|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Sara Stojkovic www.juzaphoto.com/p/SaraStojkovic  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon Z8 Pros: Ergonomics, high ISO resistance, AF and tracking, reliability. Backlit keys. Cons: Battery life. Memory card slot flap. Complex menus in my opinion: you have to study them a little before you feel at home (but a subjective evaluation). Opinion: I have been lucky enough to use most of the brands for work and last, but not least, I find myself working with Nikon now. What can I say: the high ISO resistance, criticized by many, I see as excellent. You can't compare it to a 20, 24 or 33 mpx! Such a dense sensor is normal to have noise and even more than the previous sensors listed, but definitely manageable. Leaving aside the fact that for those who print, up to 12,800 ISO, on paper they are not noticeable, I shot up to 25600 ISO and even if the noise is evident, but the colors remain faithful, as well as the details and sharpness so desired ... With a minimum of posts, every difficulty is solved and the file is truly exceptional. The grain, or noise in my opinion remain very pleasant and what is important for me is not so much the noise (sorry for the repetition), rather it is important that colors and details remain. This way you can save the photo even in the most extreme situations. As for the AF, it's what I was looking for: to date, all the big tops have excellent AF and tracking, needless to say the opposite, where you throw yourself, you will feel good. But with her, and this is a personal opinion, for how she thinks with recognition and tracking, that's what I was looking for. Sometimes he loses the hook or in difficult situations, he can have difficulties, but it happens very few times... If we want to give numbers: he can make mistakes one time out of ten, just to be fiscal and that time obviously does not always happen, but only in situations of high stress with important backlights, or drastic light or really confusing backgrounds. But I always talk about borderline cases such as: sunset in shaded areas photographing small passerines in the middle of branches and twigs and I repeat: it rarely happens. The recognition: impeccable. The camera is large compared to other mirrorless cameras, but once you pick it up you never part with it. Comfortable, well balanced with the objectives. I, who have serious back problems and a broken hand that only works halfway, was afraid of the bulks and weights but paradoxically, they are so well distributed that I keep it with me all day in the forests that there is, it's clear: but I feel absolutely no discomfort. The viewfinder is truly spectacular. I can't find any other words to describe it. The monitor as well. I feel like being essential because I really don't know what to say more than that. I have not yet felt the overheating of the machines and/or memory cards. I reserve the right to add the defect if it now comes up on mine. The machine is complex. At first, because of the menus, you can find it frustrating... But once set properly, the menus can also be forgotten. It is a machine that can give great satisfaction but it is not for beginners with money. Put simply. You have to know how to work with it but in the end, it becomes a glove. For me at least it was like that. The battery is sufficient, but it does not cry out for a miracle. They could have done much better. The card compartment door opens too easily. Sometimes, taking the car out of my backpack, I find myself taking it out and opening it. We have to be careful. I got used to it and it never happened to me again. sent on September 27, 2024 |
 | Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 Di III VXD Pros: Focal range from 35 to 150.. brightness from 2 to 2.8 well proportioned. AF great for my way of photographing. Image quality combined with Sony sensors. Cons: Weight but understandable. Hood that I personally do not like the petal design. Zoom that lengthens: I prefer internal focus. Opinion: I've had this lens for a couple of years. I mainly use it for ceremonies and events. Personally it covers the range of focal lengths that I use the most. It is true that it is big and weight, but if we keep in mind the quality and concreteness that you can bring with you only one lens and you do everything ... I don't see the problem. Personally to have a more wide-angle lens I matched the 20 40 2.8 Tamron and so I feel covered, even if.. If I need to enlarge the frame, just step back 2/3 steps and you're fine. For those like me, does not prefer many optical changes especially in adverse environments, and those like me, do not like to wear two cameras around their neck ... With this all-rounder you are fully booked. I call him a handyman but I don't want to belittle him. For me it is really a great goal. Now I bought a second one for the study, trying to understand the new Samyang 35 150 2 2.8 if it could, given the lower price, replace this Tamron. No. The lower price explains my answer no. You pay less, you have less. So Tamron all life. Sometimes I miss those extra 50 mm that gives me the 70 200... But as we all know... Extra mm is never enough :-) in no lens and the choice between 70 200 or 35 150 brought me to the second because with a range that reaches 35 you have more elasticity and those 50 less that I said in the end can be a good compromise. sent on August 27, 2023 |
