|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Mastro78 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Mastro78  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony FE 50mm f/1.2 GM Pros: the top among the 50 Cons: weight and price. Opinion: With him I finally concluded my triad 24-50-135. the 50 GM is in engineering masterpiece. In spite of the maximum aperture 1.2 has an extraordinary autofocus capable of tracking very fast subjects. optical performance is superb. definition, blurred, three-dimensionality and detachment of the planes are the best I have ever seen in a 50. no doing, no aberrations, no coma. the diaphragm ring on the optics is very comfortable. I would have preferred a less bulky hood, perhaps metallic as in the Sony A-mount professional lenses. sent on August 27, 2022 |
 | Sony FE 35mm f/1.8 Pros: Excellent price-performance-size ratio, good for AF and re-resolution Cons: on 42 mp it has slight aberrations, too neutral as yield. Opinion: I sold the 50 1.4 zeiss before it devalued too much given the rumors of a GM 1.2, which was discovered between 24 and 135 I opted to buy 35 and 85 1.8 taking advantage of the cashback. the 35 is not actually my favorite focal point, but it still remains very versatile. this 35, which many praise, takes a few shots on the 42mp of the a7riii. the resolution remains very high, even at full opening, but to achieve the performance of the GM you must close at least f2.5. photographing in the backlight or with reflective metals in the scene, slight aberrations can occur probably not at all noticeable on 24mp. Luckily I found no signs of flare, even shooting in full sun, if anything it loses a contrast thread, but I find it absolutely normal. the 35 1.8 remains a very light and very small lens. very performing at AF level, but, compared to the famous and expensive little brothers, it lacks verve. when I look at the photos taken with 35 1.8 I find them absolutely neutral, almost aseptic, indeed, midges. of course, processing the file you can get a lot. but already the 55 1.8 zeiss for me had much, much more character. I will conclude by saying that, however, it remains a MUST HAVE lens given the relationship between dimensions, performance and costs. it's just PERFECT for making street and generic walking photos. sent on March 06, 2021 |
 | Sony FE 24mm f/1.4 GM Pros: construction, ottich performance, compactness Cons: Flare Opinion: I am an "animal" from 24-50-135. I waited a long time for this 24 and exceeded my rosiest expectations. my use is more direct to the portrait set and I just love it! allows you to contextualize scenes of manual work, or set portraits. the minimum distance of MAF allows excellent use also the macro and flora. the diaphragm ring, as for all GOs, is extraordinarily comfortable. optical performance is also exceptional at 42mp. there is no sign of aberrations (often visible on these large limonosis angles), while contrast and resolution are simply perfect. Only one mole has this 24: flares. as long as the lumonous source is within 1/3 of the center of the frame everything is ok. but beyond it creates green flares that are really difficult to control and even more to delete in posts. sent on March 06, 2021 |
 | Fujifilm XF 35mm f/1.4 R Pros: Small and discreet, vintage look Cons: Autofocus, construction, price-performance ratio Opinion: I used this lens for over a year as the only lens attached to my XT30 fuji. I needed a small and discreet combination but also fast and performing. I found the 35 a nice lens all in all, particularly suitable for the vintage nature of some fuji bodies. the lens really starts to show its side compared to competitors (especially FF). the seniority of the project is more than evident. the resolution remains excellent despite the very high density of modern aps-c fuji, but haimè aberrations are very evident, especially in some contexts. I had to throw away a series of beautiful summer photos because the rippled surface of the water was half purple and half green. but even contrasted contexts such as backlights are vuori of the annoying Purple fringe. the blurry is .... Vintage! very few differences between the blurry obtained with this 35 and with the 50 minolta rokkor on FF. in some contexts there is, in some contexts indeed, emphasizes. but clearly not in all. to me, after a while he got tired. also because alternatives to this fuji lens practically there is none. the 35 f2 is modern and very well controlled, but loses a whole stop and much blurry on aps-c. one of the most annoying things ever is the excursion of the frontal lens during sealing. Which I didn't see of the KIT 18-55 lens I had 10 years ago. that allows dust and dirt to damage the optics very easily. finally, autofocus. absolutely not at the level of more modern lenses. sent on March 06, 2021 |
 | Fujifilm X-T30 Pros: small but complete and performance Cons: the stabilizer is missing, af not at the top Opinion: Taken with the 35 1.4 to be joined alls sony a7riii in all those situations where I want to bring a "box around the neck" while not giving up performance and quality. the sensor is great for both ISO and DR, but I didn't expect it differently as the last sony aps-c cry. the AF minus. Especially the implementation of face/eye tracking functions where two faces in the scene are enough to bomb everything. Although the data sheet speaks of 20 fps these can only be used in panning or subjects at a constant distance. buffer is reduced and writing slow. but at least it is allowed in the meantime to change and the parameters are clicked. the AF, at least with the outdated 35 1.4, is not suitable for dynamic scenes. As far as I'm concerned, it remains a chamber to use "reflex" with moving point, af and single shot. among the things I appreciate the most is the minimum time of 1/32000 and the automatism that allows you to switch electronically in case you need time over 1/4000 clickable and setable rings at will, fantastic jpegs, analog feeling. among the things that can be improved are certainly the af algorithm, the switch operation between the viewfinder and the display, the unusable fn button put there. Among the things I really miss is sensor stabilization. Also, since it is practically impossible to shoot under 1/120 freehand, I do not understand why filling half the time ring with times from 60 to 1" T and B. these last functions used obviously by easel could be made selectable from menu. I would have preferred a physical ring from 60 to 4000. sent on November 14, 2020 |
