|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Campitelli Riccardo www.juzaphoto.com/p/CampitelliRiccardo  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 180mm Macro f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Pros: Good Af, fast precise no calibration ... !!!! ??? and good as well with Nikon 1.4 Cons: weight! weight! weight! mmm ... then every time the stabilizer is turned on ... Opinion: there is not 70 200 to hold ... kind of optical aberrations to look for with 200 300%, now used only for portraits, very blurry good engraving throughout the frame, great stabilizer but ... for me it would be pretty much perfect if it was not a whalebone nearly 2 kg !!! To say the old nikon 180 2.8 is not so evolved, it's not macro, it's not stabilized, weighs less than half ... 760 grams, though, here's my heretic part .... better or the like? 200 f 2 vr ??? for some could be a viable alternative (to the King 200 F2) cheap and even light ... gulp .. I said ... indeed .. I also wrote it !!! sent on October 17, 2017 |
 | Nikon D600 Pros: FX, Light, good files, high iso estate, affordable price, Cons: sometimes abnormal battery consumption, even bufer a bit small, no crop mode 1.2. Opinion: the first fx for all ... thanks to the fall in prices of usato..sinceramente by jumping from right to fx I thought there was an enormity for many kinds, if you do not use higher sensitivity 800 1600 current dx are not so far away , then we would see with D500, in fact the real difference comes out with shorter type 35 24 1.4 optical light fixed where the fund's dividend seems more obvious, especially because in three-dimensional dx missing competitor might be the only one that actually 18 35 1.8 equivalent to a 2.7 on fx, are 2 stops ... in this regard would be interesting to have the crop type 1.2 d810 d750 because as I found some optical dx discreetly covering this format. As for the system af I felt always complain about an already inferior to the d800, so it was said that foosse more powerful and had a more extensive air, true shame that the side sensors were not that much that the next 810/750 modules have shrunken the whole af area approaching the fattola copof the bore of the Multicam 3500 to 4800. Manuals to hand in a normal environment (the change ev) THE MULTICAM 4800 seems to work better with optical F4 combined with tc 1.7, or with optical af 6.7, in fact, lost only three points on each side af, against a heavy loss (allopecia style) af points of multicam 3500 and this even in the most advanced versions .. (see Page 430 D750 VS PAGE 287 D 600). another side that I found strange is the excessive consumption of the battery, verificare.Per else I have to say that the more you will go less parra must update the next fx the premiums level is very high we are no longer at the D .. 100 jumps technologists are less than one time and the level reached allows you to do a great 3200 6400 files that make it less necessary updates ... I see more evolutionary necessary margin of dx of 4/3 .... So now the advantage of the D600 fx in particular it is that it feels less time and the need to update sent on February 21, 2016 |
| Nikon D600 Pros: FX, Light, good files, high iso estate, affordable price, Cons: sometimes abnormal battery consumption, even bufer a bit small, no crop mode 1.2. Opinion: the first fx for all ... thanks to the fall in prices of usato..sinceramente by jumping from right to fx I thought there was an enormity for many kinds, if you do not use higher sensitivity 800 1600 current dx are not so far away , then we would see with D500, in fact the real difference comes out with shorter type 35 24 1.4 optical light fixed where the fund's dividend seems more obvious, especially because in three-dimensional dx missing competitor might be the only one that actually 18 35 1.8 equivalent to a 2.7 on fx, are 2 stops ... in this regard would be interesting to have the crop type 1.2 d810 d750 because as I found some optical dx discreetly covering this format. As for the system af I felt always complain about an already inferior to the d800, so it was said that foosse more powerful and had a more extensive air, true shame that the side sensors were not that much that the next 810/750 modules have shrunken the whole af area approaching the fattola copof the bore of the Multicam 3500 to 4800. Manuals to hand in a normal environment (the change ev) THE MULTICAM 4800 seems to work better with optical F4 combined with tc 1.7, or with optical af 6.7, in fact, lost only three points on each side af, against a heavy loss (allopecia style) af points of multicam 3500 and this even in the most advanced versions .. (see Page 430 D750 VS PAGE 287 D 600). another side that I found strange is the excessive consumption of the battery, verificare.Per else I have to say that the more you will go less parra must update the next fx the premiums level is very high we are no longer at the D .. 100 jumps technologists are less than one time and the level reached allows you to do a great 3200 6400 files that make it less necessary updates ... I see more evolutionary necessary margin of dx of 4/3 .... So now the advantage of the D600 fx in particular it is that it feels less time and the need to update sent on February 21, 2016 |
