|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Massimo.danza www.juzaphoto.com/p/Massimo.danza  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EOS R3 Pros: Sharpness, focus, viewfinder, dynamic range, high ISO noise hold. I add focus with the gaze, overbust of the shot with 195 shots in a second, synchronization with the phase of the Led lights absolutely spectacular. Cons: Battery life: forget the endurance of the 1D M IV! but also of the 1DX M II or III! Opinion: I modify the post: I finally managed to do three replicas of the same show, so I was able to seriously test the car: I varied the following parameters under the same conditions. 1) Focus tracking: unrivaled. What amazed me, I had never tried it, was "the chase with the gaze", that is, where you look focuses. IT WORKS GREAT! Except that contrary to what they recommend, I have seen that it works well only if you make only one setting, the more you do the more the machine gets "tangled". He is not 100% accurate but still does not miss a beat. Just be careful not to look at the parameters at the bottom because it obviously blurs everything ?. Moreover, my eye does not withstand the brightness of the mirrorless viewfinder for long, so I always shoot with the screen, I feel GREAT in it and I do not tire the eyes; but in some steps it can make a difference. 2) 1.6 magnification: I have always avoided it because it has always degraded the quality of the image. With the R3 the quality remains excellent! so in many situations it can be used without losing quality. 3) the overbust of 195 shots in a second: it makes a maximum of 50, then there is a buffer interval, but you have those 50 shots in a quarter of a second that really allow you to capture the right moment when the movement, as in dance, in its perfection is fundamental. Compared to the classic engine, it must be said that you still have to hit the moment of movement, but in that fraction of a second you have 50 different possibilities. not to be used all the time, you have to insert it and then disenseri, but it is an extra gear. 4) Finally the electronic shot: with LED lights it has always been a nightmare. It finds the phase of the light very well, automatically adjusts to it, and COMPLETELY solves the banding problem! I absolutely recommend the purchase, you save compared to the r1, which certainly gives more, but it is an absolutely exceptional machine. The definition, thanks to the thinner low-pass filter, is absolutely FANTASTIC, and also allows for large crops... Just be careful to calibrate the definition well with the photo styles, because at full definition some artifacts could also appear, you can't have ? everything! sent on January 01, 2025 |
 | Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z Pros: sharpness, extremely smooth zoom, very low distortions, absence of obvious aberrations. Awesome AF! Tripod Attachment Ring Cons: Against weight and handling Opinion: I used it on trial at Cemera service Rome. It's a big goal. The price, in my opinion, for what it gives, is low. Obviously, if we compare it with a 70-200 of the "Ciofeca Foto" 5.6 16, the price is skyrocketing. but we are talking about a professional Canon 2.8 with fluorite lenses etc, well then the matter changes. I'm considering buying it because it's worth what they ask for, and if I don't buy it it will only be because of budget problems. What immediately amazes is the "butteriness" of the zoom, evidently designed for video, but which still does not hurt us photographers either. the AF is beyond the immediate, focuses with impressive speed, and is even more precise than the already famous 70-200. I did not detect any significant aberrations, not even obvious distortions; although obviously, given the optics, there are. The length, the weight; but I would also add the preciousness in the hands; make it unwieldy. In my opinion, it is not a jack of all trades, to be carried around for reportage. His soul is three-footed; Which is no small thing, especially for me in the theater. This is obviously in my opinion: because I know at least two photographers who already use it for weddings. The tripod mounting ring is the final highlight! sent on June 26, 2024 |
 | Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Pros: sharpness, plasticity, stabilization, autofocus Cons: Nobody Opinion: We have to understand that the really important aspect of this perspective is being dedicated to the RF Canon system, and therefore not judging on its own. 9 out of 10 international brand comparison reviews, from the Canon system and this perspective as the best in the world. The already perfect definition in the ef system, has a big leap forward thanks to the wider annex; and less pull, which also improves dynamic range, peripheral light drop, color vivezza, exposure. Exposure, which thus, almost earns a stop. The somewhat disliked thing is the telescopic zoom, instead of the interior, which makes the purists turn their noses up a little: this system, until now, was relegated to the "bottle funds". But the designers took care of it. much of its aesthetic aspect, so I immediately got into the habit, indeed the old ef system is aesthetically "ancient". Very comfortable in transport, like the mountains on the r6, it roars. Hooks the subject and no longer drops it, returns a PERFECT stabilization up to 5 stops! in my case I took freehand photographs at 200mm at a 1/15! Perfect! I DO NOT recommend you buy it because you are competitors! ? sent on March 17, 2021 |
 | Canon EOS R6 Pros: lightweight, great stabilizer, excellent sensor, best autofocus in the world Cons: nobody, not even the price Opinion: I've recently moved on to this technology. I have to say that the first impressions are really excellent! stabilization, along with 70-200 rf 2.8, is monstrous. autofocus is unbeatable. 9 out of 10 reviews give the r6 paired with rf optics as the best in the world. Compared to R, we're on another planet. I don't recommend buying it because we're competitors? sent on March 17, 2021 |
 | Canon EOS R Pros: price, sensor, touch-bar display (or as you call the digital sidebar), configuration of dial buttons and touch-bars, handling Cons: lack of the double card, silent click: it distorts the moving subjects, there is no antiflicker: in short it is useless. Annoying image freezer at the time of shooting. Opinion: Bought to photograph dance in the theater that is my job. Clearly as a second body. But I needed a mirrorless for the silent shot because in certain theaters if you make noise with the camera they kick you out. Almost successful operation just because what makes noise is the mirror, so without mirror the hassle is practically nil and you just have to do a little bit of attention. Great image rendering that adds quality to the sensor of the 5d miV, also thanks to the work, I think correct me if I'm wrong, of the processor digit 8!, which does its duty. The new self-configurable buttons make the job VERY easier and the innovative touch-bar allows immediate control over a function you decided: I chose iso because during a choreography I have to change them constantly, and so I exposure ALWAYS under control. The silent shot distorts the moving subjects (and distorts them a lot) can not activate the antiflicker, conclusion for me in the theater is COMPLETELY useless: except the fact, to which I mentioned, that anyway the "normal" shot, being without mirror, is quite silent, I would have returned it, I am sincere. It also has another nice flaw, however "superable": Despite having disabled the vision of the image after the shot, which made it impossible for me to work with the dancers in continuous motion, there remains a moment of "freezer", followed also by some flicker, which for a moment it freezes me the vision of the shot made and prevents me from watching live. let's face it is a moment, it's overcome by making a little habit, but in my industry it's limiting, and it risks making me miss important moments of choreography. However you get used to managing it, we hope that with some updates you can delete it. It remains a great body perfectly up to its rivals, which I highly recommend if you do not do my job. If you take pictures in the theater like me think about it first, and then do the same maybe but know these weaknesses. sent on July 21, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS III USM Pros: The quality L to the height of its fame. Cons: Nobody Opinion: I Come from the same lens Mark II, who had "exhausted" for too much work.... I changed it just to look for a better approach to backlighting and grazing lights... For me necessary for my work in the field of Coreutics. The difference you see a lot. The Controluci control has markedly improved (even if the miracles do not exist), but it manages to bear the detail much better, in the theater where precisely the differences disposition are enormous. They Say the stabilizer is better, but I, working at least a 500th, never use it... I did some experiments, and with my hand not steadfast I made sharp images at 1/45 second to 200mm, and I do not seem to little, but I work I do not use it so I do not know anything more. sent on April 05, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II USM Pros: Crisp, fast in af, precise, etc. etc. In short, PERFECT! Cons: NOTHING Opinion: I've been using it for all the years. It has sharpness and a graceful plasticity that is absolutely unmatched. This sometimes allows me to even crochet at least "daring" without loss of quality.rnInsomma imperdibile in both daily and quality workAssolutely necessary! sent on August 03, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM II Pros: Sufficiently "handy" even with free hand, great resolution at all focal points, the fluorite lenses are seen. Given the zoom, certainly not "cheap" but not expensive either. Cons: I do not remember anything Opinion: I just did a couple of tests right after the purchase, I'm looking forward to hearing the talk as soon as I have tried the theater optics that will not happen shortly. I also made comparisons with the 70-200 2.8 mark II. Except for the obvious loss of brightness, there is no qualitative difference between the two. Of course, the autofocus and the stabilizer have greatly improved. The lens is extremely manoeuvrable and lightweight despite the "field" focal points. I personally DO NOT like the lens that stretches outward but builds it like the 70's. -200 would have made it absolutely unmanageable and very heavy. Even the diaphragm a little too closed for my tastes, made it more compact and handy, without altering to this first test, the quality: complice a 1dx mII which has no limits in iso and noise control. Fluoride treatment in terms of resolutionGrace and plasticity make it absolutely top of the range! sent on August 03, 2017 |