 | Sony FE 100mm f/2.8 STF GM OSS Pros: Stratospheric resolution, always, everywhere. Blurred inimitable, colors and contrasts very natural. Possibility of light macro Cons: As a result of the apodized element, although an 2.8 is optically, it appears to have a maximum T of 5.6 limiting on many occasions Opinion: I bought this lens almost for Sfizio, having already a 85 1.8 and a 135 1.8. I was curious to try the smooth trans focus effect. I was absolutely amaliato from this lens, built impeccably, with Shag Hood, declickable aperture ring and fire ring perfect for feeling. The 100 STF in reality is a totally different optics from large luminous fixed. Its design allows you to always read the background. and "Pialla" the light points, which often in portraits annoy distracting the spectator from the subject. The sharpness is extraordinary on A7RIII, and even the tones of the incarnate have something more than any other fixed I've ever tried. Zeiss included. Unlike many other STF solutions This is autofocus, and it also works pretty well allowing you to pick up kids in running or biking. A third ring allows to set the focus distance between neighboring or relatively distant subjects up to infinity. I mean. It allows a bit of macro that marries perfectly in Flora's photography. Where the silky and uniform background, without dazzling light points or "balloons" from a very soft aura to the images. I guess I'm never going to sell this lens. Only real limit, as mentioned above, is that at the brightness level is a 5.6. So it needs light to be able to use it at non-stellar ISO. To have a moment idea what is capable this lens I invite you to watch this shot at full resolution: https://danieledimiccoli.prodibi.com/a/d8yzj72750v9y6/i/olg20d0qdk46kv sent on October 09, 2018 |
 | Sony FE 24-70mm f/4 ZA OSS Vario Tessar T* Pros: Small and Compact. Crisp and quiet Cons: honestly, maybe the price Opinion: The zoom zess Handyman I found it excellent paired with the a6300. It is very compact, light and Well-finished. The image quality is very good. Not as much as a fixed clearly, but considering it is a zoom on a very dense sensor there you just complain. You can't ask for the sharp angle, but up to 2/3 of the frame really very good. The AF is behind the a6300 without any problem, and is absolutely silent. For me a slow to maple asoliously together with a 12 and a 50 1.8. sent on October 09, 2018 |
 | Sony RX100 VI Pros: Extreme versatility in a pocket body Cons: Accessory Grip essential, does not close and does not turn off until you have finished writing the Buffer. The autonomy is really poor. Opinion: I have three young children, and there were holidays in the mountains, then those on the Beach. It is practically a siucidio carry a backpack but also a shoulder strap Don two-three Optics When you are around with borsoni, shoulder seats and Whatnot. The RXVI was presented with perfect timing! It was exactly what I was looking for (i had the 4th and the 5th for the low focal excursion). The RX100VI is solid, comfortable and very versatile. You can really use it for any scope. From the landscape where a discrete dynamic range allows to have good results, with fast and sporty actions thanks to the maximum focal, the autofocus, the exaggerated frame rate and in capacent buffer. Also for video is an excellent choice, with an excellent 4k and Slow-mo significtive; But you have to consider a gimbal. Holding it and moving it, with those minute dimensions, leads to excessive movements that are hardly compensated by the Optics. As now all Sony will recharge via USB. Required a power bank to be kept on the stock exchange and a spare battery. Only thing really annoying is that it takes quite a while to download the buffer of a burst and as long as it has not finished it is not possible to change the parameters or turn off the Camera. Therefore the optics are not covered and cannot be put BACK. The viewfinder, however fairly definite is an emergency cockpit. I always wear a cap to be better covered during use, but the opening movement was finally optimized (compared to the III i had). Now disassociating him from the side he rises and Exfles himself. Ready to look inside (and the room comes on). Finished photographing just push it in and with an asmall lever ance the viewfinder will go back on its own (the camera goes out). It is possible to set the menu if the camera has to return to the last selected focal or Not. There are memories on Ghera comfortable to have access ravished to multiple configurations together (since the physical controls are really safe) sent on October 09, 2018 |