 | Nikon 1 AW1 Pros: UNDERWATER robust and high quality video..af continuous shooting Cons: Like all Nikon 1 cumbersome unintuitive little Nikon !!!! Opinion: I was intrigued by the idea of ??a car 360 degrees small fast fast, really it tropicallized more .. indeed sub, but the default is always the same ... I've already had a v1 v2 v3..anche I tried this though more justified , it is one that is not a nikon NIKON !!!! as all ONE, all counterintuitive buttons uncomfortable improbable menu and sub-menu, the ISO button ??? it takes so ?? one command for diaphragms one difficult times ?? video formats all in the usual menu utopia ?? ?? all UNO seems to be designed in a closet by an engineer who did the machines for Epson ... THAT EVEN THE CANTEEN lunched FACTORY ONCE a sociopath .... !!!! the potential is there but it is very usable ... and then .. a pair of optical zoom 2.8 also no sub ... rnNello specific AW1, the machine has two flaws, the flash sync 1/60 and CONDENSA on front lens but I say ... but here the lens their designers ?? !! girlfriend imaginary sociopath above ??? It is but the problem is only in summer... But I think it's normal to use such a machine just in the summer ... not ?? But there is a BUT, called NIKON NC AW a neutral density filter that I have completely solved the problem .. but what about after the obvious merits of the first complaint had to be included in the package Aw1 not? rnih end but here I exaggerate, if they put a viewfinder .. no !! maybe even that was condensation. sent on January 09, 2016 |
 | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: sharp is an understatement ... a nice Vetrone heavy solid .. if we were writing Zeiss and took away the af..ci I fell .. Cons: front / back focus and too many m.pixel from contare..ci scemisco !! ops but I know that is not a fault ?? !!! ... a bit bland to prissy miss the gasket for the wet ... and it cost so much more ?. Opinion: 3B the absolute neutrality of colors I have not yet figured out if it's a defect or a virtue, I see this whole three-dimensionality that I see instead of lenses less clear .... I do not know the old 301.4 it seemed more 3d .. I do not know then maybe depends these days a little gray ... for me it is a great lens scontatamente certainly no major flaws, but is it any good? regarding the blurred and I have not pinned against light until now no downside but the evidence is still poche..ma update. sent on December 15, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 17-35mm f/2.8 D ED Pros: 2.8, 77 filters, saturated colors but natural skin tones, excellent used. Cons: excessive distortions on edges at 17 with aberrations of all tipi..vignetta 2.8 but for portraits may be an advantage Opinion: taking lens used coupled with D7000in pending before the passage in fx. now in D600 expresses its real potential .. that dire..veramente multipurpose, made me discover the pleasure of portraits settled, is not crystal clear indeed my tokina 12 24dx seems to have better edges, but the 17 35 has better color fidelity and against the loss in contrast is less obvious but more especially clean, the focal 30-35 more congenial to me has a good three-dimensional (certainly not a 35 1.4) I think for the naturalness that gives the tonal passages, the picture probably accomplice technology of the new CMOS fx, generally does not require big changes if a ritocchino the contrast curve, but then again it is not a lens for fans of pixels 100% for the type of photos they wish to address, the images it produces are seen to what they are, not lines / mm, there are other lenses for it ... I like my cosi.rnp.s is older and not fischia.rnrnrnrn sent on October 27, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF 135mm f/2 D DC Pros: 135 mm more compact and discreet Cons: to f2 do not look at the pixel is not the case Opinion: a lens of another time, when they used Vaseline on the lens ... I tried it, well, well just using the normal diaphragms, the defocus requires a thorough test, the results too variable to be matched to the change of the diaphragm, it is not easy to understand I think that sometimes it's