|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
EmanueleA www.juzaphoto.com/p/EmanueleA  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II LD Pros: Focus excursion, price, focus speed, at least on the Canon EOS 40D and 7D. Cons: No one considering he's a handyman. Opinion: He advised me as an all-rounder a gentleman who took pictures of the wildlife oase; I bought it, I did great. I used it for eleven years, on a Canon EOS 40D and then on a 7D, I absolutely have to talk about it well. In the long run, after so many years, he pumped a little impurities - minimal - that were not noticed or absolutely affected in the photos. In good light conditions, you could be pulled up to the maximum excursion without any problems. The lampshade has the petals of size and arranged in an unusual way, however in the countless photos taken on the Riviera in the summer and here and there has always carried out its task very well. The colors are not as bright as those of the Canon goals but they are always valid. A lens all-rounder that find him in good condition I can definitely recommend. sent on November 25, 2019 |
 | Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Pros: Great value for money. If you find one in good condition I absolutely recommend it. Cons: Considering the cost none. Opinion: I used it for nine years on a Canon 7D. Great yield, good colors. Perfect focus. I have used it several times in parks to photograph animals; I had to move and i used the mono foot and sometimes I would shoot freehand. Great photos anyway. I was amazed that on the first I always looked for support given the mole, then slowly took confidence even pulling it at 500 mm - given the sensor in practice correspond to 800 mm - I often snapped freehand to have more mobility, obviously keeping the whole thing firmly. You have a good handle holding the bracket to the stand. There was no difference in comparing the photos to be supported or with the one foot with the freehand ones. For the moments of break absolutely remember to adjust the strap that holds the lens more tense than that of the camera so that leaving the whole thing around the neck even for a short time the weight weighs on the pin of the lens bracket and not on the body machine that would be affected too, are almost 2 kg of lens ! sent on November 23, 2019 |
 | Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Pros: Focus Cons: Apart from the focus in my humble and very personal opinion I never got excited Opinion: I've been using it for years. Unlike the other comments I read it is a lens that contrary to other Sigma that I had has never overwhelmed me. On 200 mm he tended to "lose"." In suboptimal light conditions the colors and the definition of the image, unlike other Sigma possessed, did not satisfy me in full. Probably a very personal taste but when there were opportunities to use it "never dragged me". For manual shots it is better to remove the bracket for the stand for a better grip and to save a little weight. After nine years of use I must say it did not pump any impurities and the internal lenses were perfect ; the ghires of zoom and focus had not taken any slack and were as new as new. sent on November 23, 2019 |
 | Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Pros: Sharp, I use it on a Canon 7D. Very fast focus, great colors, lightness; Price. Cons: Nobody. I have owned it for ten years and, I try to keep it very well, given the non-extended excursion does not pump in itself too much dust but inside is still very clean. Opinion: Since 2009 I use it on a Canon 7D. I have to talk about it absolutely well. With that I did at the amateur level all the photographs of the family ; weddings, baptisms and by all accounts were excellent. On the occasion of the events they always tell me "I recommend bring the camera". A lens that in the use "does not make you feel any problem". Especially in winter with little light I often use it for shots in the city and on the Riviera, it has always given excellent results. At the time of the purchase I did not want to spend much even though I risked having a lens not too high ; I had taken yes of advice around but little to do , an object is judged when it is yours and you use it for some time and on various occasions as it should : It certainly will not have the same characteristics as the analogue Canon - much more expensive - but I have absolutely no regrets ; go back I would definitely buy it back. sent on November 19, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM II Pros: Fast, exceptional focus, crisp. I use it with a 7D Cons: Nobody Opinion: I bought it used, I find it really good. It's very fast, crisp; considering the excursion also has the advantage of lightness. Of note I took pictures of the Giro d'Italia and in the Abruzzo National Park, Lazio and Molise and in some Faunistic Oases. More than excellent results in all very different cases. sent on November 19, 2019 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Honest handyman Cons: None for its construction Opinion: I use it on a 7D, it's appreciable. Let's start with the concept that it is not a top of the range but it is designed to make the lens all-rounder and performs the job well. I also used it in low light conditions and found well-defined images up to its limit : obviously not a f 2.8 . To search for depth of field in valid light frames f 9 ; 10 and 11. Color yield and good focus. sent on November 17, 2019 |
 | Canon 40D Pros: Keep in mind that it is a 2007 DSLR, time passes for everyone, however very valid machine Cons: No one considered came out on the market 13 years ago Opinion: My first DSLR; Great. I sold it to buy a Canon 7D but I wish I still had it. It performed well with the original lens with both Tamron and Sigma optics. Very valid colors and depth of field as of the rest of use for Canon . With a 17/50 mm f 2.8 I took many photos on the Riviera in the dark and at night very pleasant even today. sent on November 14, 2019 |
 | Fujifilm FinePix S6500fd / S6000fd Pros: Great handyman; robust; exceptional for the year of production Cons: Nobody Opinion: My first camera properly. It gave me a lot of satisfaction. I sold it to buy the reflex but I would like to own it again. It also held discreetly with suboptimal light conditions. Considering the year of release on the market has good colors and a minimum battery consumption . Pigiando the 2x button pushes up to 600 mm digitally and I have to say with great light manages to still take acceptable photos at 2x . I have a 60 x 80 cm hanging in the house, printed with a good professional printer, snapped with the s6500. sent on November 14, 2019 |
 | Fujifilm FinePix S8000fd Pros: Lightness, good excursion for the year 2007 market release, 18 x magnifications. Cons: No one considering it's a little superzoom of the year 2007. Since then 12 years have passed and photography has had a technological metamorphosis Opinion: I write at the end of 2019 : I have owned the FinePix s8000fd for five years . Great all-rounder machine very light then. It pulls up to over 500 mm and it was not cheap ; if one does not want to know what is still valid today. Use AA rechargeable batteries from no less than 2500 mAh . When I bought it new after a few days of use I noticed a certain propensity to make the white shine too much. I sent it to assistance, I remember paying the shipment, attaching a CD of explanatory photos, the copy of the purchase receipt and after a while they sent it back perfectly, without any expense; calibrated it beautifully. After five years I sold it and bought the FinePix Hs 20 EXR. From Fuji I had the s3000, the s5500, the 6500, the present 8000 and the HS 20 EXR and in their peculiarities I absolutely have to talk about it well. sent on November 13, 2019 |
 | FujiFilm FinePix HS20 EXR Pros: Price; all in one of good level ; robust; stylus stacks; 3" tilting monitor; good 30x excursion equal to 24/ 720 mm. It is a 16 Mpixel still valid today if you do not claim who knows what. Cons: None of note. Opinion: I write the opinion now at the end of 2019, to keep in mind that it is a bridge of 2011 ; I bought it in 2012 and then the parameters were other. Great for those who do not claim to have a bridge that give the performance of a reflex (otherwise reflex would not sell anymore). In the six years of use, I also own a valid DSLR, I found that it also holds enough ISOs. On the manual I also set to 800, support under certain times is a must. It makes good in the various automatic possibilities, great for landscapes, for flowers for documents and in dog and cat modes. In cat mode I used it a lot, it manages to perfectly frame the face of the kitten interpolating its features and makes very good. If you set the resolution "end" and the "velvia type" mode gives an extra touch to the color ; the blue, red and yellow become well accentuated and "ringing". Pulling it to 720 mm if there is no good light collapses a little and pulls to whiten especially if around there is the autumn forest, the typical case when in the natural parks you go to photograph the deer in advanced September . The colors then you manage to resume quite well in post production . With good light he manages to make panoramas like a reflex. sent on November 13, 2019 |
 | Sony HX400V Pros: Zoom 50x equal to 1200 mm. , ZEISS optics, reduced weight and compactness; beautiful colors for the concentrated technology in a relatively small machine body. Great definition of images and colors photographing with flash in dark rooms. Cons: I have owned it for a few months; with little light does what you can but you can't expect anything from a zoom that pulls at 1200 mm, 50x, and for 359 euros, with a compact machine body of 6 ects in all Opinion: Exceptional optics, moreover, the ZEISS brand speaks for itself. I bought it to photograph animals in the mountains so as not to carry big weights. With the DSLR and the 500 mm that for the apsc became an 800 mm after three hours of climbing I went back that I was hunchback. Obviously from a compact of six ects that pulls to 1200 mm paid new 359 euros you can not expect the world. It's a great superzoom compact! I photographed an eagle pulling it to 50 x when the sun illuminated its wings and the focus surprised me for the speed, also great the photo from so far away with the raptor in flight. I also tried from adistance, without support, with a warning sign and the reading of the writing remained very clear. Good rendering of colors and images with flash photographing in dark rooms. sent on November 13, 2019 |
 | Canon 7D Pros: He's 10 years old but he's always current. The most successful apsc ever made ! Cons: Nobody Opinion: I've owned it for 10 years, I fell in love with it right away. Exceptional focus, low disturbance at high ISOs. Great gust . In addition to the Canons I installed Tamron and Sigma lenses, digests everything. Zoom, super Zoom, keeps the colors wonderful and doesn't suffer anything in the focus. A machine that always makes you say "I guessed to buy it", makes you want to use it all the time and it is not common after ten years. Never a magician. When we talk to enthusiasts and even professionals, everyone agrees that it was a very successful model; In fact, it still has an honourable market today! P. S. The battery is still the original one from 2009 and is fine to this day. sent on November 11, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
