; Fanboys no comment ). Amazing detail at f.2.8 and improvable up to f.8-11, also used duplicated at 2x lost very little. Reflexes contained all in all but to be used with the hood, uncomfortable but effective. Excellent performance also in digital and the shots with the very old 6D testify to this ... Sold in 2011, at 60% of the price paid, and regret for quality and satisfaction obtained. Rating: 10 and 1/2. sent on April 21, 2022 |
 | Zeiss Milvus 85mm f/1.4 Pros: Construction, colors, precision and graduality of the MAF mechanism, blurred charm, balancing on body machine... Cons: Hard to master, it has no stabilization but I knew it. I would say the ERA rubber, which tends to collect dust and does not seem to me to be of a suitable level to this amazing optics. Opinion: RESOR: The judgment "against" is aimed mainly at me and therefore does not demerit the optics. My wish was, after trying the optics on the Sony RXIII, to see how a real Zeiss behaves compared to the other brands, in a broad sense. I'm happy with it, really, even though I've just had it and I'm working on it (bitling, more honestly) a little bit up. On the body Canon 5D MKIV goes well but I have to be very careful for the sealing; I wanted it as a throwback, because I wanted to redefine my shooting, going back to the manual sealing. I think I'll have to do a lot of hand and maybe make calibrations - I ask for help in that regard, is it necessary ?? - because even if it appears or signals me in focus, reviewing the image on video I notice that I patch several of them. On ditto stabilization, it is missing and it must be noted. It is an excellent quality optic: the same degree Sigma, already excellent, did not reach the visual complexity of this lens despite being a great product. Made of metal and manual glass, weight ok but not to be used on light machine bodies, penalty imbalance . What else, I will insist and I am convinced of the choice. sent on November 14, 2019 |
 | Sony RX10 III Pros: Solidity, focal excursion, AF accuracy in optimal light conditions, wide variety of diaphragms, optics. Cons: Lack of external charger, obvious difficulties in AF in case of poor light or contrast . Opinion: Just taken through the increasingly trusty and perfect RCE Padua, I make a very short comparison with the Leica V-LUX Typ 114 ; more solid, impeccable and uncertainties-free AF, quality optics like the other, very practical all-in-one. One flaw, quite macroscopic, is the lack of external charger, given the poor durability of the same... I made up for it by buying two spare accumulators and its Ravpower Chargers from Sunvalley on Amazon. I would say a valid companion of shots for excursions, outdoors and street (for those who do). It makes me also review in positive the non-reflex vision, which I have been for a long, too accustomed , although I certainly do not disuse the set of reflex and related optics ! But it is a lot, but SO comfortable and without reins of quality... I update to 24 June 2019 : I use it frequently and we start to get to know each other better : what I start to notice is that the AF in conditions of little contrast (white/gray subjects as in the Bistolfi Museum photographed by me ) goes on its own and struggles to capture the image. For me, not bad; for other needs can be very problematic. Zeiss lens, however, really amazing !!! Rating: 9 sent on May 20, 2019 |
 | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 Pros: Engraving, net and non-invasive colours, ductility, brightness 2.8 fixed, class stabilization, optical quality and absolute construction. Cons: A bit of flare in backlight, AF which, only sometimes, has some uncertainty. Opinion: There Are many more pros, even unwritten ones. My "vademecum" is just under a year, in the sense of always with me. I preferred it to the (almost) perfect Sigma 24-105mm f/4 DG OS HSM Art-that was happening at the Canon 1a equivalent series-for the great brightness, for the Tamron quality that I've learned to appreciate more and more and for not having too many focal overlapping... I am really satisfied, the weight is not yet a problem and gives solidity in handling it, the images are always well engraved and is made in an almost certosina, with a nice rounded bottom in clear metal to attack the nozzle that gives elegance (pure that, Zanzan! ) ; Purchased by RCE PD with maximum celerity and price always at the top. Also Great in portraits. I Don't feel the lack of an original optics! sent on April 14, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM II Pros: Sharpness at all focal lengths, general robustness, much smoother focal block on zoom, stabilization, color, minimum MAF distance improved. Cons: Perhaps, but only perhaps, the uncomfortable disconnect of the bracket and only partially. But just to write something also in this section... Opinion: Still improved compared to my much-loved 100-400 I; I think it's pointless to write torrents of words but only because using it you realize you have a top optics to use for years without sagging. For yield, elasticity of use, general quality, balancing. Having also the excellent 150-600 Sigma S I do not consider however this optics at all in overlap, given the comfort and ductility in the use. Rating: 10, and praise. sent on July 17, 2018 |
