|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Ringorin www.juzaphoto.com/p/Ringorin  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: focal length Cons: all the rest, building, distortion at 18 mm, color, big, the worst Nikon lens Opinion: I bought and sold, after about a month a few years ago, I still remember the expectations that I had and the huge disappointment that gave me this goal, the worst I've ever Nikkor provato.rnL 'hike is good, although not 105 is neither fish nor fowl, then better to focus on the 18 200 very good, much better performance as well as quality d 'images! RNLA distortion at 18mm is awesome and makes you feel like trashing' s lens in the first use, such as paintings can also be good, but it's still a little bright and the colors are not beautiful at all, considering the excellent standard nikkor, even the type of objectives by Kit 18 55 or 55 300.rnLa stabilization is the worst stabilization nikkor never proven, in short, not good I found nothing, I would not recommend at all, if you have 18 to 55 hold on sent on June 25, 2014 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Pros: remarkable focal range, sharpness in the center at all focal lengths, construction, reliability and speed AF, great stabilizer Cons: weight, distortion at 18mm, nothing provided Opinion: I l 'I bought used at 230 € and I have to say that for that amount it I was extremely pleased! RnIntendiamoci, is a superzoom, so ideal for quick photos, holidays with the family, but at the same time can also be used for something more creative, given that 'such a wide focal length range allows you to get good at fuzzy focal massime.rnLa image quality in my opinion is very good, I zoomed in images is often in both 18 mm to 200 mm and I noticed an unexpected sharpness, especially in the center, obvious that close to 18 mm better than one stop, as well as 200, for best results, but even at full aperture the guy knows how to tell her, of course, compared with other kit zoom or super zoom! RNLA optical stabilization is nothing short of amazing, I took pictures at 200m (320mm equivalent) freehand to 1/50 and came sharp! GNI 'AF is fast and quiet, despite being of the older generation do not silenziosa.rnI colors are good, as well as the contrast foto.rnI difects of this superzoom are the main weight (my poor reflex always travels with his head down), the lack of equipment (hood and housing in particular), the distortion generated at 18 mm, and the low light (although 5.6 200 mm is not bad considering that the kit has the same dark at 55mm) rnrnLo used to recommend 250/300 €, a new € 400 seems a bit 'Tantini with 500 € you will find some good used 70 200 2.8 and if I were to invest the kind of money I would invest on those ... sent on June 25, 2014 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 III Pros: sharpness, lightweight, great start, price Cons: not stabilized, plastic bayonet, dim, leaves little to the imagination Opinion: Contrary to what they say all the 'objective in question (series III) is excellent as far as sharpness, ease of use and lightness, the problem is that it leaves little to the imagination of the photographer, being a little' dark , another problem (not for me) is the absence of stabilization, which in some cases back utile.rnC 'is, however, saying that the price of this' lens is really very low, we will not find anything so good at that price, then recommend it to those who do not have any objective, at least to start ... sent on June 25, 2014 |
 | Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Pros: bright, sharp, well-built, stable, price, comes with case and lens hood Cons: does not have the Full Time manual focus, some specimens have problems f / b focus Opinion: I 've got it used at 230 €, I started a bit' skeptical because of the numerous reports of the problem of f / b focus, then I 've tried it and I have removed all doubts, the' objective is phenomenal! RnOttima sharpness to center at F 2.8 at all focal lengths, F 4.0 is also a knife around the edges, really a great objective, well-built and comes with hood and pouch! rnOttima stabilization, perhaps not to the levels of Nikon and Canon ( but very close), I would really recommend to all (of course it is advisable to avoid running a test on a specimen with f / b focus)! rnHo had the Tamron 17-50 2.8 smooth, the Tamron 17-50 2.8 VC and beats them both for a span ... I think we are certainly at the levels of the Canon and Nikkor lenses, if not better in some respects .... GNI 'only flaw is that it does not have full time manual focus .. . sent on June 25, 2014 |
 | Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Pros: nothing Cons: all Opinion: The 'goal is to be avoided, I' ve had on nikon and I could not find the merits .... the photo quality is always very low, hence the low price is not paid, when a little more, we find the nikkor 55-300 VR or the Canon 55-250 IS which spans over 10 are a waste of money ...... insommarnConsiglio to invest a few more Euros in the above-mentioned optical sent on June 25, 2014 |
 | Tamron 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II LD Pros: price, zoom range, sharpness, accurate AF Cons: sharpness compared with the fixed or professional goals, AF slow and noisy (but accurate) Opinion: I had this' objective for Canon and I was pleasantly satisfied, the sharpness is always very good, decays only slightly to 250mm, the aberrations are well controlled and distortion in the media, in short, can not recommend it, too bad that you find it hard to face used at a good price, I'd recommend not to pay more than 180/200 € ... sent on June 25, 2014 |
 | Tamron SP 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II VC LD Pros: Aperture f 2.8 constant, stabilized price Cons: weight, construction, AF slow and noisy, too soft to F 2.8, stabilization slow, not suitable for fast point and shoot, sharpness precarious Opinion: I do not recommend having tried the Tamron 17-50 F 2.8 smooth and having today the Sigma 17-50 F 2.8 EX OS, both the best of all aspetti.rnIl point is this, what can I do with a lens F 2 8 if the sharpness starts to become good only at F 5.6? rnrnPreciso that my copy was perfect and did not show any defect in f / b focus .... rnrnComprate the smooth and you are sure sent on June 25, 2014 |
 | Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Pros: very bright, good zoom range, good sharpness, light, money, great for those who want a good lens at a fraction of the cost Cons: construction is not flawless, non-stabilized (for those interested), not excellent sharpness at 50mm f 2.8 AF slow and noisy Opinion: I 've had years ago for Nikon and I was very satisfied, very convinced me the colors, sharpness, especially at F 4.0 and F 2.8 basso.rnA cost much to 50 mm is slightly morbidornLo recommend it to anyone who wish to replace the 'kit lens prezzo.rnrnSicuramente little better than the Tamron 17-50 VC (which I had) rnSicuramente worse than the Sigma 17-50 EX OS (which I excelled and is) rnrnNon've never tried 17-50/55 Canon and Nikon. sent on June 25, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
