JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS III USM : Specifications and Opinions

The Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS III USM is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2018. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 2177 €;

32 users have given it an average vote of 9.8 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.

Specifications
Focal lenght	70-200 mm
Angle of view	34.4 - 12.4°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.8
Aperture blades	8
Lenses/Groups	23 elements in 19 groups
Min. focus distance	1.20 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.21x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, interal
Stabilization	Yes (built in lens)
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	Yes
Extenders	Yes
Filters	77 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	1440 g
Dimensions	89 x 199 mm
Buy
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS III USM, buy on Ebay

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 237000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Angela Platania

sent on September 26, 2023

Pros: comparing it to version 2 NONE

Cons: COMPARING IT TO VERSION 2. lack of sharpness.

Opinion: I decided to review this lens that I bought, kept three days and returned to the sender, because DISGUSTED by the non-quality of this optics. I don't know if I have trimmed a defective optics and to know I would have to try another. But this one, new, is really pitiful. I used it twice, at the Zarrillo concert, because I use this lens for concerts, and I had brought only this, the photos taken were blurred, blurred, without detail. A colleague of mine told me, look it was probably because of the lights that were actually quite poor. But the next day I went to the POOH concert and this time not to risk, given the event, I also brought version 2. At that point I had no more doubts. The optics were poor, not very sharp, not very focused and gave that blur effect. I repeat I do not know if the optics were defective, but I certainly had no intention of sending it to canon for a check and waste time. I can only say that if Canon makes a lens like this... Don't complain if you lose customers. I will try to borrow this lens, for another concert, but now they have almost all switched to sony and those who do not have sony have switched to mirroles and therefore has RF optics, so if you are going to buy this lens, I advise you to try it first... For concerts it is not good at all. For other things I don't know.

Nicoli Giuliano

sent on April 05, 2023

Pros: Sharpness, AF speed, price with the release of the new RF

Cons: Nothing to report

Opinion: I come from the first version of the 70 200 f 2.8, you can clearly see the difference in sharpness and speed of the AF, having never tried the mark II I can not give a judgment of comparison with the predecessor. the lens proves to be very resistant and ductile, you feel a bit the difference in weight with the new RF but the quality is not discussed, I tried it both on R3 and on 1DX and I did not notice any difference, it has always given its best on all occasions. Excellent UPGRADE from the first version.

Giuseppe Patruno

sent on November 22, 2021

Pros: Pretty much everything its predecessor had but with an improved yield in flare resistance and backlight management, slightly stronger stabilization, sharper sharpness at 2.8, improved speed ratio

Cons: not a real upgrade considering that it changes only in terms of yield and sharpness that (in my opinion) were not needed at all considering the quality of the predecessor, all this makes it practically meaningless considering also the advancement of the mirrorless optics.

Opinion: Tried and tested for two months, an exceptional lens, practically perfect on all its aspects but, does it really make sense to buy it ? Compared to its predecessor it has only improvements in terms of central sharpness and angles, a clearer stabilization at longer focal lengths and a slightly better speed ratio, and if we really have to say it all they could at least bring down the minimum focusing distance since it remains practically stationary at one meter and twenty ... I therefore reiterate that if the second version already offers a lot how useful could it be? For the rest it is really impeccable, colors, blurred, beautiful shades ... Definitive for portraits, sports, reportage even in very harsh conditions, its global yield is very close to the latest L, such as 85mm f1.4 and 24-70 f2.8, buying it is a guarantee for many uses but I believe that in any case our dearest Canon Mother House has made a big hole in the water.

user218602

sent on April 25, 2021

Pros: Construction quality, lens quality, very bright.

Cons: nobody

Opinion: Never bought, but had available for work. Lens that I used for ceremonies until before March 2020, which results in excellent and sometimes spectacular results. Would I buy it? ... no! because if on the one hand it has a spectacular yield, on the other it captures too much light. I think I am one of the few photographers who does not like large focal openings, considering that I never go down under F4 even if I shoot at night, spend over 2000 for an F2.8 I find it useless and I would prefer to spend them on another type of lens. That doesn't alter the fact that this is a 10-in-one lens, worth every penny spent.

Gigifire

sent on October 27, 2020

Pros: It is a lens of high quality and reliability, from the fluidity of the rings to the stabilizer, from absolute silence to the rendering of images. It's beautiful.

