JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 176000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: buona lente per il costo e per la qualità del sistema autofocus STM studiato per essere usato in modo specifico con la nuova canon 70 D
con la quale si ottiene un abbinamento eccezionale grazie al nuovo sistema rivoluzionario Af Dual Pixel CMOS AF .
Cons: all'apparenza sembrerebbe plasticoso , in confronto alla serie L professionale tropicalizzata , ma che ha un'altra funzionalità
Opinion: in risposta all'amico Carletto66 , dico di provare questo obbiettivo con la Canon 70 D e rimarrà entusiasta, per un autofocus mai visto prima su nessuna macchina canon ed io posseggo la 1DS mark III e la 1D mark iv.......l'autofocus dell'accoppiata 70d + 55-250 stm è 4 volte piu' veloce di qualsiasi obbiettivo L montato sulle mie macchine professionali. inoltre caro amico riguardo al sito che tu citi sulsito www.the-digital-picture.com/Lens c'e un piccolo trucco .....il sito dove si paragona il 55-250 stm è settato a f 5.6 con una canon 60D
mentre il paragone fotografico con il canon 70-200 L IS USM è settato con la 1DS markIII a f/4........è certo che così si vedono delle differenze.
prova a modificare i parametri mettendo su entrambi gli obbiettivi la 60D, 200mm e f /5.6 per entrambi......e noterai subito che le differenze sono del tutto minime.
ciononostante stiamo parlando di un obbiettivo dal costo di 1/3 dell'altro.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Price, lightness, portability, good excursion.
Cons:It is particularly noticeable the plasticity of the materials, the brightness is not the strong.
Opinion:Bought at the last second for a mountain holiday, my kit was lacking in a tele lens and this was a great purchase to cover long focal lengths. It loses a lot of brightness if we do not have sunny days, but given its price (just over €150 on eglobal) I would say that we can not expect that much. All in all quality/price I am very satisfied and I recommend this lens on APS-C entry level as my 600d, instead I recommend the Canon 18-200mm on APS-C like my 80d.
Pros:Sharpness, autofocus, robustness, focus and zoom bezel, stabilizer, silent
Cons:Little Bright
Opinion:I try this lens on a Canon 600d. For the current price, excellent lens! Maybe at 250mm is not the maximum sharpness, but up to 200mm is fantastic! Then on APS-C is an 88-400mm! Perfect for sports photos, portraits and photos at long distance subjects. Only flaw is the diaphragm, very closed F4 to 55mm to end at F 5.6 to 250mm
Opinion:For the current price I don't think there is any better in the market. I found it very sharp up to 200 mm or so, at 250 it is still sufficiently sharp in the center at full aperture. Ideal to start and understand if these focal lengths are for you. The plastic construction makes it very light and transportable, I use it with adaptor on an M50 and I have no problem with weight or imbalance contrary to what you might think. The autofocus works best on the M50 compared to the 1200d I had, I think for the new AF technology, although in low light when it does not find the correct focus continues to focalize back and forth continuously (rarely happens). I used it in landscaping and sometimes even for sports in good light conditions and I always found it good. Vignette a bit but it's all correctable in a second. Recommended
Pros:Lightweight, very handy focal length range, AC contained such extremely quiet, good workmanship
Cons:F slow and uncertain, sometimes give up altogether, cartoon that is a pleasure, sharpness
Opinion:Not suitable for sports photos, took the x test and curiosity I did some shooting in an oasis on the Dese Sile, the sharpness is sufficient, very light. Hopefully, with still shots in daylight. However, if you try to photograph fast moving subjects, even simple gulls, begins to focus back and forth (and talk about center point with AI servo) and basically when is the fire is too late and managed to shoot only the bottom of the subject now in escape ... for use I wanted make doesn't fit much. I put my hand to my old Canon 18 200, which I used more so because of the weight when travelling but is stronger in af, albeit with all other lens limits, AC included. Too bad because the rest feeling it was all there, even at that price, XO too. I'd give it a 7.5, if I think of various tamron and sigma of the same category.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