 | Canon 1DX Mark II Pros: Autofocus, maneuverability, disturbance to 1d m IV, robustness etc. etc. RECOMMENDED! Cons: Silent shot of de stappa! ;-) sorry! But the silenced shutter is noisier than a distracted tractor! 2) caricature lan link, only succeeded with eos utility, and not via ftp protocol. 3) High battery consumption compared to 1d m IV at least twice as high. Opinion: When I try the field I will update. For the moment I have done some tests and I have to say that it is at least 2 steps forward to the unforgettable 1d M IV, which I am AFFECTABLE! In fact it was difficult for me to replace it I confess it. In these tests I saw a latitude of pose (dynamic range to mean ;-)) absolutely fantastic, the "asa" yield (sorry but i'm "iso" i can not say it) and its disturbance are absolutely out of the ordinary, revealing As canon engineers have worked us well. Great setting af and its picture style that have at least 3 different factors to adjust for definition. It has infinitely configurable configuration for all needs. Well-tune LCD monitor that returns a well made prew. It has an exceptionally brilliant delay of just 0.055 which can further be reduced to 0.033 (I'll let you know how it will just happen to have its baptism of fire) .rnRimane the tare of the "clickSilent "silence is not (it was more than 1d m IV) .nn BATTESIMO DEL FUOCO: Then yesterday I tried it on the field, during a well-fed dance and work load. Rn As" review "there was Even the unknown "light" (that is, each participant can ask for the variations of scene lights as he wants, which he can not do in the competition because an "atmosphere" could influence judges by distracting them from the technical and artistic aspect that each dancer expresses) .FREE FIRE: absolutely perfect at all times engages the subject and keeps the fire even with very little light. The only thing to be aware of is the speed of fire to settle well because for example I was slow and in a couple Of cases did not make time to fuze (though a couple of cases over 4,000 shots) .rRITART OF ROTATE: Further reduced. However, giving up the stabilization check (with the mono piAnd even deactivating it to gain in definition) it can further reduce 0.033. Done! And you have the real feeling of immeasurability. In fact, too, I have to do my hand, because used to the old car, initially I had some difficulty, nothing can not be exceeded though.rnPOSITION: I lowered the contrast of the picture style to the minimum, which theater is important to keep under control As much as possible, cut lights etc. etc. A great dynamic range that can contrast with exposure differences of at least 3 stops more than the previous models, so you have a total of 5 0 6 stops total latitude on which you can rely on 25,000 and broken iso ( However, to be checked EVER case by case), let's say that all iso, even h3, the range remains completely under control and returns an absolutely natural grayscale. Even the "ISO yield" in my opinion is better (but it could be a "feeling" dictated by enthusiasm), whichEqual adjustment has a much better result in display response, certainly due to the best dynamic range.rnDISTURBO (PIXEL GRAN ASA / ISO ECC. ECC): Absolutely another planet compared to the 1d mark IV. I worked quietly up to 25,000 asa! I pushed up to 40,000! NO problem of disturbance. Although, objectively, the image is overwhelmed by sensitivity, due to the "high-pitched noise control", which is increasingly heavy, and to me this is a nuisance. So I recommend a lower intensity adjustment to return more naturalness to the image. However up to 1,600 asa the grain is absolutely absent as if you hit at 50! Up to 6,400 is really as minimal as the old 400. Up to 12,600 as the old 800! So compared to my reference model I bought about 4 stop disruptions! DEFINITION: ABSOLUTELY WITHOUT PREVIOUS! BnBATTERIA: Consume 'in digit! With the old car and battery I faced at least a coupleOf events of this amount of photos. With this and its new battery I came to 2/3 of the event with lan and gps turned off. I put the old battery to end the show and at the end of the job I had consumed about 55%. My advice is, if you work, to buy it, even working in the studio, unless you have to do particular magnifications. Why take a good step. I understand that it is costly, but believe me in a job prospect in which you seek uncompromised