JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM : Specifications and Opinions

The Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2021. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Nano-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 699 €;

48 users have given it an average vote of 9.1 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon RF: this lens is compatible with mirrorless fullframe and APS-C Canon RF.

Specifications
Focal lenght	100-400 mm
Angle of view	24.4 - 6.2°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/5.6-8
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	12 elements in 9 groups
Min. focus distance	0.88 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.41x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	Yes (built in lens)
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Nano-USM)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	Yes
Filters	67 mm
Lens hood	Yes (not supplied)
Weather sealing	No
Weight	635 g
Dimensions	79 x 164 mm
Buy
Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Vegmik

sent on February 26, 2022

Pros: Small, light as a feather, surprisingly sharp, a perfect lens (not only) for hiking

Cons: Reduced brightness, lack of hood and weather sealing

Opinion: Among ef lenses I have always looked for the alternative that is light with a relatively large zoom range, and of course able to capture sharp, clear pictures. For me this solution was the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM (I also had 100-400 L and Tam 150-600, but this was my ideal partner for hiking). I bought rf 100-400 as soon as arrived to the market and I have to say that I didn't regret it. Nowadays this is my nr1 lens on short trips and it does the job perfectly. Of course its a bit darker than expected, but even with my EOS R it is not a problem even in low light conditions. Images are sharp, colours are beautiful "Canon-icals" :) before and after sunset, in cloudy weather as well. And it is works perfect in daylight. Yep, lack of tropicalization, so you wont use it in heavy rain or snowstorm, but some raindrops are absolutely ok. It is a perfect exchange of cheaper Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS II nano USM but in quality its step by step with the 70-300mm f/4-5.6L big brother. EF 100-400 and RF 100-500 are playing in az upper league, but you should decide if the plusplusplus amount of money worth it for you or not. For a normal everyday usage for a non-millionaire Ill definitely stick wit this clever, tiny friend :)

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Edoardo Vaccaro

sent on May 04, 2025

Pros: Weight, minimum focus/magnification distance

Cons: Focusing performance degrades between 300 and 400mm

Opinion: I've owned it for a couple of years. I bought it to evaluate and try a focal length greater than 200mm. I use it mainly in landscaping and on some occasions for birdlife (which is not a genre in which I am well versed). In these scenarios I used the EF 70-200 f/4 IS USM and in some cases I found the 200mm insufficient. The weight is certainly a plus point for walks and hikes. The focal range for landscape is appreciated, as well as the maximum reproduction ratio at about 0.4X which allows you to shoot details of flora and insects. All this makes it a versatile enough lens to use outdoors. The construction is made of plastic, at the same time it seems solid enough. In my model I did not notice any play of the ferrules and the barrel once extended. I find the color rendering a bit dull compared to other lenses and then there is something more to work on in post. I find the focusing speed adequate, even if in my experience the responsiveness drops at focal lengths from 300mm upwards. This can be partly compensated by the fact that it supports the maximum shutter speeds of the RF system and therefore to have a few more photos available. Considering the price, I think it is a good purchase, especially if you prefer lightness and portability at the expense of tropicalization and brightness.

Claudiocanon

sent on May 04, 2025

Pros: Lightness, sharpness more than good in relation to the price.

Cons: Autofocus a bit slow even with R3.

Opinion: The RF 100-400 is a great compromise for those who don't want to or can't spend as much. Very convenient to carry around. Sharp enough to then optimize the quality with the software we have available. I bought it two years ago as a second long lens and the few times I used it it made decent images. Unfortunately, the autofocus speed isn't great even with very responsive cameras. But I repeat, with 700 Euros you buy very little alternative.

Magnum58

sent on April 14, 2025

Pros: Lightness and compactness compared to the long focal length, possibility of use as semi-macro, unexpected sharpness on a lens of this cost and level.

Cons: If you know before buying its low light I would say none.

Opinion: I switched to this lens from the RF 200-800, given that photographic hunting is not among my priorities, especially for the excessive weight and bulk of the L series super zoom, which certainly do not make it a bag lens to always carry with you with the rest of the kit as this 100-400 allows you to do. The comparisons made with the various 100-400 L series make me smile, since it would be like comparing a medium-sized Dacia with a Mercedes or BMW of the same displacement... Is it necessary to specify that one of the latter is far superior to the Dacia?, or is it nice to fill your mouth by necessarily praising an L series snubbing everything that the market offers as an alternative to its absurd costs, weights and dimensions? Surely the choice of these lenses, in my opinion, in most cases is not dictated by the lack of economic availability (or at least it is not in my case) but by their versatility of use and transport combined with an enviable sharpness achieved even on basic lenses, perhaps helped by everything that post production offers today, with which you can very well make up for both low light and a contrast or definition that is not excellent given the containment of production costs of these non-pro lenses, which in any case offer the priceless advantage of being able to carry them with you without the fear of carrying an overweight that could ruin a pleasant photographic excursion. Obviously it is not a lens recommended for those who as a genre of photography practice primarily photographic hunting or sports photography, especially indoors, or night shooting or in any case in low light, but it is assumed that one knows this before making the purchase of such a specific lens ..., so I am surprised to read negative comments on characteristics that one should already know before buying, Especially for the fact that these negative comments, in most cases, are expressed in the evaluation of economic optics, as if the fact of being cheap is always synonymous with poor quality, without ever taking into account the parameter that in my opinion is the first to be taken into consideration, that is the quality/price ratio, even if, I repeat, in my case it is not the price that dictates the choice of a lens.

