|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Patrizio1948 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Patrizio1948  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | TTArtisan APS-C 50mm f/1.2 Pros: Very small, all in metal precise and very fun graft Cons: It is important to know what you are buying and not to expect the impossible Opinion: I use it on a z6 Ii and I have a lot of fun. Of course I have to set the camera sensor not to create vignettes and the raw file generated is quite small, but I use it to have fun photographing completely manually and as I said I find it fun and educational. The apertures are selected with precise shots, the focus is precise and personally I am assisted by the camera function that draws the edges (I am NOT a purist and I don't know what it is called) Even at full aperture I get decent photos, in line with my purpose, at f5.6 I would say that you can definitely be satisfied. Ultimately I am satisfied with my purchase without expecting too much but certainly getting much more than the 100 euros spent sent on March 30, 2025 |
 | TTArtisan AF 75mm f/2 Pros: Lightness, good construction, excellent blur, good sharpness even at f2 Cons: for now nothing to say Opinion: Just purchased on Amazon, one day delivery and great packaging. Tried only at home to check the sharpness at f2 and the related bokeh effect, I must say that I was very satisfied considering that I shot at 3200 Iso. I also "discovered" that camera Raw recognizes the profile and therefore no problem of aberrations of any kind. I had the impression that maybe (I say maybe because it is to be verified also considering the hasty test) that underexposes by 1/2 stop, of course no problem in post, Soon I will post on my profile some photos taken with the TTartisan sent on February 06, 2025 |
 | Canon EF 100mm f/2.0 USM Pros: Sharpness to TA. The price in relation to the excellent quality Cons: It annoys me the fact that the lens hood is purchased separately. I took on Amazon a commercial for a few euros and it's fine. Opinion: I confirm all the good that is said, I bought it used in a physical store very prestigious in Rome and I think I got a good deal. It seems to me that it underexposes slightly, not that it is a problem but I would like to be comforted by other users by the way. I only did a few test shots with a 5 D Mark 3, and I have no photos to show, as soon as I have one the place on the site with pleasure. I hope to have opinions about the underexposure. I also add that with Kenko 1.4 it works fine. The opening becomes an honorable 2.8 and with very little weight we carry a more than honorable 140 mm. I finally tested outdoors the lens bought used. I confirm how good I had already said, in this case I had no problems of underexposure, the autofocus, was immediate and it seems very accurate. The photo was taken in the street with the Nice collaboration of an unknown tourist also passionate about photography. https://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?l=it&t=2870558 thanks sent on July 30, 2018 |
 | Tokina AT-X 16-28mm f/2.8 Pro FX Pros: Bright magnificent building great sharpness and perfect fast autofocus Cons: Weight (I knew and I like) lack of insert screw filters. At night or indoors and illuminated by spotlights have to live with flare ... unfortunately Opinion: I will write on the forum a little more about this topic because this morning just arrived I had the opportunity to snap a few pictures from the balcony of the house, and I was immediately and sincerely entusiasta.rnLa thing that is perceived before operating it and l ' extreme robustness and build quality. We all know that the lens hood is fixed and can not be used to screw thread, for me frankly is not a problem, of course the possibility to use a polarizer would have liked, but we must "put on" at least another 300 Euros to get to canon, and I honestly think I can handle still in post. The quality polarizer possess it for 24 ta tamron and I realize often not usarlo.rnNell'uso Everyone will appreciate its great clarity already f4 (I have not tried to 2.8) the speed and accuracy of focus saturated colors and above all the absence of any noticeable distortions already at 16 mm of ff.rnRipeterò forum on this topic withparticolarirnciao more! sent on April 01, 2016 |
 | Tokina AT-X Pro 100mm f/2.8 Macro Pros: Sharpness good construction weight Cons: at the moment no Opinion: I bought one this morning, particularly to promote the withdrawal of a used I could not sell. For the first time they are holding a Tokina lens, and I must say that I was very impressed. Neglecting to mention the aesthetic beauty, which is not great but not bad, what struck me was the exceptional clarity already in TA and beautiful saturated and pure colors it produces. I did not make an exact comparison but feel I must say that the more famous Tamron 90 macro 2.8 stabilized in my possession grabs a track for surrender. I repeat it is just a feeling. Lacking the stabilizer, and is the only one reason why at the moment I do not sell the tamron that however I can cover it with other optical and therefore his fate seems to me quite marked. sent on March 19, 2016 |
 | Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM S Pros: Sharpness at maximum aperture. speed focusing, construction, weather sealing. All equated equivalent Tamron, although in fact I appreciated the considerable qualità.rnNaturalmente talk about super telephoto price umano.rnHo verified the focus of my exemplary and not needed any adjustment, perfect! Cons: The weight is felt, but it is known. Opinion: I tried it once, then it is likely that my opinions are dictated in part by the enthusiasm of the new purchase. As mentioned come from Tamron, excellent lens with which I took many of my photos present on the site, rnDel Sigma I liked the strength and design of an object costruto materials without compromise, you pay by the weight, but I knew and I'm bene.rnNella field test, in my opinion it is more than Tamron speed autofocus and sharpness at maximum aperture, to f8 more or less equivalent. We always speak of individuals and of the coupling with fotocamera.rnMa the thing that really struck me is the ease with which you get the final result by working in post. With the Tamron to achieve the same result, we must certainly operate more in Ph.rnInsomma'm happy with my purchase. rnrnPS I bought the USB dock and discovered an exciting new world. Possibility of customized adjustments really exceptional. The Iexemplary or did not need to adjust the autofocus because in my opinion it is good for the factory, but I upgraded firware and I solved the coupling with the camera, and especially I adjusted the preset distances for hiking distances MAF and its speed and assure you that you can reach results stupefacenti.rnHO POSTED two photos of test with its specifications adjustments those interested can see here, but over time will remove the folder if I need spazio.rnrnhttp: //www.juzaphoto. com / me.php? pg = 150771 & l = en sent on December 30, 2015 |
 | Kenko Pro 300 DGX 2.0x Pros: see opinion Cons: see opinion or when sincerely nothing Opinion: Upon arriving I did a simple test ... I mounted on my 1DS Mark 2 in conjunction with the Tamron 24/70 2.8- PERFECT NO PROBLEM. The autofocus locks perfectly even under difficult conditions today was a rainy and gray and I photographed from the window of the house at full apertura.rnMa difficie we tested, the one that I wanted to più.rnSempre Mark 2 (full frame so) and Tamron 150 / 600- maximum extension for a total of 1200 mm! rncavalletto, mirror raised f 6 Original (hence twice) 1/40 second, I photographed an earthenware pot-holder on the balcony of the house which is one gnomo.rnL'autofocus does not hook, but the light was really little, I's focused hand smoothly iso 1200.rnPostero the photos in my gallery test objectives, for those interested can make us jump, do not know how to put it into this recenzione.rnIL MIO JUDGEMENT AND 'ABSOLUTELY POSITIVOrn sent on January 20, 2015 |
 | Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD Pros: low price for caratteristichernbokeh eccellenternnitidezza even at maximum focalernpeso contenutorneccellente stabilizer Cons: I honestly do not see it, of course you can not compare to goals that cost figures astonomiche ... Opinion: I just got done a few shots on the stand and without, at the maximum aperture and maximum seal lia indoor and outdoor controluce.rnmette also focus very well and quickly is always crisp, stabilizes quickly, what else to say, I'm entusiasta.rnLeggo Some users have found little contrast to 600 mm, I use a full frame and did not find it, but in any case, nothing that can not be easily corrected in post.rnmi like to attach a photo, but I do not know how to do sent on January 09, 2015 |
 | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical Pros: Super wide angle especially if used on a full frame at a price ragionevolerncostruzione rncolori and excellent definition schiantornpossibilita to photograph with a virtually unlimited PDF Cons: Distorts a little ... is normalernvignetta? honestly nothing that can not be fixed with a clickrnNon has automatic, but in a wide angle like this is not really a problem. Opinion: personally do not use it very much, I prefer a 24 mm and I always refer to a full frame, so you have to make the necessary conversioni.rnMa when needed are glad in some cases it is essential, in others it is extremely creativo.rnLa thing I appreciated is very saturated colors, the blue sky is truly incomparable, certainly given the wide field of view must be able to manage the light sources and in some cases, a double esposizione.rnSe you love the post production will derive great satisfaction sent on January 06, 2015 |
 | Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Exceptional sharpness even at 2.8 and all focali.Boken gradevolissimo.Costruzione solid and smaller burden, fluid controls and a nice paraluce.Viene provided with support for a tripod, but you shoot with ease even freehand times ridiculous thanks a stabilizer in exceptional Cons: Honestly I have not found, when they are on their honeymoon with this goal! Opinion: I had a canon unregulated f4 the series (The harrier) and I assure you that there is no comparison at all. Tamron is doing exceptional things. Are entusiasta.E 'a lens extremely versatile, with which you can photograph any style, from portraits to landscapes, through the still live.rnLa thing I like most is the ease with which you can shoot handheld for a stabilizer excellent. It also has a motor and a fast autofocus, which for now I have never betrayed. sent on January 06, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
