|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on March 14, 2022 Pros: robustness and comfort Cons: can be improved tripod attachment, few pockets Opinion: great backpack, made very well and very comfortable. I have been using it for years and I would never change it, even after hours around and load it makes itself felt little. perfected the attachment for the tripod, not so much in the lower pocket when in the anchor strap, with massive tripods begins to be unstable, I added a strap in the upper handle that helps to lock the tripod and is much much better. if they had put a few more pockets it was not bad |
 | sent on July 15, 2020 Pros: Robustness, optionals, pout cover, tripod attachment, comfortable to wear. Cons: Tripod attack that, although present, is a bit "dancer" with tripods a little long and the back back that would be more comfortable if it were completely open, while instead it goes a bit "forced", but maybe it is a feature sought and wanted. I agree with those who say that the pockets could be improved. Opinion: Great backpack, I've been using it for a few years and it's still perfect, general quality quite high and very robust; taken at a very good price, but in such optimal conditions that it will be practically new. I mean... I could hardly ask for more because I know how well quality backpacks cost and this is no exception. I would add that being the owner of the m4/3 kit, there is everything and more. |
 | sent on July 15, 2020 Pros: Great quality, as in fact the brand speaks for itself... Everything I have of Lowepro and still intact never skinned or consumed... Cons: Maybe the price, in fact they cost very expensive compared to other brands that are still good the same... Opinion: I have several backpacks that I don't use - for reasons of changing ways of travel or photographs, in any case they are all comfortable, the Flipside 400 AW and gorgeous I brought it to the mountains summer and winter rugged waterproof... There was the 50-500 Sigma with paraluce mounted and photo machine including a D300s utto comfortable and ready to use... Not very ready to eat because when I go to the mountains I do not have to protate the sandwiches, but at least a capponata, or a baked lass, or the chicken on the spit... In short, I have to Magnà.... I in 2014 paid on Amazon 140.00 usd a great greeting to all... (MGNELLO) |
 | sent on May 09, 2019 Pros: Sufficiently capacent, comfortable on the shoulders, ingenious the anti-theft opening although a bit uncomfortable Cons: Apparently not sturdy (we'll see), feeling that the zipper will remain in your hand, uncomfortable storing and withdrawing equipment from the main compartment, lumbar belt only for Miss Italy and not detachable Opinion: What about this backpack, equipment, to know how to organize, there is a lot but not too much, even if you have the feeling that you can crumble with the use, perhaps influenced by the tactile experience and what I read in customer reviews on Amazon , where someone claimed that he had detached a shoulder strap or that the hinge of the external compartment, was opened maldestramente. The opening and use of the main compartment is certainly not easy and needs to find a safe support to carry out this operation a bit cumbersome, but that in the crowd allows you to be more comfortable from attempts to theft. The illustrated operation of blocking it to life before with the lumbar belt as illustrated on the site of Lowepro for the Prelevo/reposition of equipment, I see it quite unlikely for several factors: 1 ° The lumbar belt seems made for Miss Italy in bathing suit (too short); 2 ° If the backpack is not balanced (full at the bottom), spill the contents on the ground. I wonder: Why make a lumbar belt so short and cumbersome and not foresee at least the disassembly? I've had a Tamrac Expedition 5 for about 20 years, I've loaded it like a mule, and still not a broken zip, not a scucing or sign of wear. In Rolandone I suggest the solution I made about the lumbar belt, that is to replace the closure of the same, buying two twins and a piece of strap of the same width of the original, so as to apply one of the two closures Complete in place of the original and the other to make, together with the piece of strap, an extension that you can put and lift if necessary. It was my first lowepro, but for what you spend and the quality you buy (at least in this case), after you have had bags and backpacks Tamrac in my case, it will also be the only one. Overall judgement 6 and we hope we do not overestimate the object. |
 | sent on January 12, 2019 Pros: Robust and Capacent Cons: Lumbar Belt Opinion: I really like the backpack, but...... it doesn't look like my size. For the first time I'm embarrassed, I have a waist of about a meter and wearing a sweater and windbreaker I can not fasten the waist, I would need 25/30 cm more. If you have solutions thank you (please do not make the witty that to lose weight I try continuously;)) Hello |