 | OM System OM-1 Pros: High ISO tightness: yes, I used it up to 40,000 iso. If you want to see the file, I can send it to you. The details remain, with the artificial intelligence of Camera RAW for noise reduction, we break down many barriers but the merit also goes to the file of the machine because it manages to preserve colors and details excellently. 12,800, 16,000, 20,000 and 40,000 ISO with bad light, indeed, I can say even in the absence of light and the little that there was, in my working condition, were colored LEDs .. I didn't miss the FF. WARNING: I am not making comparisons. But I'm saying I thought worse and my thinking was all the wrong points of view. I worked in the same event with both Om and Sony a7iii and I noticed the difference in 3 hours of sporting event, only in some rare cases and only one stop difference. The camera is excellent and the speech lightness, portability, excellent lenses and stratospheric quality, tropicalization ... they do not make me miss the only stop I mentioned above of difference in favor of the FF that sometimes can come out. Ergonomics.. As a whole an excellent machine with which you can do everything: from wedding to sport to fauna and landscapes. If you know how to use it, if you know how to use the m4/3 this machine can be the point of arrival. Cons: The real cons are: 1) viewfinder when the light is bad (Otherwise it is a great viewfinder). It goes jerky and loses so much quality. Even here, once you know about this limit, you accept it and live with it and try to improve yourself as a photographer (problems that I also found with the two Sony mentioned below) 2) in the video field: I did not succeed, so if someone maybe solved, I could re-evaluate this point 2. That is the backup!! Obscene! For videos I did not find any possibility to save the files simultaneously in the two tabs and not even to use the second card when the first is full!! This, those who review the machines should say! Because it is a point that you get there only when you actually run out of card and we could find ourselves really in difficulty. So, in the video field ok stabilization, excellent file that comes out ... Excellent menus... But memory management is WORTHWHILE. Absolutely rejected (I speak video department). For a professional, or at least for me, for my way of operating .. It is unthinkable not to be able to make video backups. Point 3: the rings in which I manage times and apertures... Too recessed, so a bit uncomfortable. When I pick up the X, for example, a whole other world of comfort. Step 4: The joistick. Good but there is better. Opinion: The AF is not comparable to the FF super flagships but not so much below. More than AF... I correct myself, the tracking is more nervous and dancer. The af as reactivity I can easily place it on a par with the FF flagships (I come from Sony A9ii, Sony A7r5). I waited months to be able to say this and those who say otherwise make me wonder "how did you test the car? Have you really tried it?" And... If we are not yet objective, then I wonder about the quality of the preparation of the individual himself. The car unlike competing flagships, does not forgive you if you make a mistake. While with the others you can afford to make mistakes because there is so much the machine that remedies .. With her you can't. You have to know how to photograph. One stop or two of underexposure, sometimes even three, and one stop of overexposure you can afford. More is a risk. But if you really learn to use it, it doesn't give you any problems whatsoever. On the contrary, it pushes you to improve yourself as a photographer and once you improve, it does not leave you behind. So for me it's a point of quality. Like any product there are advantages and disadvantages. As well as sensors: M4/3, FF, super FF and so on... The blanket is always the usual short blanket. It is up to the professional to identify what interests him and his profession or passion. There is no best or worst, but the best for the individual himself. All the rest is bar chatter that leads to nothing but not improving ourselves. The camera is excellent when combined with pro optics. To really high quality optics. Then you will not miss anything. If you mount enough optics... You will have enough results. Here's how I think about it. Who buys this machine, can not have kit lenses. With lenses 1.2, 1.4, 1.7, 2.0... 