|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Luke115 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Luke115  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) Pros: Good Day Photos Cons: In trouble with little light, lack RAW Opinion: An excellent phone, but the camera with little light has considerable difficulty enough small movements of the subject and the photo is moved, the light of the flash does not close in the slightest in the natural light, does not allow to shoot in RAW so you can not intervene on Color temperature in post production. Good instead of daytime with the sunlight and in the movies goes pretty well. sent on June 09, 2019 |
 | Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM C Pros: Good focus speed. Possibility 'of personalization using dock-usb. Very Robusto.rn Cons: Bracket for the tripod a little bit, but nothing serious. Opinion: Purchased for just over a month for 900 Euros, it is my first super telephoto, and I was fine right now. The quality / price / performance ratio is truly remarkable, rnha good speed 'and precision in focus, it is quite clear wide open, but F8 from the best. It weighs 1,830 kg is not so much for a 600, has a very good ergonomics, well-balanced. Very useful for all the block length of the dock focale.rnCon-usb can modify many parameters, focus, stabilizer, update the firmware, and customize 2 configurations that can be invoked via a selector Flare stesso.rnSigma It provides several very useful accessories, such as the rigid carrying bag, the shoulder strap, and a ring gummy to be applied when removing the bracket for the tripod. In addition, this lens has the rubber gasket on the attack bayonet-mail, this means that a small tropicalisation not be compared to that of the Sport series is clear, however qualchand splash of water and a bit of dust should not creagli problems. rnUna thing that I did not expect is no compatibility with the multiplier Kenko Pro 300 DGX 1.4x, but only if I mount on Canon 7D mk2 does not recognize me Sigma 150-600, the camera gives me the message: "not updatable firmware" . With other optics instead 7d mk2 + kenko 1.4x works fine. rnQuando instead use the Canon 550D and apply the multiplier kenko to sigma 150-600 everything works well, certain AF is slower but it works, and also pass all the shooting data. It states that all hardwere is updated to the latest versions. rnUna thing I highly recommend is the Sigma 95mm Protector Filter, the original is ish, I found it online at 78 Euros, but it's worth it, protects the lens and does not create any loss of quality. sent on August 17, 2016 |
 | Hoya Pro1 Circular Polarizer Pros: Excellent value for money Cons: Nobody Opinion: A good polarizing filter does its job with a low cost, online is very competitive prices, does not produce any adverse effect on shooting. Only trick is that it takes away a bit of light, but that they do it all the polarizers. If like me you want to spend a reasonable fee and have a good product that is right for vosto. sent on September 28, 2015 |
 | Canon 7D Mark II Pros: 100% coverage viewfinder, excellent high ISO, AF speed and accuracy at 65 points, dual slot, dual processor, robust and ergonomic, flash remote control, shutter guaranteed for 200,000 shots. Cons: Yet I found none. Opinion: Coming from the 550D to the first impact I realized immediately that I had in my hands "so much stuff", the camera body is fantastic, ergonomic and robust. In the first shots were good ones only those easy-Invoice, those a bit more complicated I were better with the 550D, but this did not give me concern, because the beds forum earlier I knew that I had bought a special machine, which has to be understood, always studied and set manually depending on the type of shots to do, and to do so in the best way you must read, study well the fact manuale.rnPersonalmente had already begun to study it before owning the camera, but then the theory must be added a lot of practice on campo.rnAd today are about 18 months that i own, i still can not exploit the full potential also because of the mancaza a tele L. the AF series is very sensitive, it is necessary to make good use of the CASE AF menu and always select the best one for the situation. Excellent sealing at high ISO, up to 6400 I go quiet, I tried anchand shots at ISO 16000 with little light and was amazed with the result, certainly they are not shots to be published, but can be used, I think is a great result like for a 20 MP APS-C. Files that are churning pesantini but PP is working well, if canon avresse opted for a less dense sensor of 18MP in my opinion would be would be almost a FF at high ISO. RNLA flurry of 10-12 frames per second (some say 10 people 12 but no matter) is monstrous, is a macchima designed for sport and nature, is also tropicalized, also has integrated GPS, I would not use it because I do not need , and then consumes a lot of battery, however, a second battery is a must, many have written that consumes a lot, but I think it's normal, I should mention that it has a double-Digit 6 board ... you can