more clear when it is added to that when it is zero ... oh, well. ?? .. it takes longer ... rn Proven on both FX and on dx..a f2 light passes right in all photos are beautiful saturated colors and c is a good contrast, but if it looks good c is a heavy ball that takes aberazione microcontrast, a green and purple to no end on the already blurred slightly contrasting light not to mention the metal surfaces .. .and a pochina vignetting want it ?? it is close .... rnpoi a stop ... and everything changes ... another lens, engraved throughout the frame, delicate strokes of color saturation incredibly three-dimensional solid red .... ... that strong .. but polite ... but c 'is a but .. it is light years away from a good 70 200 !! I expected better ... and how to havea Ferrari that goes a bit 'better than a Golf GTi pumped ... (oh god !! actually is course also costs more) rnche know I was expecting something like a 200 f2 vr miniature, they are the 70 200 remain in the post ... devastante.Magari the new version soon ... ??? sent on November 12, 2014 |
 | Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX DC HSM (old) Pros: 1.4 and tridimensionalitàrn Cons: Finish Sigma, SIN ONLY DX (35 sigma has just come out), the af in video mode on D 7000 does not go ... and the normal af should however be calibrated for each individual machine. I would have liked a working distance a tad bit less than say 35 to 30 cm that would give him a little arrow more ... Opinion: L 'I took my son when he arrived ... needless to say we are so fond of hand, if the subject is not too much to one side gives great shots, fuzzy creamy, excellent tonal passages, little dominant, not to mention the movie full hd, but .. c 'is a but ..... is not the optics to look for pixels, out of 10, 12 0 16 mp see little difference ........ but probably an optical portrait should be so ... rnPrima of this' optical I had never considered this focal length, I must say that to 1.4, clearly flying over the resolution, it returns an excellent three-dimensional .. the subject comes out well .. well well, in video then ... which made me think about what could give a perspective on FX so .. His Majesty 35 afs 1.4.rnIn recommended short, but today, on DX, would estimate even the little nikon 35 1.8 afs. sent on October 29, 2013 |
 | Nikon 105mm f/2.8 AF Micro Pros: Compact, heavy, with excellent tonal passages Cons: does not have the VR but in those days .... recently recorded at distances out macro .. Opinion: It seemed only right to post review of what has been my first optical pro. We must say that it is impossible to find 250 euro is also true that compared to what you paid, nowadays not to keep it ... L 'is compact optical filters from 52 mounts which allows you to insert the original doublets serious T (better if reversed even if it sounds weird) or invertirci the old 50, 35, 52 and 28 step if you please ... compared to more modern Vr loses something like sharpness Aperture average 8-11 (tested), but probably, and only my impression, it resists better than Aperture f16, more beautiful that also does not close too the shadows as his son .. GNI single tc that makes me good is an old tc 1.4a (tce also changed is incompatible), but involves close the aperture by hand, maybe a kenko pro ... rnFuori distances from macro I've never been convinced that much to what concerns the detail at wider apertures, some modern zoom make better .. rnNel complex for the macro resta a great choice and if you have the time and patience to search, can also be economic. sent on October 29, 2013 |
 | Nikon TC-14E II Pros: small and compact Cons: ?? Rn Opinion: Great multiplier are fully satisfied, af is fast ... there are dominant (as is already good on the kenko pro) on my optic them imperceptible signs of spherical aberration. For purists' s unique Tce worth having .... for a long time I did not understand because of the forum in orbit nikon tell you this .. I had the D70, D2x others ... now, after a while 'I understand why ... I said purists who in my opinion are the ones that do tests to ISO 100, and in fact that's where you see the difference with others where modern sensors do not forgive optical defects of any kind, where it is better to crop a file tce1.4 rather than enter a tce 1.7 or 2x . Indeed, the 1.4 tce is strong it gets really hard to understand from a photo of the signs of his presence, even on optical pro to my eye it is impossible! In fact out of the stamps are now using higher ISO (which we all willingly accept), where the lack of micro-contrast lens becomes less noticeable for the sensor itself will become .... we ..."Short-sighted" and where the advantage of the digital crop improbabile.rnQuindi