JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II is a tele lens for 4/3, manufactured from 2013. The focus is done by Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 529 €;
56 users have given it an average vote of 8.7 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Micro 4/3: this lens is compatible with mirrorless micro-4/3.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:For the price you find it, especially in the second-hand world, it is in my opinion an excellent compromise to have a nice long focal length zoom with practically zero weights and dimensions. Unfortunately, it is not a tropicalized lens and it is rather dark at the end of the stroke (6.7). The fact that it is dark for me is not a big problem since the camera stabilizes very well, of course, a little more brightness did not hurt. Very sharp even at maximum apertures (it gives its best anyway with a closing stop, like almost all lenses). I consider it a good lens, especially for those more naturalistic photographs where you need mm. I would say that in principle it has an excellent quality price
Opinion:I took it back years later. It is a very light lens for its range and the construction in my opinion is satisfactory. I had sold it because due to my inexperience I had not realized that using a 600mm equivalent is not obvious. The stabilizer of the e-m10 mk1 could not prevent the shake. Even with the gx7 it is difficult. While with the g90, thanks to the best stabilizer, an excellent grip, an excellent viewfinder, a fast AF, ...., the percentage of good shots has risen a lot, resulting sharp even at 300mm at TA.
Pros:Compactness with respect to the focal lengths reached; Lightness; Fluidity of use; Yield compared to cost; Sharpness at TA and beyond;
Cons:Resistance of somewhat delicate materials (not the construction) Absence of tropicalization; Slightly dark towards the end (6.7); 75 or 150mm with MTF factor limits a little the use as a handyman;
Opinion:Taken new on offer + cashback, Polyphoto Italia, at a laughable price compared to any other 150-600mm on the market. Of course, we talk about equivalence and in itself the aperture values are not those of a PRO lens, but thanks to the stabilization of the Om-1 (and MFT) in general it is an excellent superzoom lens, with reduced size and weight, easy to wear in accompaniment to another main lens, perhaps in the range 12-60. Despite the relative "buiety", the photographic yield such as colors, sharpness and three-dimensionality is good, almost excellent if related to the cost. The autofocus is a slower hair than PRO lenses, but absolutely effective in catching, even at 300mm. Too bad there is a lack of tropicalization and, above all, that plastics are slightly fragile and are easily marked. Despite this, the construction and the mechanism seem very well done. Personal mark: 7/8
Cons:It suffers from bright light resulting in loss of detail. Maximum focal length not very sharp. Not tropicalized.
Opinion:A good goal, much more than what people are professing. Definitely usable on almost the entire focal length, obviously trying to pay attention to the shake and timing. It is a light lens, perhaps even too much, so you have to be especially careful when shooting. I noticed a loss of detail on particularly sunny days, with lots of light, where it tends to knead a little, but otherwise I highly recommend it.
Opinion:For those approaching nature and bird photography for the first time in addition to sports, the M.Zuiko 75-300 II series is an excellent lens. Characterized by an ergonomic design, lightweight and excellent construction. Too bad it does not have tropicalization, it would have given it that extra plus that Olympus has accustomed us to. The optics are very good when there is a lot of light during the day decays a bit when the sun goes down and the AF suffers, especially when used in dynamic AF-C. However, the photos are of excellent quality and in general the autofocus in the dynamic is responsive but only on advanced medium bodies (from the E-M5 upwards). If used on E-M10 in the dynamic is very suffering (it is not reactive), it goes a little better in the static AF-S. It is instead precise and perfect on OM-1, on E-M1 mk3 or E-M1X and can be used by professionals as a third or fourth spare lens or as a "jack of all trades".
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
