JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 177000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Magic Lantern that runs very well above, colors, robustness even if it is not tropicalized, perfect size and low weight to carry it everywhere, very manageable noise with magic lantern and using multiples of 80.
Cons:For me, nobody.
Opinion:It may seem strange, but since I installed magic lantern on my 550d, my love for my SLR has increased a lot. Try to believe: test the 550d using the multiples of 80, then from 160 ISO upwards and you will notice that the situations of serious noise will be reduced to a minimum. Maybe it's a risky phrase but I did a test of daily photos with a 5d mark II and a 550d, using the same lens and same settings and 2 professional photographers friends, they could not recognize the origin of the two photos. This SLR is exceptional. Needless to talk about 600d 650d 700d 750d ... because in reality after 2010-11 there were very few changes to entry level level, semi pro. There were only minor news that are almost never used, such as NFC, Wi-Fi, GPS, etc. So I recommend it to all those who want to start and to those who want a valid second body. Install magic lantern immediately to take advantage of the infinite settings added and taken taken. In conclusion I wanted to say that, tested with an objective of the L series, qhis reflex makes it really breathless ... so my advice is: take it at prices now torn and with the money saved invest in a high quality lens and a battery grip. And it will be just pure fun!
Pros:Ease of use, speed, weight, quality / price ratio
Cons:Autofocus, high ISO seal
Opinion:It seems a review copy of the other, well, in part it is. rnMa the vote that I gave is 9, because when I passed by this machine current, a bit 'to tear it scesa.rnE' easy to use and great to gain experience taking out some beautiful pictures. They feel very much in the dark limits (up to 800 ok, besides suffering), but for what it costs used with any lens, I would say that more can not pretendere.rnLa speed with which the carousel with the parameters after having taken hand is really nice.
Pros:Easy to use; Lightweight and versatile, well-defined screen; yet generous and valuable sensor; Tight up to ISO 1600 (require post processing), Rich in accessories, used excellent price, just over 200 Euros full of batteries etc. 1080P video
Cons:Burst slow and Buffer really little one, Combinations of buttons sometimes awkward to use, in the Settings menu is not rich because the 600/650/700 and 100DrnImpostazione Iso successes only to full-stop, no middle ground as ISO125 / 160/320 etc.
Opinion:really excellent machine, used for landscapes, street, black and white and fauna. After watching closely made Iso and color sensor that is closest to that of the older sister 7D, and this was why I had chosen only the price actually used concorrenziale.rnAl current price just over 200 euro is a real deal, very rewarding and a yield better than XX0D came after lei.rnColori excellent, focusing with 9 points and very good quality of buona.rnSotituita files just now to pass to the eldest sister 7D.
Pros:ease 'of use, sensor generous, good to gain experience
Cons:personally only noise at high ISO
Opinion:I own this car since 2011 and to date never a problem to be one, certainly compared to a fullframe the difference is, but only in low light, in fact comparing the photos with a 5d mark 3 shot in broad daylight the 550d is defended very bene.rnNaturalmente then the difference is the goals, display very well established although under the direct light and 'almost inutilizzabil.
Opinion:C "Landscape", etc.). Alternatively you quietly a minimum of PP.rnrnEssendo, then, a machine "dated", the 550D loses today the comparison with the other cameras and amateur, that in terms of functionality are perhaps higher, in particular for the presence of spherical display, touch screen, HDR-on-camera, ecc.rnA level of image quality, however, at least on paper the 550D is still a competitive car, at least in respect of the bigger range XXXD (even DxOMark believes the yield sensor 550D higher than the 700D: http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Canon-EOS-700D-versus-Canon-EOS-550D___870_645).rnrnIn Finally, once you're comfortable with the settings, and combined with the right optics, the Canon 550D is a great gem, ideal if you approach it for the first time in the world of digital SLR cameras. Personally I have always appreciated and, although I are attempting bodies decidedly higher performance as the 7DmkII and 6D, I think I keep it with me again for a while ', downgradingthe maximum to the second machine body.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
