JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD : Specifications and Opinions

Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD

The Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2008 to 2020 (discontinued). The focus is done by Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic), it does not have image stabilization. The average price was 642 €;

83 users have given it an average vote of 9.3 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.

Sony A-mount: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Sony A-mount.

Pentax: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Pentax.

Specifications
Focal lenght	70-200 mm
Angle of view	34.4 - 12.4°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.8
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	19 elements in 16 groups
Min. focus distance	0.95 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.32x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, interal
Stabilization	No
Focus	Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	Yes
Extenders	Yes
Filters	77 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	No
Weight	1330 g
Dimensions	90 x 194 mm
Buy
Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Paolo Calderara

sent on March 13, 2025

Pros: Price, color rendering, image balance (sharpness, colors, detail)

Cons: manual focus, weight (but with 2.8 brightness at all apertures is normal), no weather sealing

Opinion: In 2020 I bought a Pentax k1 Mk 2 camera body which in my opinion is an excellent camera except for sports photos, with too low shutter speed. In addition to the Pentax 24-70 I needed a medium telephoto and I was leaning towards the 70-200. I have been monitoring the price of the Pentax 70 200 f2.8 for a year but the price has never dropped below 1800 €, excluding purchases from Japan / USA or "scam" suppliers. I found the Used Tamron for less than 400 € and I didn't hesitate to buy it. It was a surprise !. Apart from the fact that it is in excellent condition, it works really well and pairs great with the K1. The autofocus works well, at least for landscape and portrait photos. The greatest advantages are the balance of the images (detail with the full frame, colors, sharpness) and the solid construction. In my kit there are mainly Pentax lenses but I also have two Sigma, including the 150 - 500 mm that I use with the Pentax K 5 for sports photos. I tried to compare the Sigma 150-500 with the Tamron at the same focal length (200mm) and I have to say that the Tamron comes out on top with no history. I know that this is an incorrect comparison due to the difference in characteristics of the two lenses. The Tamron is on another level and deserves the SP (Superior performance) label in its own right. I agree with those who say that the age of a lens (2008 in this case) is not necessarily a problem: a good lens remains a valid friend if used for what its potential is. It makes no sense to compare a lens that costs less than €400 with an original that you don't get for less than €1800.

Carlojvan Pellegrini

sent on August 18, 2023

Pros: Construction, aesthetics, balance

Cons: Lack of tropicalization, stabilization and focus stroke limiter.

Opinion: Purchased instead of the Nikon 70/200 f4 VR, built in Thailand, after owning the top, for others, Nikon 70/200 f2.8 VR, I must say that it is an excellent lens with an amazing value for money. I read about speed problems for AF, not suitable for sports photography; looking in the Sports gallery, the photos of Philip Mok, I realize that, if I achieve similar results, for me it would be more than fine. Tested on planes on landing, it's fine at the moment. I have it for too little to say more, but from the first photos I consider it suitable for me. I reserve the right to post more, positive or negative, when I have tried it on outdoor courts or in gyms. For now it is a pleasure to have it. Sorry to intrude

Lorenzo Vezzali

sent on May 03, 2021

Pros: Optical performance, price, aesthetics, macro (little macro).

Cons: Manuel focus NOT continuous, AF useful only for static photos.

Opinion: I have to say thank you to Tamron for creating this goal, which allows photo amateurs like me to approach a lens with professional openness without too much expense. This 70-200 f2.8 was my photography school and I'm very fond of it. Let's start with listing its flaws, first of all the non-continuous manual focus and the autofocus itself. Let's be clear, nowadays this is a lens that lends itself to landscape and portrait use, however the AF sometimes does not find the subject, even if stationary, and consequently looks for it from 0.95m until infinity. Especially for this reason the inability to act in full time MF makes the shooting experience nervous. The manual focus, however, is managed by a beautiful and large ring placed at the end of the barrel. What convinced me instead is optical performance. Tamron wasn't churning out targets like the G2 at the time, able to compete with nikon ones, but I think he did a better job with this lens than expected. To make you understand I also have a newer 24-70 2.8 G1 and I think this 70-200 is relatively superior to him, especially in colors. Finally the lens is sharp already at TA (except in close ups where at 2.8 it is soft), while closing it becomes very sharp. The lack of stabilisation is certainly felt when the light falls, but honestly I have never felt able to criticize it for this also because I prefer not to have it rather than have a poor stabilization from the non-first-class objective of 2008.

Lorenzo C.

sent on July 04, 2020

Pros: Sharpness, bright, price on used (and also on the new actually), macro function.

Cons: Weight not indifferent, not stabilized.

Opinion: Taken 3d days ago, done some testing on the field and. what to say: for the price on the used is excellent. Bright at all openings, crisp and excellent color rendering. The focus is a little ballerina sometimes (I use it on Sony a7rii with Sigma adapter for Canon) but using it in manual the thing does not bother me that much. The lack of stabilization and weight make it a piece to be used almost exclusively on tripod (at least for me that with the adapter the internal stabilization of Sony is disabled). It has its years, but all in all for those who do not want to spend a fortune on the Canon or Nikon counterparts and want excellent results, it is an alternative to take into account. Do I recommend it? I'd say so.

Roland Barthes

sent on October 03, 2019

Pros: Sharpness

Cons: Weight

Opinion: Excuse me I read in some opinion this phrase referring to this lens "... seniority of the project." Frankly I do not understand, the geometric optics have not been modified by the theory of relativity, and, more or less, it is from the time of Baruch Spinoza that lenses are made in the same way. Would anyone say that the Carl Zeiss Biogon project is outdated? No, because, like the ZEISS Biogon T-28mm f/2.8 ZM Lens Mount Leica M, f/2.8, it costs over 1,000 euros. I." given the seniority of the project" I would like to have it in my kit.

There are 28 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD

Arianna

by Deanbauer79
39 comments, 41072 views

Fires in Calenzano

by Gaetano Catalano
108 comments, 31779 views [editors pick]

Mother girl, Calcutta

by Genesis
67 comments, 6877 views [editors pick]

My Landscape

by Ez1984
93 comments, 6299 views

"An ordinary place"

by Ez1984
51 comments, 5352 views

Sunset on the Hills

by Ez1984
44 comments, 6802 views

Marche Landscape

by Ez1984
52 comments, 5476 views

Italian Hills

by Ez1984
38 comments, 5803 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Coca-Cola

by Niccolo' Morando
24 comments, 3318 views [editors pick]

HI RES 10.2 MP

Erika 2

by David Coen
23 comments, 33285 views

Cypress Sunset

by Fascione
35 comments, 6159 views

The Storm

by Ez1984
40 comments, 3037 views

Super happy

by Philip Mok
116 comments, 6989 views

HI RES 7.0 MP

Primordialis

by Peli840
46 comments, 3971 views

Want to emerge

by Turibol
68 comments, 5172 views

Just 02 portraits

by Danielerudian
21 comments, 12861 views

HI RES 12.2 MP

Erika 1

by David Coen
19 comments, 19276 views

Thoughts

by Tia90
40 comments, 4238 views

HI RES 24.1 MP

Italian Hills

by Ez1984
29 comments, 4222 views

Morning gold

by Turibol
62 comments, 4290 views

Stratifications

by Ilmore52
81 comments, 8161 views

Vanity fair

by Turibol
65 comments, 4236 views

Yulia

by Deanbauer79
11 comments, 14427 views

Jennifer

by Deanbauer79
12 comments, 4210 views

Yin Yiang

by Turibol
83 comments, 5233 views

The Paradise of flamingos

by Enrico Chiavassa
41 comments, 5877 views

Orissa, India

by Genesis
26 comments, 2904 views

Zinat River

by Massimopitorri
28 comments, 2830 views

Come our

by Turibol
50 comments, 3368 views

Shaen

by Deanbauer79
11 comments, 7598 views

The fog in the forest

by Ilmore52
60 comments, 4210 views

Marillie, Marillie,

by Pierluigi Andronico
15 comments, 4470 views

HI RES 20.0 MP

Fly ... in the blue painted blue ...

by Enrico Chiavassa
38 comments, 6203 views

Splash!...

by Ahalm
35 comments, 7408 views

HI RES 20.8 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

The sentinels of the Val d'Orcia

by Enrico Chiavassa
33 comments, 2865 views

Dolomites!

by Ilmore52
32 comments, 5119 views

I can fly

by Philip Mok
61 comments, 1972 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Tamron » Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD

Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD