|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Innerlight www.juzaphoto.com/p/Innerlight  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Manfrotto Pixi EVO Pros: Small, light Cons: Highly unstable Opinion: It is an excellent tripod to use with a light machine and a very light polycarbonate lens. However if the lens is heavy e.g. 500g the head does not hold. Therefore the meso of the lens will affect the position of the head. In addition it is quite elastic advice to use a re ritartato click otherwise you get choppy or micro choppy. sent on May 23, 2021 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III Pros: Aesthetically appealing, lightweight, small size, excellent grip, tropicalized and IPX1 certified, excellent stabilizer with every lens, great AF-S and good AF-C, orientable screen, jpeg quality, raw workability, in-room battery charging, numerous special Olympus functions, high-resolution raw shot, hdr in raw, focus bracketing and focus stacking. Great video capabilities. Cons: Battery life, no battery pack. Opinion: Taken to replace the E-M10 II, the E-M5 III is an E-M10 II with steroids. The machine is a miniature EM1 II, same sensor, same AF, same Menu change only burst, thetring possibilities and battery. The 5.5 stop/6.5 stop IS stabilizer is a span over any other machine other than the EM1 III. The car is very ergonomic and comfortable to carry around and shoot. The viewfinder is of excellent quality, as is the screen. It holds the isos well up to 3200, with the proprietary software Olympus Workspace demosaicizing the file in a better way to get even to 6400 (however it tends to be slow, but it is not a problem of the machine). End-version .jpg files have low compression and are close to the quality of a raw file, which is rarely found on other machines. It's a great vlogging machine as well. It has great features such as Live Time, Live Bulb, Live Composite, various bracketing and Staking capabilities. In short, it's a best buy. sent on June 19, 2020 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 30mm f/3.5 Macro Pros: High sharpness at the center and top edge, high magnification, high proximity to fire, no distortion and significant aberrations, compact light, very fast autofocus for a macro, focus is internal. Cons: Opening only f3.5 (which in the macro is not a fault, it is only because it can not be used as a portrait target), no fire limiter Opinion: The goal is certainly a best buy in the Macro field, since it is the cheapest macro target for m4 / 3 and has high performance despite the poor opening and vabbeh that the macro is not a decisive one. The lens is sharp at full aperture and sharpness grows up to f5.6. There are no significant chromatic aberrations or deformities as in the panasonic cousin, blurry is nice. I highly recommend it for both the macro and the still life. sent on July 08, 2017 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ Pros: Size, weight, aesthetics, colors, quiet AF Cons: Motorized zoom, slow, diffraction Opinion: If we consider that is a kit lens, ultra-portable, ultra-lightweight, it is an objective optically good, equal to the APS-C SLR kit for entry-level / midrange. If we want to compare to a fixed or an optical PRO, does not compare. If it's in the kit is a recommended optics, especially for video. If you want to take it on its own, it is not recommended. It is clear from f1: 3.5 to f1: 5.6 over the image pulp, compared to CaNikon kit niditissimo.rn sent on November 13, 2016 |
 | Pentax SMC DA 16-45mm f/4 ED AL Pros: Image quality, constant aperture, versatility, speed, focus, optical construction excellent, excellent color Cons: Short focal length, mechanical construction in some specimens to improve, not to tropical distortion evident from 16-20 correctable in post production Opinion: From the optical point of view is an excellent lens. Best of optics as the SMC DA 17-70 f / 4 and SMC DA * 16-50 f / 2.8 or the Tamron 28-75 f2.8 SP, colors and sharpness are excellent since the maximum aperture , I suggest you use F4 to F8. The only flaw is a distortion corrected to 16 mm in development. The use of the lens hood is required above under 28mm. Be careful if you buy the lens used without a hood that it costs about 70 Euros. The average price of used is from 200 to 220 Euros. sent on November 20, 2014 |
 | Kiron 105mm f/2.8 macro Pros: High sharpness even at full aperture, blurry excellent, high separation plans, high contrast, excellent color, very solid all-metal construction. Cons: Hard to find, some little chromatic aberration. Opinion: It is probably the best macro lens ever built, has a impressive sharpness. The focus ring is very long and eStream accurate. It allows you to focus on dissecting the plans as if you were under a microscope. The sharpness is high even at full aperture. The construction is solid, is built entirely of metal with glass lenses, probably if it fell, they cleave the floor. sent on July 14, 2014 |
 | Tamron 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II LD Pros: Great zoom range, low price, sharpness 18-200, few chromatic aberrations Cons: AF slow and noisy (but it is a jack of all trades, therefore, to be expected), spherical aberration at 18mm. Hood problematic. Opinion: I bought this lens for Pentax. It's a great all-rounder quality. It has good performance from 18-200, except for some spherical aberration at 18 mm, certainly far superior to the handyman 18-200 Sigma / Tamron. He has no particular chromatic aberrations. Unfortunately, compared to his twin Pentax 18-250 has a color rendering index lower due to the absence of SMC treatment on the lenses. Price performance is still a great lens from tourism. It also has the ability to close-up photography. sent on July 10, 2014 |
 | Pentax SMC FA 50mm f/1.4 Pros: Grand opening, color rendering, versatility and optical quality to F2.2 as sharp as a scalpel, very economical. Cons: Construction 'plasticky', manual focus ring of small, no lens hood, soft to from 1.7 to 2, unusable under 1 .7. Opinion: It's a great goal. Council's use F2 to F8, the bokeh is very nice, very smooth, tends to have a 70's style blur. The colors are excellent typical Pentax. The focus is fast but it is not always accurate. The lens is stabilizable via sensor, even if to 50mm and to a large aperture stabilization tends to be useless. sent on March 06, 2014 |
 | Pentax K-500 Pros: Excellent value for money, lack of chroma noise, stabilized camera body, made good up to 3200 ISO, usable up to 6400, ergonomics, ability to use mount lenses K/M42 with confirmation of focus and stabilization, strength, cover the viewfinder 100% through the pentaprism, superior image quality for the segment Entry Level, stop increments settable to 1/3 stop, good dynamic range, autofocus motor in the camera body, nikon shutter quieter than competitors. Cons: Not selectability point autofocus to focus on the screen, confirming the absence of autofocus point on the screen to focus, lack of Pentax lenses is that third-party, autofocus slower than the video concorrenza.rnLato not up to the competition (but if I want to use a video camera, not an SLR). Lack of lenses used on the side. Opinion: The camera body is definitely a good body, though not weather sealed, it is very solid and sturdy, the body is the same as the K-50, from which it differs marginally. It 'an economic machine in the entry level segment, so it can not be compared to other higher end machines. In his segment is extremely generous and enables the user to have features that the brand damage only during the scheduled major competitors in the market, such as the presence of the pentaprism, the presence of a double ring, the autofocus motor in the camera body. At the same price, and excluding the video side (which is not at the top), is a machine equivalent to a semi-pro as Nikon D7000. Regarding the optical side, there is an absence of the optics from the side used. sent on January 21, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
