RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)

Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ : Specifications and Opinions

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ

The Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ is a standard lens for 4/3, manufactured from 2014. The focus is done by Stepper Motor, it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 319 €;
59 users have given it an average vote of 8.4 out of 10.

If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  


This lens is available with the following mounts:

Micro 4/3: this lens is compatible with mirrorless micro-4/3.

SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuySample Photos

 Focal lenght   14-42 mm
 Angle of view   74.8 - 28.6°  (equivalent to a 28-85mm in Fullframe 24x36mm format)
 Format   4/3
 Max. aperture   f/3.5-5.6
 Aperture blades   5
 Lenses/Groups   8 elements in 7 groups
 Min. focus distance   0.25 meters
 Reproduction ratio   0.23x

 Zoom type   Ring, external
 Stabilization   Yes (built in lens)
 Focus   Stepper Motor
 Internal AF   Yes
 Full Time MF   No

 Built and notes
 Tripod ring   No
 Extenders   No
 Filters   37 mm
 Lens hood   Yes (not supplied)
 Weather sealing   No
 Weight   91 g
 Dimensions   61 x 23 mm


Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ, buy on Ebay Ebay


What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 220000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

sent on August 06, 2021

Pros: All for me mediocre without any excellence.

Cons: I find it "dark" and "faded"

Opinion: I'll be used to it too well myself, but I find the quality of this lens mediocre. Not usable for my needs: sold immediately. Clearly it's just my experience. Now on my Olympus I put series lenses and it's a whole other story. Rather than a handyman in the kit, I would have put a 20 mm f1/7 and they would have made a better impression.

sent on January 02, 2021

Pros: Compactness

Cons: absolutely useless goal

Opinion: I do not want to denigrate this objective, but I would like to be useful to those like me who have never tried a Micro 4/3 camera. I had for a couple of weeks an Olympus E-pl8 (same sensor as the new E-pl10) with this 14-42 pancake lens in the kit. Well, I was stunned. It's not like I expected who knows what and of course the camera is cheap (well... the E-pl10 in kit costs 650 euros and the lens not in kit alone costs over 200) but... it's a camera! (By the way, the new 20mpx m43 sensor doesn't seem to be much better.) And the lens as can also be seen from other reviews is not a bottle bottom yet I made a comparison with the same photos made by a cheap smartphone (Xiaomi mi9 lite of 230 euros, to say not a top of the range and that basically costs like this lens) and the photos are qualitatively absolutely similar apart from a little more depth of field, which nevertheless improved them, in favor of the smartphone, and a better (but very little) dynamic range in favor of the camera, while the detail is practically identical. Raw photos processed in LR with white dot in manual against photos taken from the smartphone in jpeg automatically. Yes because jpeg photos directly from camera were really unwatchable. In addition, the maximum opening of the 3.5 lens with the M43 sensor allows you to take decent photos at the maximum around 3200 iso but already we are at 1/30 sec. For heaven's sake, the machine is stabilized.. at least that! because otherwise with little light it would not be usable only with very bright fixes or static subjects. In fact, in my opinion, micro4/3 generally makes sense when used with good light with telephoto jectives. Of course also with quality fixes but at that point you have to evaluate the costs / benefits. While it can certainly have its say in the naturalistic field reducing volumes and weights costs. Otherwise mounting a pancake like this on an m43 for size (e.g. to make street) doesn't make any sense. You get the same or even better photos with a cheap smartphone (or with a compact... they still sell).

sent on September 09, 2019

Pros: Compactness even in full extension, lightness, good optical performance if the right specimen happens, unexpected resistance to flares

Cons: The construction is acceptable but I would have preferred it all metal type the 12mm f2 or the 17mm f1.8, electronic zoom speed (still improves a lot by setting "High" from Menu), difficulty docking and unhooking from the bayonet due to the ridiculous thickness the die

Opinion: I have the zoom 2.8 triad but I was looking for something extremely compact and light: considering the very low cost I tried this zoom of which I had read unencouraging opinions. I must say that I was surprised, sharpness not at the level of the Pros but very good also at the corners, both at 14 and 42mm. I believe that being a cheap production there is variability between the specimens, if the edges do not satisfy you I recommend you to try with another copy because mine has a definitely appreciable yield

sent on July 23, 2018

Pros: Extreme compactness when not operating

Cons: Average output of kit lenses, no lens hood, electric zoom consumes battery

Opinion: Looking for a very compact compact:-) that did not make me lose too much in quality and still allow me to have interchangeable optics as on the SLR I took a kit OM D 10 Mark II inclusive of this lens. The result is achieved, camera and lens mounted you put them anywhere, not in a pocket but in a normal pocket or in a pouch without problems. The optical performance of the lens is sufficient, in the average of the kit optics and it really allows you to walk without weights and clutter. Closing the diaphragm a lot the sharpness is good, otherwise the images are always a bit mixed, especially at the longest focal length. In short, a perspective from which not to expect much and to replace quickly with something better if you are willing to give up the ultra compactness of the Camera + lens set. A note on the zoom drive. It is electrically assisted and the ring on the optic does not rotate completely but behaves as if two buttons are assembled: turning it lightly on one side goes in tele, rotating it slightly on the other goes in wide angle. In essence you can zoom manually but the displacement of the lenses is carried out by the electric motor with consequent energy consumption. The automatic MAF is pretty fast. The stabilization is entrusted to the sensor in the machine body. In conclusion A view that I do not recommend to buy alone, better to take something else. If you take the camera in kit then it is highly recommended because you would buy a really compact system and overall acceptable quality.

