JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM II is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2012. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1915 €;
158 users have given it an average vote of 9.6 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 237000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: very sharp even wide open on all focal lengths, high contrasts, solid construction, reliable and fast AF
Cons: expensive, heavy, large 82mm filter thread, vignetting at 24mm (can be easily corrected in postprocessing).
Compared to the old design of its predecessor the short lens hood can't provide much protection.
Opinion: The sharpest standard zoom for full frame. Brilliant colors and contrast.
Expensive and heavy but the produced images are outstanding.
AF hit rate is nearly 100%, fast and reliable.
Compared to the old design of its predecessor (with its 'inverse' zooming) the short lens hood can't provide much protection.
The 82mm filter thread may introduce additional costs for new larger filters.
Pros: very sharp at all settings, great contrast, accurate AF
Cons: filter size, price
Opinion: I lost most of my interest in primes after getting this lens. In fact I will sell my 50mm f/1.4 after getting the zoom. The zoom is really sharp with great contrast and good rendering. My friend has seen the onion ring bokeh from out-of-focus metallic objects, but I have not encountered this yet. I wanted to buy cheaper lenses but in the long run I decided this was still cheaper, lighter, and more convenient than a few primes.
AF is fast and accurate, build is solid, and I like the size of the lens hood... it isn't too obnoxious like the one with the 17-40L. It fits in my bags without having to remove it.
This is subjective, but I also like how it feels in my hands. The rings are well-placed and easy to locate by feel. It balances nicely on a 5D3.
The downside for me is the filters. I hoped to avoid buying more and carrying more than one set, but in the end I think this lens is worth it.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:It is not stabilized, the diaphragm group from what I understand almost always breaks (mine is broken)
Opinion:The 24/70 is the lens that should never be missing (for Full Frame systems) practically you can do a bit of everything from the landscape to the portrait, the model in question is an L series lens and in my opinion has no particular defects, the images generated are pleasant, sharp (even at full aperture) with pleasant colors, I used it for years on the 5D Mark III I noticed some difficulty in focusing in particular situations such as backlight using it instead on Canon R6 with adapter I did not encounter the problem indeed there was a significant improvement in focus. Defects : missing the stabilizer that perhaps in some cases would be useful the problem but I solved it with the R6 that is stabilized; The diaphragm group EROOR 01 broke and considering that I use it very little is somewhat strange, reading on the various online forums from what little I understood is a very frequent defect, the cost for the repair was 200 Euro and considering the cost of the lens we say you would not expect similar problems.
Pros:Crisp at all focal points, pleasant blurry, compact size
Cons:nobody
Opinion:Objective excellently built and able to give high performance to all focal points. For the same opening, it does not make us regret the corresponding fixes. I am using it mainly on a 5DsR and it is a perfect pairing that can give results always of excellence. It is the natural complement of the 70-200 f/2.8 IS II. In general the resolution is always excellent with a prevalence on shorter focal points. At 70 mm Maybe I find something more in the 70-200 but let's talk about laughable news. Distortion is always well controlled even at 24 mm where it is slightly more noticeable but controllable via software. For my use I do not find it heavy or bulky. Until now I have not felt the lack of the stabilizer even in the less favorable conditions where the large opening almost always allows safety times. Mechanically it is impeccable and robust. I am also recently trying it a Canon R5 on which it works very well and without creating difficulties for autofocus. The total footprint is slightly lower in volume terms than that of 5DsR. I would say that it is a advisable optics even after the advent of the new RF attack especially for those who know how to move in the used.
Opinion:Taken instead of 24-105 f4 ii. I didn't regret it at all despite costing twice as much and it's shorter on the canvas side. Much sharper and returns quality, image cleaning, bokeh and three-dimensionality of another level. It would be 10, but I'm taking half a point off the lack of stabilization that, to be honest, is not so indispensable on these focal points at this opening, taking into account what today's high-iso cameras can do. The price is proportionate to the quality it offers
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