not expect that a supercar low fuel consumption, and anyway 6/700 photos they can do and I do not seem few. rnFantastica also in the videos, if combined with optical stm never loses focus on moving subjects, I had a chance to compare it to the 70d (also a lady machine) which occasionally in special situations loses focus.rnIl delay in activating autofocus after switch from standby mode I also noticed I, but we talk yes and no 1 / 2 seconds, and in any case then the second click on is a machine gun and not miss a beat. rnAppena aquistata I used it with the Tamron 70-300 and performance were not the best, then I managed to try it with a Canon 70-300 L series and recently I purchased the Sigma 150-600 C and AF performance and sharpness Photos are another thing. rnC'è who wrote in the forum "Lack of flash pop up", does not it is flash, and "lack dell'intervallometo" Also this feature is present in the menu. rnih conclusion this camera is not the evolution of the old 7d, is a totally new car, revolutionary, its price tag is worth it all, do not recommend it to those who are starting out, but for chi have a bit of experience and practical this is the machine body that changes your life. rn sent on September 21, 2015 |
 | Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Compact, Good Materials, Image Quality. Cons: It can not be mounted on Full Frame Opinion: It 'a good lens, very convenient to carry around for the small size, very clear already at 2.8, the picture quality is remarkable. I bought it to match it to 'EF-40 STM outputs for comfortable reading and I am very satisfied. And 'STM then applied to the latest Canon camera bodies home allows the continuous focus on moving subjects in making the video. The only flaw is that unlike the Canon EF-40 STM 24mm this is an EF-S and therefore can not be mounted on a Full Frame. sent on July 21, 2015 |
 | Canon Speedlite 430EX II Pros: Short recharge time, powerful, slave function Cons: Lack of master function and speaker Removable Opinion: I have the Canon Speedlite 430EX II for about two years, I am fully satisfied, the flash is powerful and can be recharged quickly, illuminates the schena always properly diffondento a beautiful white light at 5400K. It has many functions and can be used either in TTL mode and manual. It has a wide panel that allows coverage to 14mm focal. I saw that many professionals use it as a second flash in slave with the 600 or the 580. It lacks the master function, a function that canon incorporates the external flash from 400 euro up, but with the new Canon cameras like the 700D - 70D - 7Dmk2 is not a problem as they have the master function is incorporated in the camera body. rnUna thing canon failed is the diffuser is removable ... I find this outrageous (it's a piece of plastic that will cost 20 cents) often important houses are lost in absurd banality, however, is not a problem with a little imagination me are made from solo.rnLo recommend it to everyone, but keep in mind that the light of the flash to make inso goes soddiscefente issued and correctly oriented. sent on May 31, 2015 |
 | Samyang 8mm f/3.5 Fisheye Pros: Great fun, Sturdy and well-built, no vignetting. Cons: Lack shooting data Opinion: Perspective is creative fun, a nice toy that has great value for money. It 's my first fisheye I bought it used for cheap with intentodi play with it and do qialche creative experience, I must say that sharpness is not the best, you should also take a little hand in quente is all manual including the focus that is necessary to adjust the dial measures, made in good f8, but the tripod is almost a must. The flare I have to say that under certain conditions it suffers a bit, but guys for less than 200 euro is a great deal. sent on September 25, 2014 |
 | Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Pros: Wide range of focal AF-fast and precise, sharp. Cons: It 'a little dark, if it was a 2.8 ... For what it costs the hood MUST be standard. Opinion: It 'a great quality to do everything, and fortunately I was able to prove it for a week and you can decide to change my Sigma 17-70mm f / 2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM Canon with this, I have to say that I've got thought well, because even the sigma is a great lens. The canon 15-85 actually is not very bright, but the focus is very fast, has a good sharpness, 15mm distorts little, the stabilizer is the AF are silent, has the AF Full Time, but I never use it because the AF not miss a shot is very accurate. A f 5.6 starts to work very well. Sure, maybe the price is a bit exaggerated, if I had this opportunity I would not have spent so much on this lens, because it is not tropical conditions, it does not open at 2.8 and is an EF-S and if you spent a full frame I would be forced to sell it. For me it is a great lens, but my THE COUNCIL AND: look for a bargain second hand found, buy new 650 euro about not worth it. One points outtion with the lens hood attached (even if the original canon) focal 15-18 depending dell'illuminazzione photos may show a slight vignetting in the high parts, nothing that can not be Correct in post. sent on September 13, 2014 |
 | Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini Pros: Good value for money, 4G Cons: Camera not up to Opinion: As the phone is great, the touch responds well, navigate velocemnete and 4G. It 'easy to blow up its neither too big nor too small, the camera is not the best, especially when there is so much light is not acceptable photos, and also the automatic and manual color balance does not work well. Mind you I'm not making a comparison with an SLR, God forbid, and I see only pictures taken on other smartphones like the i-phone or other lower-end and the pictures are much better out of the oven. sent on August 13, 2014 |
 | Manfrotto MK 394-PQ Pros: Quality, head quick release, price, weight and size. Cons: For 80 euro anyone. Opinion: The product is quality, convenient to carry around as it comes with a carrying bag. And 'quite stable, but if there is a lot of wind is not great, but more can not be asked to a tripod from 80 euro, and then the weight is reduced if it were heavier it would not be very comfortable to carry around. I made a couple of changes to this tripod, I added a ballast hook to make it stable when it's windy and I wrapped the grip of the tennis racket in the legs, for a better grip, and to avoid contact with the aluminum winter in the mountains becomes very cold. Personally it is a product that I recommend, and he aquistassi another top level of this tripod I do priverei.rnUltimamente I put us Sigma 150-600mm f / 5-6.3 DG OS HSM C which weighs almost 2 kg + the 7d Mk2 and other 700/800 grams of camera body, simply put a load of about 3 kg and did extremely well. sent on August 06, 2014 |
 | Kenko Pro 300 DGX 1.4x Pros: Hoya lenses of excellent quality, no vignetting, the Auto focus in good light conditions remain acceptable retains EXIF ??data Cons: In my opinion no, it is clear that if you apply a multiplier a slight loss on the performance of the lens we have to be. Opinion: I use it on a Canon EOS 550D paired with the Canon EF-100 2.8 macro or the Tamron 70-300 4-5.6 Di VC USD, with both lenses behaves well. E 'consists of high-quality lenses, then you will get very good shots. But you have to take into account some precautions when using it because some light is lost, if it is used during the day with the sun, it is not a problem, it keeps the AF although close to F9-10, but with the sunset would use the MF and in some cases even a tripod. With the 70-300 a bit of speed and accuracy sull'AF you hear. These are not critical to this fantasico multiplier that buy back 100 times. With the canon 100 2.8 macro the problem does not feel as it becomes a 140mm F4 and remains a beautiful opening. In the end you have to be careful as not all lenses are compatible. That said I think this is a real giogliello. sent on July 12, 2013 |
 | Canon PowerShot A710 IS Pros: Little is light, good quality camera, 6x optical zoom, optical viewfinder, ability to adjust the flash output. Cons: None to be a compact, but one thing I've noticed often signals the exhaustion of the batteries even if they are charged. Opinion: It 'was my first digital camera, I immediately felt at home with the 710-is because it has the ability to manually adjust shutter speed and aperture, you pull out beautiful pictures from this little gem. Every now and then I still use when I have the chance to bring the camera with all lenses. Take good up to ISO 400, 800 you can see its limitations. Searching the internet you have the ability to install additional firmware (Type Magic Lantern) that allow you to shoot in RAW and other useful functions. It was an expensive proposition in 2006 cost about 250 Euros but it was one of the few that allow you to work in manual mode. It also has the option to install adapter rings for zoom lenses, macro and wide angle. Do this 10 to a nice little camera of 2006. sent on May 24, 2013 |
 | Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Pros: Good stabilizer Cons: Shortly bright, distortion and vignetting. Opinion: Had borrowed for a weekend and honestly I was not dissapointed, I think the 18-55 is both better. And 'dim, 17 distorts a lot, and often notice a marked vignetting. The only plus point is the stabilizer which is good, but it's hard to find a stabilizer scarce, the rest is good facale the range of 17 to 85, but the quality leaves something to be desired. I do not recommend it. sent on May 21, 2013 |
 | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC OS HSM Macro Pros: Great value for money, bright and sharp, excellent resistance to flare, vignetting nothing on aps-c. Cons: Lack of focus Full Time. Opinion: This lens is truly a jewel of Sigma, accurate and fast on focus, clear and bright, the most out of this lens is ottine at F6.3 / F8. Also great stabilizer. It has a small focal defect in the ring, sometimes it's a little soft if you fold down the camera tends to vary the focal length, I think depends on the weight of the lens which has a diameter of 72, however, nothing that compromises the performance and 'use. How to put its point against only the lack of focus on Full Time. It should be the antagonist of the canon 17-85, but in my opinion is much higher. rnHo heard that some specimens may have small problems of back-focus, you are not on my verificato.rnUno of my best Purchasing, super recommended. sent on May 20, 2013 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: AF fast, almost too perfect to 300 mm, very good stabilizer, Price, 5-year warranty. Cons: Indeed it is pesantino then the ring to the tripod would have been handy. Opinion: I have worked for a few days and I did find really great, so I sold my Canon 55-250 to go to the Tamron. The AF is really fast and accurate, able to maintain focus even birds in motion, the only flaw I noticed was the subject contrastai just a little effort to focus, but it compensates with the AF-Full . Excellent image quality even at the 200 mm focal addition you lose very little in sharpness between F8 and F10 from the best. The stabilizer is a bit noisy but it works great, vignetting absent. It 'sa bit heavy, but I must say that you hold very well, it has the right weight that makes you maintain stability, but this is entirely peronale. I confirm that it is perfectly compatible with the teleconverter 1.4x kenko pro DGX 300 is a big plus. For a little over € 300, there is nothing better. sent on April 11, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Compact, Excellent materials, Boken, image quality. Cons: At a price of 155 Euros NO. Opinion: It 'a very good lens, almost all do, but according to me the best on portraits. It 's very comfortable to carry around the small size, the best quality of immaggine you around F4, 2.8 loses slightly, but I would say that you hardly notice it. I found it on the web at € 155 and straconsiglio at all, a few euro more than the 50mm 1.8 is worth them both as building materials and as a photographic quality. Then an STM and if applied to the 650D (or others in Hybrid Sensor) allows the continuous focus on moving subjects in making the video. sent on January 04, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Pros: Excellent image quality, sharpness, Construction Materials, Internal Focus, Maghifico Bokeh. Cons: A bit slow auto focus Opinion: I bought used for as little as 300 euro (including the hood), I immediately noticed the strength of the materials and the convenience of internal focus, ie the lens expands its length during focusing, for macro is a useful thing. It 'also great for portraits and sharp at F2.8 but already the highest in F4/F5. The focus to infinity loses a lot, but it's still a Macro lens and it is here that the best. I combined all'extension Tube EF12 II and it does not lose anything in brightness in it qualità.rnMolto satisfied with this fulfill purchase, highly recommend it. sent on December 13, 2012 |
 | Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II Pros: Value for money, stabilizer, and focal length. Cons: Materials, Over 200mm loses a lot of sharpness. Opinion: And 'perspective inexpensive because it is usm, its lenses are not bad for what they cost. E 'equipped with an excellent stabilizer, and covers a good range of focal lengths, the AF is not fast but accurate it gets along with little light should be in trouble. Over 200mm loses much in clarity, it should be at least close to F8. One lens that I recommend to us a budget, when combined with the classic 18-55 provided in almost every kit allows you to have a good equipment at a reasonable price, if you want you do brisk business on second. sent on August 31, 2012 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II Pros: Price, size and stabilizer. Cons: Slow AF, flare Opinion: It 's the classic that comes in almost every kit, buy it separately even though it is almost worth it, but if you find yourself in the kit you use it a lot for its versatility. Suffers from the flare, recommended that the hood does not solve the problem but dim. Not bad stabilizer. Great rather the minimum distance of focus, 25 cm at all focal lengths, and when combined with an extension tube to focus 55 taking pictures macro remarkable. sent on August 31, 2012 |
 | Canon 550D Pros: Great value for money, sensor and processor of high quality, ergonomic, lightweight and robust, compatible with the FW Magic Lantern.rn Cons: Suffers burst and the focus in low light. Opinion: Excellent camera, a step above other entry level, if combined with good optics does not fear comparison with other semi-pro higher end of which the internal processor and sensor. If you shoot in bursts in RAW + Jpeg is a bit slow, but if you select only a 18MP Jpeg even with a good Class 10 card is not bad. As for the iso, personally I almost never go above 800, but I happened to shoot to 1600 and you can see its limitations. Also good in video mode. Council-Battery Grip changes for the better ergonomics of the camera body. With the release of the 650D the 550D has dropped a bit in price, and you can get a good deal on the new, I recommend it. sent on August 31, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