2.8... and also with the F4... We can work very, very well. I recommend the Zuiko as a first choice but also the panaleica (the top) are exceptional. That said, I have reduced weights and backpacks a lot. I am a photographer who lives and works in photography from events, shootings and weddings to work around the world for author projects related to flora and fauna. I need the machine to move all round. I need portability. And don't say that the machine is as big as the other FFs. Because it means that you have not understood anything at all. The machine has the volume it needs to have. It's the lenses that really make the difference. And for those who travel the world and need hand luggage and do not have problems with weight and volumes .. This is a great alternative. sent on August 14, 2023 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M1X Pros: Tropicalization, ergonomics, buttons, responsiveness. Cons: Holding at high ISO not comparable to om1 as well as af and total file quality. But still a valid machine. Opinion: I use it as a forklift... As I use it to date, I do not complain about anything. The machine is very performing, the batteries last a long time and once understood .. As I always say, we can bring out the best in her. The viewfinder is not the best as we are used to today with the top range but it still does its job. The buttons and dials are outstanding. The file is very good, stabilization amazing. If I compare it to om1 is a couple of steps below... But this does not mean that it is a machine to be discarded, on the contrary. In my opinion up to 12,800 it is possible to pull out good photographs. With the artificial intelligence of Camera RAW we can in my opinion save many situations but also because the detail of the image remains. I'm not for the heavy and extreme post. But only improvements on noise. Or a style to create an image with an artistic signature. So I find the help of AI sensible. I would like to first make a definitive review, try it again for some time and then ... I will extend my experience hoping it will be of help to those concerned. sent on August 14, 2023 |
 | Canon EF 300mm f/2.8 L IS USM Pros: Af fast, accurate and reliable. Amazing sharpness and blur. Portability: I use it for wild photography by hand, without mono and tripod. Several hours of walking and always kept by hand or with the help of a harness. It gives a soft and engraved look at the same time. Minimum focusing distance. Cons: Small tripod mount. I often use the rod to hold it during walking and it is too small, it grabs badly. A bit noisy but nothing striking. Opinion: I bought this 300 to match my a9ii with sigma mc11 adapter. Not being able to buy the Sony 400 because of the price, and also evaluating the Canon 400 (too heavy for me and especially for the style of photography that I have without a monopod), this 300 was the most obvious choice and I'm not taking it. At the moment I use it smooth, but I will also test it with the dup 1.4 x iii. To this day I have nothing to complain about: fast, precise, gives beautiful emotions. Incredible blur and equally incredible sharpness. It makes a difference. Weight is not a problem for me. Very transportable, in case a good harness can be of help as a support. This Sony/Canon pairing is giving me some good emotions. I found some slight and for the moment insignificant weakness: stabilization is valid but sometimes it can give you some false positives let's say so. And some images in some critical situations of little light or faunal confusion, are a bit soft but on these last two points that I just wrote, I reserve for other tests and I will update the comment shortly. I usually shoot with the 200 600. And although compared to the latter it is much shorter, with some precautions we can also keep the 200 600 at home. The difference in image, especially in difficult situations, can be seen with the 300 winning hands down. As far as AF and accuracy are concerned, the Sony wins anyway. sent on March 21, 2023 |
