JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Samsung S22 Ultra : Specifications and Opinions

Samsung S22 Ultra

The Samsung S22 Ultra is a smartphone with Android operative system and OLED 6.8", 1440 x 3080pxscreen, manufactured from 2022 to 2025 (discontinued). The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 449 €;

8 users have given it an average vote of 9.3 out of 10

Camera
Camera (1)	13mm f/2.2, resolution 12MP, sensor 1/2.5"
Camera (2)	24mm f/1.8, resolution 108MP, sensore 1/1.33", stabilization
Camera (3)	70mm f/2.4, resolution 10MP, sensore 1/3.5", stabilization
Camera (4)	230mm f/4.9, resolution 10MP, sensore 1/3.5", stabilization
Video	8K (7680 x 4320p) @ 24 FPS
Front Camera	40 MP, 4K (3840 x 2160p) @ 60 FPS
Flash	Yes
Screen
Size	6.8", 1440 x 3080 pixel, 19.5:9
Screen Area	114 cm²
PPI Screen	500 ppi
Type	OLED
Built and notes
CPU	Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
RAM	8/12 GB
GPU	Adreno 730
Internal memory	128/256/512/1024 GB
Memory cards	No
Battery	Li-Ion, 5000 mAh
Charging Speed	45 W
Waterproof	Yes, up to 1.5 meters
Weight	229 g
Dimensions	163 x 78 x 8.9 mm
Buy
Samsung S22 Ultra, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this camera?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Claudio Ricci

sent on December 22, 2023

Pros: Unrivalled photographic versatility (but with results very dependent on modes and conditions - see cons). Overall excellent in the rest as well.

Cons: Extremely fluctuating photographic results, depending on the mode of use (it has quite a few, including Raw, Expert Raw, stock camera and full 108 mpx) and light conditions. It takes time to master them all and choose the best one. They can range from stunning medium-format results to mediocre photos full of artifacts and only suitable for social context. Unbelievable waste of the "Expert Raw" mode, which would be great if it didn't produce bad NR artifacts.

Opinion: (Over a year of intensive use - I've taken more pictures with him, who is always with me, than with all the other cameras put together in the last good four years). First of all, it's literally like having in your pocket something ranging from 16 to 230 mm FF equivalent, but with a limit: you have to use the basic lenses of the individual cams, because the intermediate results are interpolated and with considerable deterioration of the image. So we have, 16 (0.6x), 23 (base), 69 (3x) and 230 (10x, and also decently bright, f4.9). The normal 12 mpx stock cam produces results that can range from very good to very bad (artifacts, excess sharpening, "oily" areas from excess NR), but it does a beautiful HDR that is very natural and has great colors, especially when using the "hot" filter. The 108 mpx mode often gives results that are out of this world, and it feels like having a medium format in your pocket! It is imperative to use the "detail improvement" and, equally, to stay at the 23 mm base: forcing it to 2x or higher, does nothing but crop and enlarge it, with results in strong deterioration (but given the size, I have a 50 cm print mistakenly made from 3x rows and it is practically perfect). Ordinary Raw, dng, allows you to change WB, ISO, shutter speed, etc. before shooting, and gives excellent results using a common editor such as Camera Raw, although it is quite noisy and difficult to use in low light (dynamic range is what it is, and it doesn't use multiple photos to make an HDR or a stacking that eliminates noise). The "Expert Raw" mode, sensational on paper, is an absurd waste! It's very bad! In many photos it produces horrendous "oily" artifacts due to overlapping errors and excess denoise that cannot be eliminated. And also excessive sharpening halos, even those that cannot be eliminated. I've saved a few photos using that, I avoid it now. Basically, you have to understand WELL what is best to do, or take several shots with various modes and then choose the best one. But when it's good, try to make 50 or even 70 cm prints, and then you'll be amazed, unable to distinguish them from those made of the same subject with a Reflex. Indeed... Sometimes they were even better than those of the cell phone :-D My rating is : 9. If the Expert Raw mode had been perfect, we would have been at 14 :-D

user198779

sent on December 18, 2022

Pros: Screen, size at least for is a merit, cameras and finally the price.

