JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 179000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Considerable as everything do, stabilization, light weight, used price
Cons:Lens with closed diaphragm, sharpness and in some cases chromatic aberrations
Opinion:I recommend it to an audience that is approaching the world of photography. It's a simple lens to use, and as good as everything do without too many pretensions. A more careful eye could see the little sharpness that there is on the lower diaphragms and some chromatic aberration that correctable in post production. To stay happy spending advice to buy it used that we can find it even under 200 euros.
Opinion:From a simple fan of photography I can only say good of this goal. I use it, with Canon 70d, mainly in external, in AV mode, almost always between F/7 and F/8. I rarely "canno" a picture and if it happens it's my fault. I always got beautiful images, sharp and excellently contraed. Shot in JPEG format, with post-production quite minimal. Segnalo a lightning-fast AF and a high degree of usability due to the focal range of the most in use. I also work, sometimes, even indoors, but accompanied by the external flash Canon 430EX III-RT, with very remarkable results. From time to time, I also use it for movies with more than great results: their vision, on a full HD TV, is excellent. I have read several negative opinions or mostly sufficient on the performance of this lens. I don't think so. Perhaps, I was fortunate enough to find an excellent specimen. Based on my experience, I recommend it without any hesitation.
Pros:imperceptible AF noise, wide range of focal excursion, sufficiently sharp
Cons:sharpness loss at the maximum focal length, ring nut for MF, weight
Opinion:I've been using this lens for 3 years continuously on my 500D. The wide focal length allows you to take advantage of it in a variety of situations (from landscapes, night photography, to wildlife photography) to achieving more than dignified results: in particular, the AF is totally silent so you can go completely unnoticed when you need to make silence so as not to scare the subject. It does not shine for sharpness, especially at 18 and 135 mm, but overall it is acceptable. The lens, compared to the other zoom, is quite compact and lightweight; however, its weight is not indifferent, especially if brought to the neck during long hikes. For this reason, I decided to temporarily set it to use lighter and sharper fixed optics.
Pros:AF speed, good sharpness, lightweight, good stabilization
Cons:Excessive distortion at 18 drops sharpness to the focal length
Opinion:Saying a good handy goal, aside from almost unusable at 18 and with obvious drop in the max focal length is good across the range, it is not "sharp" but well defined on all other focal points even at TA - For what it would cost I would say that I am Well spent money and would recommend it without any shadow of doubt. Given the previous reviews I would say that it is too underestimated compared to the actual potential it offers.
Pros:Value, AF fast enough though noisy, zoom range, light weight, stabilizzazione.rn
Cons:Dim (but it is an all-rounder), it lacks the scale of distances, not exceptional sharpness between f. 3.5 and f. 7.2, slight vignetting at TA, dust accumulates in the barrel, questionable mechanical construction.
Opinion:I used it for more than three years during which he gradually accumulated dust inside the front lens, up to give me a curious problem: a 18 mm. the camera reads 44 mm. and Aperture 5.0 instead of f. 3.5 as it should be. I used it with good satisfaction as a handyman, especially in meetings and events where he revealed to the occasion ... a little 'less in photographs of rural and urban landscapes. Okay as a travel lens disengaged ... ie holidays, travel in a group, and so on. To those who wish to achieve real photographic reports during their holidays I would recommend the excellent 15-85 because it combines the versatility of a handyman also an excellent optical quality.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
