There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 119000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: Sharpness, build quality, custom settings / USB dock
This lens is real value for money. You get great quality, sturdiness and very sharp photos (even at 600mm). With the USB dock you ar able to adjust the focus setting, but when using several cameras i prefer finetuning on the camera's.For birds in flight i think the lens is a bit slow.
I use this lens combined with the Nikon D7200 These two combined creates great photo's
Pubblicata da Peterwiggerman November 30, 2016
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros: Sharpness, quality construction, AF, tripod bracket
Cons: Weight can be a problem for someone.
Before choosing this lens I tried and I am informed on the internet for a long time also because there is dirt cheap, my question was, worth it 600 euro more than in contemporary or tamron (I live in Holland and I buy in germany so i prices are different from Italian.) after much research and seeing him live I am convinced. Decision was never more right, it is a fantastic goal, excellent quality of construction, the photos are sharp and the most important thing for me is that I'm happy to use it and I do not have second thoughts, it makes me realize that I made a good buy because they are very critical with my acquisti.rnPer me is a highly recommended purchase.
Pubblicata da Andrea Bovolo February 08, 2017
Pros: rugged construction, zoom range, fast AF, bracket nice big tripod, USB dock to set the parameters, MAF distance selectors, stabilization, pump zoom system
Cons: For now only the weight but eventually weighs like my old 300 2.8, a bit 'unbalanced when used freehand above the maximum escursionernZoom a bit' difficult because duretta
I have not tried a lot, but really positive first impressions, spectacularly metal housing, tripod bracket comoda.rnBelli and convenient buttons for selecting various settings and AF really good, to be SIGMA works at grande.rnPrivato yesterday with little light and so I expect even better with buona.rnOra light I have to update and see if it changes qualcosa.rnUsato with 7dMk2
Pubblicata da Basketsam83 October 01, 2016
Pros: Sharpness, accuracy, quality / price ratio, the tripod support bracket of generous size
Cons: Definitely the weight, size zoom ring
I state that I do not I do not have this perspective, I do not have other superteleobiettivi zoom and sports / wildlife is not my thing, but I've got to try this objective to a Sigma Day yesterday. The impression is of a professional viewpoint, from the construction, the lens hood (secured with a screw and not interlocking), the image quality, AF accuracy and sharpness. Excellent quality / price ratio and focal lengths covered in my opinion. On the other hand, weight is something extraordinary (hard to shoot handheld, even if for this kind of photography is obviously necessary a monopod, tripod or any kind of support); the zoom ring seems too small and hard (much better than the Contemporary version).
Pubblicata da Enrico Galvani September 25, 2016
Pros: economic, precise, very good image quality
Cons: the weight, the ring of maf
I write after a while I use it; only impressions about the field of course! I use it for bird life and I find really excellent from zero to 15 meters. Besides I can not judge, it is not given because even little over shooting and when shooting never throw anything buono.rnE 'a good 600mm value-priced. The use of Canon and is fine (7dII, 70D and 5dIII) .rnSulla 5dIII in my opinion is even better as dell'AF.rnDiciamo precision to 600mm has all the flaws of this focal namely reduced depth of field, need time fast shutter; but it allows you to have to crop less, thereby improving quality. Unfortunately in the shots of the birds mm are used primarily to subject little ones or very wary, amche because we often fail to make truly effective stalking to the limits of luoghi.rnIo come from the 400 mm f5.6 Canon always, beautiful! The only comparison I can make is that with the 400mm is more easy to shoot and quality "looks" better, in fact I saw that; even better because of the depth of field for the benefit of the 400mm.rnCon 600 mm have to close the iris and starting dall'f8 will have results very buoni.rnLa ring of maf is positioned at half lens and I find it a bit cumbersome, but it is subjective.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.