 | Sony A6300 Pros: compact but robust, af tremendously fast and accurate, possibility of af on the eyes even with constant f, IQ very high, up to 1600 ISO indistinguishable from a completely silent FF.rnscatto (3fps) Cons: limited buffer (slow actually writing to SD. few external controls, no touch screen. flash off when shooting in silent mode Opinion: I replaced the a6000 that already had a very good car, with this a6300.rnmigliora visibly in strength, viewfinder, shutter release button sensitivity and performance video.rnresta the flaw of slow writing scheda.rnl'af is the thing most of all I impressed. I took photos at football matches where the af was glued to the subject, without being distracted by other players who passed davanti.rnl'af provides extra functions with respect to the progenitrice.rninnanzitutto af eyes are now also allowed using af -c. and is a boon! I photographed my daughter while playing with a friend mattimani (imagine sudden movements throughout the frame with hand-passing continuously in front) over 30 shots only one was on the ear rather than opens the eye with a mounted 55 1.8! rnanche subjects who approach they are quickly tracked very well, with a rate of shots perfectly at 50-70% fire and shots still usable / printable close to 100% .rnrnè been implementata the expanded stitch function. As on many pro SLR you can assign a point (anywhere lel frame) in which the start traking there rnper then track the subject throughout the frame. NO, unfortunately, a convenient joystick to quickly move the punto.rnA Actually, other programmable buttons may be thought meglio.rnassegnando such pomp F1 to shooting mode I would have preferred that to every pressure change the shooting mode instead (as on all the sony) it leads to a carried away, so you need to select and confirm with the PAD. laborioso.rnlo slow and silent shooting could prove very handy in many circumstances (sprints from 30 "to 1/4000) but with this activates the camera mode inhibits the use of the flash, also controls radio external flash etc. probably because the slow sensor reading would create artefatti.rnla video section is at the top. I do the little use, but I can say that f is precise, and the function of slow motion (120fps with output in FHD) is verycarina.rnQui, stabilization on the sensor FF sister is definitely more effective than obbiettivi.rnil overheating much complained it happened to me only once recorded under the sun in July (after 10-15 min of different clips), while the rolling shutter it is actually noticeable in 4K by panning. clearly in a normal use it's really hard to notice. sent on August 05, 2016 |
 | Sony A7 II Pros: Unrivaled versatility (in two minutes to become a small bridge hanging from the neck to an SLR with BG capable of working with large lenses) rnpermette to use all the lenses in the world and stabilization is very effective even at 1/20 of a second. rn Cons: For professional missing something. primarily the second board, the autonomy and tropicalization efficiente.rnl'autofocus is sufficient for most uses and good traking of faces and objects. but it does not have the consistency and repeatability of an SLR. Opinion: I purchased this camera to replace one of the two cameras nie (actually SLT, a a99) RNLA use as the main body in the ceremonies with three lenses: 16-35 f4, f2 28 and 55 1.8.rna kit I also Rokkor 60s and 135 1.8 zeiss not sell mai.rnho acqquistato the BG to better grip and autonomy in the events and ceremonies. rnuna a7ii the beautiful thing is the number of keys customizable (TEN!) in addition to the 4 ghiere.rnuna of which exclusively regulates the exposure. this way you can work manually with the four rings that regulate opening times, iso (iso leaving the car set the dial adjusts the exposure ISO) and WB. fantastic! rninutile mention the electronic viewfinder which for years I find insostituibile.rnil display articulated could be more articulate, and maybe touch. management HOT POINT wi fi is complex, I think you could delegate the management to 'phone application or desktop for installing appricazioni. some of which, however, interesting. sent on January 08, 2016 |
 | Minolta AF 35mm f/2 Pros: Lens compact, lightweight, Sharp in the center and a 35 2/3 as modern, warm colors and wonderful contrast. Typical optical zeiss.rnperfetto in flesh reproduction. Where it produces many nuances and details. Cons: the boehk not the best. Nervous and erratic. rna full aperture angles are quite soft. choudendo to f4 become buoni.rnimpossibile mount the front cap over the lens hood. rnlfare beautiful but treacherous Opinion: From this, bought a little whim of a market, equips my sony a99 (the bayonet is native and has a fast f) rnsono lente.rnè love with this small and weighs a pound, seems to shoot without lens. rnma produces amazing results and mezzobusti perfect! details such as the skin hair and eyes are reproduced with a natural level of well more famous lenses zeiss.rnrnFar get the sun in quest'obbiettivo be more dangerous as meraviglioso.rna depending on the angle and distance of fire in fact, flare can take beautiful shapes and colors typical of film lenses, or devastating loss of detail with dominant blue-viola.rnrnpurtroppo is out of production for twenty years, and still maintains excellent quotazioni.rnrnad today competes only with the 50mm 1.4 zeiss ultrasonic. sent on January 12, 2015 |
 | Sony 70-200mm f/2.8 G SSM II Pros: Lens rather sharp, quick to focuse and well built. Double customizable button on the barrel for use in vertical or horizontal Cons: 200mm TA and some copies (not mine thankfully) loses a bit in definition Opinion: The story is this: I had a 70-300 G, beautiful fast but dark, and a Tamron 70-200 2.8, beautiful, crisp but very slow ... rnvenduti both and with a little effort I reached this small gioiellino.rnrnVa said this is the latest lens still legacy Kit Minolta. and this can be seen particularly of the colors that are beautiful caldi.rnrnLa lens is well done, the hood has a small side door that allows you to tighten the filters without smontre paraluce.rnla the sharpness is more than enough even the accuracy of AF is not at the level of the competitors. rn (Sony recently unveiled version II improving precisely the AF and making tropicalizzata.rnil price is excessive in my opinion for the yield, but on sony there are few other alternatives valide.rnrnDaniele sent on December 22, 2014 |