 | Leica V-Lux (Typ 114) Pros: Optical quality, stabilization, many possible shooting options and pre-coded scenes. Luxury handyman. Cons: Non-reflex, then electronic viewfinder and fixed optics, but does not make you regret a machine with pentaprism. Opinion: A surprise. It took me a bit ' of shots but I have changed back on several "-yes, but..." Compared to my Canon. Optics of great quality, very good stabilization, AF ready and selective, but to make us a little ' hand. The dynamic research of the AF points on moving animals is an astonishing reason for reactivity; A peculiarity, using the burst the V-Lux automatically reduces the size of the file, allowing almost a movie. Saturated and pleasant colors, a few diaphragms available but more than enough and, on the road, is a nice, lightweight shooting companion. Rating: 9 sent on June 05, 2018 |
 | Nikon F5 Pros: Efficient analog, a miracle. Cons: I had found. Opinion: I'm from MO canonist free from preconceived notions, but it was my last Nikon F90X, FM2N, purchased in 1998 after-F100-of which I still have great memories; solidity, ergonomics, amazing Matrix display system, many solutions really innovative for its time and again the pentaprism replaceable, silent shutter true. Excellent, those who purchase now will not regret it. sent on April 13, 2018 |
 | Sigma 100-400mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM C Pros: Price, lightness of the set, rotating zoom, discrete sharpness at more closed apertures. Cons: Decent stabilizer but not too much to the height, realization "plasticosa" of the body with visible welds and unperceivable solidity, sufficient AF, low brightness that influences the AF, lens hood that mounted on the contrary does not access the zoom (AW...) . Opinion: Initial vote, 7. Final Vote: 8 required premise: Consider that it is a very first impression after purchase and initial shots on the 7d MK II. I come from the Canon 100-400 L 1a series and I have, always Sigma, the 150-600 Sport plus other series ART lenses; are goals qualitatively im-pa-ra-Go-na-bi-li at this. Canon won with low hands on AF, sharpness, stabilization and sturdiness paying for weight, long lenses and dust infiltrations, but it was exceptional. At Canon price, then expensive and prohibitive now, but to each and his own pockets. Sigma 150-600 amazing and heavy but very satisfying. So... This Sigma, after other shots, I can well recommend it for the pro above. Purchased from the excellent RCE PD at an absolutely competitive price; It is a good lens that anyone can afford to be able to dare over 300 mm without svenarsi and at 400 mm is very sharp. But without expecting the rendition of the real Sigmas. The lack of the collar would see it more as an advantage in terms of portability and less weight, IMHO. sent on March 14, 2018 |
 | Canon Speedlite 270EX II Pros: Everything from the size of the results. Cons: Very little, maybe the fact overestimate it and ask him what he can not do ... Opinion: Compact, ideal for fill-flashes but also to ambientati portraits. Good construction, easy to use and discreet possibility of bascularlo top; cheaply made and so, as they say. I can compensate the power with high ISO, afforded the opportunity - from higher range flash - to act as a slave to another device with more power. Be highly recommended. sent on February 06, 2017 |
 | Sigma 85mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: color rendering, detail, BOKEH! , Af, build quality, extendable warranty to 3 years. Cons: I have not yet discovered it. And perhaps there are ... Opinion: If someone will object that it is heavy, it tells only the obvious, but ... it's a great lente.rn Valid, af ready and accurately without the need to use the dock, manual focus with no games and very effective; first photos taken today with full frame and I put in a mini-gallery of 5 pictures (useless bore you) to link http://www.juzaphoto.com/me.php?pg=189442&l=it rnrn that very nicely confirm the It estimates that Sigma has gained from me and many others. You have to actually take a little 'hand, it is like driving a quality weight machine and performance benefits, and not easy to be reckoned with - especially in the pdc of course - but that can only give satisfaction. rnProcurato swiftly and great treatment from RCE Photo Padua. sent on December 08, 2016 |
 | Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8 VC USD Pros: Construction, solidity, AF, f.2.8 FIXED, stabilization, ten-year guarantee (!), Retail and light output. Cons: At the moment, however, zero zero street waiting for field testing in the second half. Opinion: FIRST IMPRESSIONS - Received today, purchased by RCE PHOTO with invaluable service and excellent resale values; at first glance, it seems a great accomplishment Tamron.rn I repeat: the universal builders of lenses are making strides into viable and innovative products, at affordable prices for their quality, the Major ... sleep and Campania on the bodies more or less up to date. rnTornando the beast, the short test it on the field but we are currently strasoddisfatto. Note dutiful: for weak wrist and fighettini, unwise because it looks like a washing machine and see him arrive before and after the camera body. For me, a must. rnrnSECONDE IMPRESSIONS to 03/10/2016: already wide open, clear and etched. well-rendered colors, suitable AF to the mass of slow but precise, not too suitable for action shots. Great and soo recommended ... sent on August 18, 2016 |
