|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Danylele www.juzaphoto.com/p/Danylele  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Pros: Sharpness, lightness, stabilization, colors, af Cons: Nothing for what was conceived Opinion: Bought to be used on an eos r with adapter ring, the lens is very well held in the hand, light and not bulky also calculating that it is a stabilized lens not native per ml, used in various contexts has behaved very well in all uses, making me take home 100% of the shots! Of defects I have nothing to list, the sharpness is excellent from f4 and becomes perfect already at f5.6, it is not a bright lens but you know, you buy being aware of this but the stabilizer recovers to the overwhelming, making you shoot in low times even without a tripod. Vote 10 sent on February 22, 2023 |
 | Samsung S22 Ultra Pros: DESIGN, DISPLAY, TOP CAMERA, STYLUS, GENERAL SPEED NOT COMPARABLE WITH OLD SAMSUNG, RECEPTION Cons: NOTHING OR MAYBE.... THE BATTERY Opinion: I HAVE OWNED SEVERAL TERMINALS OVER THE YEARS AND THE BEST I HAD TO DATE I WOULD NEVER HAVE THOUGHT TO SAY IT, BUT IT WAS A HUAWEI, MORE PRECISELY P40 PRO PLUS, INFINITE BATTERY, AFTER 2 YEARS OF USE I STILL LAST 1 DAY AND A HALF ... I GOT TO THIS POINT TO START FROM THE ONLY CON DELL S22 ULTRA, THE BATTERY!!! FROM NEW COMES TO EVENING, WHICH HUAWEI CAME TO 2 DAYS FULL, AFTER ALL THIS PHONE IS PHENOMENAL, FAST, RELIABLE AND TOP CAMERA, BETTER OF COURSE THAN P40 PRO PLUS AND IPHONE 14 PRO OF WHICH I HAVE COMPARED LATELY, SAMSUNG IS CRITICIZED BY MANY BUT IT IS THE LEAST WORSE THAN THE OTHERS, HOWEVER AN OPPO HAS PROBLEMS WITH SOME APPS OR SLOWDOWNS, XIAOMI SOFTWARE PROBLEMS AND EVEN THIS SOMETIMES GETS STUCK ... THE BEST FOR ME REMAINS HUAWEI BUT WITHOUT GOOGLE SERVICES UNFORTUNATELY NOW CAN NOT COMPETE WITH OTHERS, ESPECIALLY IF YOU TRAVEL TO AMERICA AS I DID IN AUGUST ... sent on October 11, 2022 |
 | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Sharpness, 1.4 aperture, excellent bokeh, good construction, AF with eos r does not miss a beat Cons: Not found yet Opinion: Lens in my possession for a short time, used and happens almost immediately, first fixed lens at f1.4 and I find it gorgeous, I confirm the merits listed by other people such as the excellent sharpness already in ta, bockeh, etc ... a little less who says the weight (compared to other fixed ok, but calculating the quality that gives you already a ta you carry quietly all day coupled to an eos r, I was used to 5d3 and 24 70 tamron 2.8 stabilized, maybe this helps?). No focusing problems with eos r, compared with Canon lenses in my possession (16 35 f4 and 70 200 2.8 II) is slightly slower, but nothing like that, a few thousandths of a second more!!! After all, an excellent lens, excellent value for money! sent on June 25, 2022 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II USM Pros: L series, a real blade, constant opening at 2.8, impressive stabilizer, tropicalization, etc. Cons: Nothing Opinion: A truly exceptional lens, a sharp blade, before I had the f4 smooth also a blade, but this allows shots at 1/60 in total safety, has colors compared to the warmer f4, a blurry to envy many other lenses, it seems to have fixed always mounted that make you go from 70 to 200 without disassembling them from the body machine, once mounted you struggle to detach it. Paired with the 5d mark iii he never missed a shot, only pro. Grade 10/10 sent on October 20, 2020 |
 | Canon 60D Pros: yield, iso usable up to ISO 3200 (in some cases also in 6400), swivel screen, weight, polycarbonate and fiberglass, use sd, beautiful video full hd, manageability, price, fast and accurate autofocus, possibility to work in the room , battery life, and certainly I forget something else ... Cons: I could say the micro, but I do nothing, the magnesium body (???) for those who do not know what and polycarbonate and glass fiber ... just Opinion: I have this body since April and just gave me satisfaction for me and perfect in every way! the fps is good for me (I tried a 50d and those are pretty much similar) ... great the swivel screen that allows you to take pictures unimaginable, in very difficult conditions, made good up to ISO 3200 and ISO "workable" in 6400iso according to shooting conditions! rnresa crazy with the 40mm pancake and 70-200f4 ... does very well with the classic 18-55! rnrifarei the choice made at the time of purchase! change it only for a 5d mark iii! sent on July 26, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Weight, construction, sharpness, colors, price, speed auto focus, f4 at all focal lengths Cons: None for now Opinion: At the beginning I doubted this lens, provenivo from 55-250 and find it little different from last quest (from inexperienced) ... making the most accurate picture I noticed a difference nothing short of abysmal, I noticed a lot of sharpness, color difference, a supersonic speed in focusing and excellent construction, not to mention the color GNI ... I tried a little, but what little I have not felt the absence of the stabilizer (at the beginning I had micro moved, but only because I was used with the stabilized lens) ... the straconsiglio at all! sent on July 13, 2013 |
 | Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II Pros: Price-size-stabilizer-very precise auto focus-zoom-to-weight materials for a good price like this Cons: I have not found no cons Opinion: Bell precise objective, the first time I used a picture of a race horse and the pictures came very well, thanks to the fast and precise focusing! Having a 18-55 the materials of 55-250 are excellent, as the former is its plasticky! RnNiente to say, and that is a great lens ... would recommend it to anyone who wants to buy a cheap lens! sent on March 25, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