 | sent on November 13, 2017 Pros: The load is ergonomically distributed between well padded shoulder straps and straps that lock it to the chest, effective anti-theft opening system without having to remove it to support it, for a standard kit or for a short-legged exit can not be beat. Cons: To improve the anchorage system for the tripod especially in the part where the paw lies in the case of large treads.rnThe base of the backpack should be made more rigid to safeguard f / 2.8 lenses as ex 70-200mm. The side pockets may be slightly larger and deep enough to best store bottles of water and food. Opinion: Good value for money. The construction materials are up, cleaned easily after naturalistic sessions and properly protects the equipment in weather conditions every once in a while. For scenic sessions quietly housing a reflex with 70-200 f / 2.8 mounted and a 16.35 in one of the slim compartments, filter holders and various sheet filters, a gray panel, telcomando and lens cleaning kit. Alternatively, put a reflex with a macro lens 2 flash, a wirless transmitter and a couple of reflector panels. These are my kind uses. Having to walk in rugged places for many miles remains firm and well glued to the body.rnIn conclusion it is a great backpack, I recommend it.rnrn |
| sent on September 10, 2017 Pros: Excellent, spacious, lightweight, indestructible protection Cons: No one, obviously for large kits, has to resort to other models Opinion: I have used it for many years, in a variety of climates, with snow, torrential sun, rain, always perfect, it has been discolored a bit, but it is more than logical. It may not be nice to open the back, but habit becomes normal, indeed very practical. The materials are exceptional, as always to offer Lowepro, I have never used other brands and I will never do it |
 | sent on August 31, 2017 Pros: Sturdy and secure at the right point. Cons: Declarative measures are strict. Opinion: All in all, very reliable, robust, comfortable and rigid at the right point. All this gives a very good protection to the equipment.rn Against this characteristic feature so that the measures declared by the manufacturer are just stretched. In my model I actually measured the depth of the room compartment that is 13 cm to the hard edge of the compartment (not 15 as stated). at 15 cm you will also get measured by the soft fabric part overlapping the rigid side, which also holds the zip. This makes the "convenient" space available is smaller than the declared one (if you put higher objects these will make a small hump, especially if even the accessories pocket has items inside it. But it's not as serious as it seems, I did put my 7d on the long side and closed very well.rnI might have added some extra pocket and made the stand system more functional, but all in all a good backpack if you do not have to carry too many accessories standard.rnrnFor the mie maybe a bit tight (I'm waiting for the 500w version), but it has to be good if it deserves it (my needs are different from what the backpack can offer, not the latter not knowing how to do it own "dirty work"). |
user128541  | sent on August 04, 2017 Pros: Protect the point you can carry crystal glasses and kick it! Various pockets and pockets for the photographic need and not only! Extra stretch pockets useful! (1/2 liter of water and a sandwich!) RECOMMENDED PURCHASE! Cons: Sufficient space for a standard but limited kit if used for accessories with over 85mm lenses. Poor interior pockets hardly hold the batteries! The padding of overhanging bands! Superficiality? The pocket of the tongue wears rampant tripod! Oversight / Forgetfulness? Space for a Lap Top? I did it by force a net book as well. Missing instructions to find camouflaged pockets and hips. Opinion: Sufficient space for a standard kit! Limited if used to fit with a body machine and lenses mounted over a diameter of 85mm and respective hoods, they punch! Replacing the separators, you also get space for a third zoom lens 24-70, battery charger, a flash + filters 5/6 filters, (instead of battery charger, 4/5 charged batteries) STOP! The bundles of cutters that can be used with pockets for other small needs instead of over-filling (eg Battery Pockets, or other personnel). Is the tongue useful but inconspicuous, if the same remains closed, distracted or superficial? To avoid pulling 5/7 cm of thinner feet that together with the upper cuffs ensure the backpack tripod !. Extremely moisturized cushion protection in a pocket on the bottom of the closed backpack with strecth, plus not removable and therefore not lean! Purchased by AMAZON € 113.00 punctual delivery packing a bit banged but intact! Generally excellent product made but improved in details, PURCHASERECOMMENDED! Rn |
