|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
AlessioDraghi www.juzaphoto.com/p/AlessioDraghi  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon Z fc Pros: Vintage aesthetics, ergonomics even if without handle, practicality of use rings, high ISO hold, menu, weight, battery life. Cons: Since they put a small display for the aperture they could have made it backlit for night use; absence of dedicated vintage lenses. Opinion: Purchased at Christmas, I used it for the first time on a trip to London just ended, despite the temperatures below zero during all the days, the battery has abundantly covered the whole days of use even from diplay without ever going down more than half charge ... what do they say; I state that I have always used it with polarizing filter during the day and with a filter for night photos (removes light pollution and yellow casts) at night, but the yield of jpeg files are practically almost ready to use! The high ISO yield really top, pushed up to 6400 without any problem and in any case never fell below 1600 of darkness! (above ISO 1600 at night if you enlarge the JPEG image to 100%, you notice digital noise... Obviously we can't expect crisp 50x70 prints, but on 20x30 prints remain acceptable results.) Really good ergonomic feeling! Machine body certainly underestimated for the final yield of the files, despite being an apsc has a sensor that gives great satisfaction and excellent yields! I used it with the purchase kit of the Nikkor Z 28mm f / 2.8 SE, despite the absence of stabilizer both in the body and on the lens, not going beyond 1/30sec. It does not feel lack of stabilization even freehand (I have never used the tripod and I have never had problems with shake). I absolutely recommend the purchase for lovers of retro look. sent on January 20, 2023 |
 | Panasonic Lumix TZ70 / ZS50 Pros: Build quality, functionality, unparalleled quality/price ratio, small 1" sensor in ratio with 12 mpxl, compactness and lightness, possibility of setting shooting in scene mode. Cons: Maybe... maybe... but just to want to find the needle in the haystack and be picky, the viewfinder too small and until you become familiar, given its compactness, you risk inadvertently pressing a few buttons on the back during the shot ... but all this is irrelevant as I have already said, after a little familiarity. Opinion: My watchword in the choice of purchase was: "compactness for daily portability in your pocket and spend very little." My lens was maximum portability everywhere every single day, still having in my hands something clearly superior to a mobile phone. After a month of careful selection and studies, the choice fell on this gem, found new in the physical store at the price of € 240.00 (yes I know it was an unsold leftover because out of production, but precisely this could not be a better opportunity!) My need was to have a third body for when REFLEX and mirrorless remain at home, but never miss the moment that precisely with the mobile you could never equate. I WANTED the viewfinder, the ability to work completely in manual, the ability to shoot in monochrome mode and the compactness as much as possible while maintaining the photographic quality that a mobile phone cannot give you. Now after a month of intense daily use, tests and comparisons I would like to draw two conclusions about this gem! Many demand a lot of noise in the scarcity of light... ok, at night it is definitely not the best means with which to shoot, but I can guarantee you that during the golden hour, if you know how to manage the shadows and dark areas well, they will still be excellent files printable in A4 without any minimum noise (test carried out in practice personally). It has a great white balance automatically. The starting focal length 24mm in equivalence is well usable up to 600mm in optimal light conditions and without haze. I used it mainly for the B & W in monochrome scene mode ... a delicacy in the automatic management of whites and blacks, not always very manageable files in post production, but if you make a good starting shot, there are no problems. Also the sepia scene mode is very pleasant if you love the genre. Its "only" 12mpxl in a small 1" sensor (1cmX1cm) are more than enough for excellent sharp prints of at least 20x30. In short, I highly recommend the purchase of the new if you can find it as a leftover store. Do not think that the later models are better, on the contrary... with small sensor, often better a few pxl less ... sent on February 26, 2022 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 III Pros: Size, lightness, price of availability of the new on the internet, resolution despite its 16mpx, practicality of use, functions, settings. Cons: In relation to its value/price range absolutely no cons. Opinion: Purchased mainly for its outward charm, I must