RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Maraglia
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Maraglia



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Maraglia


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

kingston_sdhc16gb_r45w10Kingston SDHC 16 GB r45w10 (45 MB/s)

Pros: price, reliable brand, speed (for my needs)

Cons: Nobody

Opinion: For about 10-11 euros it's perfect for my 6D since I do not have special burst requirements (it comes to shoot 14 consecutive RAWs at 1/1000 times before taking the time to empty the buffer) and wanted to have multiple cards of this cut at a low price. rnCrystalDiskMark provides a maximum reading value of 28.5 mb / s of 14.5 mb / s in writing, not the best on the market but not bad.

sent on October 30, 2017


patona_4in1Patona 4in1

Pros: Versatile, can also be used with powerbank via USB, smaller than the original Canon

Cons: a bit 'slower (300mAh)

Opinion: Taken together with a compatible battery for Canon 6D on Amazon (23,99 €), is ideal for the reflex charge anywhere, even via powerbank (in addition to the wall outlet with 220V or caricacellulare microUSB or by car via the cigarette lighter) , it is also half compared to the original Canon size. Loads fine all the original and compatible batteries, only a bit 'slower (1200mAh original 300mAh against the Patona), but it is not necessarily a bad thing since most are loaded slowly and better ... and then you can always load around!

sent on June 06, 2016


manfrotto_pixiManfrotto Pixi

Pros: Small, robust, quality manfrotto

Cons: rarely becomes unbalanced

Opinion: Taken as a joke for self-portraits or long exposures ... surprised me! I said in rnCome against rarely with 6D + 24-105 is cautious, but just align a leg objective and the problem disappears. I also used with other fixed targets (28-50-100) and are increasingly pleased with this small but effective aid it would replace only if you had with extendable legs up to a meter but equally compact when folded, but obviously with these features would never be the same!

sent on June 02, 2016


canon_100_f2Canon EF 100mm f/2.0 USM

Pros: Bokeh, sharpness, color, iris 2.0

Cons: nobody

Opinion: I was really surprised by this goal: it is compact, clear already at f2.0, great bokeh, practically a brother of 135L but at half the price. Only known where I was hoping better is the minimum focusing distance, but for what we are the 100 macro and you can easily fix with the pipes as I tested. Perfect to complete my set of three 28-1.8-50ino 100 2.0 on FF.

sent on May 30, 2016


canon_28_f1-8Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM

Pros: Construction, Yield, AF speed, Sharpness

Cons: Finding none, perhaps I am vignetting but in my opinion is very pleasant

Opinion: Despite the different opinions I decided to buy used, having found a deal and wanting to have a fixed set "low cost" (28, 1.8, 50cc and 100 f2) of 6D ... It will be lucky my copy, but I find it perfect, crisp the center already at 1.8, fast AF, pleasing to both the blurred that the colors and so the vignetting, relatively light, focusing distance reduced fire for close up. For me it is a sight to be used!

sent on May 30, 2016


canon_50_f1-8_v2Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II

Pros: Price, brightness, made a good night sleep

Cons: Making slow fire and sometimes a bit 'inaccurate, built only in plastic, loud

Opinion: And 'ideal to approach the world of fixed, it costs little and let good use to experience the apertures. Used with satisfaction on APS-C (80mm equivalent) for portraits, became great on FF, I can not take it off. Sometimes some shots slightly out TA fire does not regret a focus faster, but just be careful as you do with all fixed diaphragms so open and everything is resolved. Focus a bit 'noisy but given the price you can not complain. good quality already f2.2, I do not mind even to 1.8 provided you do not look for the perfect clarity and the absence of defects.

sent on May 10, 2016


canon_70-200_f4Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM

Pros: Cheap to be a series L, crystal clear, focus lightning, solid

Cons: Lacking the stabilizer, but who buys it already knows, it is a choice, not weather sealed

Opinion: And 'the perfect canvas to start with L, crisp fear already at TA, fast, beautiful blurred and color rendering, very solid. The only flaw in addition to the failure tropicalization, then that is not a flaw, it is the lack of stabilization, but to overcome is the IS model that costs twice as much, for those who mainly shooting in good lighting conditions just be careful with the safety time ... so I never had a picture move! I just sold to fund my "fixed for fixed" and disuse of focal lengths.

sent on May 10, 2016


canon_24-105Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM

Pros: Great all-rounder, solid and durable as all L-series

Cons: Barrel stretching alone, not as sharp as in the TA objectives, problem (tacitly resolved in 2012) of the flat cable that breaks freaky

Opinion: Bought a copy of 2013 after careful research to avoid the problem of the flat cable (seems to have been resolved in the post-2012 specimens along with some flare problems), it is an excellent all-rounder view of the focal length. good quality, without infamy and without praise, that's fine on FF is that APS-C, its value is in the versatility and relative lightness compared to 24-70. Solidity typical of L-series, however, it is absurd that a lens so expensive and widespread as it is the "18-55 as" the full frame kit has a breaking problem so expensive, widespread and, at project level, stupid, after zooming Xmila the cable that makes communicating aperture and the camera body is only breaks for rubbing wear inside!

