|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Gioteam www.juzaphoto.com/p/Gioteam  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III Pros: compact and lightweight. excellent numerous rings and customizable buttons. Cons: poor battery especially if you make some videos. maybe the price is excessive Opinion: classy machine with the well-known olympus advantages in terms of very effective autofocus. Not really cheap but the construction is impeccable. Stabilization is also proverbial. I would recommend everyone to buy a spare battery. I would say that the handle is sufficiently protruding and I personally feel good in my hand. sent on February 15, 2021 |
 | Olympus 9mm f/8 Fish-Eye Body Cap Pros: superlight body cap Cons: fire lever moves by itself. obvious distortion. Dark Opinion: bought for its palious cost and negligible weight and footprint. For a picture of landscape in full sun is fine and makes up for the lack of a super-enlargement that you did not bring while this is in the pocket of the shirt and if necessary does its humble work. Of course, if you photographed monuments you will have to correct the distortions in PP sent on September 12, 2020 |
 | Manfrotto Pixi EVO Pros: Small, light, versatile Cons: it's small can't be high! Opinion: for macro photos is great. I've been using it for a long time for flower photos and it's just what I need. a groove allows you to place the camera at 90 degrees. possessing an olympus kit I do not have problems with the weights of the machine/target system so for the hub holds up very well. Probably cameras with lenses for FF may not be entirely stable. sent on September 12, 2020 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm f/2.8 Pro Pros: gorgeous wide angle 14-28 equivalent. content weight Cons: easy flare Opinion: if you use it indoors it's great. on the outside, the flare appears easily, which in the end bothers a lot. I only use it for indoor movies and it's fine even with low light. very well usable. built-in lampshade. It is not very light to be a micro 4/3 and it would be better to combine it at least with an om-d 5 (for the 10 does not seem proportionate) sent on August 19, 2020 |
 | DJI Mavic Mini Pros: Lightweight! Affordable price for hobbyists; doesn't need a flight license in the city Cons: no anti-collision sensor Opinion: you don't feel it in your backpack. exceptional stability. good ready-made files. better to fly on sight but if you don't need (and almost never need) go far it's more than fine. For someone like me who uses it just for fun and take some photos and videos in the mountains just and advances. For those who use it by profession I think has excessive limitations (the lack of anti-collision sensors is the biggest problem) sent on June 01, 2020 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II Pros: Value for money. Light and Handy (Supertele!) Cons: A little dark; Not sealed Opinion: I use tele and supertele occasionally for distant or unreachable flora photos. Photographer only by day with light so I have no problems for opening 6.7 a300 mm. Its lightness and compactness compensates for any criticism in my opinion. If you do not expect super performance in difficult conditions (dark, animal photos) seems to me a good compromise to have in the backpack; The optimum stabilization of the Olympus om-D 1 MarkII then helps in freehand photos (pretty much all I do) sent on May 07, 2018 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 14-150mm f/4-5.6 II Pros: lightweight. good definition. handyman. Cons: opening is not constant. not weather sealed Opinion: I'm not a great expert photographer for which they are not able to make many comparisons especially with other Micro4 / 3 while I know a little 'more goals Nikon SLR which I really appreciated when I accepted much iron below (= beautiful but very heavy). the versatility of this lens is remarkable. but also it weighs less. sent on September 10, 2015 |
 | Fujifilm XQ2 Pros: bright for the category (no zoom) autofocus quickly and accurately. customizable dials. Cons: the ring of functions in the pocket moves Opinion: I bought it as a pocket-sized machine (and it is) for photos of flowers together, for nature and varied landscapes. The software is intuitive. the ring is customizable and many checks can be made available quickly. zoom range (25-100 equivalent) is enough for me and rewards quality optics (1.8 to 25 mm!) sent on June 04, 2015 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Pros: light and versatile- value high. stabilization. Cons: It is tropicalized. noise during the focus (if not negligible photographing insects) Opinion: fantastic car. light well built quality. I think before long this system will undermine the throne of reflex. for the moment, however, lack of competitors at optical reflex lineage .I use two optical zoom all-rounder with good results. stabilization is spectacular. Photographer freehand without problems to 1/15. some optical appearance of high-level macro sent on June 01, 2015 |
 | Nikon D610 Pros: made at high ISO. weight content. Affordable Cons: not using the autofocus not know Opinion: I have this machine for some months now and I must say that the yield even at high ISO (6400) is remarkable in the woods and photographing plants this feature is essential for me. stabilization is perfect. you can photograph freehand also 1/30 despite the weight of the machine but is tolerable and forgivable given the quality that returns sent on June 01, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 105mm f/2.8 G ED VR Micro Pros: sharpness, blur Cons: weight Opinion: wonderful for flowers; great at high ISO. thanks to the stabilization and high brightness allows photos without a tripod even in low light conditions as in the woods. personally I use it for photo macro detail of flowers and always with manual focus so I can not comment sull'autofocus sent on June 01, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