absolutely say that it was a surprise in terms of quality compared to the price. I absolutely did not believe in his abilities in terms of quality both of machine body and quality at the level of image resolution. Colors, high ISO emnumbered, noise, are comparable to a much higher range as a price range (purchased 400 euros on eglobal). Absolutely holds up the comparison alongside my Canon 80D. For the moment I am positively surprised by the high quality, far above expectations. Absolutely recommended if you like the retro look, it does not disappoint in terms of quality. sent on December 27, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 28-70mm f/2.8 L USM Pros: Robustness, brightness, sharpness! Cons: Considering the modern competition... NO one, it's always ahead of so many lenses today! Opinion: Inherited from my dad, former photographer, once you attached it to the machine body you wouldn't take it off anymore... and not because of hereditary nostalgia, but because of its f.2.8! On photostreet is one of the best. With my 80D, he doesn't miss a beat... I'd like to one day try it on an FF... however, there is still a lens that makes a difference... especially when we have little light! If you find it used, you won't let it get away! sent on November 01, 2019 |
 | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical Pros: general product quality, sharpness, materials, lightness, price. Cons: Analyzing the product, Nesuno. Opinion: I think it's one of the best fixed-focal wide-angle product. True, it has manual focus, but you choose it for that, otherwise you would opt for something else. It's very precise and crisp, and if you shoot the manual once you've learned how to handle manual focus, it's a lot of fun. Excellent and almost unparalleled to photograph panoramas from having to include as much as possible in the scene... to photograph sunsets and above all gives the best of SE to photograph the stars without having to resort to PP. sent on January 03, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Pros: Unique value for money without going to look for so many under brands. Cons: Despite being a f/1.8 little brightness being a fixed 50mm. Opinion: Personally I was looking for a 50ino from the affordable price to have fun with the blurry and staying in the house Canon I would say that this was a great buy, gives great blurred, but after a few tens of shots already you realize to be tight in his F/1.8 and not You do miss the desire to buy an F/1.4. The price compared to its quality is still unbeatable and matchless to date on other brands. sent on January 03, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM II Pros: Sharpness, versatility, stabilizer, material quality, robustness, construction, tropicalization. Cons: In my opinion NO! Opinion: I say it is my favorite lens and I believe that anyone who owns a reflex (professional or amateur) should have it in his kit! I think the lens is all about doing 90% of the shots you want to take. Great focal excursion for landscape photos, panorama, mountain, close-ups and portraits, weddings and creams, street... It goes without saying that the f/2.8 would be better, but already having the f/4 in your hands I think is MORE than enough! I mean, I'd recommend it in a thousand!!! sent on January 03, 2019 |
 | Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Pros: Price, lightness, portability, good excursion. Cons: It is particularly noticeable the plasticity of the materials, the brightness is not the strong. Opinion: Bought at the last second for a mountain holiday, my kit was lacking in a tele lens and this was a great purchase to cover long focal lengths. It loses a lot of brightness if we do not have sunny days, but given its price (just over €150 on eglobal) I would say that we can not expect that much. All in all quality/price I am very satisfied and I recommend this lens on APS-C entry level as my 600d, instead I recommend the Canon 18-200mm on APS-C like my 80d. sent on January 03, 2019 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Price, lightness and excellent focus taking into account the quality/price. Cons: Quality/Price no cons. Obvious distortion at 10/11mm, but acceptable given the price! Excessive autofocus noise when used for video. Opinion: Bought at a reasonable price on eglobal (less than €200) to take away some wide-angle whim, I was immediately satisfied with the first shots! I would say even great on APS-C when used with good natural light. I recommend for those who like me has an APS-C and wants to have fun with wide angle without spending exorbitant figures... said that satisfaction, as soon as I can, I will immediately evaluate the purchase of Canon 10-22mm, slightly higher, but always at an affordable price. sent on January 03, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