 | Sony Carl Zeiss Planar T* 50mm f/1.4 ZA SSM Pros: I really have to explain the benefits of a Zeiss? Rncolori and embodied wonderful. matched only by the 135 1.8 and 24 f2, always Zeiss. Cons: I would expect a hood metallic petals as for other objectives signed ZEISS.rnil lens hood is absolutely understated. Opinion: I tried this lens for over a year, trying different copies of 50 1.4 sigma sony and that I was not fully soddisfatto.rnquesta, however, is another planet! Rnanzitutto sharpness up to 2/3 of the frame, it is also good to TA. closing at 2 becomes superb throughout the fotogramma.rni colors and blurred morbidissomo are a peculiar feature of this lente.rnil ultrasonic motor current videos silent and lets chase in AF children in corsa.rncosa want? sent on November 14, 2014 |
 | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical Pros: Sharp !!! bright! economic Cons: The bill does not go crazy, cartoon TA, has a distortion "special" Opinion: bought as a wide-angle lens for my sony a99, it is no problem to focuse also for portraits because I aiutano.rnla peaking and magnification lens to f8 is a knife! perfect !!! rnrna f2.8 cartoon a lot, but for some photographs is also nice ... RNLA focus ring is vague, does not score at the correct distance, and has excessive hike in my opinion ... rnrnResta a lens to have if you rarely use and you do not have money to invest ... sent on October 02, 2014 |
 | Sony RX100 III Pros: Image Quality and ISO resistance similar to SLR. Lens really bright. shoot or film to light abajour on a 24mm equivalent is a dream for many SLRs. fully customizable. aluminum body. retractable electronic viewfinder. 10 frames per second. AF very fast for a compact light conditions buona.rnVideo in SLo-mo up to 120 fps. rn Cons: Continuous mode unreliable in low light lens that 24mmè 1.8 to 32mm already down to 2.8 to 70mmrnsi up easily, without ever going into the block, can lead fastidio.rnOccorrono SDXC cards to take advantage of the best performing video performance Opinion: I have been for a long time drawn from E sony. I was tempted by a6000. but braked by having to build a second kit optics. however costose.rnrnNon I therefore missed an opportunity when I found this little gem at a great price vantaggioso.rnmi completely surprised! I can say with certainty that in an afternoon of use has made me forget the attack and sony (so much so that I sold what I had) .rnrnOra, after two months of use, I feel able to review with care and detail this little gem. rnrnIniziamo by saying that the photo quality is surprisingly close to an SLR. A closer look at only the left and right edges, especially the corners. are a little soft. The problem is almost exclusively the minimum focal length. the center on the other hand is always, always detail, at any aperture and length focale.rnrnDa consider that even the RAW software is "straightened" to the wide-angle lens. deformation can be seen only during the working landscape photos. rni colors zono zeiss. as embodied, perfectly played. up to ISO 1600, the filand products are very very close to an SLR. in addition, are used, but percepusce a drop in performance and gamma.rnrnUna of the more beautiful is the use of wide angle (24mm) with an opening equal to 1.8.rnsi can take pictures and video by candlelight. rnrnaltro aspect that I find wonderful is the fact that you do everything with one hand ... rnfinito wanting to take it off, the optical retires, quits, and gets in tasca.rnniente bags caps, etc etc .... rnrnIl display can be rotated up to 180 ° is clearly legible. if anything, seems little, but you can do little ... rnil electronic viewfinder Piò serve in some contexts. but it's really small. difficult to use with goggles and it's easy not to see anything because the sun filtering from the edges. I found it very convenient to use it in combination with a cap! RNLA definition is good, as well as color and contrasto.rnAprendolo and closing it automatically turns on or off the camera. may be annoyed, but I found something comoda.rnrnLa RX100III has 4 fully customizable buttons and two dials customizable depending on the mode selected. makes it easy to shoot in manual. as well as focus manually using the dial frontale.rnquesta no shots, and the new vuoco seamless continuità.rnrnMolto interesting, in P mode, the display cursor parameters and opening times during the ISO settings with ghiera.rnrnAUTO always available with upper and lower limits. but without the possibility to set time sicurezza.rnrnPer be a compact sensor with only one inch allows also pleasing sfocati.rna 24mm and maximum aperture, the PDC is less than a m4 / 3 clicks to 24mm f2.8rnrnsono possible macro up to a cm from the subject. but should close the diaphragm as can be seen in this context, many aberrations in large aperture.rnrnResistenza to flare and gost very good. except with only a corner out of shot in 24mm 1.8rnrncomoda and immediate function wi fi. that allows you to go full-frame shots or hijack a PC and a 2mb computer.rnpermette comando remote and has a series of app installed for time lapse, motion photography, etc. ecc.rnrnAutonomia Scarsini battery, especially if you play with the wi fi.rnfornito only a USB charger. rnrnIn Ultimately this camera will replace a good 70% of my shots household. the a99 comes out almost exclusively for work! rnrnSalute to voirnrnDaniele sent on September 25, 2014 |
