|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Claudiocanon www.juzaphoto.com/p/Claudiocanon  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1 L IS USM Pros: Sharpness, lightning-fast autofocus motor, construction. Cons: It is impossible to bring it to a focal length below 300 mm with a teleconverter. Opinion: Used exclusively with R3 and R5 for birdlife. I reluctantly sold the 8-year-old 100-400, but after the first test I forgot about it. The autofocus of the 100-500 is great, the lens is sharp even at full aperture. Perfect from f 8 to 500 mm. The sharpness with the 1.4X extender is also good (I have never tried the 2X). The only "flaw" is the impossibility, with the extender mounted, to retract the lens below 300 mm. Which comes to think of it makes sense. I am extremely satisfied. sent on July 23, 2024 |
 | Canon EOS R3 Pros: Speed of subject attaching, workability and quality of the file, ISO hold, ergonomics, battery life, simple and clear menu. Cons: Mine is afraid of humidity, if it had a few more pixels it would be perfect. Opinion: I use the R3 exclusively for birdlife and the performance is excellent. I come from a 1 DX Mark II, which is already excellent, but the subject tracking of the R3 is another thing. I used it with adapter and EF 100-400 without losing focus speed. Canon has done a great job of technical and marketing. Now I mount the RF 100-500. I unfortunately had a couple of problems during two days of rain (not intense). The first time, the dial on the back (which I use for apertures) no longer worked, and the second time, the screen turned off while rotating. Once dry (I repeat, just a few droplets) the camera was perfect again. The EOS R3, for me, is still exceptional. sent on June 28, 2024 |
 | Fujifilm XF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR Pros: A compromise. Cons: High price for performance, plastic parts, slow autofocus. Opinion: I purchased it and use it in combination with the X-T4. I tried with the birdlife on the go but.... It is soft at 400 mm at full aperture. Better to close than one stop. (so via blurred and light) Good up to 300 mm. Autofocus very slow and unable to keep the subject hooked. I've tried to set the camera in so many ways, but with just the center point it doesn't keep hooked. It works well, but not exceptionally, with the 9-point zone. Accustomed to the Canon 100-400, I find myself a bit displaced. Price with official warranty Italy 1,750 Euros. I'm deciding whether to keep it or resell it. I am a little disappointed. Excellent instead for still subjects. Good stabilization. sent on July 31, 2021 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM II Pros: Sharpness, no deformation at 24 mm, excellent focus on the entire frame. Cons: A bit soft at f 4 and slightly on the outer corners. Opinion: I use it with 6D Mk. II for about 3 months both in the open and in the studio. Considerable improvement over everything compared to the previous series. Excellent yield also to f 4, but it gives the best of itself from F 6.3. Great focus on the whole frame. Very efficient Stabilizer. I Would say it is a great compromise between price and quality. sent on April 04, 2019 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: Raw file quality, handling, quality / price ratio, resistance to high ISO. Cons: Metering sometimes imprecise. Opinion: I myself stepping stone to the ranks of sull'esposimetro.rnHo comments bought the new 6D and I took about 1000 photographs. Not a lot to have a full review on the camera, but the first thing you notice is that the meter in the same picture changes the diaphragm or the time a little 'as he wishes. (Switch to P and evaluative exposure). The result of the file is still more than good, but not always as perfect as I pretended to be a ff Canon. rnContinuerò with the change of settings to see if you are having differenze.rnSaluti, Claudio.rnrnPSrnQualcuno of you have found an improvement by changing some shooting setting to make more stable the meter? rnAd as spot metering, priority of time, fixed ISO, etc. . ? RnGrazie ancora.rnClaudio. sent on September 26, 2016 |
 | Benro A2192TB1 Pros: Versatile, stable, excellent value for money, minimum and maximum height, minimum space for transportation. Cons: Nobody. Maybe a little 'heavier the aluminum version, but nothing special. Opinion: I purchased it recently and I'm excited. And 'stable even with fairly long and heavy optics. the leg padding is unscrewed and becomes monopod or even walking stick (included a wooden knob). Supplied in convenient carry bag is also short center column so you can lower the tripod to 10 cm from the ground. The head is robust, complete with bubble and panning adjustment and double ball nut for blocking. For this price, I think is unmatched. sent on March 24, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 300mm f/4.0 L IS USM Pros: Lightweight, good sharpness, good value for money, multipable. Cons: Stabilizer 2 Stop. Opinion: I use it recently and I have to say that although it is "just" a f4, the chromatic yield is pretty good. Using it on 7D and alone has a discrete, fast-running AF and a more than enough stabilizer. Coupled with Canon's 1.4X III on 7D, it loses one step and slows down the AF. Sharpness does not change. I would say that without spending too much you can get a good focal distance for the bird. The quality approaches 400 f5.6, but with the advantage of the stabilizer. sent on March 21, 2016 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Price, focal length, weight, autofocus, image stabilization. Cons: just enough image quality and low in TA. Opinion: I purchased in a kit with the 700D. Great start, but then we do not longer content. Suitable for photos with vacations and trips unassuming. "Obligation" to close at least af 8. Also good for photos indoors with flash. In short, a handyman lens but it does not give what all of us expect. There are those who appreciate it for video; I though I have not yet made. sent on March 07, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 L IS USM Pros: autofocus speed, sharpness at full aperture and at all focal lengths, fantastic stabilizer, focal length and color rendering. Cons: Nobody. Opinion: I bought this lens still used as collateral. And 'ideal for both FF that APS-C. Great for stalking and stalking in the shed if the "prey" are moving towards and away. 5.6 to 300 mm is not at all a problem. I use it with the 7D and I am fully satisfied. The ring for the tripod is not original to less than half the original price Canon. sent on March 07, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
