|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Pierluigi Asturi www.juzaphoto.com/p/PierluigiAsturi  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm XF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR Pros: Sharpness, microcontrast, absent aberrations, wonderfully balanced despite the weight, block at 5 meters, polarizer window, versatile, construction. Cons: On the xt10 af continuous not very fast. Opinion: It was so much that I wanted it, I wanted a superzoom apsc and fuji is the only one to do it. Moreover, my experience with 18/55 f2.8 / 4 was, all in all, positive. The weight of 1375g. it scared me a lot, but as soon as I picked it up I was stunned by the exceptional balance that makes it very maneuverable, another thing that scares me the combination with the tiny xt10, no problem, is held perfectly, with the due caution of course. The first shots made in the shop made me immeasurably immediate. I've been using it for seven months with satisfaction, the only digital lens that has really impressed me so far. Yield of colors, three-dimensionality, sharpness, microcontrast, stabilizer, aperture ring, absence of aberrations and vignetting, are, in my opinion, at the top (perhaps I found a particularly successful specimen). I would like to compare it with rivals Canon and Nikon, but I do not have them and I did not have them. The only defect is the continuous non fast on the xt10, which also say improved on the xt20. In practice what I can not do is stop birds of prey in flight, in return, the electronic click of the xt10 makes it great to get closer to the subjects. Highly recommended rating 10 sent on January 27, 2018 |
 | Sigma 24-105mm f/4 DG OS HSM Art Pros: Construction quality, veratility Cons: Weight, dimensions, af slow coupled with the mc11 adapter Opinion: I used it for a year on both the canon 760d and the sony a7II. As soon as the shopkeeper pulled it out of the box, I felt like not buying it anymore, given the size and weight. Used on the Canon did not do wonders, in the sense that it could not eliminate the heavy chromatic aberrations of that sensor, a surrender then in the complexno not exciting, discreet stabilizer, autofocus sufficient in one shot but too slow in af continuous, good color rendering, sharpness conditioned by the aberration of which rnsopra. Used on the sony obviously the sharpness was excellent and the aberrations disappeared, but the mc11 adapter prevented the continuous af. The size and weight made it ridiculous compared to the body of the A7II everything was unbalanced and manageable with difficulty. In short, a lens with which I have never found, plus compared to the old28 / 70 c / y (9 lenses) is not that it was so superior, in the end I gave it in exchange for 16/35 f4 sony (zeiss ). Rated 7, personallyI advise against the purchase of weight and dimensions, with the current technology and with the cost that digital lenses must be lighter and easier to handle. sent on January 27, 2018 |
 | Canon 100D Pros: compact and lightweight, aesthetically pleasing Cons: autofocus, viewfinder pentamirror Opinion: I bought x to tile it fuji XE1 x having an optical viewfinder on the long focal x birds and animals in general. (the viewfinder of fuji does not get along with the speed 'of the subjects). I thought that would have made bad by fuji x noise and sharpness, not + from time to truth, he quickly proved to have the best of fuji color. His Achilles heel and 'always been the maf, I held x almost 2 years, I sent 2 times a Canon without getting big improvements. Used with 55/250 stm he focused enough, with 10/18 stm came into focus only in the live mode, a disaster. All the photos I uploaded in my card made with 10/18 are not made using the viewfinder (pentamirror). A pity, it could be fun to use, has always made me insecure (thinking that I had bought x having an optical viewfinder sic!) sent on June 15, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm X-E1 Pros: beautiful to look at, intuitive to use, lightweight and compact, crop to 100x100 in my reference point x all the others, including full frame, the original noise, threaded socket snap flessiile Cons: little color fidelity, EVF too slow and small, annoying tendency to burn the highlights Opinion: After long he delayed the digital switchover (I used contax air and contaxg2) and 'was my first digital, bought in December 2012. I had already' element x 10 x photo editing I used the scanned slide timing, so I was a bit 'already 'digitized, in the nex 3 + I played with my partner. I was torn between nex 7 and fuji xpro (too expensive), costing less XE1 I bought it right away (in + had the flash). I used it first with the old Zeiss lenses already 'in my possession, I then bought the 18/55 2.8 / 4. He immediately demonstrated his (many) strengths and its flaws, has given me great satisfaction, run 'proven very reliable and honest (if not focusing it clicks). An old-style machine that produces files of exemplary cleanliness, quiet shutter chance 25 'high and low lights adjustment, constant firmware update by fuji. In short, be able to create a real addiction, I used it along with a couple of canon (100d and 760d), but if I wanted to take a picture I used THE BEAUTIFULI. I commuted x sony A7II not without regret, in the future I will buy 'a fuji, if they were to make a FF I would be sooo happy. Really fantastic, I will not bore well, a pier greeting. sent on May 29, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
