|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Guidoz www.juzaphoto.com/p/Guidoz ![]() |
![]() | Lowepro Flipside 400 AW Pros: Opening theft. Ability to tilt the front (tied at the waist) and access the material without having to rest his backpack on the ground (useful when the ground is mud / water). Interior modularity. Waterproof cover included. Plenty of room for the equipment in proportion to the size. Cons: Belt + pocket to hold the tripod is not very practical: a tripod and protruding rocks, making the trasposrto difficult and dangerous places tight / crowded. Opinion: I backpack for two years and is one of my most loyal companions. Meanwhile it has dimensions that do not create problems as hand luggage under any circumstances (even when with Ryanair decided to compel the boarding in the hold after the first x passengers ... it happened to me, and the guy told me "if you held under the front seat can take him in the cabin ") ... the beauty is that it does not seem to see it heavy even when it is full as an egg equipment pesantina and goes beyond the weight limits laid down by the company. rnOltre to such equipment, allows you to bring small personal items (book, ipad, various cables and wires, sunglasses etc) in the front pocket that is not small as it sounds). I can not even put a Macbook pro 13 "in the back pocket, over the equipment practically (with his second skin to prevent scratches) ... of course this is only the shift, on-site as much as possible I empty backpack to be light and certainly do not leave the computer impedirHe had rapid access to the equipment ... but it is also convenient to take the laptop in hand luggage. rnrn sent on June 30, 2015 |
![]() | Canon 5D Mark III Pros: Ergonomic controls and partially customizable. AF module complete and configurable. AF with max aperture of f / 8. Wind gusts good (although not to the levels of machines "sports"). 100% viewfinder. Dual slot (although I would have preferred two CF). Tropicalization and solid and professional. VERSATILITY ' Cons: Spot only to Central. No exposure compensation in M ??+ AutoISO (and the camera tends to underexpose by at least half a stop). All in all a few things and unimportant anyway. Opinion: A complete camera which although not the best in some specific genres (eg, birds) is very well balanced and versatile, allowing you to do well pretty much all genres. Professional body, the AF module valid and configurable, dual-slot, clean files and very workable compared to my old 50D. Could improve on something (someone said dynamic range?), But at home Canon is definitely the most complete machine after the 1DX (though it costs at least twice). If you do not specialize in specific genres that can benefit from the best volleys or slightly wider dynamic range is basically the car to aspire to, at least at home Canon. sent on June 28, 2014 |
![]() | Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Price, compact, versatile focal length, quality / price ratio excellent. Cons: A bit 'of chromatic aberration in addition to being easily corrected him forgives readily saw the price! Opinion: It 'almost become my "handyman" preferred on FF. "The death of his" I think it's the street: the compactness makes it very discreet, the focal length is quite suitable and versatile, the AF very good, and the opening interesting. Price for size and weight is indicutibilmente a wildcard to take with if, at least on FF, which turns into a kind of compattona. In this sense has changed upon 50 1.8. The image quality is very good already wide open, and the very low price makes you forget the rest (and maybe a little chromatic aberration 'vignetting, both easily corrected in post) sent on November 20, 2013 |
![]() | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Pros: Resistance to flare, optical quality, well-controlled distortion. Cons: Hood not included. Opinion: With its focal length range (16-35 equivalent) is a lens firmly focused on the landscape and reportage / street, and in these fields does very well, especially in the countryside where I think it is arguably the best lens also by virtue of the excellent resistance to flare. It really gave me a lot of satisfaction, and still sometimes regret after purchasing of FF 16-35L II that does not always live up to the comparison despite the red ring (in particular in terms of flare). sent on November 20, 2013 |
![]() | Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Pros: Sharpness, brightness, stability, versatility. Cons: Sucks a lot of dust, which may at this point does not affect the quality diell'immagine. Hood not included. Opinion: I've used it with satisfaction for almost 4 years before moving to FF and on occasions not regret it. I think it's definitely the best all-rounder that you could want on APS-C. The building is not the best and it shows especially in the effect vacuum cleaner. In terms of image quality, perhaps the greatest limitation is the flare, which however is not excessive for a handyman. In summary: a lens next to the excellence that loses some point only for APS-C designed, and then built "on the cheap" compared to the L series that from the standpoint of purely optical in my opinion it deserves. sent on November 20, 2013 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me