JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM II is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2016. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1099 €;
62 users have given it an average vote of 9.1 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 190000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:A little soft TA, chromatic aberrations, 24mm distortions
Opinion:A versatile lens with the classic range of focals that on FF allows you to cover many needs. Excellent build quality and excellent stabilizer. I have never tried the previous version so I can not say what the improvements are. Soft to TA, it suffers from chromatic aberrations and 24mm distortions. It's definitely the classic "all-rounder" lens that allows you to go out with a "minimal" body-goal set, which I needed for the "daily" and "holiday" outings. Obviously my assessment of quality is very influenced by the fact that I do the comparison with the surrender of the 16-35 f/4 IS, a monster of sharpness from board to board also to TA and poor distortion.
Opinion:Compared to the first version, those ugly dark 24 mm corners have disappeared, the optical quality I judge it more than good, not only, but to perceive differences with more ephaly ephaly opticals, such as. The 24-70 2 8 II, you have to enlarge a lot and does not always come out to the worst: the 24-70 I owned but I preferred the most compromised solution between the two. Often I find myself traveling only with that optics on the 6D2: the perceived quality of the images is definitely satisfying and even the blurred, if used at f/4 is pleasant, of course you can not expect the same bokeh of the 85 superlumbosis. Impeccable autofocus, excellent construction and excellent stabilizer. Only the weight was in favor of the old version.
Pros:Sharpness, no deformation at 24 mm, excellent focus on the entire frame.
Cons:A bit soft at f 4 and slightly on the outer corners.
Opinion:I use it with 6D Mk. II for about 3 months both in the open and in the studio. Considerable improvement over everything compared to the previous series. Excellent yield also to f 4, but it gives the best of itself from F 6.3. Great focus on the whole frame. Very efficient Stabilizer. I Would say it is a great compromise between price and quality.
Pros:Sharpness, versatility, stabilizer, material quality, robustness, construction, tropicalization.
Cons:In my opinion NO!
Opinion:I say it is my favorite lens and I believe that anyone who owns a reflex (professional or amateur) should have it in his kit! I think the lens is all about doing 90% of the shots you want to take. Great focal excursion for landscape photos, panorama, mountain, close-ups and portraits, weddings and creams, street... It goes without saying that the f/2.8 would be better, but already having the f/4 in your hands I think is MORE than enough! I mean, I'd recommend it in a thousand!!!
Opinion:I have not tried with diagrams or things like that, but after more than twenty years of photography though amateur, I can make a judgement. It's a great lens to do the dirtiest jobs. From 24mm to 105, it covers the overwhelming magigornanza of applications, a decidedly high-level mechanics, an excellent optical yield, considering the object and very good in absolute terms, an effective stabilizer, a brightness that... ok not the best But for a 4x that starts from 24mm an F 2.8 is not prpprio to be proposed: weights and encumbrances would be unmanageable. I have sharper lenses, nicer, and plastic I don't deny it. However this is a lens that makes it pretty good in the embodied and even the Greens are very beautiful. Colors are affixed! It has no poetry, this is normal for a zoom like this. The opening on the Shadows is generally good, by the standards of a product like that, but the blurry is really valuable. It denotes a general quality of respect, both mechanically and optically. So it is a professional lens in all respects and should not be considered as the poor child of an excellent class of Canon lenses, it is not so! Inside the bag of a he manages to make sense and finds its space when it needs an operational ease and at the same time a good yield, without having to go down to the compromise of a stinking optics to be able to do something very difficult. Undoubtedly an exceptional lens for the photographer who looks for a good quality, a truly professional object and a zoom to make us all with the least effort. I made a good buy!
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
