|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Cordes63 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Cordes63  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Versatile, constant f4, sharpness, stability, manageability, 77mm filters Cons: Nothing Opinion: My example above 100mm does not drop all that you read, at least in the middle, maybe a little at the corners, but it seems normale.rnIo I find it an excellent zoom with a versatile focal range for Fx, with a good general sharpness, a beautiful color rendering, excellent stabilizer, excellent handling thanks to non-overweight, the 77mm filters so I did not have to buy the others, including the adapter for Lee filter system, weather-resistant and finally full compatibility with all my Nikon camera bodies, including a Fuji S5pro.rnSoprattutto for that reason I preferred it to the Sigma 24-105 f4 Art OS which is spoken well but I was not convinced by the various compatibility issues Nikon bodies as well as for possible problems of front / back focus.rnIn reality the various comparative (not those housewives and then not all) between the two lenses give an average a slight prevalence from the optical quality point of view to Sigma, m to for the reasons already I expressed I preferito go on the safe side, and I think I guessed, since it is fine on all of my camera bodies without many concussions with Dock Station and stuff, maybe to be redone for every body macchina.rnDimenticavo, I took it to import 582 € including UV filter and at that price I dare not take it! rnSaluti sent on April 10, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.8 G Pros: All the reviews I read, but all., Both online and in trade magazines have it as a great goal, the cost and the optimum yield Cons: I confirm the reviews read Opinion: Really do not understand that the writer is a ciofeche .... you take a big responsibility! RnDetto that I have both the old version D this G.rnSulla sharpness at wide apertures there is no history, in favor of newer, for rest of small differences, is one of Questin gusti.rnAberrazioni there are to large openings but nothing so blatant or outrageous as some would say ... there's a lot peggio.rnL'affermazione then it costs a blunder makes me smile! rnDunque to rebalance the votes do a nice 10, just because it is cheap and that is optically molto.rnrnrn sent on December 31, 2016 |
 | Nikon D90 Pros: A highly successful model Cons: For the category none Opinion: Excellent machine, one of the best models of Nikon succeeded. free from defects, lack or almost new firmware release speaks for sola.rnSe 12 mpx there are enough and often not taken over in 1600 iso then get one used in excellent condition 4 money is a bargain! RNPs: I also have a D300S and D3S a d700 .... I like the 12 mpx ..... forgot ... a fuji x30 .... 12 mpx ahahahah! sent on September 21, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm X30 Pros: Ergonomics Cons: Perhaps the yield to over ISO 800 and other small flaws Opinion: Beautiful car, good ergonomics, great mechanical zoom, excellent viewfinder, tilting the screen up and down, the excellent battery life, great autofocus.rnForse would have preferred a 24-100 to 28-112, the choice of format (3: 2 4: 3 09.16 etc. etc.) even in raw (you can only jpg), firing less practical, a cap with strap ... rnPer the rest very good car, and also the iso made all things considered, the sensor is not at all bad; it was the sensor 1 '' would have been perfect! rnIl shutter speed limited to 1/1000 at full aperture is a question only partly true, because it is such auto only because using it in the manual, for example you can safely shoot at all opening up to 1/4000; the number appears in red funziona.rnCosa but instead I do not like is that the dynamic range can make up to 200% and 400%, respectively, only increasing the ISO 200 and ISO 400 iso.rnDetto There og &rave; if you are looking for a large sensor, a thumbs-up, and want a fun car to use, with all the controls in the right place and highly customizable then I can only advise! rnrn sent on May 02, 2016 |
 | Canon PowerShot G7 X Pros: Excellent zoom range, solid construction Cons: Dust enters easily in the lenses Opinion: Excellent compact, perfect and bright zoom range, touch screen, excellent image quality. The orientation features only up to me is not an issue, the battery life is not the top, but on firm still need at least a second battery. Convenient to recharge the external battery charger, obviously if you have more than one battery. The problem that I consider unacceptable on a compact that level is entering the dust in the lens which is a beauty, and for this I have given away .... sent on April 11, 2016 |
 | Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8 VC USD Pros: Best Tamron lens ever (at least so far) Cons: For me against any but those who know before purchase Opinion: A masterpiece! Improving albeit with 1mm less on the wide-angle side of the legendary Nikkor 14-24 was not easy, and Tamron Company's success, and moreover adding us stabilizer. What do you want? Ok the baby is bulky and heavy, is less beautiful than the Nikkor 14-24 and less noble material, but still well made and sturdy ... Defects that can not mount the filters and the cap is like that of the 14-24? Then do not buy for yourselves! sent on February 25, 2016 |
 | Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM S Pros: Build quality, sharpness at 600mm too TA, Af good Cons: Heavy ... but who buys it is aware of this (hopefully) Opinion: Outstanding telephoto zoom, Sigma has exceeded! 600mm clear at room temperature (at least to the center of the frame, which is then interesting to those focal) what else want to zoom with these focal? RnAutofocus slow someone said? Of course if we compare it to that of a 500mm f4 fixed I would say yes, but say it's slow it seems misleading ... maybe it will be a bad example! RNE 'dark, ok, but this one knows before buying and you know even in low light conditions or get up the ISO or you can enjoy the show (sports or nature that is) and not shooting; or you buy a nice f4 or even f2.8, but then you are not here to write a lens that costs somewhere between 1000 and 2000 euro .... rnIo use of the D300S and d700 and I must say that on d700 returns better images, but this is about the d700 think! rnInsomma a lens really good and well made, and that does not force you to close the aperture to f8 to have good clarity, and this for me is a miracle! rnPer me in its classtele zoom up to 500mm is currently the best and the average score of less than 9.0 is in my opinion ungenerous! rnrn sent on November 16, 2015 |
 | Nikon D700 Pros: Immortal Cons: gums that over time tend to break away Opinion: The error Nikon greater when they released together with the D3 .... rnSarebbe as if they had now put on the market with the body of a d750 d810, the sensor of the D4S and the speed of the latter adding the BG ... .rnHo 2 d700 backpack with a battery and BG En el-4th for long range and gusts as 8fps and one without BG with L bracket for quick use on the stand for landscapes and are ready to take every photographic genre. ... rnSinceramente not feel the need to do an upgrade .... and view the goodness and reliability of the machine are more interested in ottiche.rnUnico defect well known are the tires that over time tend to fall off (as do those of some lenses), but you can do to fix .... rnChe say, now that they are used with a few tens of thousands of shots at prices well below 1000 euro and often with BG including it's time to make the deal .. ..rnIl advice is to go with it the BG with the battery En-el the fourth, and you'll have a car ready for anything! rn sent on October 27, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED Pros: Lightweight, excellent sharpness Cons: No one in particular, because the distortion in the 18mm consider physiological. Opinion: I found this lens a welcome surprise. First, it is lightweight and at the same time good quality, and then it is surprisingly sharp, even in the corners. Will that my d700 digests better than other, more recent FF, but so! RnHo the 14-24 f2.8 but I needed a lens to be able to mount my filters of Lee; the choice was between this and the 16-35 VR and after reading a few reviews, I threw myself on the 18-35. Never choice was more apt, because at a price quite lower than the 16-35 VR has little to envy! RnIl VR precisely, but in a wide angle that mostly use the tripod honestly I can do without, and then the lightness and practicality of this is truly a gem and make it easy to use even hand libera.rnInsomma for me is a Highly Recommended for sure! sent on February 04, 2015 |
 | Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Pros: Focal range and therefore versatility; f2.8 (subject); stabilizer; sharpness (with reserve) price Cons: Heaviness, poor sharpness at TA Opinion: I have long had the previous version is not stabilized and then I got to try it for a while even this stabilizzata.rnPurtroppo apart stabilization, convenient, and finishing stronger, I must say that despite the new optical scheme, even This new version of the sharpness in TA is not the best, and to get good results you need to close at least one stop, but I think it's also a matter of course for a zoom of genere.rnE 'but one thing to know before you buy because if you plan to use it often multiplied that TA is smooth then it is better to look for another, using a TA must be an emergency to stop the action in low light and you do not want to raise the iso too. I preferred to add to the Nikkor 70-200 VRII I already had the occasion to have a TC x1.4 zoom 98-280mm already very very sharp at room temperature (f4), because the Sigma is not actually own a 300mm but rather a 285/290mm. And if the interest is a major focus for caccia a great camera and sharpness already at RT without spending so much better then a Nikkor AF-S 300 f4 possibly multiplied x1.4 Some will say that it is not stabilized and ... oh well you can not have everything, but it is very handy and if you have the foresight to use a monopod or appropriate times the results are outstanding ... rnDunque recapping the Sigma lens unique, excellent, versatile, but not without "defects" that are in summary: heaviness, sharpness is not exciting at room temperature, shorter focal length of 300mm declared collar worse than the previous version in which he could be removed or put too lens mounted sent on February 06, 2014 |
 | Kenko Pro 300 DGX 1.4x Pros: Optical performance, cost Cons: Compatibility Nikon's VR? Opinion: With Nikkor 300mm f4 AF-s must be a marvel, with Nikkor 70-200 VR II stabilizer works but the noise is greatly amplified compared to the use without teleconverter; wondered lights of this e-mail to the parent, the answer was that the TC is not compatible with Nikon's VR and therefore would be better to turn it off ... rnCerto if that is really so, they could also report it somewhere, right? rn sent on January 31, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