sent on May 10, 2016


motorola_moto_g2015Motorola Moto G (2015, 3rd gen)

Pros: Price more than the manufacturer's minimum customization, fast, good camera, waterproof, capacious battery, ultra-resistant screen with beautiful colors and beautiful light, the release system without keys, possibility of inserting microSD

Cons: The lack of IR transmitter as many competitors (to use as a TV remote control), but it would be less waterproof, battery not removable

Opinion: Taken thanks to an offer from Amazon in December 2015 189.99 EUR, I heartily recommend the 16GB version because it has 2GB of RAM instead of just one GB.rnE 'basically a Nexus at a fraction of the facts brothers from Google (was Motorola was realized when Google yet), was the first since the Nexus to have to upgrade to Android Marshmallow, minimum customization of the house that make the lightweight and fast OS. Quad-core processor, 2GB of RAM, 16GB of memory make it compete with other models that cost 2-3 also 4 times as much ... and looks good at all, not at all! excellent reception, the GPS hooked instantly, minimal but practical interface, camera 13mpx + excellent front 5mpx for his band and with good skills at night thanks to double flash. system of gestures to turn on flash / torch or access the camera without unlock it really useful (Moto Actions), as well as the release just taking it in hand or-displaying system notifications (Motion Display). The 2470mah battery lasts very very youmpo, even if you use it a lot, the screen is clearly visible even in the sun, it consumes the battery due to its size but with the adaptive brightness is activated very resizes the problem. Last feature is the waterproofing: resists up to 30min at 1m depth, I tested it, though of course the touch does not work, however, is useful to be able to really use in all conditions without fear ... at best is washed away and ! For less than 200 € you can not ask for more.

sent on May 10, 2016


canon_6dCanon 6D

Pros: Usable up to ISO 25600, quality files, Access for remote release from smartphone (including bulb), Wireless to switch the images, pre-processing RAW Room, 20mpx ideal for report file quality / size, ideal for portrait / street / landscape / static genres occasionally also be used for dynamic subjects.

Cons: Sometimes cumbersome selection of AF points but you learn with the habit, slow burst and few focus points for those who do sports / wildlife. Wifi is capable of halving the battery life (800 shots to 400 if it is very intensively used). AF points, perhaps a bit 'too concentrated at the center.

Opinion: I come from 1100D (passage in November 2015), the jump was monstrous both in quality and solidity. Who says you do not know what plastic is used, proving the 5D mkIII I did not notice much difference. amazing ISO range and usable to 25600 with a bit of post-production. AF very good, especially the central point at very responsive -3EV, the slowness that known by the 50 1.8 II think is due to the lens, not to the body. I would have preferred, however, the AF points a bit 'more external and not as concentrated in the center. Access to shoot remotely really useful as well as to send on time a few shots to whoever requests it (is automatically converted to jpeg and a little 'downsized but still with a very good quality). Handy, small compared to the 5D and lighter, even the Manfrotto Pixi supports it safely (must be used with some care 24-105 if extended to 105 and facing down but still holds). sore point is the battery which dries using the wifi in maniera intense, otherwise it lasts for about 800 shots. The use 50 1.8 II 28 1.8 USM and 24-105L, in the past even with 70-200 f4.

sent on May 10, 2016


canon_1100dCanon 1100D

Pros: Advantageous price, ease of use, size and ergonomics

Cons: Noise at high ISO (above 800), AF inaccurate, lack exposure spot

Opinion: After two years of use, I consider it a good SLR for those who want to look out into the world without spending a fortune: excellent quality, megapixels are ready for operation, good ergonomics although very plasticky, easy to use. The biggest minus is in the ISO, noise from 800 onwards and of little use in 3200 to 6400, as all the rest of the APSC, and as the AF that is not always flawless. The greatest lack in my opinion is the exposure spot, however, is offset in the manner provided.

sent on July 01, 2015


amazonbasics_zaino_fotocamera_accessoriAmazonBasics - Zaino per fotocamera e accessori

Pros: Price, ergonomic, padded shoulder straps and inner compartments

Cons: Hook for external tripod nonfunctional, rain cover

Opinion: I bought it about two years ago, brought much fun and has always behaved perfectly, fillings make that seem not to have even him. Currently it contains 1100D mounted with 24-105, 70-200 f4, 50 1.8, 18-55, extension tube 25mm and there is still room for another perspective on the size of 24-105! For the average photographer would say that in place there for sale! Also in the cubicles there are comfortably filters, cables and caricabatterie.rnPer 25 Euros is a bargain, keeps considerable weights without straining and does not give the slightest sign of abating after all this time.

sent on July 01, 2015




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me