JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM II is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2012. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1865 €;
165 users have given it an average vote of 9.5 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: very sharp even wide open on all focal lengths, high contrasts, solid construction, reliable and fast AF
Cons: expensive, heavy, large 82mm filter thread, vignetting at 24mm (can be easily corrected in postprocessing).
Compared to the old design of its predecessor the short lens hood can't provide much protection.
Opinion: The sharpest standard zoom for full frame. Brilliant colors and contrast.
Expensive and heavy but the produced images are outstanding.
AF hit rate is nearly 100%, fast and reliable.
Compared to the old design of its predecessor (with its 'inverse' zooming) the short lens hood can't provide much protection.
The 82mm filter thread may introduce additional costs for new larger filters.
Pros: very sharp at all settings, great contrast, accurate AF
Cons: filter size, price
Opinion: I lost most of my interest in primes after getting this lens. In fact I will sell my 50mm f/1.4 after getting the zoom. The zoom is really sharp with great contrast and good rendering. My friend has seen the onion ring bokeh from out-of-focus metallic objects, but I have not encountered this yet. I wanted to buy cheaper lenses but in the long run I decided this was still cheaper, lighter, and more convenient than a few primes.
AF is fast and accurate, build is solid, and I like the size of the lens hood... it isn't too obnoxious like the one with the 17-40L. It fits in my bags without having to remove it.
This is subjective, but I also like how it feels in my hands. The rings are well-placed and easy to locate by feel. It balances nicely on a 5D3.
The downside for me is the filters. I hoped to avoid buying more and carrying more than one set, but in the end I think this lens is worth it.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:Embarrassing, fantastic lens, I've read reviews that say it's equivalent to three fixed ones put together even in sharpness factor, and what can I say, they're right.... Let's start with the sharpness, exceptional, stunning for a zoom, a little below the 70 200 f2.8 ii version that I own but the level is very high, and I come from tamron 24 70 g1 and g2, sigma art 24 70 and last but not least canon ef 24 105 f4 ii version (I'm talking about non-fixed zooms) The af even at very high levels, on canon r it behaves great, you took pictures of my son in motion and also of the dog running and they didn't miss a beat... The construction is also indisputable, like a true L series, in the hand gives a lot of security, you can feel the quality Regarding the quality of the image, the bokeh to be a zoom also here very very well, allows an excellent three-dimensionality of the image by detaching the planes very well... I was really satisfied with this lens, I walked around it for a long time looking for side ways (the others were stabilized) but the image quality released by this lens does not weigh the lack of stabilization in the slightest... Maybe who knows, further down the line an R5 that will overcome this problem
Opinion:Beyond the technical characteristics, it is a great lens. I do everything with it and with always excellent results, relative to my expectations. It is extremely versatile, robust, sharp. The constant opening at 2.8 allows various uses in even adverse conditions. It's a bit heavy and lacks stabilization, but that's really minor. It's worth the expense, it's worth it all.
Pros:Sharpness, speed and precision autofocus, construction, versatility of use, constant 2.8 aperture
Cons:Blurry (I explain more below)
Opinion:I copy/paste in part the reasoning made for the 70-200 II: the blur is not as poetic as in the first version, indeed I would say it is quite "brutal" as required by today's times, but perhaps I just have to look at it since the II has recently entered my kit and it is still a matter of personal taste. The sharpness is incredible, already from full aperture, the autofocus is crazy for speed and precision and those like me who do sports sincerely thank you. That said, and going into the specifics of this 24-70mm, compared to the first version I appreciated the more human-sized lens hood than that of the 1 version. The construction is also excellent, with the lens that extends to 70mm and is compact at 24mm, contrary to what happens in the first version. The lack of stabilization is not a big problem, given the focal range. Whose versatility remains excellent for an incredible variety of uses in every photographic genre ranging from reportage to portraits to everything your imagination and creativity suggests.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
