JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II : Specifications and Opinions

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II

The Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II is a tele lens for 4/3, manufactured from 2013. The focus is done by Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 459 €;

49 users have given it an average vote of 8.9 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Micro 4/3: this lens is compatible with mirrorless micro-4/3.

Specifications
Focal lenght	75-300 mm
Angle of view	16.2 - 4.1° (equivalent to a 152-606mm in Fullframe 24x36mm format)
Format	4/3
Max. aperture	f/4.8-6.7
Aperture blades	7
Lenses/Groups	18 elements in 13 groups
Min. focus distance	0.90 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.18x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	No
Focus	Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic)
Internal AF	Yes
Full Time MF	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	58 mm
Lens hood	Yes (not supplied)
Weather sealing	No
Weight	423 g
Dimensions	69 x 117 mm
Buy
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II, buy on Ebay

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 220000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Esse

sent on September 16, 2021

Pros: Weight - Overall dimensions - Yield also at TA at all focal lengths - well built

Cons: Not tropicalized, a little delicate the knurling of the rings

Opinion: Used for years. Sometimes not understood. We must take our hand. I use it with the em1 mk1. Essential to use it with electronic shutter. with the stabilizer of the machine you shoot without micromosso paying attention to absurd times (1/30s-1/40s) on static subjects with a shrewdness that I discovered unfortunately after some time. At first I was not satisfied and I found that it kneaded the details at 300mm (the tests I do from home on the writings under the license plates of parked cars that are relentless to highlight micro-bump, contrast and definition) in comparison to zd50-200 + ec14 and panasonic 100-300. then one day I tried to remove the uv filter fil (a slim reporter) and boom. perfect details. Equivalent to the yield of pana 100-300. For me perhaps even slightly better as a microcontrasto. So those who do not find it sharp try with electronic shooting, obviously trying to be as firm and without filter as possible.

Esse

sent on September 16, 2021

Pros: Weight - Overall dimensions - Yield also at TA at all focal lengths - well built

Cons: Not tropicalized, a little delicate the knurling of the rings

Opinion: Used for years. Sometimes not understood. We must take our hand. I use it with the em1 mk1. Essential to use it with electronic shutter. with the shutter of the camera you shoot without micromosso paying attention to absurd times (1/30s-1/40s) on static subjects with a shrewdness that I discovered unfortunately after time. At first I was not satisfied and I found that it kneaded the details at 300mm (the tests I do from home on the writings under the license plates of parked cars that are relentless to highlight micro-bump, contrast and definition) in comparison to zd50-200 + ec14 and panasonic 100-300. then one day I tried to remove the uv filter fil (a slim reporter) and boom. perfect details. Equivalent to the yield of pana 100-300. For me perhaps even slightly better as a microcontrasto. So those who do not find it sharp try with electronic shooting, obviously trying to be as firm and without filter as possible.

BallaCoiPupi

sent on September 03, 2021

Pros: Weight, compactness, optical yield, focal range, quality-price ratio

Cons: Relatively dark, some difficulties for use on cameras with non-stabilized sensor

Opinion: I bought it used, in excellent condition, with hood and UV filter, from another amateur photographer who, although satisfied, had purchased the 100-400 for his nature photography needs. After 3 months of use on Olympus OMD E-M10 MkII body I can only say that it turned out to be a pleasant surprise. I have not encountered the problems and defects that I read, published by other friends amateur photographers. Between f. 8 and f. 11 it returns very sharp images with a good microcontrasting, while over f. 16 appears, but not always, some diffraction problems. Combined with the OMD E-M10 MkII which has the sensor stabilized, I shot freehand at maximum focal length, with unthinkable times: 1/80 and even 1/60 without problems of move or microvy. In short, I am satisfied with it. There is probably something better, especially in terms of greater brightness, but the price to pay is the greater weight and the higher price

Rossostarter

sent on March 20, 2021

Pros: Lightness optical quality mannegevolezza practicality compactness...

Cons: Nothing

Opinion: Bought used at 300€ was a pleasant surprise. Is it right that nowadays, from an optical point of view, the maximum is demanded and sometimes exaggerated expectations are placed on it, not very bright? Brighter assumes larger lenses consequently greater weight higher cost optical correction different use of rare earths in glass.. It is more than evident how much the 300mm f4 costs... Quality weight results and price in proportion, same speech at 75... Lower quality at 300? Same as above, quality costs money. After all, those who want to perform at Ferrari cannot demand them from a panda. As far as it costs it gives so much species up to 150/200mm at 300mm is more than honest, and the quality exceeds some 300 analog fixeds I have, especially in the case of CA. (I also tried it in astronomical photography at 300, to photograph stellar fields and nebulae is more than fine, you have no idea perhaps how glass bottoms are highlighted in astronomical photography) For what it costs 10 full.