is great, the best, but the need is not that the others are unrealistic .. RNPs there is a version of "elderly" the TEC II 1.4 and optically identical, the Tce I, change the plugs, the writing, and the tooth of the bayonet in the least. From there, the change from the second to make it compatible with older lenses or Sigma or even stack it with other tce ... sent on October 29, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 G ED VR Pros: Great body on the right and on film even at 2.8 Cons: weakling in backlight, and not too pushed ... I remedied with a longer hood soo craft but makes his ... Opinion: Lens really sharp, blurred beautiful, fast AF, but AF performance is not the same in 70mmm and 200mm, holds up well the tc 1.4 multipliers can be an alternative to the 300 afs ... even the TC 1.7 is fine but begin to see a bit of aberazine ball that does not "cure" propio immediately by stopping the tce2 II Forget was fine on a d70 now with modern cars come out all the limits optical .. venduto..magari the tc2 III. .rnTrovo very useful limiter f, is a great advantage especially combined with the tc1.7.rnMi have paid for a full day the vr2 (my dealer wanted to sell it to me at all costs, along allla D3S I had not even Scrooge .. never mind, I was afraid to leave the shop) and I immediately noticed the great advantage of VR1 on subjects close to the focal length is 200 and the subjects are more obvious grandi..con vantaggi..per what little I've seen it seems to me that the optical performance is indistinguishable, VR1 vs vr 2 to a position so short in relation to the persons to whom it is addressed, I would say that changes little, at least I find it useless mobile objects fall below1/30 the time when the two worked steadily and surely better, but the picture will most likely move anyway ... then if one photographing the light poles then you, you may want ... get down with the tempi..rndiciamo surely the vr2 will be higher and maybe useful in combination with tce .. here we are ... ..but smooth them. RN12 novembre..aggiornamento, crossing fx, phew !!! I thought I have to change it .... ok I consider myself very lucky after several trials with control off, I notice that my copy is not in the cartoon fx .. (to be picky a tiny corner on the right if you're looking for photographing a white sheet and overexposing There is, but it is really very small in the frame ...) I documented and it seems that they are not a fly bianca..per I have not done scientific tests on the premises of the edges are designed to verify the sharpness, but the nose but not having post-production work to bring out the edges of the "dark" I guess is better already ... rnsarebbe interesting at this point to know what mom Nikon serial numbers give little problem ... I'm probably absurdly quelli newer, mine is one of the first credo..rn sent on December 22, 2012 |
 | Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.8 G Pros: Clear but with great focus, Cons: It seems a little leggerino .. I thought the box was empty ... hopefully not as fragile. Opinion: Beautiful lens, to make better, especially if the subject is close is necessary to make a regulation of af fino.rnlo blurred backgrounds that melts them is a pleasure without stifling tonal passage, so, those are really three-dimensional effect without that a little milky old style. I have not tried landscapes but if I so much as we also qui.rnPer curiosity as well as on fx right and I tried on the size cx .. a nice 230mm 1.8 but still well etched to make the same shot is retracted too cutout cx and you lose the blurry .. but sin is the law. sent on November 25, 2012 |
 | Nikon D7000 Pros: Good overall yield. Excellent shooting mode silenzioso.Una machine 360 ??with which you do a little of everything, has no major limiti.rn Cons: It is not the 'heir to the D300 .. rn 1) Does not have entry cards cf, sd only ... a little lentine ... RN2) The body is a bit small indeed, little ergonomic, or rather the fingers close on the wrong grip, which is too narrow and in addition, the 'target is too close to the lentern3) sin not the lcd adjustable, Olympus has since before the D 300, in macro and extract video seems very comodo.rn Opinion: Well, it was said a little everything, but I think I can add something not yet said. For me it was a bit a "reverse" I've got the D 300 and D 7000 for 7-8 months I used them together, the body is a bit too small for my taste and does not fit well in the hand, then there get used to it .. then .. then ... but no .. rnNon has the CF that are faster and I already had, and maybe a sd cf was not bad, up from 12 to 16 mp is irrelevant, the af a little lower, but basically on par with the old body. RNLA