|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Sceriffoh725 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Sceriffoh725  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Apple iPhone 15 Pros: General performance and dimensions. Cons: With covers in summer and pushing the processor, the temperature rises quite a bit. The most malicious app for temperature seems to be Instagram. Opinion: After years of Android, switching to IOS was all in all simple. Maybe it's because with Android you fiddle more but using an Apple is much easier and more practical to me. It is true that I now use the phone for what I need and not for apps that are sometimes not necessary, but with Apple everything always works well. On the photography side, I don't mind at all. In daylight, without looking for microscope monitor magnifications, the photos are beautiful and workable. I was amazed by the use in low light which I consider exceptional since it is still a smartphone. sent on July 21, 2024 |
 | Fujifilm XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR Pros: Crystal clear with excellent colors. Cons: For me that I do not have a Fuji stabilized under certain times microcosm. Opinion: Fantastic lens for sharpness and color rendering. Corrected to the unbelievable. Difficult to find, considering the balance of power to be taken into account, an equivalent in ff. As I wrote in the cons, for me who am content with an xe1, I often rip off the micromove. I don't even find it unbalanced; it will be that using it 2 hands mounted on a camera that weighs less than him, the ratio of forces predominates on the hand and arm for me on the left with firm grip. Last consideration not related to the lens but to the use of software, in jpeg or tiff is really impressive the engraving and detail that you appreciate by opening the files with Canon dpp, not the 4 but previous versions. sent on June 18, 2022 |
 | Fujifilm X-E1 Pros: A lot of stuff in little space. 16 mpx quality. Cons: The good 18 55 limits it quite a bit in a low light. Opinion: Light and essential camera, produces more than good files. I use it mainly with the 35 1.4 and 14 2.8 and with the fixed, compared to the zoom, the photos have a well-marked and very pleasant character and is more than satisfactory the speed and accuracy of the focus. Irreplaceable for street. The new, much better performing models have more technology on board but to my taste a less pleasant file. sent on November 02, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM Pros: Many. Cons: Needless to hide them just for love. Opinion: The lens is not difficult to describe because what is written about him is not all but so much truth. Definitely not as sharp and correct as the other 50 but it has so much more than others do not have. First of all the colors, really something that fascinates along with the "crazy" deadlift if you shoot at full opening. And then the focus, even if a little lazy, does not fail the shot if you know how to aim. In short, from 1.2 to 2.8, thanks to the af system of the reflex, you have to learn to manage it and it does not disappoint you, but it is not so difficult and impossible to tame it. Without having it and reading only a few reviews, perhaps there remains the fear of buying a rip-off, but it is not the truth. sent on June 20, 2019 |
 | Fujifilm XF 14mm f/2.8 R Pros: Sublime Lens. Cons: I haven't found it yet. Opinion: After 35 1.4 The 14 2.8 cannot be missed. What to add to what has already been said, I do not know. It then remarks two of the most important features it has and that make it a fantastic wide angle, peripheral sharpness and distortion. I think in Fuji, he, the 35 1.4 and the 40 150 2.8 do kit without needing to add more. sent on May 17, 2019 |
 | Zeiss Touit 32mm f/1.8 Pros: Well built and so much optical quality. Cons: I expected more but probably for very subjective issues. Opinion: In the end, love was not tripped with this lens. Used with Fuji has always been competing with the 35 1.4 and eventually won this. The Zeiss is not a bad lens indeed. Beautiful colors, beautiful the blurred, more neutral and predictable lens of the Fuji, perhaps the edges even sharper, beautiful three-dimensionality by contrast, minor A.C. but the character of the 35 1.4 at the end prevailed. I did not notice differences on the speed and accuracy of the focus, the operation seemed to me equal. In conclusion, perhaps the Zeiss are part of a photographic world different from the most practiced and proposed and can for this not be well understood and pay pawn, or more simply, as in my case, you prefer other regardless. sent on February 27, 2019 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: Legerezza in all senses and raw quality. Cons: Unfortunately when it came out it was not needed to equip it with AF and higher performance shutter speeds. They knew they were still selling tons. Opinion: For some photographic scopes perhaps the best Canon of the old generation. No need for optics and PC to scream to be squeezed and in my opinion this is good. Forgive enough but still true is that under exposes half a stop in evaluative except with the 35 F2 is that F2 is also transmittance. Having also the 5d3 file is more "oily" less detailed but I repeat for some photographic scopes this is only good. Today they are sold used less than a third of the new a few years ago and so who wants and can has way to try the "mythical" photographic world of the FF. sent on September 24, 2018 |
 | Canon 5D Mark III Pros: Professional. Cons: Photographic quality not better than sister 6d. Opinion: Great Photographic tool. The shot is not wrong and can handle very well many situations and conditions. All in favor of an extremely professional and balanced result. Great AF, excellent color balance and exposure just slightly below the correct. Very good Iso but not stratospheric. As against I indicated the photographic quality not better than the 6d, and for me possedendole both so it turns out. Surely the evaluation is dictated by conditions of visual sensations and personal analysis. Of the two rooms so much has already compared and clarified. If Canon had mounted the sensor 6 on the machine 5iii, surely, for some but many photographic genres would not have served other cameras for several years with great peace for monkeys and deniers. sent on May 12, 2018 |
 | Fujifilm XF 35mm f/1.4 R Pros: Many. Cons: Few. Opinion: Always very sharp in the center and closing a bit across the entire frame. Beautifully blurred, a very successful blend between the confused and the foggy, great colors and so much ease of use of the fuji system. Compared to my 50 sigma much less perfect and for this and other features in my taste you know how to love more. Stitches apart, body and hoods gorgeous. Always precise even with low lighting but it does slow down, but I repeat without losing the precision. Perfection in photography is measurable but the satisfaction and the taste of photographing and enjoying the result using a tool rather than another no, so for me deserves a good 10. sent on May 21, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: See opinion. Cons: Same as above. Opinion: Honest and genuinely fantastic. The use of both full that APSC and have never been disappointed. I always take home fantastic shots. If I had to choose only one among my goal, this wins. I think that all assessments have an important subjective component often full of expectations that can be betrayed but this canon does not really mind and does not disappoint. I'm tempted by the brothers with superior brightness but I'm afraid of losing the ease and assurance of use that this 70200 is capable of giving. sent on April 23, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Crisp, af fast and accurate, stabilizer and weight for the category. Cons: The 24 mm. Opinion: For value for money there is no better. The overall yield is always high in the face of those goals, give a click on 10 formidable and the other 9 leave you with a bitter taste. The stabilizer works best of modern although activated long before crossing the threshold of safety times. Canon colors and contrast, almost impossible not to recognize his picture. Only F4? F are used to more open canvas above 300 mm and 24 mm from the corner down; This is a "handyman" and F4 is her why because the F4 ever cheated once by a consistent and accurate af.F open, from 35 to 150 mm, in my opinion need any more for the pdc that for speed . My repurchase is a 2013; I think Canon has quietly revised and improved optics without calling it "II" not to penalize other Zoom products, certainly better but different and very much more expensive. Sooner or later will the "II" but I hope not dot tutto just how crisp the rest forgetting too that's good in the "I". sent on October 18, 2015 |
 | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: --- Cons: --- Opinion: Tried borrow for a few months, then bought. Sometimes in post sharpness because they take off from too much but for this often compensates for the need of a canvas. Until now he has never betrayed the fire plan (Canon 6d and 100d) or electromechanical presented abnormalities. No need correction data why not aim is nothing to correct; truly amazing lack of chromatic noise, distortions and abnormal optical inhomogeneities. If you already have lenses important try and weigh up the purchase; when mounted to the body the rest of the outfit would be more and more often at home. I find indispensable compare other similar optical maybe designed and built not only for digital as well or expressly for the film and therefore have specific qualities, strengths and weaknesses. 50 mm This is a real tool to take pictures. sent on January 09, 2015 |
 | Canon 100D Pros: Lightness, handle (despite the size and my hands are not small), sensor quality more than good considering the level of membership, as the screen and position controls. It has everything to learn and go further without investing too much. Cons: Flasher just enough, battery life (but only if you do not consider the benefits of size and weight in the game). Opinion: With the Canon 100D has put on the market a camera "trap"; when used with optical kit we are located just a short time later, but dissatisfied, always Canon has made in my opinion the master stroke by pushing the 100D with the 40mm f2.8 stm (loss of quality because although on aps- c I think most versatile a fixed 28 mm). I think most people who buy an SLR do to try to go beyond the photographs and memories, having tried for a few weeks the 40 f2.8 on the 100D, the combination creates a very good condition and very inspiring to want to go out and photograph. I personally use the "small" with different optics and 70% returns me to the first shot, and without too much work setting, the result I want, obviously thinking to post production. I do not evaluate the video part because until now never used a camera to make movies. sent on June 18, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