Cons: No

Opinion: I sweated "seven coats" to get her new. There is not much to say because you immediately see that the quality that churns out, amazing is superb. I haven't used it for a long time yet but from the first shots you can tell it's a great product. I reluctantly sold the Ef 80 200 f2.8 L after 30 years of beautiful photos, but the speed of focus, the efficiency of the stabilizer of the EF 70 200 IS III L and the sharpness comes out the winner great.

There are 4 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS III USM

Lord of the woods

by SeRed
33 comments, 4523 views [editors pick]

HI RES 21.6 MP

Labrothers

by SeRed
35 comments, 4271 views [editors pick]

HI RES 17.2 MP

No mail!

by Gandy
46 comments, 2152 views

The lights of Genoa

by Stefun84
91 comments, 2961 views

HI RES 20.0 MP

Still in play

by Alberto Tirri
36 comments, 1501 views

HI RES 29.0 MP

Desire for tenderness

by Alberto Tirri
34 comments, 2013 views

HI RES 29.0 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

The warmth of those thoughts

by Alberto Tirri
27 comments, 1182 views

HI RES 29.5 MP

Alexia

by AlessioR
16 comments, 2021 views

HI RES 34.6 MP

Alessia in red

by AlessioR
17 comments, 2279 views

HI RES 8.4 MP

Valentina, Ae valentina

by AlessioR
11 comments, 4164 views

HI RES 8.3 MP

Irene

by Rosamaria Bidoli
45 comments, 2636 views

HI RES 16.7 MP

Untitled Photo

by Rosamaria Bidoli
65 comments, 2093 views

HI RES 16.7 MP

A little orphan

by Fausto Carrara
33 comments, 2239 views

HI RES 28.4 MP

Flying

by Shotofgod
23 comments, 3114 views

Alexia

by AlessioR
13 comments, 3248 views

HI RES 19.7 MP

It's hot

by AlessioR
10 comments, 2118 views

HI RES 8.4 MP

Boudoir

by AlessioR
6 comments, 5304 views

HI RES 17.7 MP

Let's light up Christmas!

by Barbara Gatti Cocci
103 comments, 1538 views

HI RES 18.5 MP

Faces to the Feast of Peoples 2022 in Vr

by Gandy
31 comments, 1472 views

HI RES 16.7 MP

Carlotta Ferlito

by Shotofgod
13 comments, 2833 views

We were rock you

by Rosamaria Bidoli
42 comments, 2001 views

HI RES 16.7 MP

Nastja as Princess Sissi

by Rosamaria Bidoli
45 comments, 1155 views

HI RES 11.2 MP

Alessia by the sea

by AlessioR
13 comments, 1984 views

HI RES 26.9 MP

Character!

by Bruno_pratico
54 comments, 1298 views

In the places of Reclamation

by Rosamaria Bidoli
41 comments, 727 views

HI RES 28.8 MP

Sunflowers in San Daniele

by Rosamaria Bidoli
47 comments, 1128 views

HI RES 10.7 MP

Towards evening .....

by Rosamaria Bidoli
41 comments, 1099 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Elly&Sabry

by Andrea Brugnara
3 comments, 2293 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Charles Leclerc-Bahrain International Circuit-2019

by Nfi
8 comments, 2569 views

HI RES 6.3 MP

Little Woman ....

by Rosamaria Bidoli
60 comments, 1527 views

HI RES 11.2 MP

Bored

by Alberto Tirri
30 comments, 2043 views

HI RES 29.0 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Spring Dream

by Rosamaria Bidoli
37 comments, 1132 views

HI RES 16.7 MP

Eyes that look

by Rosamaria Bidoli
37 comments, 1217 views

HI RES 16.7 MP

Living the fields

by Rosamaria Bidoli
48 comments, 1285 views

HI RES 16.7 MP

Crimson roses

by Barbara Gatti Cocci
43 comments, 943 views

HI RES 20.0 MP

Francesca's yellow side

by Rosamaria Bidoli
31 comments, 806 views

HI RES 16.7 MP

Sara

by Mariosalvo
12 comments, 2186 views

HI RES 26.0 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Canon » Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS III USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS III USM : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS III USM