 | Tamron 20-40mm f/2.8 Di III VXD Pros: Nesting, very little distortion, af Cons: Nothing relevant at the moment Opinion: Excellent lens with "right focal lengths"! The 20 40 for me is the right wide-angle compromise. The 16mm was too wide for my photographic style and the 35mm is my lens with which I shoot practically everything. So, with the 20 40 I bring home most of the work: weddings, shootings and events and panoramas. The constant 2.8 aperture makes it bright and suitable for everything. I haven't noticed flare or aberrations yet. Sharp in the center already at full opening and good at the edges. At least, my specimen is. If you close at f4 it is a blade. Very responsive AF. Coupled with my Tamron 35 150 2 2.8 I can cover any type of event. In my opinion it can be the right compromise for those like me who are used to working with a fixed 35 because for speed you can easily get to a 20 without changing lens or carrying two camera bodies. sent on December 12, 2022 |
 | Fujifilm X-H2S Pros: The pros according to my personal style and nothing more: AF, COLORIMETRY, STABILIZATION, IMAGE QUALITY, BODY, FEELING AND HOLD AT HIGH ISO Cons: Display adjustable in all directions for me not easy to digest. Failure to set the ISO in a ring to improve practicality (I hope they will solve it through updates), the inability to keep the shutter curtain dropped to protect the sensor (I hope this can also be solved via firmware), standby slowness in use mode. For dynamic photographers, those brief moments are nerve-wracking. Machine lock when saving burst. November 30, 2022: AFC issue they describe in opinions. * Opinion: I try to speak a little for everyone. I love the car. Now I have Fuji for several years and from XT4 I switched to XH2s. I'm a photographer. I take pictures and that's what I want to talk about. The fuji COLORIMETRY is exceptional, the af is really good! He doesn't miss a beat and if he does, it's because we got it wrong. It recognizes animals and birds in an impressive way. Much faster than the Sony A9 I own. Before even focusing it is as if he had already understood and tac! Here we go! It always seems like a span above my thoughts. The high ISO seal is also excellent: I work up to 12800 average, and the files are definitely good! High quality dynamic range. I really recommend it because for me it is the right compromise to make excellent photography. I could also talk about videos, but it's not my field, so I leave room for those who understand more. The things that I just can't digest are described in the "cons". Just today they do not go down with me. I do not want to repeat them because, after some time, that they have not yet been resolved is unjustifiable for me. And it's not true that when you set ISO once, you're fine. But not at all! Maybe in the studio with the lights under control. But for those who work in sports halls, with artificial lights that cannot be controlled, in particular situations in short... ISOs must be kept under control. We let ourselves be influenced too often by what a machine can do. And that's not good. But here we would open another discussion. Another thing I want to say, flickering. It is present. Even with active anti flickering. I didn't come across it often, but sometimes I did. It does not create defects in the photo such as to throw it away, rather it creates lights and shadows that can also be used to our advantage on some occasions. But, both in mechanics and electronics, sometimes the problem gives it and you have to be careful. As far as I'm concerned nothing alarming but when we are in situations of particular light, do not let the camera do it, but rather, a check for safety give it. The stacked sensor works perfectly. In electronic shutter, photographing sports (Padel), zero distortion of the ball. The machine is a big machine. Still to be discovered, on some unripe points, but I am convinced that Fuji will remedy the small problems he has. We will grow together. * November 20. For a whole week in which I found myself working for sporting events with artificial lighting (but not with little light) I encountered a big problem: AFc with slow tracking. At any fps I shot... On 100 photos.. 1 good. I generally don't do long but short bursts. And I try (knowing very well the sport I am going to photograph, sports dance) to take moments without waste. In short, I have been photographing this discipline for eight years. Never had such problems. I tried to solve the problem by changing all the settings. Nothing to do. I also noticed that the various types of subject tracking .... One is worth the other because they don't work. They are all the same. Things never encountered with the XT4. This is a serious problem in my view. I've already contacted fuji and let's see how they fix it. In my review I speak very well of the AFC with fast tracking with 10 20 30 40 FPS .. I keep reiterating its excellent quality. I will continue to update the situation. sent on November 14, 2022 |