first thing I noticed from the first day of the colors and shading are generally ready files, but basically nothing unattainable with 300 in PP. The yield at high ISO up to 1600 is very similar but now I miss a little bit the exposure and the picture is good ... in addition, it is further obvious improvement, both of noise that malleability of the file, the whites do not burn as soon as you try to recover 1/3 ev ... sometimes the files I look good even in 3200, certainly not for everyone genres,or macro photos, but have a good margin of workability ... rnrnInsomma the real jump in quality for me was the dynamic range! another planet! and it does not stop at the lowest iso .. and from there remains a good degree of intervention in PP, well good Nikon.rnrn sent on November 25, 2012 |
 | Nikon AF-S 300mm f/2.8 G ED VR Pros: Clear from fear. Cons: Cost, Space Opinion: It cost me many hours of overtime, but it was worth it? Since it's practically a cashier I would say yes ... The yield of this lens I was thrilled .... to 2.8 is exceptional ... the focus, color saturation the three-dimensional .. the f ... in short, all the top .. Very favorably multipliers until at least tce 1.7, but dancing is another thing, 2.8 is a Martian ... The VR works well but I thought better, with TC1.7 monopod and have never been able to go below 1/160 maybe VR2 ... The only negative is the weight over the price, or better exploitability daily, for me I'm not a pro, it is a challenging lens when I go out with him I already know that picture I want to do, just requires an approach Pro .. if you go on vacation, it is he who chooses where to go! you always have to have a holiday photo ... Let's say that a 300 f4 afs is more mischievous, more to walk through the mountains, or if the photo does not happen at all the same ... sent on April 27, 2012 |
 | Nikon D2H Pros: FAST ... FAST ... FILE FINDER PRO LIGHT Cons: LCD HIGH LIGHTS Opinion: What about in the era of an old 4MP fx 36mp dx? A pro is a pro even if old, I bought it to take off a whim thinking of selling it in a little while ... I had the best D 300 .. The viewfinder outstanding (the mirror and pentaprism are derived from the f5 ..) readiness to shoot, and the sensitivity of the button are devastating, just trying a D3 you can understand .. L f and really good it seemed not so much faster, but stronger than that of D 300. The sensor has a yield LABCAST particular, very crisp and dry, hard to explain, let's say that I often find myself in 100% view shots and go beyond believing not be reached already 100%. I know that at the time the PRO interpolavano heavily on his file, I printed up A2 but comfortably .. The use of the obligation of Raw is not so much for the detail, but for the highlights, which peels a little too big for the grandchildren, the advantages are lightweight file is for computers for modern CF are endless. Sore LCD of the machine, unreliable for color and this time also for the display of thumbnails so that it is always best to check the histogram ... The yield of iso say that goes a little better than the D 200 / D 80 but not in all cases .. I tried to see her a few times but the last wing end I always reverse ... sent on April 27, 2012 |
 | Sigma 50-500mm f/4-6.3 EX DG HSM Pros: 50 500 "opportunity compositional" Cons: 50 500 Opinion: Really a lens, a kit ... I miss a bit, hunting and photographic composition a boon for the yield must be content with the branches behind the subject you could see a bit of astigmatism, sharpness variable on a distant subject not great, few crop so to speak. Even with small subjects, close to 5-6 metrii goes a little better, I would say is that I miss them for the "opportunity of composition." Motor usm not very fast indeed the old Sigma 80 400 non-motorized os was faster on my nikon bodies. Relatively heavy, 500mm! the handle is convenient for transportation, burst of obligation, the monopod .. well! Sold for 300 afs incomparable otticamene. sent on April 26, 2012 |
 | Nikon TC-17E II Pros: High quality Cons: Auto focus slows to 300 f4 afs Opinion: Comfortable with excellent performance on all of my paintings and zoom (300 afs afs vr f 4300 08.02 70 200) increased in all cases the old tce 2X series II ... I'll explain on all lenses above the crop of tce 1.7 makes it better than the 2X II tce not cropped. Some close 1/3 or 1/2 stop is not bad .. Recently I also tce 1.4 but for now I do not see great advantages optical, maybe it's more evident a more ready f ... especially with afs f4. Last consideration should be made with the combination of 70 200 vr that I found most performing of the 80 400 .. sent on April 26, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