 | sent on April 19, 2017 Pros: Robustness, capacity, burglar opened unless the front pocket, compact exterior dimensions, design, comfort and distribution at full load weights for long walks Cons: just enough padding, totally useless easel door Opinion: Purchased black / green version on amazon for 115 €. For me it's perfect, used numersoe times and I appreciated especially the weight distribution, with about 12 kg of equipment does not weigh on my back, also in addition to supporting the lower back, the band provides access to the objectives (burglar opening of backrest) without doverselo remove. I think it is very large, I will bring the suer tele sigma 150-600 C & adapter Sigma mc-11, a7ii sony and sony a6000, Samyang 14mm aspherical 2.8, sony 18-105g sel or sel Sony 50mm 1.8 and Samyang panchace, or 21mm or 8mm fish eye. Very comfortable and the ability to adjust effectively to your liking spaces. It seems fairly robust and above all has its waterproof bag, while the front pocket is not very large and not very functional (deep but narrow). The only drawback the absolutely useless easel door is not balanced with respect to the backpack and also the bottom pocket and the snare for the body are not on the same axis in case of backpack full ... |
 | sent on April 01, 2017 Pros: Aesthetically pleasing, convenient and comfortable, opening 'theft', excellent idea to have access to the equipment without having to lay on the ground, good (but not great) materials, front pocket, rain cover Cons: port useless and inconvenient tripod compartment for bulky tripod, generally not very large, for q / p is better Opinion: It seems a photo backpack and this makes it an unobtrusive and aesthetically pleasing object. The materials seem well made and I still a sense of solidity and security is also quite handy and comfortable on your shoulders and be able to access the equipment without having to rest on the ground is a remarkable gem. Also useful the rain cover. rnOra the painful notes. If they had moved a few centimeters more about the tripod door pocket belt and expanded slightly to insert the feet, perhaps to carry a bulky tripod (eg Manfrotto 290xta) it was more comfortable. In this way one must strive not just to make it stable also, inevitably, the contents of the front pocket is crushed. rnDa photos found on the net looked like it could hold the world but the interior is actually smaller than I hoped. Fortunately, the front pocket is enough (but not very) large and can accommodate some accessory. rnPrezzo excessively high sales for me and queI'm in my opinion does not make a product q / p interesting (there are better alternatives). rnPeccato, with some changes and a few more $$$ in less could become a must have. My 2 cents. rn |
 | sent on March 02, 2017 Pros: I do not know yet, for the moment the only one I find the alarm opening and the fact that you can take and share objectives without having to lean, stoop, etc., light and roomy for the photographic material for its cubic volume than other backpacks. ergonomic Cons: quality of materials, accommodation for tiny lenses .... Opinion: I expected better, much better from this backpack. I have other Lowepro of other tonnages, the extent of this previously I used a Caselogic I always snubbed, but who now feel nostalgic. seemed to have less housing for equipment than this, but in fact the stuff that goes convenient equals. The Caselogic has many more pockets, made better and more functional. Including a cernierona on the shoulders that can accommodate a laptop. I'm struggling to put into the Lowe's what I'd like accessories and other menate within the Caselogic. In short .... so the first impression was disappointed ddi this step ... then vedremo.rn |
 | sent on March 02, 2017 Pros: Light, robust, very handy Cons: Capacity not exceptional, just big front pocket Opinion: I got this backpack for sostiuire my old mini trekker 300aw that after 10years of service began to accuse the coup. I looked for a quality backpack, robust and comfortable and above all that it was compatible with the carry-on baggage limits, something fundamental for me. After several readings the ascelta I fell on the flipside 400. I must say I was slightly disappointed by the capacity. My old 300aw although smaller had a larger room and more usable. There is everything that was there in 300 but less razionale.Mi explain: in my old backpack put 7d + 100-400 mounted, 5D + 24-105 mounted, sigma 35, Samyang 14, canon 501.4 and wanting us she was also another. In this one of the two cameras can not store it with the lens attached !!! The Sigma 150-600s, due to the opening of the narrow compartment, do an absurd effort to store it with parlauce mounted upside, while in 300aw we fit comfortably !!! The front pocket, used to store phone batteries etc stc is for me too little large. For the rest of this & quot; small "Disappointment is a great buy. Much more rugged, ergonomic and comfortable to put the shoulder thanks algli more padded shoulder straps and hooking in a much more efficient life, we do a lot of ground without discomfort or feel too much weight . the tripod attachment system is the same as the old backpack with lower support, top mount and center therefore very stable and secure. I forgot the bag has a handy waterproof pockets at the bottom. Overall rating 8 |