 | Fujifilm X-Pro2 Pros: Waterproofness, quality of JPEG and RAW files, rings, held to high ISO, ease of use, his poetry. Cons: Image stabilizer (although this is subjective anyway). The iso ring that anyway for moments where you have to be faster, slows you down a little. Opinion: What about... I love her. I fell in love with her a couple of years ago (having never tried her). I have a mostly Sony kit but you know, the monkey when it comes only leaves when you buy... So, as an additional gift for my passion I took the XT2 at the time (sold after a few months and not because I didn't like it, but because it was the most expendable in my kit to have other work optics). After that, not knowing how to give up fuji files, I took the x100F... But the XPro ball was always there.... So, after a moment of madness, I gave away my Fujina... She switched to the Pro2 with the 23 2.0 kit. Graphyte model. What about... The other night at a photo shoot, I posed for my Sony and only snapped with her. And not because I compare the two machines. I wouldn't even think about it.. but for his poetry. It gives me incredible files even at high ISOs. I was amazed when I took at 12800 ISO and the photo was very used (I published it here too). I got the focus wrong, but other than that, I wanted to publish it to show its high quality even in very bad conditions. Fuji colors are amazing... I can't even describe them: they're poetry. Something full-bodied that when you look at a photo you feel like you've been touching it since it's full-bodied. I like it! As an AF I did not find any kind of problem but for this I want to test it better to be able to say something more. I thought I'd keep it as a machine/hobby... But I'm actually going to support it with my work machines without any kind of problem, from weddings, shootings as well as my free time. sent on February 09, 2021 |
 | DJI Mavic Mini Pros: Small, light, practical and easy to use. Great files, stabilized. Cons: If you have no experience in the field of photography you can last hard to pull out beautiful photos because it has little recovery of shadows and light (for beginners). Opinion: I'm just happy with this little gem. Great value for money! I recommend it to all those who want to take up this area. Very easy to use. To me personally he lost the signal only once but nothing worrying. To date, I don't see any problems. On a photographic level you have to know how to deal with lights and shadows because otherwise flat, noisy and burnt images can come out above all. It has little room for recovery of shadows and lights, so you have to know how to turn defects into merits. But with a little photo preparation, you don't have any kind of problem to pull out nice photos. Too bad you can not program the size of the file in photos. At least, I only see it at 72 dpi so I have to enlarge it in post production. I'd go back and i'd take it back. sent on February 21, 2020 |
| DJI Mavic Mini Pros: Small, light, practical and easy to use. Great files, stabilized. Cons: If you have no experience in the field of photography you can last hard to pull out beautiful photos because it has little recovery of shadows and light (for beginners). Opinion: I'm just happy with this little gem. Great value for money! I recommend it to all those who want to take up this area. Very easy to use. To me personally he lost the signal only once but nothing worrying. To date, I don't see any problems. On a photographic level you have to know how to deal with lights and shadows because otherwise flat, noisy and burnt images can come out above all. It has little room for recovery of shadows and lights, so you have to know how to turn defects into merits. But with a little photo preparation, you don't have any kind of problem to pull out nice photos. Too bad you can not program the size of the file in photos. At least, I only see it at 72 dpi so I have to enlarge it in post production. I'd go back and i'd take it back. sent on February 21, 2020 |
 | Samyang AF 14mm f/2.8 FE Pros: AF fast, sharpness, reliability Cons: Vignettà a bit and distortion (although justified) Opinion: Excellent lens. I have it coupled with my A7R3 and I do not regret having it with me, indeed! I always bring her back! From very sharp results and does not create problems with flare. It distorts but not too much, everything can be improved with a fast PP or knowing how to work even during its use in the field with the right perspectives. I didn't find it difficult. I used it mainly for landscapes and architectural photography without wasting even a minute in trouble. AF Fast and accurate. sent on December 21, 2018 |
 | Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM Pros: Fast, accurate, reliable Cons: Flare-Plasticous Lens Hood Opinion: Excellent lens, I use it as everything do with my A7R3. I do not find any faults nor encundiments nor weight, but this is only a purely subjective factor. On a practical level it is a lens that you don't miss a photo. Performing, fast and accurate as I said in the title. The only big flaw in my opinion are the presence of flare... definitely too annoying and you have to resort to stratagems or other to avoid them. I mean, they wouldn't even be such a big problem, but for what it costs and what it promises, it shouldn't suffer so much. For the rest, I have nothing to say: It is definitely a very good target! sent on December 21, 2018 |
