JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 177000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:It's an IMPORTANT to the AdmiralTy CANON EOS 1 D MARK 2 ETC... LASCIA WITHOUT THE TIME FOR THE IMAGE QUALITY , IN Fact, HOW TO VERY OTTICHE OF HIGH QUALITy NOT TO BE GOOD TO CAMERAS NOT PROF. THE USE WITH A 5D THE MESSE IN VERY CASI RESULT INDECISA, BUT NOT DIPENDEN OF THE OPTICAL BUT THE ECONOMIC SYSTEM ADOPTED OF THE CANON FOR THESE CAMERAS, IF INSTEAD the US FOR SUNA 1D MARK 2 O 1DS MARK2 O 1DS MARK 3 ETCE... is A SCHEGGIA AND OF ABSOLUTE
Pros:Current purchase price, construction, yield from L.
Cons:Knowing what you do nothing
Opinion:Really amazed. Having found a used specimen, in excellent condition and not far from home; I tried. Having not had the opportunity to test the latest models, I refrain from making comparisons. The last two times I spent that amount I regretted after a little of the purchases made. I heard many, rightly, warn about the lack of spare parts: that specimen looked new and after trying it for half an hour I took it home with me. I have even older lenses, which kept with regard have never given me boredom (it is always true that you defy fate, I do not deny it, but it is with regard to all purchases without guarantees whatsoever). A lens with infinite versatility, but you pay by weight. Incredible yield and blurry for a zoom, I had never seen anything like it. Sharp and bright enough. I was fascinated by the rendering on the canvas side, leaving me in front of beautiful portraits. The rendering of the colors seemed to me peculiar, it has something dated; like the lens of the rest, which has more years than me. I highly recommend it to anyone who finds a well-kept specimen and who has the opportunity to try it out.
Pros:Handyman.... Construction, brightness, sharpness even at full aperture (which can vary according to sensors) color depth, wonderful blur, lightning precision and focus, very little distortion, professional performance of L-series, cost in used currently, Lens Hood (obviously purchased apart)
Cons:28mm sometimes they are a little pochini... Risk of not finding spare parts in case of faults... For the rest really nothing.
Opinion:Bought by very little, really really great lens! I needed a zoom to use for events and ceremonies, obviously with a big opening but I didn't want to spend a capital... I decided to buy this "veteran" of the series Zoom L Canon... What about, excellent construction, smooth and very very sturdy nuts, for big hands can be very comfortable, the hood then does really well its duty. From the technical point of view is already sharp enough to 2.8 even if in post I still have to increase a bit ' value, I expected a flare resistance much sharper and more decisive, especially on values of 28 and 35 millimeters, but in post production you can recover... Little distortion and to my opinion an excellent yield even on the edges, the colors are really good and true to reality, even if they remain stationary to those who were analogue camera bodies and perhaps the first digital... For those who want to take home a series zoom L bright all make it really recommend at all!
Pros:Constructive quality, sharpness, speed of focus, good focal excursion, no excess, Splendid bokeh.
Cons:Slight loss of sharpness up to diaphragm 4, lack of spare parts, weight.
Opinion:An inescapable handyman-friendly design goal. with loose, saturated, well contrasted colors, it returns a very nice blur and sharpness at all the best focal points diaphragming a bit, I've been able to compare it with the 24/70 I and in my opinion it is slightly better even if it does not reach 24mm I do not feel the pain of the pain because there is no risk of distortion and eberration of the image with a 28 that is practically everything.rnProved both on old eos5D that on eos 6D diaphragm on 4 returns magnificent images! rnConsiglible if paid the right today under £ 400 if in good condition it is the best purchase for a standard zoom Canon.rnvoto 9.5 only for a slight lack of clarity up to f4 otherwise 10
Pros:build quality, 2.8 fixed, accurate colors, bokeh
Cons:no spare parts, weight
Opinion:I've had it for a very short time available and it was love at first sight: impeccable build quality. It returns true colors, saturated, well contrasted, balanced. Beautiful bokeh. Unfortunately, one of the lenses of the optical unit was slightly opaque and I had to send back (in the bad luck I have had the good fortune to meet an honest person). Now I bought a lot less a Sigma 17-50 f / 2.8 EX DC OS HSM ... let ', here on the site we all speak well ... VOTE 9.5
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
