The Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 III is a standard lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2011 to 2014 (discontinued). The focus is done by Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 120 €;
39 users have given it an average vote of 7.1 out of 10.
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex APS-C Canon EF.
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 193000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:Given that you can not expect who knows what came out in a kit lens, it must be said that from 2011 until October of 2015 was the only lens I've used. For those who have never used a DSLR or approaches for the first time in the world of photography, a lens is more than useful! The 18-55 is a lens that does scuola.rnE 'so light as to seem empty, therefore, perfect for trips and hiking excursions, in low light conditions the auto focus makes a huge effort to connect with the subject (and it is said that he does it ) and the noise can be annoying if we are in a museum, in a church or in a particularly silent places ... rnNon is a lens to aquistare separately, it would be foolish to spend money on accaparrarselo if it is not sold in kit, but this does not mean that is poor. RNTI does taste the potential of SLR and if used in optimal conditions Offering beautiful shots.
Cons:slow autofocus, non-stabilized, not bright, sharpness
Opinion:Without infamy and without praise. Perfect to learn and to understand what are the favorite genres of photography. Suitable for all kinds except sports photography: slow autofocus and very dark. Is it okay to gain experience and not be afraid to do damage; Recommended only for those who buy for the first time and finds him in an SLR kit, that is what I did with my 700D.
Opinion:Price here is the only pro of objective data in 'gift' with the reflex acquistata.Lo would change immediately with the Tamron 17 50 much clearer to the point that not even compare it. I used it with the first SLR that I purchased and was asking myself stè reflex cos'anno of so different from a Canon S90? I knew when I sold the lens and passed to goals best. It is a lens that takes 'to free' with the reflex of the kit I can not say that they are a waste of money but do not ever buy it separately.
Cons:It 'an objective basis and the numerous limitations are noted but, for what it costs, no
Opinion:Goal came in the kit with my now worn 1100D. The limits to list are numerous: the bad material, the maf ... but may be limits to a lens that comes with a coffee from 350 euro? I think what he does is acceptable. No doubt the board to use for newbies like me and get some 'hands with the SLR.
Opinion:I had written the usual comment, plasticky, dark, AF inaccurate. Then I decided to change it, because a judgment, in my opinion, must be related to the actual cost of the object and this is supplied in kit form, for the same price of the camera body only, so it's almost free. In addition it is an objective that has a lens audience from beginner like me, it is a lens that serves to learn. With its focal range can cover all that is needed, allowing pictures ranging from the landscape, the road, the portrait, so I do not find defects that are not the classic ones of a basic objective. Great to learn and to take the first steps. Surely, if you are passionate about photography, he soon wants to experiment with other
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.