  | sent on January 22, 2017 Pros: Rugged, bind and expandable Cons: No negative note Opinion: This backpack can hold inside: rn-SLR + battery grip attached (or with such bodies canon series 1) + superzoomrn-superzoom contemporany as Sigma or Tamron 150-600mm lens hood with rovesciorn-num. 2 as super-wide-angle lenses with lens hood rovesciorn-flash or 50inorn-uv filters Polarn gimbal-type Benro gh-1 rnAltre specific external caratteristichern-compartment (outer pocket) for k-way, cell phone, batteries, wiring, etc, rugged, rn -port tripod top mount, lower support and central location at the external zip pocket. RNE 'can unfasten the two lateral straps of the backpack and unite them between them offend a 3 ° locking point for the treppiedernSe the straps are left laterally closed, allow the fixing of a sweatshirt-giaccarn-There are two strong bands at sides where to hang the houses of lowepro for optical-flash-extenderrn- 2 side compartments acquarn- has not: rn-ipad notebook doorway rn-zip rain but a gap, however, there is an elastic bag Rain rn-color: black or green/black |
 | sent on December 24, 2016 Pros: Roomy, comfortable, robust all more Cons: No one except the price !! Opinion: I have bought so many professional backpacks but this is the top !! you can always find a place x everything even what you can not imagine. When you fill it and you put it in the shoulder you do not even notice you have it, it's perfect x when they are out all day animal parks, mountains, Monza. rnLogicamente if you want something you pay for, taking into account that I am not a photographer by trade when you have to do an expense you think about it more than once. |
 | sent on October 10, 2016 Pros: Value for money, opening on the backrest, light Cons: Unfortunately, the quality of the materials Opinion: The judgment on this Lowepro is influenced by the comparison with my previous backpack: Tamrac Expedition 5. Backpack that I have used for almost 20 years in all possible conditions many of them extreme. I had to replace him because he started to wear out dangerously on the bottom from the outside. To orient myself on this backpack I was confirmed by the positive reviews, the weight and the curiosity to try the opening on the backrest. I have had it for 4 months and have been testing it intensively in "monsoon" conditions for three weeks. He passed the test brilliantly. The only drawback: the seams of the backrest hinge began to skin. I don't know if today's Tamracs have the same quality as what I've owned but surely the weight and price play against them. I just hope the seams hold up. All in all it is a backpack voucher at the right price. Update in January 2021: more than positive opinion. Tested in different situations it has always been reliable. I recommend it! |
 | sent on July 19, 2016 Pros: quality materials, opening in the back, lightweight Cons: if you have a kit zoom all f 2.8 or bulky can be "cramped" Opinion: I re-bought this backpack, I re-bought it because I had a couple of years ago but then sold for backpacks with traditional opening. I took it almost exclusively to the fact that the opening on schienale..cosa very very useful for photographic excursions where there are many people or parties or events. backpack is soft but at the same time rigid enough to hold the material well without going around the backpack. the only "new" if it can be defined, that is, if you have bulky or zoom lenses with f2.8 aperture (hence big fat) all zoom are there ... but you have to study well the arrangement otherwise you find yourself zoom difficult to extract or crushed close to others. I say this because a couple of years ago (when I got it the first time) was with all my kit zoom f4 and there were no problems. in any case I am not seen regret having taken up, just the fact of the opening on the back and the quality of the materials they deserve the9; purchase. |
 | sent on July 08, 2016 Pros: is convenient to carry, the load is distributed well on the shoulders and back. Cons: in my case I can never put the SLR with another lens attached to the outside of the Nikon 200-500. Opinion: I bought this bag used to 60 € put in specifically for the Nikon 200-500. Due to the conical shape of the Nikon with the hood mounted "backwards", you can insert additional objectives with very small diameter. Still playing a bit with dividers in my can bring (struggling a bit) around the camera kit. rnConsiglio this backpack for those who must carry a telezoom medium dimension ealtre two lenses and without many obiettivo.rnComunque change Lowpro quality is excellent confirmation. Profit for the removable rainfly. rnse you have any questions please contact me by MP |
