JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Nikon D600 is a reflex camera with FF (1.0x) sensor and 24.3 megapixels manufactured from 2012 to 2013 (discontinued). The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 50 - 25600 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 5.5 FPS. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1433 €;
99 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 181000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:I also made the transition from D7000 to D600. Taken used with 7100 shots of which only 2000 made after the replacement of the shutter. It's my first FF, I have yet to know it of course, but the first impressions are: absent iso noise, colors, incredible image quality. The autofocus area is not large but is still usable. The body has perfect weight and size (for me) and with the battery grip becomes even firmer in the hand. For my use has everything, now I have to learn to master it.
Pros:high iso yield, good sharpness, internal engine for af
Cons:for now none
Opinion:Bought today used: my first full frame. Compared to the d7000, still an exceptional machine, this monster outperforms it in everything. Being used to the apsc format, I expected to be interrupted by the fact that the af points are concentrated in the middle of the frame, but in reality I did well for now. I would like to add further considerations after a little practice
Opinion:The D600 was the second Full Frame heir to the Nikon F100 design after the D700. The improvements, compared to the D700, were remarkable, 24mpx versus 12, double memory slots, use of SD instead of CFs, video mode, 100% crosshair coverage but lost in bursts and, incredibly, in AF points. A shutter problem made life of the D600 very short (Nikon quickly and furiously replaced it with the D610). Reviewing it in 2019 makes you smile: compared to today's machines it lacks a huge number of features/features, from the LCD not tipper nor touch to the absence of Wi-Fi. I have owned it for years (without any shutter problem) and despite being an old lady, she produces beautiful files in every situation.
Pros:Construction, dynamic range, value for money, battery life
Cons:Known problem of shutter that soils the sensor.
Opinion:A tank with which you can do any kind of photography. For years it was my main machine and I did everything from studio photos to portraits, from architecture photos to show photos, from macros to sports to birdlife. I've had two in my life, the first purchased new, shutter replacement in warranty for known problem, then changed two more times for wear, more than 1 million shots in total. The second socket used at 500E practically new. There is, I believe, no other camera with equal value for money. Except for the D610 which is pretty much the same and is at a great price both new and used. A real work mule.
Pros:Best value for money in the entire FF panorama (other than D700...)
Cons:Obvious handicaps and castrations introduced by the mother on purpose to not cannibalize the market
Opinion:Had, sold to take the d750, then d810, then a7r, then d750 and finally d600 (with Olympus Intermezzo EM1 Mk2). What about, if I came back on this machine after all my laps, in addition to a speech of money, there is also a speech of "not betraying expectations": The machine is a trust allied, the performance are respectable, especially considering that to date, on the market , a FF at €500 or so, with this performance, you don't find it. And his sister d750 costs twice as much, I dare say unsubtly (if you do mostly landscape like me): The dynamic range at low ISO is better in Sister D600. is not an all around, in portraiture his points all concentrated in the center does not help (which is why the substitution), idem the absence of the screen tiltabile, if you feel the lack (I had even the one with the flexible arm on the Canon 600d and the First contact without tilt screen was traumatic). So, in conclusion, if you have reduced finances but you want to give a FF, this is the best solution. Is it worth the jump to the d750? If you need gust and points of MAF less in the center, you, otherwise spare yourselves those €300 and enjoy this without fears!
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