 | Sony A7r III Pros: Powerful, AF speed, ability to shoot at high ISO, an incredible sensor Cons: In my opinion no one Opinion: I have for a few months this formidable A7R3. I come from the World Olympus Micro 4/3 and I had a very good Om-D EM1 Mk 2 with all Pro optics. I will not make any kind of comparison as they are two cameras distinctly different, but I do not miss even a bit because I found two points for me important: the speed and the ability to raise the ISO (although as a machine, the Sony, having all these mega Pixel in his bonnet suffers a bit of noise presence, but I took up to 24,000 ISO without working too much in PP and remain pleasantly affected. It has an incredible AF, a deadly burst and the duration of a single battery (purely original) infinite!!!! I worked a lot with Nikon D4, D4S and D5 at professional sports level and I can at the AF level and high ISO, compare them to this Sony. I will not play which is better or worse because for me all good machines and some different from each other, but with A7R3 I found everything I had, using the Nikon, with the difference of having less weight on. As far as I am concerned, also talking about weight, I am a person who does not care because I want more quality than portability and when they mount over Supertele cameras or qualitatively professional objectives, I think it always weighs everything but with the Just because. But when you don't have to mount a tele, but travel light, with this machine you can do it. A backpack and go! I hope to be able to help someone with my opinion... it is not easy to express what I mean, but as a machine is not back to any. I use it for landscapes, sports, weddings... it doesn't limit me to anything. There's nothing missing. The difference with other machines like Canon and Nikon is just that there is still a large market of used that can allow more competitive prices and this can be a thing to put into account because the lenses cost a lot but as I said before , if we want quality, we must also know that it has a cost. Other than that, I'm also using Canon and Tamron lenses (with adapters without looking for savings) and I'm finding it very well... so in my opinion, the optical park can be expanded quietly even for a PRO use at decidedly more decent prices. sent on December 21, 2018 |
 | Huawei P10 Pros: Small, fast, great camera. Never bother you. Cons: To date no one, maybe warm a bit, but nothing harmful or unbearable. It is not resistant to water and dust. Opinion: I have this beautiful P10 for a month. I have to say that as a phone I can compare it to the iPhone 7 quietly. I got both and I gave it away after 10 days while he does not bother me at the moment. It has a camera I think better than that of the Iphone although not as fast as the latter, but like autofocus instead of the same being lightning. Sharp images, impeccable, beautiful colors! Small in hand and for this very convenient, but the display is exceptional and allows you to do whatever you want. Battery? I have read some very bad reviews about it: for my modest opinion the battery is much but much better than the Iphone and other phones I had like LG G5, Samsung Galaxy S7, etc ... It lasts me all day, We arrive in the evening with 20/15% after a busy day between videos, music, photos, games, web and more. I was amazed that the game was prevented because of criticism. I can not do it: for me the battery is good. At the phone level, I stress a lot, and I have to say that I have never fallenThey have never slowed down, locked, switched off, etc ... For me it is PHENOMENAL !!! sent on June 23, 2017 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f/4.0 IS Pro Pros: Versatile, a handsome handyman! Fast, accurate, pro lens. It feels like it. Cons: To date, nobody lacks F / 2.8, but it would be much bigger. Some say it's too big and heavy, but as far as I'm concerned, it's not too big and not too heavy. Opinion: I've got this lens for a few months and I have to say I was literally wretched! I do it all, I take it with me everywhere! I am surprised every passing day: fast, accurate, incredible autofocus, high image quality, and faithful colors to reality. I would have liked F / 2.8, but you can not have everything in your life, especially because it would be much bigger and heavy, which I do not find it difficult to do now. It's big? When is it enough. Heavy? When is it enough. It