Cons: Nothing in particular.

Opinion: Smartphone at the top as performance even outside the fast and fluid photo department with a display truly at the top of the category . Very good video department even at night. We come to the cameras that then what interests us . This summer my S20 plus ended up under the wheels of an off-road vehicle in a dirt road above the Stelvio Pass at about 3000 meters above sea level I thought I had to catch on the crumbs of the phone that instead incredibly had only the footprint of the tire on the cover and the dented display in two points by 2 pebbles that damaged the display was practically intact. If it hadn't been for those 2 pebbles it wouldn't have even broken. ( For repair replacement of the display it takes 300 euros) So accustomed to the times of the S7 and the quality of the materials I stayed in Samsung taking the top for the photo department at Samsung . The quality of the normal and 3 x I already knew more than excellent for my claims I was curious to see how the camera went with 10 x that has an angle of view of a 270 mm on FF here the quality expires compared to other cameras but it is more than acceptable the result you take home unthinkable until 2 or 3 ago. You can also take action photos without using the burst. I don't give 10 just for the 10 x but a 9 deserves it all.

Fabio291067

sent on October 18, 2022

Pros: Excellent cameras and valid digital zoom algorithm.

Cons: Grip not always easy for thin bezels and ultra-wide angle very close to the edge

Opinion: Always faithful to the Galaxy Note series (1, 4 and 8), I have never appreciated the photographic sector. Not that I pretended to replace the mirrorless, but that it was a decent forklift for emergencies, this yes. Finally this S22 Ultra (which in fact replaces the Note series) has cameras and software suitable for a top of the range: excellent the main, really wide angle of the ultra-wide angle, good optical zoom, and effective processing of 10X, much more detailed than the simple crop on 3X. The focus of the ultra-wide angle is a few millimeters, so that even pseudomacros are successful. Significantly improved automatic white balance. Superlative backlight tightness: minimal ghost images and excellent legibility of shaded areas. The effectiveness of the night mode is impressive, but above all the yellow dominant has disappeared from the night photos, which characterized the shots of my previous Galaxy. In conclusion, a perfect and versatile photographic sector. Shots so good that it could be difficult to create a creative photograph without filters and working only with jpg. It is useful to apply a cover in rubbery material, which is a bit thick and rigid, to improve the grip, and which has a sliding protection for the objectives.

Danylele

sent on October 11, 2022

Pros: DESIGN, DISPLAY, TOP CAMERA, STYLUS, GENERAL SPEED NOT COMPARABLE WITH OLD SAMSUNG, RECEPTION

Cons: NOTHING OR MAYBE.... THE BATTERY

Opinion: I HAVE OWNED SEVERAL TERMINALS OVER THE YEARS AND THE BEST I HAD TO DATE I WOULD NEVER HAVE THOUGHT TO SAY IT, BUT IT WAS A HUAWEI, MORE PRECISELY P40 PRO PLUS, INFINITE BATTERY, AFTER 2 YEARS OF USE I STILL LAST 1 DAY AND A HALF ... I GOT TO THIS POINT TO START FROM THE ONLY CON DELL S22 ULTRA, THE BATTERY!!! FROM NEW COMES TO EVENING, WHICH HUAWEI CAME TO 2 DAYS FULL, AFTER ALL THIS PHONE IS PHENOMENAL, FAST, RELIABLE AND TOP CAMERA, BETTER OF COURSE THAN P40 PRO PLUS AND IPHONE 14 PRO OF WHICH I HAVE COMPARED LATELY, SAMSUNG IS CRITICIZED BY MANY BUT IT IS THE LEAST WORSE THAN THE OTHERS, HOWEVER AN OPPO HAS PROBLEMS WITH SOME APPS OR SLOWDOWNS, XIAOMI SOFTWARE PROBLEMS AND EVEN THIS SOMETIMES GETS STUCK ... THE BEST FOR ME REMAINS HUAWEI BUT WITHOUT GOOGLE SERVICES UNFORTUNATELY NOW CAN NOT COMPETE WITH OTHERS, ESPECIALLY IF YOU TRAVEL TO AMERICA AS I DID IN AUGUST ...

