|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Manicomic www.juzaphoto.com/p/Manicomic  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon Z 50mm f/1.8 S Pros: Pretty much everything Cons: Maybe a bit expensive? Aesthetics Opinion: Sharp, beautiful blurry, fast, relatively light (but not small). Lens without flaws, perhaps a hair expensive considering the price of the old 50 ini for SLR, but absolutely aligned with the new mirrorless generation. Aesthetics not very successful and apparently cheap as finishes, but in reality it is very resistant. sent on October 13, 2021 |
 | Nikon D750 Pros: file quality, high ISO performance, autofocus, ergonomics, quality video. Cons: af scarce in lv Opinion: Full traditional SLR, excels in all, a less af far from the best in lv, the yield at high ISO is to be applauded, the file is always very clean, the f is ottimo.La machine holds good, weighs the right, the materials do not seem the most 'noble least so far held up well. To note a more 'good video quality, area where nikon than Canon is soo underrated, the evidence shows it is by no means inferior, if not for af. sent on June 05, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: zoom range, constant brightness, blur, versatility, weight. Cons: Sharpness at longer focal lengths. Opinion: I own this lens mounted on a d750 six months I think if you took into kits and therefore with premium content is a lens to have, does not excel in anything, but it is a 5x zoom with constant brightness, you do everything. The optical quality is good but not eccelta (24 distorts and decreases yield after 100 mm a little too) .rnSoprendentemente (given the non-exceptional brightness) blurred is very pleasant. sent on June 05, 2016 |
 | Yongnuo YN-560 IV Pros: Price, triggers embedded functionality Cons: Manual only lacks illuminator af Opinion: Very inexpensive flash handy if you want to take a set for use away from the machine having incorporated both the transmitter and receiver trigger. With 240 € you take a master + 2 slaves all triggered with ... 240 € there will not even buy a flash serio.rnUsato as the only flash on the machine has two problems: not ttl but you know, I personally have found that not no information exchange with the car (but use a canon of sony, I used it only briefly on canon and then I could be wrong), but above all has no af illuminator that I find essential for a flash, the machine is usually covered almost entirely dall'obiettivo.rn sent on September 27, 2015 |
 | Sony 24-70mm f/2.8 ZA SSM Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* Pros: Optical quality and construction to very high levels, excellent af Cons: A bit of distortion at the focal more 'wide angles, price is not exactly popular Opinion: Classic zoom quality standards for ff, a lens that you can not 'give up, the Zeiss optical quality has a very good clear in every situation, durable backlit, sins a slight distortion at 24mm nothing problematic and all in all normal for wide-angle zoom but at this level you look tutto.rnLa build quality is of reference, a lens made to last. The af is fast and very preciso.rnCosta nearly 2000 euro ... there are many, but this lens and an a99 behind are a great tool. sent on March 11, 2015 |
 | Sony SLT-A99 Pros: Ergonomics, functionality and overall performance. Cons: None in particular Opinion: I bought this car a few months ago with his original vg and the Zeiss 24-70 f 2.8, prevenivo from a77 with the 16-50 f 2.8 and the a850 with the 28-75 f 2.8.rnIl leap forward was clear, the two systems are quite similar, but the a99 is superior in everything, some things much in other poco.rnSicuramente of the qi is greater, while having the same resolution exploits all the lens surfaces ff managing to have a better sharpness, Also the file is more 'malleable and needless to say the files at high ISO are finally usable. We do not speak of values ??"absolute" in difficult lighting conditions in my opinion the files are good up to 3200 ISO, usable in 6400, to avoid the higher sensitivity, however, a big step forward compared to a77 that already in 1600 iso gave results osceni.rnL'autofocus is slightly more 'fast, is more' accurate and can 'count on useful function af range.rnL'ergonomia, the build quality and reliability are very good, a real machine professionale.rnIl viewfinder good oled can also be used in situations where maybe with the optician you could not see anything, the rear monitor tiltable is usually pleasing plus that sony puts all its machines, convenient stabilizer and finally we also have the sled "standard" flashes instead of wobbly slide minolta.rnUna machine recommended unreservedly to those who own a sony kit to mount ff, probably there are machines with more 'resolution or better performance at high ISO, but if you need a car to work seriously sony a99 never betrays. sent on March 11, 2015 |
 | Sony SLT-A77 Pros: Build quality, af, versatility, image quality at low ISO, stabilized sensor, tilt monitor in high resolution, price (today) to be used. Cons: Yield from 800 up in dimly lit situations less than the more modern competition, af in video if it is set to automatic exposure obliges ... Absurd !!! Opinion: Great car, I own more than a year, purchased used with already 2 years of life took me in a thousand different situations, very well built, resistant to everything, versatile for every situation, the electronic viewfinder is a pleasure, the Af really quick and easy to impostare.rnL'unico weak point is the yield at high iso MA when compared to its contemporary machines APSC and resizing the file at the same resolution for me if they're playing with everyone. It should be combined with its 16-50 f2.8 and maybe vg original with the flash in 60, a workhorse. sent on October 23, 2014 |
 | Nokia Lumia 920 Pros: Build quality, speed, ease of use Cons: Weight (but on one side by the more solid feel) park app lower than the competition Opinion: Really good, it is not a smartphone perfect but I was satisfied dall'acquisto.rnLa build quality is excellent, the smartphone has fallen to me countless times on the ground and never any trouble, stability and speed is so great, the price at which the 'I paid I think it is a best buy.rn sent on September 03, 2014 |
 | Minolta 100mm f/2.8 Macro D AF Pros: Optical quality, sharpness, compactness, price Cons: Af Opinion: The objective behind with its tens of years but from the point of view of pure optical quality is still the voice grossa.Nitidezza excellent, excellent in every respect, stabilized by the machine, there is a little ... Paid 200 € l ' rnL'af latest version .... it is not usable in macros to the extreme slowness, but in this case I would say that you go to mf. sent on August 31, 2014 |
 | Minolta 50mm f/1.4 RS Pros: Small, light, cheap, well costruto, crisp close Cons: A ta sharpness collapses in a sensational way. Sharp from f2 up. And do suffer from chromatic aberration in packs. Af inaccurate Opinion: I own this lens for 11 years, paid 2 pennies together with other pellicola.rnAd at the time of today is not considerable competitive considering what the market offers (read cons). However it must be said that now is 150 €, sometimes even less, therefore saving in optical maximum can have its own because, besides the build quality is superior to that of modern optics and compact miraculous. sent on August 31, 2014 |
 | Sony DT 16-50mm f/2.8 SSM Pros: Cost, quality construction, clear already at room temperature, relatively small size. Cons: Do you suffer from flare in backlit distortion to 16 mm zoom ring too hard and wear tends to "flare" and should be changed Opinion: I've owned 2 copies of this perspective from which I made about 150,000 scatti.rnE 'definitely optics to have if you have a sony APSC to mount an absolutely affordable cost, is 600 Euros, but in some cases it is view even less offers: optical quality, build quality, fast af, f 2.8 over the entire length focale.rnIl comparison with the tamron 17-55 vc is merciless to the poor tammy that comes out with broken bones in any respect: yield optics, build quality, autofocus ... incomparable, it is not a perfect lens, it has its flaws, but at the price at which you find you can not 'do not buy it. The equivalent Canon and Nikon cost a lot more 'and do not offer anything more', indeed in some cases less damage: wide-angle, especially for the canon which is a 17x1.6 16x1.5 against the sony stabilizer for nikon. rnOttimo for video in af, in that case, the machine automatically deletes all the distortions but works in light crop (this applies to all lenses though). rn sent on August 07, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
