Sigma 24-105mm f/4 DG OS HSM Art : Specifications and Opinions
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.
Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.
Sony A-mount: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Sony A-mount.
Sigma SA: this lens is compatible with reflex and mirrorless fullframe and APS-C Sigma SA-mount.
| Focal lenght || 24-105 mm|
| Angle of view || 84 - 23.2°|
| Format || FF, APS-C|
| Max. aperture || f/4|
| Aperture blades || 9|
| Lenses/Groups || 19 elements in 14 groups|
| Min. focus distance || 0.45 meters|
| Reproduction ratio || 0.21x|
| Zoom type || Ring, external|
| Stabilization || Yes (built in lens)|
| Focus || Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)|
| Internal AF || Yes|
| Full Time MF || Yes|
Built and notes
| Tripod ring || No|
| Extenders || No|
| Filters || 82 mm|
| Lens hood || Yes, supplied|
| Weather sealing || No|
| Weight || 885 g|
| Dimensions || 88 x 109 mm|
|Buy ||Sigma 24-105mm f/4 DG OS HSM Art, buy on Ebay|
What do you think about this lens?Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 150000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
pubblicata da Pgatto July 12, 2018
Pros: Versatility, sharpness already at TA, speed MAF, blurred, colour rendition faithful, pleasant to the touch...
Cons: In certain situations "vignette" lightly, the weight (but the quality "weighs"...)
Premise Duty: I was biased towards the Sigma, so far all 4 of the optics I had taken had always had problems of F/B focus, not correctable in the room and therefore my despite I always had to return, "folding" (it is to say...;)) on Original optics of Canon mom. When I took it (in Test...) I had already had as many as 2 copies of the counterpart Canon I version and in both cases (I will have been particularly lame...) I was disappointed: poor sharpness, af not up to an original optics, blurred better to let loose ... Not being a "range" by me much used (mainly shooting sports then with "long" lenses) I did not mean in this case spend too much to take the new canon, so I had taken the excellent 24-70 F/4 canon, sharp, fast, light, etc. just that in Too many occasions was short... those 35mm more would have made me comfortable and then, when they proposed to try it without any commitment for a few days, I took advantage, convinced that would have made the same end of his predecessors... Instead, to my surprise, not only the optics in question did not manifest any problem of F/B focus, but using it in various situations, from closed for events to motor shows, the more I used it and more I liked! I've already written my impressions of the pros, that "pleasing to the touch" is everything, it seems to use a perspective of the years that were, heavy, but the build quality is there and it is felt in this case in the weight, more appropriate to a 70-200 than to a 24-105. I mean, I liked it and I like it more and more, it has a nice blur, TA you get a three-dimensionality and a detachment of the foreground subject worthy of much more expensive optics, as is faithful the color rendition (someone says that the colors are slightly Cold, it doesn't seem to me but I don't exclude it). Only flaw, but easily correctable in PP; In certain situations vignette (but also vignettavano the 2 Canon "old", I do not know the new because I have never tried) and for someone the weight, but as said before I do not consider it a problem, accustomed to turn with heavy optics, when I mount the "Fifty" I always fear Having forgotten the target, so its weight "reassures me." I took it in physical store to less than 700 euros with 3 years of official mtrading warranty, I think it's worth them all and even more!
Pubblicata da Pgatto July 12, 2018
pubblicata da Loris78 March 05, 2018
Pros: Sharp, excellent Maf without calibration (for a Sigma !!!), stabilizer
Cons: Perhaps the weight
A step away from the sale because I thought I could find better in a brighter lens, I got to "stress" this lens during a friend's event and I can say that I completely fell in love (but the Sigma are in my heart !!) . It 's true a little bit heavy and that F4 maybe knows the limit, but I assure you that for an amateur like me find myself with a lot of shots made quickly and ALL in focus (even with little light, thanks stabilizer) is something excellent. Sharp to be scary, colors quite faithful to the original (someone claimed that they were a little cold), I can not help but say that I found my "handyman" .... and I will not take it away anymore!
