What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 01, 2025 (21:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
To me it doesn't look ugly at all, it has charm! A me non sembra affatto brutta, ha fascino! |
| sent on May 01, 2025 (22:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@Nonnachecca
Thank you Francesca for visiting, commenting and giving your opinion ;-)
Hi
Franco
@Nonnachecca
Grazie Francesca per visita, commento e parere
Ciao
Franco
|
| sent on May 01, 2025 (22:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The important thing is that you like them, I also don't feel like publishing "certain" photos but the feeling they leave me is enough to use old equipment. The photo is very nice only slightly "messed up inside but it doesn't bother me at all. If you find someone who appreciates them, it will be closer to your way of seeing photography. Good evening
Giò L'importante è che piacciano a te, anch'io non mi sento di pubblicare "certe" foto ma la sensazione che mi lasciano mi basta per usare vecchie attrezzature. La foto è molto bella solo leggermente "pasticciata all'interno ma non mi disturba affatto. Se trovi qualcuno che le apprezza sarà più vicino al tuo modo di vedere la fotografia. Buona serata
Giò |
| sent on May 01, 2025 (23:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@Giobanni
Thank you Giò for visiting and commenting; I like to experiment and I also share photos that are not perfect for discussing them.
Hi
Franco
@Giobanni
Grazie Giò per visita e commento; mi piace sperimentare e condivido anche foto non perfette per discuterne.
Ciao
Franco
|
| sent on May 02, 2025 (8:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Because it's ugly, the colors stand out well and are pleasant, maybe the detail is not the best, but overall I find it pleasant, bye. Perché brutta, i colori risaltano bene e sono gradevoli, magari il dettaglio non è il massimo, ma nell'insieme la trovo gradevole, ciao. |
| sent on May 02, 2025 (8:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It turned out well!!!!
:-or
Greetings!
Oleg. E' venuta bene!!!!!
Un saluto!
Oleg. |
| sent on May 02, 2025 (8:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The detail is not incisive, but it is not ugly!
Have a nice day
Elizabeth Il dettaglio non è incisivo, ma non è brutta!
Buona giornata
Elisabetta |
| sent on May 02, 2025 (8:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@Pinitti
@Oleg Tsapko
@Elisabetta Leonardi
Thank you for visiting and commenting.
In theory, it would not be appropriate and useful to publish imperfect images of which one is not convinced; Sometimes, by experimenting, one would like to obtain a result that is then not achieved and leaves a little disappointed, but it is published anyway because it can be useful to reason and discuss by analyzing the 'mistakes'.
Hi
Franco @Pinitti
@Oleg Tsapko
@Elisabetta Leonardi
Grazie per visita e commento.
In teoria non sarebbe opportuno e utile pubblicare immagini non perfette di cui non si è convinti; a volte, sperimentando, si vorrebbe ottenere un risultato che, poi non si realizza e lascia un po' delusi, ma si pubblica ugualmente perché può tornare utile ragionare e discutere analizzando gli 'errori'.
Ciao
Franco |
| sent on May 02, 2025 (10:25) | This comment has been translated
Beautiful! |
| sent on May 02, 2025 (11:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I would say that with Sigma 70 macro art in your possession you would have had a definition not even comparable to this. The photo is all there, only the definition of a lens appropriate to the genre is missing... ;-)
Have a nice day.
Fabrizio Direi che col Sigma 70 macro art in tuo possesso avresti avuto una definizione neanche paragonabile a questa. La foto c'è tutta, manca solo la definizione di un' ottica adeguata al genere…
Buona giornata.
Fabrizio |
| sent on May 02, 2025 (12:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@Bo Larkeed
@Magnum58
Thank you for visiting and commenting.
Certainly for this type of shooting a macro lens, such as the Sigma 70, would be more suitable and would provide better results. Soon I will make a direct comparison with different lenses.
Hi
Franco
@Bo Larkeed
@Magnum58
Grazie per visita e commento.
Certamente per questo tipo di riprese un'ottica macro, come il Sigma 70, sarebbe più indicato e fornirebbe risultati migliori. Prossimamente realizzerò un confronto diretto con diverse ottiche.
Ciao
Franco
|
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