 | Canon F-1 Pros: Robust, semi-spot metering, absolute reliability, interchangeable pentaprism, the vastness of accessories, excellent market tightness. Cons: Nobody Opinion: Had as a second camera body, in parallel with the A-1 my first reflex, I can not fault it as it had become my favorite. Kept me company for many years, although it was purchased already used given the high prices, until a fall of several meters has put ko.rn Nostalgia aside, it was a great and valid machine. sent on June 23, 2016 |
 | Sigma 24-105mm f/4 DG OS HSM Art Pros: Massive, beautifully finished, low-dispersion lenses, no stretching of the lower lens. AF accurately and without hesitation. quiet and efficient stabilizer. construction quality at the top. Cons: Zooming a bit 'harder and in a bit heavier than the Canon. Opinion: INTRODUCTION: some images to a new folder in my profile. RN29 May 2016 - First day of real use on 6D, the passage of the Tour of Italy close to home. hot impressions: zooming "harder" than the Canon L series before that I had, but added advantage of not lengthening the lens when holding down (and it is no small thing), sharp images even for low dispersion lenses. Overcast and cloudy, natural colors and well made, AF also valid in the second half of incoming cyclists, although I stoner times since with rising 1/160 was moved ... rn Massif, well done, quiet, heavy the right, it seems a good choice. Satisfied with the choice and the real alternative now increasingly offered by Sigma, since the comparison is between two identical lenses to focus. sent on May 30, 2016 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Solid, more than adequate AF, versatile, attractive price. Cons: Appropriate quality at affordable price. Opinion: Let's say I was - is - flawed in judgment from having had the Canon 70-300 L el 'excellent Tamron 70-200 VC; It is a great handyman universal weight (denoting quality construction) but easy to use. The optical quality is decent, good sharpness, lightning-fast yet accurate AF, as well as color rendering. I did not expect miracles, but for that price it is absolutely worth the money them all. rnConsigliabile. sent on December 28, 2015 |
 | Canon 7D Mark II Pros: Robust, AF selective definitely improved, many customizations, file well balanced, useful levels in the frame. Cons: At the moment I would say no, even to try to bottom. Opinion: For me, comparable only with the 1D MKIII, obviously with his body grip; very valuable for photos dynamics, also excellent for portrait, able to give crisp images and full of detail. Since the first impression on the field, it falls well in hand: Canon adjustments typically, however you must have the foresight to read well and carefully the instruction booklet and avoid being misled by the apparent similarity with the 7D! Excellent evolution of the predecessor and I assume to last long. sent on January 18, 2015 |
 | Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Manufacturing, colors and lenses definition, quality stabilization and auto focus, balance. Cons: Not having tried it before! Seriously: the lack of a dedicated housing and, more severe, the tendency to let through the dust between the lenses: also the Canon 100-400 L IS-I does, but with a pump zoom, not internal. Hood effective but inconvenient if left on the body is not mounted, as does access to the settings (trifles ...) Opinion: A large bell'obiettivo, really, who does not have significant difference in quality compared to the original Canon; I had the 70-200 2.8L and this I find equal optical quality, at a price very, very beneficial and stabilized. Solid, reliable, with a / f almost perfect pesantuccio but manageable - "falls to" immediately - and really valuable. Worth every euro spent and even more! I think if the current Tamron quality is such, and I confirm the many beautiful pictures made by others with 150-600, will buy the latter rather than the Sigma. rnVoto: 9 sent on January 18, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM Pros: Clarity, practicality, absolute quality of the image even at maximum zoom range. Effective stabilization, fast AF. A handyman valuable traveling and beyond. Cons: Unbalanced to the maximum length (to be picky ...), often need to eliminate the dust that settles on the lenses inside, hardening in the long period of dials and manual focus. Opinion: A true wonder, to recommend ever in an ideal kit Canon. The fluorite is seen in the results, by definition amazing images and colors, I loved it as much as I liked the Nikon 80-200 f.2,8 in my previous kit. The weight at this point is a defect negligible; I am curious to know the version II in what could be better. sent on December 29, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
