JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Olympus OM-D E-M10 is a mirrorless camera with 4/3 (2.0x) sensor and 16.1 megapixels manufactured from 2014 to 2015 (discontinued). The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 200 - 25600 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 8 FPS. The average price was 412 €;
80 users have given it an average vote of 9.2 out of 10
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 258000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: Compact, light, auto wb, quality of files , cheap , reliable , fun to use
Cons: no weather sealing
Opinion: This cam is close to being the best value in m4/3 land . I have mine since 2017 , and I find it so good I feel no need to upgrade to version 2 ,3 or 4 ( I had version 2 for a brief time and sold it back ). Of all my m4/3 bodies, Em5, Em1, Em10 , I consider the Em10 sensor the best , yes even better than the then flagship Em1 ( don't know about Em2 or 3 ). Olympus did a great job with the white balance , colours are nice and vibrant , and above all the raw files are just splendid ( I don't usually shoot raw but the Em10 files are a pleasure ). There is a pop up flash , very convenient , I do snaps of house interiors with it at arm's length no time lost , results excellent .
I have discovered lately that my newly acquired pana 14-140 gives its best on the Em10 , so that'll be my vacation set this fall .
For the price on today's second hand market , a no brainer .
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Fantastic construction; compactness; Very good sensor for the time (2014) and good at basic ISO even today; white balance; stabilized.
Cons:Advancing age, of course; unusable continuous autofocus; Precise and punctual single autofocus only in very good light conditions.
Opinion:Very well built machine, much better than the current ones, even in the much higher range. With a small optic, it weighs the right amount, remains compact, has no ergonomic grip, but handles well and has rings with impeccable mechanics. The image quality to date is obviously outdated, but for fun, entertainment and memories, it's fine. The white balance at the time was already very, very good and allows JPEG ready. At the time it was already stabilized (on three axes) and Olympus was light years ahead of the competition, so it still allows shots with adequate safety times today. To date, it can be found at ridiculously low prices (150, 200 Euros).
Pros:Tutto.Camera for newbies approaching the photographic world. In practice, with its functions you can explore many areas of photography once you have studied the shooting method. Lightweight, not tropicalized but resistant to shocks and sudden water. Beautiful to look at and use. Now it costs little and is worth much more than its price.
Cons:It doesn't have a sniper af, stop.
Opinion:I still use it with extreme joy after years of purchase Used in the cold skiing and warm on the beach without too many worries, always ready to use and extremely fun to use thanks to the countless software functions available. Well-made body that returns excellent impressions of use even after years of use, viewfinder for me more than enough, I see well inside, the new ones I do not know what they do more but I think it is more than enough to do photography
Pros:Lightness, portability, construction, auto white balance, JPEG quality, static AF, ridiculous cost in used
Cons:Dynamic AF, three-axis stabilization (lower than that of five of the later m4/3 machines), viewfinder compared to the most recent models, no tropicalization
Opinion:It is the machine I am most fond of: despite its 7 years I still use it with satisfaction. Small and light, with the tiny lenses of the micro allows you to go out carrying a complete kit with a ridiculous weight. He accompanied me on all the trips abroad (especially those that require the plane) and never betrayed me. Obviously, compared to the latest models, something pays off (viewfinder, stabilization... in reference to the micro, however!), but if you consider that on the used you can easily find it for 150 euros, I would say that everything goes into the background. The AF-S is a sniper, while the dynamic one is like not having it. Impeccable white balance automatically, so much so that you can safely shoot in JPEG. It is not tropicalized, although on a couple of occasions I shot in the rain and it held up well. Do you need a forklift or do you want a second light, cheap and quality kit? The old E-M10, accompanied by the right lenses (12 2, 15 1.7, 20 1.7, 30 1.4, 56 1.4 to speak only of the fixed ...) is still for you.
Pros:Lightness and portability, file quality, stabilized sensor, excellent functions as live compounds, grip with additional grip
Cons:Screen. Non-tiltable and tropicalization
Opinion:After several full frame/apsc models, step by step to play this dated model to experience the micro 4/3 . Purchased with the additional grip, the feeling that transmits this mirrorless is magnificent. Combined with the 12-40 Olympus churns out files of a quality and sharpness to envy larger formats, all in a low weight. Too bad for the absence of tropicalization and tiltable screen, but for that Olympus has other options in its catalog.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