Flavio Villa

sent on March 05, 2020

Pros: Very light, compact, mounts screw ND filters, cheap, made in general.

Cons: Not tropicalized.

Opinion: Paid 280 euros used, with lampshade, for me it is a godsend to be able to make long treks in the mountains without feeling the weight. In full light the results are excellent (compared to its segment) but as soon as the light goes down, it limps. In aid comes the excellent oly body stabilizer that allows you to stretch the times a lot even by freehand (I shot at 1/60 without motion). In birdlife the mm is never enough and I always find myself shooting at 300mm but I find that there is no drastic drop in sharpness... indeed, perhaps I have a well-made specimen. It can mount screw ND filters to get creative shots. Too bad it's not tropicalized but it would mean demanding the full barrel and the drunk wife. I don't regret it at all.

There are 14 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II

Grey ..................

by Jerry Vacchieri
301 comments, 14265 views

HI RES 9.5 MP

Back in the 'business'

by Nicolò Cavallaro
42 comments, 9962 views

Autumn Sunrise

by Diamante_P
119 comments, 2376 views

HI RES 3.2 MP

Ermine

by Andnol
142 comments, 7102 views

HI RES 18.8 MP

Fists closed

by NadiaB
108 comments, 2852 views

HI RES 5.2 MP

Flat calm.

by MassimoViacava
82 comments, 938 views

HI RES 13.1 MP

Codon

by NadiaB
95 comments, 2711 views

HI RES 5.5 MP

The Red and its flaming tail

by NadiaB
70 comments, 2190 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Majestic

by NadiaB
69 comments, 1758 views

HI RES 3.1 MP

You're still

by NadiaB
65 comments, 1474 views

HI RES 5.3 MP

Dream of running free

by NadiaB
67 comments, 1309 views

HI RES 4.2 MP

Codibugnol

by NadiaB
65 comments, 2127 views

HI RES 5.4 MP

Balancing the "beam"

by NadiaB
80 comments, 1603 views

Stretching

by NadiaB
76 comments, 1298 views

HI RES 4.5 MP

Flamingos by transmitted light

by Fabrizio Fabbri
34 comments, 1945 views

HI RES 20.2 MP

The nib

by NadiaB
62 comments, 1245 views

The tab

by NadiaB
71 comments, 1226 views

HI RES 4.8 MP

Tick a face

by NadiaB
65 comments, 1474 views

HI RES 5.2 MP

One, two, three

by Lastpeanut
46 comments, 3483 views

After the storm the clear returns

by NadiaB
70 comments, 1132 views

HI RES 3.9 MP

Towards a new Beginning

by Carlo Marchese
35 comments, 1660 views

HI RES 20.2 MP

Sweetness

by NadiaB
54 comments, 1099 views

HI RES 5.5 MP

The Gold of the Woods

by NadiaB
73 comments, 1272 views

HI RES 5.1 MP

Waiting for flowering... you work in Castelluccio..

by Diamante_P
89 comments, 1087 views

HI RES 17.8 MP

Severe look

by NadiaB
61 comments, 1547 views

HI RES 4.7 MP

Test Olympus

by Goaz65
40 comments, 7304 views

The B&W dredge (man and machine)

by MassimoViacava
103 comments, 1997 views

HI RES 6.6 MP

Untitled Photo

by Vincenzo Sciumè
27 comments, 1593 views

The autumn of the red woodpecker

by NadiaB
77 comments, 1706 views

HI RES 4.3 MP

Cinciarella

by NadiaB
61 comments, 1399 views

HI RES 4.9 MP

To work on the street .............

by Jerry Vacchieri
37 comments, 3605 views

HI RES 12.4 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

On the perch

by NadiaB
59 comments, 1199 views

HI RES 4.9 MP

The blue feathers of the jay

by NadiaB
63 comments, 1296 views

HI RES 4.3 MP

The Autumn of the Squirrel

by NadiaB
54 comments, 1230 views

HI RES 5.1 MP

Red capsicum .................

by Jerry Vacchieri
42 comments, 4207 views

HI RES 14.0 MP

Robin posing

by Testarossa57
44 comments, 3930 views

HI RES 7.8 MP

Slheimaj-kull

by Diamante_P
39 comments, 888 views

HI RES 3.5 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Olympus » Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II