Pubblicata da Loris78 March 05, 2018
pubblicata da Pierluigi Asturi January 27, 2018
Pros: Construction quality, veratility
Cons: Weight, dimensions, af slow coupled with the mc11 adapter
I used it for a year on both the canon 760d and the sony a7II. As soon as the shopkeeper pulled it out of the box, I felt like not buying it anymore, given the size and weight. Used on the Canon did not do wonders, in the sense that it could not eliminate the heavy chromatic aberrations of that sensor, a surrender then in the complexno not exciting, discreet stabilizer, autofocus sufficient in one shot but too slow in af continuous, good color rendering, sharpness conditioned by the aberration of which rnsopra. Used on the sony obviously the sharpness was excellent and the aberrations disappeared, but the mc11 adapter prevented the continuous af. The size and weight made it ridiculous compared to the body of the A7II everything was unbalanced and manageable with difficulty. In short, a lens with which I have never found, plus compared to the old28 / 70 c / y (9 lenses) is not that it was so superior, in the end I gave it in exchange for 16/35 f4 sony (zeiss ). Rated 7, personallyI advise against the purchase of weight and dimensions, with the current technology and with the cost that digital lenses must be lighter and easier to handle.
Pubblicata da Pierluigi Asturi January 27, 2018
pubblicata da Stef_pz January 26, 2018
Pros: Sharpness, build quality, versatility
Cons: Weight, AF to be adjusted
Good lens for ff, versatile, excellent construction and at an acceptable price. Excellent stabilization and very clear. The weight is remarkable, it makes you feel traveling. As sometimes happens with the objectives Sigma goes a moment calibrated the mf on some specimens, problem solvable in the car itself but boring at the beginning. Filters 82mm expensive but that I share with tokina 17-35 so personally becomes a pro. Preferred to the competition given the remarkable sharpness
Pubblicata da Stef_pz January 26, 2018
pubblicata da Tiatyper January 23, 2018
Pros: Excellent stabilizer (see my test on my profile), sharpness already at TA, super build quality, speed of focus
Cons: 82 mm filters and weight
I have been using this lens for several years now on APS-C. Tested in all situations. Great lens. The sharpness is very good, the exceptional stabilizer with a very fast focus. Occasionally (rarely) I've had back-focus problems. The lens is made of metal alloys, weighs a little but the quality is really good. Too bad for the 82 mm filters. Beautiful big. AF / 8 brings out the best in itself. I feel really good. Comparing it with the cousin Nikon (24-120) the difference in weight is felt (in favor of the Nikkor) but the external quality of the lens does not question itself. It has the reverse rotation of the zoom ring on Nikon, but you get used to it quickly. I recommend it.rn
Pubblicata da Tiatyper January 23, 2018
Photos taken with Sigma 24-105mm f/4 DG OS HSM Art
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
Sunset on the frozen lake by Mau1948
94 comments, 9910 views
Excuse me for heaven? I pray this way by Zoommista
140 comments, 8452 views
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
The wonder of Notre Dame by Raffaele1978
58 comments, 1359 views
Snowplow locomotive by Mau1948
74 comments, 1889 views
Balloons to 'dawn by Mau1948
45 comments, 4837 views
Snow on the Sacro Monte of Varese by Tiatyper
41 comments, 2671 views
The man behind the window by Raffaele1978
51 comments, 669 views
Venice Carnival 2014 by Rizioc
22 comments, 15174 views
The cold and frost .. by Tiatyper
38 comments, 2248 views
Hot air balloons in flight by Mau1948
34 comments, 4837 views
Anastasia by Lentino
22 comments, 4556 views
Castelluccio the first light by Lucasixtysix
31 comments, 2713 views
Sassi at sunset by Tiatyper
25 comments, 3327 views
Massif of the Geisler by VittorioDs
29 comments, 2059 views
Untitled Photo by Marcoss
42 comments, 1617 views
The magic of the Sacro Monte of Varese by Tiatyper
38 comments, 1639 views
Frankfurt skyline at sunset by Raffaele1978
34 comments, 1122 views
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Sunset to the valleys of Rosolina by Marcoss
62 comments, 915 views
Ballooning Cappadocia by Mau1948
44 comments, 3230 views