Photos taken with Samsung S22 Ultra

The Castle by the Sea

by Claudio Ricci
69 comments, 2111 views

HI RES 5.7 MP

Col de Tourmalet - The Gregario

by ReyOk
25 comments, 712 views

HI RES 9.0 MP

Awl

by Bljum
17 comments, 2308 views

HI RES 12.0 MP

Vitorchiano (Vt) - January 2023

by Claudio Ricci
46 comments, 1810 views

La Fenice

by Claudio Ricci
70 comments, 1167 views

HI RES 18.8 MP

Allegory

by Claudio Ricci
49 comments, 1165 views

HI RES 27.0 MP

Beach Colors

by Claudio Ricci
51 comments, 747 views

HI RES 18.8 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

The Hail Sky

by Claudio Ricci
53 comments, 1428 views

HI RES 6.8 MP

Neuschwanstein Castle

by Meteopedro 57
42 comments, 539 views

HI RES 7.5 MP

Abstract Spontaneous

by Claudio Ricci
19 comments, 565 views

HI RES 4.7 MP

The World of the Red House #2

by Claudio Ricci
40 comments, 262 views

HI RES 27.0 MP

Imminent Storm

by Claudio Ricci
11 comments, 498 views

HI RES 4.7 MP

Trastevere

by Claudio Ricci
21 comments, 762 views

HI RES 4.7 MP

Milky Phone Way

by Linux
8 comments, 1682 views

HI RES 10.4 MP

Ficus Indica

by Claudio Ricci
24 comments, 757 views

HI RES 4.7 MP

First dusting

by Meteopedro 57
27 comments, 330 views

Orestes

by Claudio Ricci
16 comments, 494 views

HI RES 4.7 MP

No more walls Abstract

by Daniele Tucci
70 comments, 629 views

HI RES 16.0 MP

Adriatic Minimal

by Claudio Ricci
21 comments, 613 views

HI RES 27.0 MP

"Antica Carboneria" - Rome November 2022

by Claudio Ricci
14 comments, 526 views

Predjama Castle

by Meteopedro 57
10 comments, 407 views

HI RES 6.3 MP

Miramare Castle

by Meteopedro 57
13 comments, 363 views

HI RES 7.5 MP

Frasso Sabino (RI), November 2022

by Claudio Ricci
17 comments, 429 views

Pdr particular

by Daniele Tucci
36 comments, 289 views

HI RES 12.0 MP

November

by Meteopedro 57
11 comments, 261 views

You want to jump off the roof?... And I'm going away

by Daniele Tucci
17 comments, 389 views

HI RES 7.9 MP

Pink Thunderstorms

by Claudio Ricci
4 comments, 321 views

HI RES 4.7 MP

Opuntia Ficus Indica

by Claudio Ricci
11 comments, 333 views

HI RES 4.7 MP

Other Pink Thunderstorms

by Claudio Ricci
13 comments, 425 views

HI RES 4.7 MP

Monterotondo (Rm)

by Claudio Ricci
8 comments, 320 views

HI RES 4.7 MP

Opuntia Ficus Indica

by Claudio Ricci
29 comments, 572 views

HI RES 4.7 MP

I don't know what it is - Roman Countryside winter 2023

by Claudio Ricci
13 comments, 377 views

Shocking Red

by Claudio Ricci
0 comments, 271 views

HI RES 4.7 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Geometry lesson from the vineyards

by Daniele Tucci
25 comments, 521 views

HI RES 7.3 MP

Hellebores mix

by Lg72
6 comments, 829 views

HI RES 12.0 MP

Untitled Photo

by Lookaloopy
0 comments, 275 views

HI RES 11.4 MP

Portico d'Ottavia - Rome - January 2023

by Claudio Ricci
10 comments, 348 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Smartphone, Drones and Action Cam » Smartphone, Drones and Action Cam Samsung » Samsung S22 Ultra

Samsung S22 Ultra : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this camera?

Photos taken with Samsung S22 Ultra