 | Sony 24-70mm f/2.8 ZA SSM Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* Pros: Good resolution, fast AF, accurate, wide-angle silenzioso.rnOttima management even at full aperture, where only a trickle of deformazioen disturbing. rncolori and contrast typical zeiss. unique! rnpiccole chicce as the metal lens hood fleece internally they understand the level of this lens is lente.rnla tropical conditions. Cons: The construction is excellent! both metal and glass. but this re reflected in the high weight. rnCome each product ZEISS, even here the price is remarkable. but it's worth it ... Opinion: Lens for truly exceptional performance, colors, speed AF.rnè THE lens a99. irreplaceable. rndevo say that I have found the limits, even using the whole apertura.rnrnse really want to nit-pick, the maximum focal length and maximum aperture, you lose a bit of definition, but nothing sensational. Then, just close one stop to return to the values ??eccelsi.rnrnMi really liked those little details like the metal lens hood fleece inside, the little bag made of genuine leather, soft textured rubber ferrules ... rnun pleasure to hold in hand. .. sent on August 07, 2014 |
 | Sony NEX 3N Pros: very compact, easy to use with one hand using the zoom control at the top, good performance of the sensor up to 1600 ISO. the aps-c cheapest on the market. Cons: very little personabilizzabile. so small as to say too much at once with zoom lenses that are not the kit.rnautofocus contrasting slow, inaccurate and sometimes impossible to use as a continuous f. Opinion: had long colevo alongside something small and convenient to my sony a99 DSLR with its kit bulky, heavy and expensive) rnrnho tried the NEX nex 5 and 6 that, while most that can be personalized and more accurate AF, I found them uncomfortable because grip small and forzosa.rnrnla 3n, by contrast, has a small shape on the front, but in reality it takes a lot of comfort with compatta.rnil like a rocker for zooming the kit lens allows me to turn, zoom and shoot using the right hand only, mind, maybe in the other I have my daughter in my arms ... I rnrnl'utilizzo miglliore the ancestral stuck with the sony 20mm 2.8, that being a pankake transforms this room into a real compatta.rnrnnon having claims when shooting with her, I'll settle for jpeg already good up to 1600 ISO. shots in 3200, when processed in raw, do return something soddisfacente.rnrnnon think there is a cheaper APSC. for less than 300 € value for money I think it is exceptional! sent on June 06, 2014 |
 | Sony SLT-A99 Pros: Ergonomics, weather sealing, resolution electronic viewfinder (now irreplaceable), adjustable display (the only FF to own it), double ring and customizing buttons. Cons: AF for improved accuracy in continuous fire. especially the really poor coverage area. Opinion: Natural transition from a77, aps-c, the full frame.rnla room is almost indistinguishable from the first as ergonomics. eccellente.rnha more features, especially think about the video. was added in fact a silent ring to an optional volo.rnma is very interesting function AF range.rnpraticamente you focus on a subject is through the two rings, you set the limits within which virtual field focused. everything will be over on or before ignorato.rnrnil electronic viewfinder, as I said, I am now insostituibile.rnrivedere shots through the viewfinder, have the diagram, the preview of white balance and exposure, face detection etc etc .. ..rnrnfinalmente also high iso can be used. no problem up to 1600, if you work, even 3200 and 6400 are utilizzabili.rnrnAltra feature unknown to other FF cameras is the articulating display. many photos would be almost impossible senza.rncome this: rnrnAGGIORNAMENTO: rnNon without fear, I agreed to photograph a party we compleanno in discoteca.rnvi leave the appropriate topic made in my personal blog. sent on May 23, 2014 |
 | Sony 135mm f/2.8 (T4.5) STF Pros: Optics very specialized. offers a soft and fuzzy frightening detail where focused Cons: The type of optical elements inside the lens does not allow proper operation of the autofocus. Rnmotivo why this lens is only MF.rnrnlivello constructive typical optical minolta.rnapertura maximum of 2.8 but luninosità equal to 4.5 Opinion: Lens purchased to test, with which I delight in ritratti.rnil manual focus must be cared for, of course subjects must stand still and must be used with care is the zoom focus peaking.rnrnI results that focus on the blurred background are wonderful, very very soft , without solution of continuity. the light points do not have sharp edges, you do not notice the concentric circles and aberrazioni.rnrnbisogna be careful to dispobibilità ambient light with this lente.rnla presence of the double diaphragm (which allows you to get a smooth and soft fuzzy), affect the passage of light. then in fact, to calculate the shutter speed, the camera reads the optics as a 135 f4.5.rnrn sent on April 03, 2014 |
 | Sony 85mm f/1.4 ZA Carl Zeiss Planar T* Pros: a tank. glass and steel. zeiss colors and saturations. inconfondibilirnIl 9-blade diaphragm is impressive to see, and allows beautiful blurred. Cons: a bit too soft at full aperture. thing that is most noticeable with dense sensor as the a77. on FF is more incisive. rnAF screw slow, some copies have pergiunta the AF mechanism quite noisy, not for my fortuna.rn Opinion: The lens in question can be used on aps-c as if it were on a 135 ff. rnlo blur is very good good details from F2 onwards. RNLA construction is excellent, but the circular lens hood (felted internally) is more cumbersome lens stessa.rnrnUn'altra what is puzzling is that during the first few uses focheggiando on subjects close to the lens is bent outwards almost to the length of the telescope itself. given the size dela llente front this often leads to unbalance the chamber forward. rnrnLa ring of MAF is perfect as hardness and excursion (wide), and does not rotate during use of 'AF, but it is not the type SSM. advice you to switch the switch on the lens to focus manually, so you do not have to drag all the internal mechanics. sent on April 03, 2014 |