Manz

sent on April 13, 2025

Pros: Lightness, compactness and sharpness of subjects at short distances. Discreet stabilization. Interesting potential as semi-macro.

Cons: Rather dark, but you know it from the beginning. Only enough sharpness with distant subjects, just beyond a certain distance.

Opinion: Great hiking zoom, perfect for landscaping and more. It combines compactness, lightness and ease of swinging. He does not disdain some shots in birdlife but as soon as you exceed a certain distance from the subject the fine detail is lost. The stabilization is decent but the good old rule of maintaining shutter speeds according to the focal length chosen remains valid. It is particularly comfortable and fun to use, despite the variable aperture. Advised!

There are 16 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM

Teenage Games

by DinamiteTNT
15 comments, 6784 views [editors pick]

Ray Pal

by Savastano
93 comments, 4473 views

HI RES 20.0 MP

Guild

by Peppe Cancellieri
60 comments, 5387 views

HI RES 19.0 MP

Hope

by Peppe Cancellieri
44 comments, 2446 views

HI RES 8.3 MP

Untitled Photo

by Vincenzo Sciumè
33 comments, 996 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

The fox and the snake

by Mariogiu
23 comments, 2271 views

HI RES 8.1 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

... I seemed to see a roe deer ...

by Franca Abello
36 comments, 3283 views

HI RES 4.2 MP

Toast with the secretary

by Gazebo
61 comments, 1989 views

HI RES 17.4 MP

Waves

by Fabrizios53
53 comments, 2150 views

HI RES 7.0 MP

Kingfisher

by Alb83
26 comments, 3794 views

HI RES 7.0 MP

Paneveggio Pale di San Martino Natural Park

by 75Daniele
137 comments, 3023 views

HI RES 3.2 MP

Mr. & Mrs Weiß

by Thom
15 comments, 550 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Uveggio Castle

by 75Daniele
141 comments, 1734 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

A veil of sadness

by Peppe Cancellieri
29 comments, 2462 views

HI RES 13.7 MP

Flower fields in South Africa...

by Giuseppe Coppola
26 comments, 1046 views

HI RES 27.8 MP

In flight oasis

by Marinella Bertoglio
18 comments, 2584 views

HI RES 12.1 MP

Castle in the fog....

by Savastano
43 comments, 2141 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

So far so close

by Coradocon
44 comments, 1782 views

HI RES 20.5 MP

The castle of Tures

by Savastano
53 comments, 533 views

HI RES 19.0 MP

Look...

by Savastano
32 comments, 820 views

HI RES 12.5 MP

Norway04 among rosebuds

by Gazebo
70 comments, 1791 views

HI RES 28.5 MP

Untitled Photo

by Ladislav
18 comments, 473 views

HI RES 3.6 MP

Saltimpalo F.

by Joele
29 comments, 1776 views

HI RES 9.8 MP

The foreigner

by Peppe Cancellieri
38 comments, 1717 views

HI RES 17.7 MP

Put Owls in your cannons!

by Diegoz
12 comments, 1095 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

St. Gaudentius and the Rose

by Coradocon
50 comments, 1365 views

HI RES 24.0 MP

Untitled Photo

by Vincenzo Sciumè
23 comments, 467 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Kissed by the sun

by Coradocon
38 comments, 1135 views

HI RES 9.6 MP

Werner

by Savastano
33 comments, 2476 views

HI RES 16.2 MP

Claudio

by Savastano
37 comments, 471 views

HI RES 15.0 MP

Hide and seek

by Biobear
17 comments, 692 views

HI RES 15.6 MP

Wave upon wave

by Fabrizios53
35 comments, 1256 views

HI RES 7.8 MP

Untitled Photo

by Vincenzo Sciumè
12 comments, 866 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Bee-eater

by Alb83
8 comments, 1896 views

HI RES 11.3 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

The castle of Tures

by Savastano
26 comments, 1033 views

HI RES 17.7 MP

Parco Nord Milan, 2022

by Giallo63
24 comments, 4474 views

HI RES 14.2 MP

Here I am again

by Lugace
11 comments, 2983 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Canon » Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM

Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM