JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 176000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Portability, value for money, ease of use, vastness of the screen, AF center point, touchscreen display
Cons:ISO high noise
Opinion:I will never stop thanking Canon for creating this little gem without which, probably, I would never have approached the world of photography. It is a simple, reliable and discreet machine that in such a small body already has everything it takes to learn the various photographic techniques. And just its portability made me choose, I didn't want anything too bulky and heavy and, if that's what you're looking for, little Canon is the entry level par excellence. Among other things it has the indisputable advantage of having a virtually infinite optical park thanks to the EF attack and has always returned to me excellent images with whatever lens I have tried, including those of compatible brands. Great the AF, especially the center point, personally I use only that and I recompose the framing because doing so is always very precise. After 5 years of happy use I decided to switch to the full frame (but I kept it as the second body for the less demanding exits), only because of the poor sensor tightness at high ISO (photographer often after sunset and over ISO 1600 the noise is clearly visible) , but in my opinion it's really the only flaw. One could also mention the non-excellent battery life, but basically just a few euros to buy a spare one or, at the very least, the lack of wi-fi but this i consider marginally important. Very recommended to those who want to spend little and have in their hands a small but "real" reflex in all respects.
Pros:Small, light, handy, touch-screen, silent shutter, good JPEG files and excellent raw, built-in flash.
Cons:High ISO seal, battery life, not easy grip for big hands, non-orientable monitor.
Opinion:Socket used at €180. With 9,000 shots and lens of the kit to use it on trips, excursions and small trips, it turned out to be a real surprise in spite of the small and plasticous body. The controls and the touch respond very well and the camera returns very good files, especially with the 17-40 L and Col 70-200 L IS USM. It surprises also the general rendition of the Small and light handyman 18-55 of the kit that is more than dignified (I expected worse). Excellent files up to 400 ISO, from 800 ISO up starts to see some correctable noise in P.P.; From 3200 up the noise is a bit excessive for my liking, but you can still make free-hand shots with little light, especially in uniformly lit environments. The camera, the 18-55, the 50mm f. 1.8 and two spare batteries enter comfortably into my purse and accompany me with satisfaction on trips, small trips and excursions. When I go out just to take pictures, instead, (and I do not want to get the weight of the F.F.), I put it in a small shoulder strap with the 17-40 L USM and the 70-200 L IS USM and the results are still more than satisfactory. Obviously this camera is not comparable to the performance of the Canon 6D, but I honestly recognize that some shots made to the same subjects, on tripod, with the same lenses and focal, first with the 100 D and then with the 6D but Croppati of about 1.5 ( So at the APS-C sensor level) They proved to be qualitatively equivalent because I have not been able to find obvious differences.
Opinion:I bought a new one at the end of production at the price of Euro 379 in kit with 18 55 3.5-5, 6 Stm. Excellent for easy exits with pancakes,. It ' a Canon project in my humble opinion perfectly. Without the need to buy a second kit, I exploit the EF optics if necessary and, if necessary, also the advantages of the reduced size. Of course it has its limits, already widely highlighted but, as I always say, you must always go down to some compromise. Highly recommended spare battery.
Pros:Footprint, raw file, touch screen, good sensor rendition, PDC preview key, exposure bracketing, used price.
Cons:Limited ISO seal, small handle, battery life, jpg
Opinion:I have this entry-level for 4 years, bought with a certain skepticism on SLR cameras, had the merit of making me passionate about photography, is lightweight, practically pocket-sized with pancakes 24 or 40 mm, the yield of the sensor is good and improves with optical level ( Tried with satisfaction Canon 70-200 2.8 is and Sigma 35-70 2.8), the high ISO yield is of course Limited (max 800 still well machinable in PP), the size of the raw is contained then manageable. I would not recommend it to anyone who has huge hands because the handle is small, with the external flash ng60 is actually unbalanced so I equipped it with a Godox TT 350c Flash (perfectly compatible) which is less powerful but for amateur use can go and the whole thing is more Balanced. The memory card is together with the battery so if you put it on a tripod to remove it you have to detach it and it can be uncomfortable. The rendition of JPG files with the default settings is, in my opinion, a little ' thrust and you can see some artifact that disappears with a more accurate setting. With a charge the yield is about 300 photos as long as you limit the use of the display which is also excellent, in Live View.... as well as for the videos, buy more batteries. The autofocus with 9 points, but only the cross-section is sufficiently precise for amateur use. In conclusion if you scare the weights and dimensions of the older sisters and fear to leave the reflex in the drawer the 100d is for you....... highly recommended.
Pros:Footprint, manageability, good RAW files, price, Touch, AF, excellent entry level...
Cons:Plasticosa, non-optimal grip, Jpeg, slightly restrictive Iso
Opinion:I have this little SLR for a couple of years, bought to support a FF system always Canon, so I tried "good" optical and the sensor output is cmq satisfactory. The purchase was motivated especially when you do not want to bring the heavy FF kit, often in view in European cities with the 24 2.8 STM and the 50 1.8 stm, you bring home good files, with really minimal footprints... and obvious that it is an entry level and is a little limited , but it has everything you need. The use of a little ' luminous optics helps not to balance the gap of an ISO not exceptional... for the rest at the price that can be found in the used is a good choice for those who want to have always at hand a "discreet" small reflex...
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