does not bother me, it does not matter to me. I just know that I can not help it anymore. Anyone interested, try it out of your own trust store and go home with her again. The fact that it's a f / 4.0 is not fit in low light conditions, so for this reason, bring with me its "cousin or sister (as you want to define it)" 12-40 f / 2.8 to shoot stars or Take pictures in closed and unlit environments. A lens does not rule out the other one, I keep them both because they all together. Not% 26egrave; How to have two doubles, at all. Anyway, coming back to this mythical 12-100, it's really what you hear around. Everything then relates to the use made of it and to the photograph we are looking for, but really let us think about it. sent on May 27, 2017 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm f/1.8 Pros: Small, lightweight, practical. Incredible blow. Great resolution! Cons: No hood, available separately. Opinion: I have bought this lens mainly for two reasons: to make portraits and why it is very bright. At first I was skeptical because I was not convinced of the materials that are made, but once removed from its packaging, I must say that the plastic is of the highest quality. It holds good in hand and in any sense of presence. Even to the eyes it looks small but solid, well-built and above all to define a "little grain" that must not be missed in our set of goals. It's not a pro lens, but it behaves as if it were. His blurry personally liked me so much and his precision and speed did not surprise me and even disappointed it was what I was looking for! I had confidence in this purchase as I read the various reviews on it and I must say that it mirrors what one looks for. In my opinion, the lens is worth more than it costs (300 euros complete with hood and UV filter). Searching for the users are at great prices and for those looking for photos especially for portraits, Is not wrong. It does not distort the image, it is faithful to reality. Accurate and beautiful full colors. I advise. sent on May 27, 2017 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 II Pros: Impeccable autofocus, fast, engages the moving subject (even the fastest subjects) and will not spring it anymore. Fully customizable, absolutely amazing and excellent ISO image quality Cons: None to date Opinion: So, I spent a few days to make shots here and there with these two objects: M1Mark2 and Zuiko12-100. I state that I have to learn, but if you can help my "review" for those interested, I can gladly! So: I took the Canon 7D Mark 2 with Oly EM1 because I could not take pictures with animals in fairly decent movement, then took it (7D) exclusively for this type of photography. Months later, that not long ago, I bought for the EM1 Zuiko 12-100 and only saw this coupled with already a big difference to the point of no longer take me behind the 7D. Then I decided to sell it and take the EM1Mark2 and now I have no problems! I have to learn is true, but even now I can be very satisfied with the moving pictures that I do! He has a hyper-accurate stabilizer, un'autofocus incredible and I still have much to discover !! I do not really miss and actually more my 7D! It 's true, is not cheap, but it's worth it! Who wants to take that step to do it and not sAnd will regret it! I made photos of the ladybugs (look at my profile to understand!) Last day and there was no light, there was a lot of clouds and a wind that carried away! I had one ear with a grain of wheat where the ladybug was resting and with the other hand I was holding the car to take the photo, so you will understand that the conditions apart from being bad were also "drastic" (:-D) The stabilizer is from Yell, autofocus and speed are impressed! The way he has to hook the subject and not to give it away regardless of the direction he takes (if he or she is running, if he runs far, side, etc ...) is amazing! I was satisfied and already in so few days! What else to say: If you have any doubts about quality, performance and speed, in my opinion it has far exceeded all that Canon 7D mark 2 (including high ISO noise that the 7D is definitely noisy), coupled with A PRO lens is invincible andComparable to the FullFrame (which is not obvious from me). Think of it: lightness and quality all in one. I'm too excited to find something negative to date. sent on May 07, 2017 |
 | Panasonic Lumix G X 35-100mm f/2.8 Pros: Compact, dynamic, fast, weather sealed Cons: At the moment no Opinion: I have very few days this goal. Speaking brightness seems an understatement considering that it can be read in the datasheet ... Then I'll talk about what I've tried and I've found it, then: compact and fast. Autofocus lightning. Accurate and reliable. Create beautiful blurred and freezes the image instantaneously. I found in him what I hoped; He has not disappointed me. I recommend it to everyone, especially now that you can find much more affordable! I've paid 750 euro complete with accessories, box and warranty of 4 years (two months and even up to 100 shots), so I think I did a good buy! Plus they gave me accompanied to it, the filter uv ultra slim. What, it's just like we imagine! I highly recommend it to everyone! sent on March 26, 2017 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Pros: Beauty. Speed. Precision. tropicalized Cons: The menu is to be studied and the battery (even if it is a solvable problem by buying more batteries) Opinion: In my amateur point of view, I found the right car for me. I was born with Canon and are then passed to Olympus om-d10mark2. I liked a lot the vintage style and to learn how I thought it would be enough. That said, my passion is nature photography and Canon 9 of 10 photos I were well especially in the search for animals. With 10 second mark, the first photos of 10 I was pretty well ... The other throwaway. Demoralized I went on the purchase of the flagship of the house and I went back to the quality I was used: 10 I miss one, and it's my fault because I still have to learn a lot. I state that certainly in a few years the obstacles that I have found from experience with 10mark2 I could not find them or know how to overcome, but already now, in comparison, I went back to get my fill. A nice car and touch even more. Performing. Always under my subjective judgment, fast autofocus and rapid shooting. Very fun to use. A very good navescuola. The really recommend it to everyone. I firmly believe on my investment made sent on February 03, 2017 |
 | Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5 SWD Pros: Bright. Precise and fast. tropicalized Cons: For anyone today Opinion: Then, this morning I received this morning and this afternoon I went cannon now to try it. I accompanied with olympus om-d em1 and EC20. connecting it to the duplicator to lose a little bit of light, but in my opinion nothing serious. I was provided with kickstand but honestly I is not served. I'm a skinny girl, on my own I did not last effort. Maybe working on it all day weight there, I do not say the opposite but I did try a few shots of herons bringing it to its full zoom and then with the duplicator to 800mm and was accurate and FAST. I write in capital letters because my fear was that. It was not fast enough. I have yet to get carried away to charity. But as a first impression I was really satisfied. Recommended to all those who can not afford a leica 1600 € ... And so are "satisfied" of a lens where with a good used remains a fair compromise. I repeat: satisfied because I used freehand without a tripod at maximum zoom and photosThey are sharp and precise. I took pictures with very low light and at full zoom it with doubler EC20 reaches 800mm and focal length to 800mm is 7.0 and 5.6 to 50 mm because it increases by two stops. And with that, I made pictures more beautiful and brighter than the 75-300 with more light and with closest subject ... But it's heavy. I have to admit it. I always took in hand and all afternoon ... Beautiful, bright, precise! Autofocus also quick to 800mm (with the sd card of fast writing otherwise slow), but weight. sent on January 24, 2017 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm f/2.8 Macro Pros: Small, practical, lightweight and top range for macro photos. Luminossimo Cons: Nobody Opinion: I call for my modest experience, a super macro. He always satisfied. Bright, intuitive and fast! I do not make a wrong! It 's really a great product and if we evaluate the price in my opinion is really good! I repeat that I am not a professional, but I definitely can not speak ill of this little gem. I'm left picture macro and landscape. I also say with subjects in strong movement. A full light, in the dark, low light ... I can only say that it must not fail in our optical park. sent on January 22, 2017 |
 | Tamron 14-150mm f/3.5-5.8 Di III Pros: Small and very versatile. A real all do! Cons: Nobody Opinion: I'm trying for a few months with my Olympus om-d EM10 mark 2 and I must say that I was pleasantly surprised. Quick, convenient, a true all do! Unless you should not use super tele or something more "fine" will never take off, and I can never do without it! I recommend it heartily! It has a good focus and is very accurate. I'm not a professional but in my small way I can say it is one of those goals that bought it, they have not disappointed but was pleasantly surprised. I recommend it especially for beginners and does not know what goals to start. I could go back, I would start right with him sent on January 22, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