sent on April 17, 2018

Pros: More compact than a fixed lens! Bright enough to be a 3.5-5.6, coupled to the em10 or em5 Pocket machine

Cons: Extends a lot of on (but it is inevitable for the type of goal), has an absurd tendency to balance white towards the gray/beige even under strong sunlight

Opinion: Great lens, it was the first of my fed m43 Kit, and unlike other, a lens that won't sell. WINS hands down on any 18-55 of march more noble, for clarity and compactness. MAF fast enough even in low light, allowed me to take 2 seconds too Freehand into town in the dark by grabbing the moving objects in a precise and clean, I didn't have a real 1:1 comparison but the MAF I think faster than the 12-40 PRO (which is pa ten of my Kit). As quoted in against, pity the absurd tendency to balance white towards the gray/beige even under strong sunlight, nothing irreparable provided you shoot in RAW.

Photos taken with Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ

Three Peaks + the paternal mount
by Albieri Sergio
215 comments, 7007 views  

A little 'chatter
by Marco Brunetti
101 comments, 12659 views  [editors pick]  

The charm of the fog
by Maxlazzi
65 comments, 5231 views
Last light in Vernazza
by Cosmosub
56 comments, 10571 views  

A world of illusions
by Federico Controni
230 comments, 7500 views  
HI RES 15.4 MP

Lost in the Light
by Testarossa57
97 comments, 4624 views  

Green Hope
by Marco Biancalani
113 comments, 4184 views


Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
The "full" I already did!
by Marco Biancalani
175 comments, 7390 views  
HI RES 13.5 MP

Always on the color search
by Marco Biancalani
165 comments, 4781 views  

by Diamante_P
81 comments, 4593 views  

But what color has a gloomy day?
by Marco Biancalani
101 comments, 3271 views  
HI RES 13.3 MP

by Zen56zen
64 comments, 3216 views  
HI RES 10.3 MP

Milan Linate
by Carcat
92 comments, 3096 views  
HI RES 10.8 MP

Blue waves
by Fonzie
89 comments, 5699 views  

It's a Rainy Day
by Gift Of Faith
57 comments, 2566 views  

... I was 10 ...
by Diamante_P
69 comments, 4499 views  
HI RES 19.0 MP

by Marco Biancalani
135 comments, 3844 views  
HI RES 15.9 MP

by Zen56zen
56 comments, 3094 views  

The shadow to know your smartphone
by Testarossa57
55 comments, 2422 views  

Sunbeam Drzewiczka
by Andrzej Kocot
42 comments, 1705 views  
HI RES 15.9 MP

Untitled Photo
by P.a.t 62
63 comments, 1818 views  
HI RES 19.6 MP

Candy Cane / Cane Sugar
by Marco Biancalani
61 comments, 3215 views  
HI RES 14.0 MP

Holy Spirit Church
by Marilù 04
105 comments, 3257 views
Interior structure of the Fuksas cloud
by Nonno Baker
62 comments, 1327 views  

Reading is good
by Marco Biancalani
98 comments, 1966 views  
HI RES 14.2 MP

by Ilariaci
18 comments, 1541 views  
HI RES 13.4 MP

The spaceship
by Marco Biancalani
71 comments, 3260 views  
HI RES 14.6 MP

The prompter
by Yago
34 comments, 1901 views
San Lorenzo della Costa (Caligo)
by MassimoViacava
113 comments, 1611 views  
HI RES 11.4 MP

Acquatino, Spello
by Diamante_P
43 comments, 2505 views
Just Us
by Marco Biancalani
63 comments, 2262 views  
HI RES 14.2 MP

Staircase of Honor Caserta...
by Marilù 04
66 comments, 929 views


Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
La Dacia with blue bins (St. Petersburg)
by Diamante_P
30 comments, 1392 views  
HI RES 24.9 MP

Unrivaled beauty
by Federico Controni
73 comments, 2383 views  
HI RES 15.9 MP

Nature vs Man
by Marco Biancalani
62 comments, 2790 views  
HI RES 15.9 MP

Finally summer !
by Marco Biancalani
52 comments, 2384 views  
HI RES 15.9 MP

by Ivano58
28 comments, 907 views  
HI RES 14.9 MP

Next Page »

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.


JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me