|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Alessio1970 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Alessio1970  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon Z 28-75mm f/2.8 Pros: Sharpness, very nice bokeh, weighs the right, brightness. Cons: Perhaps the only "flaw" is the price... but it is known that lately the prices are "crazy". Opinion: I bought it because the focal length 28 is FOR ME the right wide to always have behind, 24mm I find them too dispersive. This zoom "replaces" four fixed ones while maintaining excellent quality. Already at full aperture it is sharp and perfect from edge to edge, closing by one stop is spectacular. For the moment I can talk about it positvamente, I do not find defects worthy of note. sent on March 16, 2022 |
 | Nikon AF-S 28mm f/1.8 G Pros: Sharpness, lightness, low distortion, colors, speed af. Cons: For me nobody. Opinion: I've definitely whispered this lens during the holidays just spent in Salento. What to say ... I'm "in love" with this goal. I used it at sunset, I used it in Matera with sunshine, I used it at night in Otranto ... no disappointment in yield in these conditions. I also used it for some set portrait and I have to say that the 28mm have one because in this kind of photos. The colors he returns are fantastic.rn sent on July 25, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF 24mm f/2.8 D Pros: Nitride already af / 2.8, fast af, beautiful loaded colors. Cons: For the moment I do not find it. Opinion: Bought this morning and immediately put to the test. Definitely a great value for money. I've tried it on both D3 and D3X and the quality is the same, it does not even lose anything on the 24mpx of the D3X. Nitrite already at 2.8, closing the diaphragm becomes a blade. It delivers very beautiful and pasty colors, blur it badly, quickly af. My copy has no noticeable sharpness on the edges so marked as it reads around. sent on July 25, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.8 G Pros: Sharp already to 1.8, weight, bokeh. Cons: AF is not Formula 1, AC. Opinion: From the very first tests done I can say with confidence that this is a great great great obiettivo.rnNitido (much) to 1.8, blurred mellow, classic AC present but which are eliminated with a click. The thing that has left so "open-mouthed to me" is the fact that it has no problems with the side maf points of D3, indeed, with any of the 51 AF points (seems the 180 AFD !!!). RnL'af not is lightning (I knew very well) as the D version using the engine of reflex.rnLa my biggest "fear"? Closed shadows that churn the G lenses (I had a 35 1.8 G for FX that closed the great) ... but I had to change my mind because this 85 is not as "bad" in this respect, indeed, it is very "gentle" and for those who make portraiture is a plus not just. sent on February 25, 2017 |
 | Nikon 105mm f/2.5 Ai-S Pros: Sharp already af / 2.5 and if closed by one stop becomes a knife. Blurred creamy and progressive, pastel colors and soft, soft ring, building "Old style". Cons: Nobody. Opinion: I have the version AI.rnLo was looking for a lot 'of time and I finally arrived home from a couple of hours. Tried immediately on D3 ... "love at first sight" superlative .rnLente, no difficulty in manual focusing thanks to the rangefinder D3.rnA f / 2.5 is incredible, closed scares. rnConsigliato to those who want a lens from portrait cheaply. sent on November 30, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF 35mm f/2 D Pros: Size, performance, sharpness, quality / price ratio Cons: For me against NO. Opinion: I 35 1.8 G but soon after I changed it (too contrasty and sharp hyper for my taste) with this little gem. rnNitido already af / 2, pleasing blur, delicate tones like all the D series (at least for fixed). Quick AF does not miss a nice colpo.rnSe used to reportage or ambientati portraits you can have fun as never before with results really notevoli.rnE 'perspective that should never be lacking, I highly recommend it to anyone who wants a high yield with little spesa.rnrn sent on November 16, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8 Pros: Blurry, clear, construction. Cons: For the moment I can not find. Opinion: I bought this zoom (version D) despite not being a lover of this type of lens (I only fixed in the kit). I took it more than anything to have a lens "handyman" as around town. I find this remarkable zoom in yield with very nice blurry. The AF is reactive (at least on the D3), the pump mechanism I have no problem in using. RNE ' "morbidino" to 2.8 when shooting at 35mm (such as the Canon 24-70 2.8 The first version I had), aged 50 and older is nice crisp. In backlight "pushed" I have yet to try it so I can not give a judgment in merito.rnTrovo useful to be able to use it as a "macro" blocking 35mm pump mechanism to use it only in manuale.rnVignetta and distorts it with a click of ACR settles all (although to be honest I always leave vignetting because I like) .rnPer who wanted a serious "zoom" at a very low price I see no alternative at home ... Nikon recommend it to chiusi.rnOc eyesappliance opacification of the rear doublet. sent on November 01, 2016 |
 | Nikon 300mm f/4 AF-IF ED Pros: Sharpness at TA, blurred, building. Cons: Maybe the weight (for others) but it's a subjective thing Opinion: The goal that has amazed me more than the others in my kit. Before you buy I read so many reviews and viewed a lot of photos. The yield to TA is moving, blurred is beautiful, clean and pleasant. And 'built in a solid ... the manner "Nikon old style". With my D3 falls in hand perfectly and is balanced optimally. I tried it (with Manfrotto 680B monopod) for the first time to a football match of my son (boys aged 14 who run like crazy with sudden changes of direction) can also be used very well by hand libera.rnIeri ... of 310 photos has not cannata no (also using the barrage) ... all focus although it is not an AF-S. Surely he puts af D3 which has its operational but the speed of this is absolutely notevole.rnLo highly recommend it for those who want the best results with little expense. sent on August 21, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF 180mm f/2.8 D ED IF Pros: Sharp to TA, bokeh, construction, color Cons: Honestly I found none Opinion: More I use this lens and I remain open-mouthed by what brings out. I am told by many that my copy is a "gold edition" because 2.8 is razor sharp in comparison to many other 180. RNLA yield of this lens is really amazing, the colors and various tonal passages are crazy. The dividend is to be foaming at bocca.rnLa am using the D3 and the af is beautiful fast. rnAdesso this lens takes away a little ... who wants a fixed with balls recommend. sent on August 11, 2016 |
 | Nikon 300mm f/4.5 Ai Pros: Colors, blurry, good sharpness at TA, few AC. Cons: Maybe the weight ... but it is a subjective matter. Opinion: I took a few days, I've only done test shots but I can say that the goal, despite his age, is definitely bene.rnA ta (f / 4.5) looks sharp "right" with the classic sfocatone 300mm ... close to a stop becomes beautiful "sharp" natural .rnColori, I do not see big problems in the AC high contrasto.rnCon scenes the D3 is easy to use thanks to the electronic rangefinder, falls well in hand and there are no contraindications for use free-hand (although I use it with a monopod view my hand not too firm) .rnParaluce incorporato.rnrn sent on June 08, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF 85mm f/1.8 D Pros: Sharp already TA, AF fast, construction, blurred. Cons: For the moment I can not find. Opinion: Just bought and already won me over with its very pasty bokeh. The sharpness in TA is really very very good, the af fast and accurate (use it on D3). I preferred to 1.8 G because I believe this too chiurgico for portraits, it seems a macro.rnL'1.8 D recommend it to anyone who wants a high yield without fainting too. sent on December 21, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