 | sent on March 18, 2016 Pros: You can access and use all the equipment without lay it on the ground. It's so simple and easy. It does not weigh much, compared to other similar models. Cons: The capacity or exploitability not excellent. Tripod support designed for small models, type Manfrotto befree or so large, disheartening for those who would like to put a Manfrotto 190 and the like (but you can change, as you read ...), small pocket on the back. Opinion: I wanted a backpack that would allow me to use all the equipment without being placed anywhere and this makes him very well. The closure on the inner side, when used with the backpack laid on a table, it is less convenient than a traditional backpack because it tends to close by itself being the material rather rigid, padded, but it is not much of a problem. If holding it open up, however, it leads well to all compartments. We must connect the lower belt, but it is not bothersome. Are there any additional straps, to be adjusted only once, which help to keep it at the desired angle, so that will not tip too much for the weight. Mine, with all the stuff inside, weighs 6.7 kg or 7.3 depending on what port. Use seems solid and rigid, so no fear. Mission accomplished, with regard to the practicality. But there is some sore point. I took me a while 'to understand how to settle the stuff, from a backpack Lowepro Mini Trekker AW, which is more ù wider and shorter, because some sections are rounded down and take up less space than it would appear, then the width is too precise and if you want to bring the hood of goals or filters with their box are there to fatigue. But there have been. Another sore point is the pocket on the back that you could do much more capacious making her get up to the bottom of the bag, however they stopped 5 cm. before and this greatly reduces the capacity and brings the center of gravity higher, if filled it is a kind of ball that is not aesthetically beautiful and also unbalances the weight, even more so if you mount the tripod. Here, support for the tripod is shorter than 10 cm. than my old backpack and, if it can be good for a small tripod with Manfrotto 190 is a disaster, this was my greatest disappointment. However I solved by me: in parallel to the pocket I sewed on the tripod support a strip of nylon with cobbler's thread, to make a belt.In this way I put the 190 upside down and shake with the belt, so it remains completely stable, lowers and approaches to the body center of gravity, to the advantage of portability. |
 | sent on February 02, 2016 Pros: Excellent product, fairly light and powerful, convenient the possibility to open the backpack standing without disengage from life, the big pocket on the front allows the accommodation of accessories. Aesthetically pleasing, well-padded shoulder straps with quality. Rain cover integrated. Cons: I find no major defects, the maximum would be that had the rain cover with camouflage coloring. The door center stand I find impractical, preferring placement laterally using a snare and pocket present Opinion: I highly recommend this product, I think it is much better that even the latest products from Lowepro backpacks flipside sports that do not have the comfortable side pockets. Suitable in crowded places, since it can not be opened easily the part of the backpack containing the photographic apparatus. Suitable in places where we can not put down the backpack for changing lenses. |
 | sent on January 01, 2016 Pros: Robust, large, quality of materials, opening on the back, extra modular fittings for bags, pads, waterproof, light enough, comfort. Cons: nothing to report. Opinion: I got hold recently and now use only this, fits perfectly and despite the fill (Nikon D7000 with mounted zoom, Nikon D800 with mounted zoom and other objectives as 70-200 2.8 1.8 and 80 and many accessories) You do not feel the weight but the great comfort is that I have to take off from the shoulder to change lenses. I think it's a backpack perfect. |
 | sent on September 27, 2015 Pros: Robust, large, quality of materials, opening on the back, extra modular fittings for bags, cushions, comfort Cons: If you want to be picky, the strings of the hinges of the back are too short and therefore are not easily found when you have to open and more are camouflaged because they are blacks (I changed them and I put them green and twice as long) Opinion: Always been a loyal owner of bags Lowepro. a backpack is very large, but at the same time is not overly large and cumbersome. RNLA my equipment inside: canon 60d with bg, Sigma 150-500, canon 24-105, Tamron 17-50 f / 2.8, Canon 50 f / 1.8, flash metz af-44 and other extras (sweatshirt, flash batteries, small notebook) |