 | Sony E 50mm f/1.8 OSS Pros: Good as sharpness with one or two stops closing, beautiful colors. high resistance to flare. effective stabilization times of up to 1/25 Cons: In little bulky for my gusti.rn Opinion: A good lens. excellent when compared to pezzo.rnrnEssendo a lens APS-C is a bit long in closed environments, its main use is in the portrait bust and outdoors. rnqui offers beautiful blurred and details are not excellent at full aperture. but good with a stop very close to chiusura.rnrnColori zeiss incarnate. rn sent on April 03, 2014 |
 | Sony E 35mm f/1.8 OSS Pros: Excellent resolution, already at full apertura.rnlente bright in comparison to the size, and even stabilized. Cons: One of the copies I had was noisy during the focusing of and stabilization. ronziie clicking sounds were heard during recording video.rn Opinion: Excellent lens for the cost-ratio-resolution ingombri.rnperfetto as a "normal" would seem to carry in your purse along with the 16-50 kit lens on NEX.rnrnchiusa f 5.6 achieves a sharpness wonderful! Rnnesun problem in the light, barely noticeable vignetting at full aperture . rnrnad today my nex kit consists of this lens, the 20mm pankake, and the kit 16-50 sent on April 03, 2014 |
 | Sony E 20mm f/2.8 Pros: The smaller, compact and lightweight lens for sony commercio.rnsta tury in jeans. Cons: It is not stabilized, the sharpness from half frame to the edges is only fair, in any apertura.rnrn Opinion: Purchased used, this objective is always with me when I go out in late pomeriggio.rnInfatti the kit lens of the NEX 5r is a little dark. and this is after all a 20mm fixed everything fare.rnsta also in his shirt pocket, unlike the sigma 19, which is still more nitido.rnrnIl price is not an exaggeration. I think it will be a fixed lens in my corredo.rnrnLa distortion is not obvious, good, resistance to flare. rnil hood, minimalist, is included in confesione, but increases its footprint. I do not harbor almost never. sent on April 03, 2014 |
 | Sony 24mm f/2 SSM Carl Zeiss Distagon T* Pros: Robustness, speed and silent AF, micro-contrast colors and excellent, soft and delicate it sfocato.rnè practically a macro. focuses on distances less than 2cm from the lens. rnutilizzato on APS becomes the lens for every day. Cons: to be fixed with "only" F2 costicchia, but it is always a zeiss ... rnse was Tropicalised .... Opinion: Will reflect the fact that I decided to replace the zoom 16-50 f2.8 on my a77 with this little gem! Rne are extremely satisfied !!! RNLA construction is impeccable, the lightning-fast AF and manual ring soft and smooth with great excursion .... rnrné impossible, as already described describe what offers a zeiss than other lenses ... rnnon explain even I know ... if not .... rnappena that made the first test shots with my girls, in diffused light from the window I exclaimed: WAW !!! rnl'espressività Eye, the progression in the detachment of the plans, the consistency of skin tones ... rnrnL'utilizzo that I do is on aps-c (sony a77) where the lens has not only use of street photography, but can also be used to mezzobusti or figures, as vignetting and distortion are virtually assenti.rnrnSu FF becomes a super wide angle pictures for urban night, starry, parties are not very bright. ..rnrnUna sorpesa was the minimum distance of focus, often never considered in these lenses.rnmettere focus to 2 cm from Alente allows shots out of the ordinary, with blurred wonderful and important details perfectly crisp. sent on January 02, 2014 |
 | Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Pros: It allows to keep the nex in my coat pocket or in a bag. rnqualità than the average of KITrnstabilizzato and motorized excellent for video. Cons: rather dark. 16 mm critics, fisheye distortion, vignetting and extreme. Opinion: THis is the perfect finish to make a nex3n a replacement for a compact! Rnlo thickness is slightly greater than a pancake, allow the "pocketability" thing for me importante.rncerto that having a small optical, stabilized, motorized zoom lenses, has forced to a compromesso.rnrnil first is that the lens is quite dark, especially at 50mm where f5.6.rnInoltre drops to 16 millimeters are really ugly! you can turn on in the room fixes vighettatura, chromatic aberrations and distortion, but apart from that only apply to Jpeg, correcting distortion depletes a lot of resolution and with external parties creates horrible facial deformations! rnrnil problem occurs only in 16mm is intended . rnrnla feature of this lens is that it provides separate controls for zoom and f, with the latter, on the nex 3n, can also be operated by the lever that surrounds the button scatto.rnesattamente as in compatte.rnquesto, in my opinion, increases versatility, allowing the use of the room with one hand. RnrnLa quality is good, except at the edges to a minimum focale.rnConsigliata as a kit lens. sent on January 02, 2014 |
 | Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD Pros: risuluzione excellent even at full aperture. only 2.8 to 200mm and loses something. still recoverable in pp.rnla construction is not bad. despite the plastic appears solido.rnrn Cons: AF works fairly well, as long as there is enough light. then it may happen that often go to "hunt" in limiter would giovato.rnnonostante the AF is pretty accurate lacks an ultrasonic motor. rnMa must think that costs a third of the competitors! Opinion: Perfect for handyman portrait lens. high definition, good for the blurry zoom. AF precise, even on points laterali.rnin extreme conditions I also found some nice flare, which are associated with well-ritratti.rnl 'only real lack of this lens is the AF with ultrasonic motor, widely distributed on competition. rnma fact. for figures three times more often and optical results below ... rnrnconsigliatissima! sent on November 06, 2013 |
