JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Nikon D600 is a reflex camera with FF (1.0x) sensor and 24.3 megapixels manufactured from 2012 to 2013 (discontinued). The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 50 - 25600 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 5.5 FPS. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1433 €;
107 users have given it an average vote of 9.3 out of 10
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 201000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Used value for money, file quality sometimes higher than some current cameras
Cons:Don't have it in your bag
Opinion:Nikonista for 38 years..... I think I've had and tried everything from analog, digital SLLRs to Mirrorles all at Nikon's house. But the Nikon D600 has remained in my heart I think perhaps among the best SLRs churned out by Nikon. Many complain, but find me a camera from 8 years ago that has this value for money (of the used) you have at your disposal an infinite optical park works everything at very affordable prices! A pure photo reflex suitable for everyone, including professionals still in 2020, does not have the autofocus and buffer and live View of the Z6, D500 etc... but if you need a better performing body there are other rooms, it is useless to criticize this. The tall Iso holds them very well, if you are a little awake in the post (with RAW Room or Lightroom) you can easily exceed 6400 without much trouble. Used with Nikkor G 1.8 lenses, it churns out spectacular files that are still perfectly current today, perfect in the wedding and for years that I have been using it together with many other professionals without problems. I recommend it especially to those who need a second level body without fainting, or for those who start instead of overpaying entry level of dubious quality with useless gadgets. With this you start great and maybe you also start learning to photograph.
Cons:Maybe autofocus but considering the age of the project there is
Opinion:Former Pentaxian ... passed to FF and then to Nikon ... step from d600 to d610 to d750 ... period interspersed with 2 fuji (but always with at least 1 FF Nikon) until the big jump to Sony ... 7 and 7 iir... due little time to devote to photography I sell everything ... unable to resist without camera I go back to Nikon and (re)I take the d600... little expense and a lot of yield; I've never been too convinced of Sony's electronic crosshairs and actually files. I find the best Nikon files despite having the same sensors; comparing the files of the a7 (actually in proportion also of the a7iir) with those of the d600 (and my old d750 with the Tamron 15 30 always mounted) honestly I find better the Nikons with a superior recovery especially of the shadows; I have to say that for the price paid I do not think it is better ... sometimes it's nice to think that you don't have to follow the fashions ... Nikon reflexes are always great, endless battery, top ergonomics.... small tanks... if you don't have special needs of af I think it's still very valid
Pros:Price now, sensor, iso reasonable, ergonomics, menu, weight and despite age is still valid
Cons:AF not lightning, video fps, burst, storage, shutter splashes oil
Opinion:I think I can do a review after 7 years of use and 80,000 shots. I'm going to the point, AF embarrassing with optics NOT Nikon gets to miss even 60 photos out of 100, you can put all the cards in the world but the storage is slow, maximum shooting time 1/4000, then all a fairy tale, used as the first camera flanked by D800E, D3 and D500, among the four my first car to put in the backpack is the D600, also because the D500 is sewn around the neck. Just know its diffs and then goes like a train, never stops, infinite battery, iso reasonable up to 6400. I had everything Nikon and I say ALL from 14mm 2.8 to 400mm 2.8 I sell everything or almost (no D500)x follow the mass and switch to Mirrorless Fuji, ......................... I manage to sell almost everything except the D600 does not want anyone, I work with fuji large machines, after 2 years I am selling fuji x review to Nikon (Reflex).
Opinion:Although it doesn't have a good reputation, the nikon D600 is a full-frame sensor reflex capable of bringing home top-notch work in all climatic and environmental conditions. Aesthetically it resembles the nikon D7200 but the sensor has high qualities that will only come out in the presence of professional optics. With the 50mm returns stunning images. Precise does not miss a shot, never a photo out of focus. In the used market there you buy with prices below an entry level.
Pros:Sensor that returns a good yield, double slot, ergonomics
Cons:Sensor gets dirty easily, awkward autofocus, live view ridiculous!
Opinion:Purchased a few months ago with just over 2000 shots practically new, at a very advantageous price, I knew of the known problems at the Sensor, but I always tried to clean them alone and I did not worry, double slots very useful, good ergonomics, good materials, the ghiere and selectors instead do not make me a good feeling, at least for what I expected both in terms of touch and functionality , especially of the blocks, I come from Canon systems, and in the night photography I have to say that I was disappointed by the live view, it is lower than more entry level of the same year, the menu is very intuitive even if you come from other systems it's all a bit where you expect, good dynamic range never the colors rendered found them a little cold, you need post production , the hold at the high ISO in general is good, needs to know it to understand how much you can push in various situations without suddenly generating too much noise, needless to give threshold values! The autofocus is embarrassing, both for the arrangement of the points and the functionality itself, perhaps the downside! Today the idea that I made of this machine is that it was developed with what was in the house, more than by a technical department from a commercial office on a Friday night! It's a shame! You can clearly see that the machine was "victim" of business choices, would you recommend it? Maybe as the first full frame, and for the possibility to use "old" lenses available at a good price of good quality, in short where you have to spend little and understand where you want to get!
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