 | sent on September 23, 2015 Pros: It is a comfortable backpack and capacious, capable of transporting all the equipment in safety with the possibility to regulate the internal spaces in relation to their needs. Excellent quality of materials and useful front pocket where you can store various personal effects; useful to the question whether the inevitable rain cover. There is also an inside pocket in which the backrest Store cards, in addition to a pocket in which store filters, patches, ecc.rnrn Cons: The holster for the tripod is a minor thing and useful only to those who carries a support not cumbersome and small size; impossible to carry a tripod or monopod as it is not possible to anchor it firmly to the weight too. It can become very heavy and perhaps not so convenient if you want to make long journeys. The opening on the back with backpack wheel front and access to the equipment requires due attention. rn Opinion: Review: Undoubtedly the best for those who prefer a backpack to a handbag. Lowepro brand is the best along with Tamrac. I bought other exchanges previously, but I was not satisfied. Personally I think I've finally found the solution to my needs: Canon 7D with bg, Canon L 400mm f / 5.6, tokina 12-24mm f / 4 II, Flash Metz 50AF ... and still more space for different and possible. |
 | sent on August 15, 2015 Pros: Very strong, very large, opening rear theft, compact exterior dimensions. Cons: nobody Opinion: I purchased the pack a year ago, the capacity is surprising in relation to the size and accessory pockets are useful and well-designed. Great system that allows you to open it without completely disengage. The material is very robust and is equipped with a practical rainfly that is installed in an instant in case of need. Perfect as hand luggage in Ryanair. Staying comfortably within 2 camera bodies (6d and 60d) and the range of lenses (4-5) + flash + extra batteries etc.etc. Even the front pocket is large, beyond the apparenze.rnAcquistato on Amazon to 83 €: good deal !!! |
| sent on July 27, 2015 Pros: Construction, strength, comfort, anti-theft pocket, capacity, customizable. Cons: Transportation of bulky tripod. Opinion: Great bag, pocket theft on the back is perfect, you can rotate the backpack without disengage completely and extract the contents safely. Has other pockets for accessories, the capacity is good and it is also quite robust. Comodo also incorporated the rainfly that is extracted in a second and wraps around the backpack. Great for me for walks and trekking. Only negative, if we transport heavy and bulky tripod (type Manfrotto 055 XPROB) the holder is not the maximum, the tripod is not nice fitting backpack and swings a little in the long run, creating a little 'imbalance. |
 | sent on June 30, 2015 Pros: Opening theft. Ability to tilt the front (tied at the waist) and access the material without having to rest his backpack on the ground (useful when the ground is mud / water). Interior modularity. Waterproof cover included. Plenty of room for the equipment in proportion to the size. Cons: Belt + pocket to hold the tripod is not very practical: a tripod and protruding rocks, making the trasposrto difficult and dangerous places tight / crowded. Opinion: I backpack for two years and is one of my most loyal companions. Meanwhile it has dimensions that do not create problems as hand luggage under any circumstances (even when with Ryanair decided to compel the boarding in the hold after the first x passengers ... it happened to me, and the guy told me "if you held under the front seat can take him in the cabin ") ... the beauty is that it does not seem to see it heavy even when it is full as an egg equipment pesantina and goes beyond the weight limits laid down by the company. rnOltre to such equipment, allows you to bring small personal items (book, ipad, various cables and wires, sunglasses etc) in the front pocket that is not small as it sounds). I can not even put a Macbook pro 13 "in the back pocket, over the equipment practically (with his second skin to prevent scratches) ... of course this is only the shift, on-site as much as possible I empty backpack to be light and certainly do not leave the computer impedirHe had rapid access to the equipment ... but it is also convenient to take the laptop in hand luggage. rnrn |
  | sent on June 30, 2015 Pros: Very roomy, comfortable and secure, having the opening on the back. In my opinion a good price / quality Cons: No, it was what I was looking for Opinion: Using it mainly when I travel in Africa (and elsewhere) allows me to carry all the equipment, however, returning in size from cabin baggage. Obviously the weight limit of 7 kg is far exceeded. About 12 kg in the configuration below riportata.rnPuò holds two, in my case 5D3 with mounted 300 2.8 + 1.4, a side removed, 6D, 70-200 2.8 2.8 24-70 (Tamron) the second and 2x extender, just wanting also 50L. In the pockets sd and cf, battery, battery charger, adapter, documents, wallets, foreign currency etc., and other material that would rather have with me and not put in checked baggage. In case of loss I want to be independent from the side picture. Used in trekking for gorillas in total about 4/5 hour walk. Within two bodies with lenses mounted, 70-200 and 24-70 accessories and 1.5 l of water. All perfectly in balance. After several trips seams still in good condition. |