 | Samyang 85mm f/1.4 Aspherical IF Pros: Any lens comparable to this coast at least twice. rnquesta is even compact and weighs molto.rnlo blurred is of a good standard, and sharpness to TA acceptable. closed one stop further improves. Cons: The manual focus is not a big problem for me that I use the focus peaking of sony a77, however it is "difficult" rnNessuna info to the camera may cause incorrect color esposizione.rnaberrazioni very present, at any aperture, with purple fringing practically ovunque.rnmeglio shoot in low light Opinion: For what it costs I bought waiting to reach the carl Zeiss 135.rnnon can be said to be dissatisfied. however aberrations and lens flare in this suffers the lash of the 24megapixel my sony. sometimes making the image inutilizzabile.rnrnstranamente appreciate most photos in low light, almost in the dark. rnrn sent on November 06, 2013 |
 | Samyang 8mm f/3.5 Fisheye Pros: One of the funniest circolazione.rnperfetta optics for video absolutely out of the ordinary (I started crawling babies, which looked like giants!) Rnper is what it costs to have a body Cons: the optical quality is questionable (contrary to the construction quality). rnper have good results should be close to F 5.6 at least. but it is so long buia.rnAF manual does not always comodo.rnsopratutto the inability to close half stop. will immediately switch from 3.5 to 5.6 to 8! Opinion: Optics really fun to create a special atmosphere, especially in particular contexts. bridges, city center, attractions turistiche.rnrnAL Unlike conventional grand'angoli which to fight the linear deformations end up distorting subjects as close as volti.rnrnqui the opposite happens. the faces are proportional, while walls and ceilings sag .... rnrnalcuni corners of my funniest videos are shot with this lente.rnSe it is true that the optical quality is not excellent, it is also true that the photos you do with a fisheye are just creative experiments, fantasy games. where you can see everything but the aberration. rnrnma just look at the gallery below ... rnrnUn greeting sent on November 06, 2013 |
 | Sony 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G SSM Pros: very good sharpness at full aperture. excellent resistance to flare, AF speed and compactness. Chromatic aberrations absent. vignetting absent. blurred smooth and soft Cons: must be closed by one stop from 200 to 300 mm to obtain a good resolution. rngli shots recorded are defined, but often lack contrast. solvable in pp Opinion: an excellent lens for relationship dimensions / weight / cost / prestazionirnNonostante solid construction the lens weighs less than 2.8 16-50 SSM.rne no discounts in sharpness. always good to eccellente.rnAF fast, accurate, quiet. rnrnho fatfo hard to get used to the inverted rings (AF machine side, focal lens side), and also reversed its direction of rotation. I do not know why, but I always messed up for the first 3-4 shots ... rnrninsomma, considering it is a FF lens, it remains a must-have piece in the kit. sent on August 13, 2013 |
 | Sony DT 16-50mm f/2.8 SSM Pros: very solid construction, constant aperture, Quick AF, perfect management of the light. Cons: AF is not always accurate. Focal length field is too small. distortion and vignetting too wide to 16mm Opinion: buying second-hand, to assist the carletto 16-80.rnmi needed a more versatile for shooting inside under less 50mm ISO possibile.rna the gain in the opening is large compared to carletto. rnrnla construction is impeccable, better than zeiss, there is also the extension block, superfluo.rnle rings, have a precise movement, fluid but do not give up. zero games. rnPerfetta the ring of MAF with an excursion broad that it helps to be precisi.rnrnil ultrasonco engine is perfect for video management. rnPeccato that the AF in the video does not go beyond F3.5, thus making unnecessary the use of a constant 2.8. rnrnla yield is good. the resolution is enough for me wide open, but already one stop less is excellent. rnil fact is that, if you need to close it then so much tavle use carletto that allows you to get to 80mm. and is already excellent at all apertura.rnrnin made of colors and tridimenzionalità still wins the carletto. rnih ultimately the 16-50 is an excellent lens for indoor and thevideo greeting AF.rnrnUn sent on August 13, 2013 |
 | Sony SLT-A77 Pros: ergonomics, speed AF, Live View, face detection and tracking objects very fast and precise. swiveling display, video with fast and reliable fire even in low light. Cons: only acceptable noise up to ISO 1600. Opinion: purchased to replace my old a350 I found the A77 camera very ergonomic and highly customizable. rnAl of the of the 12 frames per second, and the 24 megapixel data that leave the time they find, I felt great satisfaction OLED viewfinder and Face detection.rnInfatti, you can specify a priority of the faces, so it if the room is a face in the scene, prioritizes, however, the AF for that face, even Exposure and white balance are adjusted on the face in focus. A very nice feature, which helps me a lot of work to photograph eventi.rnLa shutter speed is very high, but her bounds. say it is more useful to make still images of a moving object in front of us, not one that runs towards us. I made great shots of basketball players during the jump. in football as the results were poor ... rnrnNel macro this camera is simply unique! plant the tripod, turn the display as desired, set manual focus and takes advantage of the focus peacking abinato preview. Withouthaving to lie down, crouching etc to look at the screen! a garanzia.rnrnAd However, the one that remains is unsurpassed in video functions. no matter how importarernsono went around at night, with the 16-80 zeiss. choosing the "zone" of fire right, center, left, is practically possible to film ognicchè with autofocus at night. rnrnl'unico compromise is the noise level to the high iso.rnaccettabili up to 1600. well, for me, is an "emergency". rnrnInoltre the battery has a limited life. especially if we consider that the same battery in my old a350 lasted a whole week ... rnqui we are at the limit of the morning .... rnrnrnrnrnrn sent on November 05, 2012 |
