JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II is a standard lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2011 to 2014 (discontinued). The focus is done by Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 140 €;
90 users have given it an average vote of 7.3 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex APS-C Canon EF.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 181000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:Sharpness, colors a bit 'off, slowness and uncertainty focusing.
Opinion:I purchased this optic kit with canon 1100d and accompanied me for a long time before being replaced by more performing optics. The stabilization, the ease of use, the weight and the ridiculous price are definitely advantages. But the fact of being a dark opaque, unclear, with a noisy focus and sometimes inaccurate and that returns colors are not always pleasant, they will soon try to switch to better optics.rnIn general, however, this lens allows you to obtain more than decent results and to get carried away with a reflex.
Opinion:I used this lens for 6 months after I bought it in a kit with the Canon 1300 d. He has given me some great satisfaction, but after a few months he feels the need to have a better lens, even though he does his duty for a beginner like me. It's a lightweight lens, it's easy to carry, but it's crisp, light, very loud and slow in focus.
Opinion:I had years ago matched primarily to the 1100D (my very first SLR) and then on the 600D. An honest lens with all its structural limits (plastic everywhere) but in specialmodo on the 600D, has always given me very clear images. More 'than fair for what stands to be the must or the entry level. I would say very good to start with, and even more '...
Cons:Autofocus slow and noisy, focus ring indecent fire, distortion
Opinion:And 'better than you might think. The sharpness is obviously not in top levels, but it is better than what is said. As evidenced by the tests easily available online. Obviously not expect exaggerated performance, but if you knew how to use soddisfazioni.E gives 'light, even if this results in a bit' too much plastica.Lo stabilizer is good. Bad points: the focusing ring Manual focus is virtually unusable and the brightness decreases rapidly with focal. The focus motor focus makes a lot of noise and it's slow. Distorts both 18 mm. The best yield, as in several objectives, is closing the 1-2 position with respect to the maximum aperture. Valid for landscapes and pictures of "family", while portraits there is indeed much better. Overall good: often they give faults that do not deserve it and who may be attributed to the photographer. It gives a hard time to the most famous goals. Perfect start and to understand better what you need later.
Pros:Sharp enough to turn pale even optical emblazoned (landscapes) Good focal range Rather than sell it for pennies, I would keep as a safety light in a APSC kit Extremely durable, unbelievable! possibility of being able to reverse to make macro with great satisfaction
Cons:plasticky construction, alas ring nonexistent maf in practice
Opinion:Well, I have also taken us an EP with this view, at night ... I could not help but love her !! Sharp, durable, he has never left me, neither in the rain nor with alpine cold. When asked, he replied semrpe present. Too bad the brightness, otherwise would give a hard time to optics that cost at least 5-6 times. Top marks for me!
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