 | sent on June 29, 2015 Pros: Resistant comfortable compact capacious. Without useless for me, ipad pocket PC port, one of the reasons why I preferred. Cons: So far no one. Opinion: Probably hard for hiking and other specializations there are other models. As a handyman to take on trips, tours and various outputs I find it very suitable. Equipped with waterproof bag, modular and well-padded interior has also discrete solutions for the transport of tripods. The price and the opening on the back of me they did prefer other brands in the same band. I do not think you will regret buying as I said if you do not have special needs. As I mentioned by others that you look like a backpack "normal" makes it far less attractive than other models with and written forms that betray the final scopo.rnIn I consider it a good buy, spend two or three hundred euro in no more a real need there is little point, when this can be done more or less than tutto.rn |
 | sent on June 29, 2015 Pros: Resistance, compactness, light weight, opening on the back Cons: For me, no Opinion: I have it from 2012 ... brought in Namibia, South Africa, Costa Rica and various European locations, with a little 'skill in the joints can lead 2 SLR, the 300 f2.8 vr, the 70-200 f4, a' other smaller lens and at least a pair of multipliers. I tested several times the resistance to shock and tears, as well as the climatic conditions, the dry Namibian desert to tropical downpours, and it's still like new! For photographic safari is highly recommended as long as you do not exceed the size of a 300 2.8. Another good thing is that it does not give much in the eye, and hardly seems a backpack for pictures ... and sometimes it's a nice benefit ;-) |
 | sent on June 29, 2015 Pros: Build quality, opening on the back, very adaptable, sufficiently compact, built-in rain cover Cons: stitching in critical not adequate, slightly padded shoulder straps for long walks, external attacks useless tripod with tripod of medium size Opinion: After a careful selection of the various products of this price range, I opted for the Lowepro by opening the back: we will close the lap belt and turns having immediately available around the camera kit; when it is on your shoulders, it is extremely difficult that someone try to open it. The interiors are very modular and adaptable to your needs. I can put in my two camera bodies (one with battery grip), 5 lenses (including wide-angle and Shiftable, no telephoto), filters, remote controls, chargers, a small netbook, cables and accessories. The tripod I put it to the side taking advantage of the outside pocket and the strap at the top, or by placing it in the center tripod tends to move too much and becomes uncomfortable when you enter the pocket on the back. I scored against in the 'stitching in critical inadequate': during a photo reportage, came off a seam of the lap belt part (a slight damage, considering the overall weight of all exceeded 13 kg). Despite this, allthe padding is more than sufficient (shoulder straps apart if used for a long period), are present on the lumbar belt of attacks on which I attached a lens case always lowepro (Lens houses 11x14cm) to have filters and / or lenses at hand when work freehand. NOT recommend this backpack if you can afford a higher budget in this case folded on the new Lowepro 450 AW ProTactic, all the advantages of this model more improvements on the pads, accessibility to equipment and versatility. Overall rating: 8 |
 | sent on June 29, 2015 Pros: Materials, access from the back, with no ability to change optical remove completely backpack, liners Cons: Space for photographic material very limited Opinion: I had this backpack for a couple of years and I found there are very bene.rnE 'very comfortable to wear and the materials are great and the interior pads to protect the equipment well. In my opinion comfortable opening its back, which, in addition to preventing access to the photographic material attackers, allows you to use the backpack as a stand and change the lens without having to place the backpack itself to terra.rnIl biggest flaw It is definitely the very little space devoted to photographic material. Other small defects: When the tripod is anchored to the pack that crushes the objects in the non-photographic; the upper hooks to stabilize the tripod are not the massimo.rnIn synthesis: a great backpack that definitely recommend it, as long as you did not need much space photo (for outputs in the day is fine). |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