 | Sony DT 35mm f/1.8 SAM Pros: Incredible sharpness. Even at full aperture is equivalent to Zeiss 16-80 of the best conditions. F4 is only surpassed by the 50mm F1.4. but very little. Very leggero.rnA that price will not buy another ... really cheap to practice with blurry ... Cons: Body completely plastic. Does not imply any waiver, if not aesthetic. front lens rotates in AF. annoying if you have your fingers near them. l 'AF is not in sight. and even a sniper. sometimes errs on the subject within a meter. physical switch from AF azionarre SEMPRE.rn Opinion: 7ottica, then the room ... rnrnPeccato! sent on May 02, 2012 |
 | Sony DT 18-70mm f/3.5-5.6 Pros: KIT to be the cheapest in history the hike up to 70mm ppermette some more daring composition of more classics KIT 18-55, Cons: Sharpness little or not at the center of the frame, go go aberrations in the minimum focal length, only partially eliminated chuidendo the diaphragm. front lens rotates during focus, no lens hood or filter. Opinion: So guys, it was practically given in this kit set for my a350 ... you do not you take it? paired with the 55-200 has made dozens and dozens of shots, it was basically a good companion. As soon as I got a good deal for 16-80 Carl Zeiss however, I did not hesitate. If I give OK, otherwise the new KIT ??18-55 ssm is definitely a step forward, at least in terms of resolution and containment of aberrations .... sent on October 21, 2011 |
 | Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro Pros: goal rather cheap for the performance it offers. good resolution wide open, very good to a stop less. good construction Cons: slow autofocus on sony. unusable autofocus less than contrastatissimi subjects. Opinion: Objective paid about € 180, I use it all summer around fields to macro. Are satisfied, the large knob of fire is smooth and ergonomic (rubber), on the other hand is the only usable as the autofocus is really bad. On my sony a350 I do not feel the lack of the stabilizer, in fact sony has stabilized sensors, works well with this sigma. A good buy to start making macro ... sent on October 03, 2011 |
 | Sony 50mm f/1.4 Pros: Sharpness unreachable for any high lens, blurred soft and delicate, high brightness retaining great detail up to F1.8 Cons: angle of view on APS too long, not usable indoors Opinion: was my first lens "post KIT". There is also a € 150 in spite of the official price lists. today is the lens that gives me more satisfaction! You can get to PDC only one cm, but that inch is incredible detail! Combined with sensors stabilized sony allows you to take in the city at night by hand. Autofocus is not SSM, but it is very fast, even the ring manual (if you really want to have fun) is convenient and free flowing. A piece that can not miss! on a FF then, its greater field of recovery would make it even more enjoyable. sent on October 03, 2011 |
 | Sony DT 16-80mm f/3.5-4.5 ZA Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* Pros: Wide zoom range, fast autofocus despite the absence of SSM, sharpness, and especially three-dimensionality of the picture far superior to other KIT. to 80mm is still open to 4.5, which is ever found in very few other lenses. Cons: the construction is not the best, plastic, ring of fire, if to be used manually, it is virtually unusable because of the hardness of drive. some chromatic aberration, a hint of distortion, and low-resolution angle at the minimum focal length of 16 mm. Opinion: I found this lens with a discount of 55% in a common mediaworld. I replaced my a350 KIT 18-70 that really left something to be desired. I am very well, the wide range and good sharpness give me satisfaction. the front lens is not rotating support which allows you to use specific lens hood and polarizer, The most common use that I do is to large openings, well above the lens competitors, along with the stabilizer on the sensor avoid me to bring back the tripod. The building is not the best but the autofocus is very fast but not ssm. I would still recommend buying only under heavy discount. It is a lens that is worth 800 € ... sent on October 01, 2011 |
 | Sony A350 Pros: Display adjustable stabilized sensor (the first was in 2009) with traditional Autofocus Live View Cons: noisy from ISO 800 onwards only 3 fps Viewfinder dim especially in macro. Opinion: Reduce by two bridges minolta without the slightest hint of a problem, I have seen a good eye sony. In my experience it was essential to the stabilizer and I noticed that no macro lens was then stabilized, let alone the cheapest sigma. Dealing with standard zoom lens, the NIKON and CANON stabilized cost an eye, the optic used was made of old and not sabilizzate. Best Fixed Canon and Nikon (35 - 50. 85mm) still NOT have stabilized ... Moral of the story? I had a great desire to macro, then the two lenses side by side with the kit was a 50mm f1, 4 with which photographer at night by hand, and the sigma 105 macro. total cost € 420 ... The recent marriage with the excellent Zeiss 16-80 gave me even emotions. I'm really pleased. Who will instead use the remote often opt for optical stabilized then other brands (even in the viewfinder in fact there are no flicker) and also those who want to take pictures of sports, will limit both the rumoroisità over 800 ISO in frames per second. A salutone sent on July 10, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