quality, the price difference with the 5th series is less than what you can think and is well damped anyway in a very short time.rnMy advice Even to the evolved hobbyists who want to move towards the 5th series, that price difference is largely "repayed" by the difference of yield. R Lan connection for the moment only succeeded through eos utility and not via ftp protocol sent on April 20, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 300mm f/4.0 L IS USM Pros: value for money handling, sharpness Cons: tropicalization no, noisy stabilizer Opinion: Just bought it and I'm still doing the very first test, and I have not yet tried on the field. Excellent results for the time being, good blur, excellent definition, the stabilizer does its "good" job. In short, I recommend it for handling quality and price, then the first test in the theater will update this post! sent on April 27, 2016 |
 | Canon 1D Mark IV Pros: robustness, reliability, "hard" work without worries, battery immortal. today the price of second making it VERY convenient. great job at high sensitivities. Cons: a little 'weight but you just get used to it Opinion: 3Bqualità "Series 1 (which for me is much higher than any 5 series, beyond the" giocarelli "electronic present), I highly recommend it, especially if you do a job like mine made of thousands of shots per day low light conditions. sent on October 15, 2015 |
 | Canon Speedlite 600EX-RT Pros: precise, consumes little battery, wireless radio ttle with the second flash, price sufficiently content Cons: ttle forces still in continuous adjustments so balance still good background and subject, you still "trick" too much of the difference in luminance Opinion: I bought 2 for professional reasons. very comfortable to use although the menu sometimes confusing, but you just get used to it. I can control the differences of power directly from the master, the great radio connection in ttle, does not force you to make eye contact between the two flash. In contrast is precisely the use of ttle that fooled too apparent from the luminance of the scene and forces in continuous adjustments of power. Great use in mixed light as a single flash with high ISO. From there the best perfectly calibrating the light flash with the environment and completely disappears every uncertainty ttle. Very powerful. It 'a flash that would absolutely, especially in pairs, where the results will delight you. sent on June 23, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 35mm f/2.0 Pros: not L series Cons: not L series Opinion: I understand that it seems a contradiction, almost a provocation. I was looking for a long-optic "simple", something of content, easy to carry and that was not visually "invasive", as almost all the noble objectives canon, they are, for better or for worse, massive, overpowering. For a professional like me make the leap to the NON L has not been easy. I read and re-read hundreds of reviews, forum, etc. etc. I must say that when I saw that my provider trust him, in asking, almost ashamed. then I got courage and I bought it at a good price I have to say, about 200 €. It looked new, but it is not what I want to talk. Just plugged in my "spare car" (the mII 5d), I immediately had a good impression of "handling", ease of use, almost as a "compact". Already on the way back to the studio I started collecting notes street, finding now really at ease. The cut "35" is perfect precisely street to be seized. Focus defined "slow and noisy" by all, in a wide angle simply NOT there. The surprise I had then to the PC, when I found myself with a definition that, pardon the extreme that many do not share, significantly beating the 24-70 2.8. The brightness and the right proportion of colors, make up the rest. Sure is a fixed lens, many will say. Of course I say why I bought it, so from this point of view I did bingo! Then comes everything else. Today had its baptism of fire in the theatrical backstage. I moved in the dressing room with agility shooting, without bothering anyone, without being noticed. Not because you have to steal anything, but because an objective "bulky" as already 1.4 L, would create embarrassment and mistrust, as it always did with 24-70. The right shot for shooting fast, not to miss the moment, the face of the dancer set for a second before going on stage, the addition of Diboranefleeting and load displacement of fear, apparel. The jokes sotto voce between friends. Things are not easy to take in those moments when you could ruin the moment you should NOT do. Do you find yourself shooting in the dressing rooms, in the glimpses behind the stage, looking for those moments that pass too quickly if you have the wrong perspective. Even felt the weight in my hands, and I did not have time to see "something" was going to happen, that the shot was made. excuse the rhetoric canon thanks to this light L is not simple, noisy and slow, that the right time comes to give you excitement and satisfaction that other optics can not do. sent on June 21, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
