JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ : Specifications and Opinions

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ

The Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ is a standard lens for 4/3, manufactured from 2014. The focus is done by Stepper Motor, it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 446 €;

64 users have given it an average vote of 8.4 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Micro 4/3: this lens is compatible with mirrorless micro-4/3.

Specifications
Focal lenght	14-42 mm
Angle of view	74.8 - 28.6° (equivalent to a 28-85mm in Fullframe 24x36mm format)
Format	4/3
Max. aperture	f/3.5-5.6
Aperture blades	5
Lenses/Groups	8 elements in 7 groups
Min. focus distance	0.25 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.23x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	Yes (built in lens)
Focus	Stepper Motor
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	37 mm
Lens hood	Yes (not supplied)
Weather sealing	No
Weight	91 g
Dimensions	61 x 23 mm
Buy
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Nicolab32

sent on September 03, 2024

Pros: Very compact, sharp, well built

Cons: Electronic zoom

Opinion: Taken as a kit with the e-m10 mk 4 it was a worthy travel companion. Its main feature is that in 2 cm of depth you carry a 14-42 with you. It is fine during the day, less so with little light. Personally I took beautiful photos (even portraits). Metal bayonet, manual focus ring (skimpy but it's there) I don't like the electronic zoom, but in videos it works well. Overall a great kit lens

Dierre.ph

sent on October 19, 2022

Pros: compactness, construction, good IQ in broad daylight

Cons: bad IQ indoors, only electronic zoom.

Opinion: Although it is not one of the "must have" of the m/43 system it is a zoom that I love either for its compactness, or also for an aesthetic that I prefer to my cousin Lumix in any case every merit and defect I write it with knowledge of the facts having it since 2015 and in that year I took it on holiday in Amsterdam: the photos - clearly taken in broad daylight - I still keep them, the IQ is more than satisfactory, defects such as vignetting and AC can be corrected in post; On the contrary, a short time ago I tried it in a dark interior where kneaded photos came out; So those who aim at this "zoom" already know what they can and cannot do. As for the construction I must say that I find it better than the brother 14-42IIr (among other things with the same brightness), it is felt to the touch and the bayonet is made of metal; In 7 years it has never given me problems but there are specimens that break the flat cable that regulates the focal lengths (a classic of the first olympus zoom like the 9-18): I have an unproven suspicion, it could depend on the menu function that adjusts the zoom speed, I have always selected it on normal, but there are those who sect on High ... moreover, actually having only electronic zoom is not a plus point, but you can not have everything in an ultra-compact lens, while a convenient accessory that serves those who do not want to waste time to remove the front cap is the LC 37C lens cover that certainly makes you seize the moment ... I have the JJC version, cheaper.

user223923

sent on August 06, 2021

Pros: All for me mediocre without any excellence.

Cons: I find it "dark" and "faded"

Opinion: I'll be used to it too well myself, but I find the quality of this lens mediocre. Not usable for my needs: sold immediately. Clearly it's just my experience. Now on my Olympus I put series lenses and it's a whole other story. Rather than a handyman in the kit, I would have put a 20 mm f1/7 and they would have made a better impression.

Sandrotorino

sent on January 02, 2021

Pros: Compactness

Cons: absolutely useless goal

Opinion: I do not want to denigrate this objective, but I would like to be useful to those like me who have never tried a Micro 4/3 camera. I had for a couple of weeks an Olympus E-pl8 (same sensor as the new E-pl10) with this 14-42 pancake lens in the kit. Well, I was stunned. It's not like I expected who knows what and of course the camera is cheap (well... the E-pl10 in kit costs 650 euros and the lens not in kit alone costs over 200) but... it's a camera! (By the way, the new 20mpx m43 sensor doesn't seem to be much better.) And the lens as can also be seen from other reviews is not a bottle bottom yet I made a comparison with the same photos made by a cheap smartphone (Xiaomi mi9 lite of 230 euros, to say not a top of the range and that basically costs like this lens) and the photos are qualitatively absolutely similar apart from a little more depth of field, which nevertheless improved them, in favor of the smartphone, and a better (but very little) dynamic range in favor of the camera, while the detail is practically identical. Raw photos processed in LR with white dot in manual against photos taken from the smartphone in jpeg automatically. Yes because jpeg photos directly from camera were really unwatchable. In addition, the maximum opening of the 3.5 lens with the M43 sensor allows you to take decent photos at the maximum around 3200 iso but already we are at 1/30 sec. For heaven's sake, the machine is stabilized.. at least that! because otherwise with little light it would not be usable only with very bright fixes or static subjects. In fact, in my opinion, micro4/3 generally makes sense when used with good light with telephoto jectives. Of course also with quality fixes but at that point you have to evaluate the costs / benefits. While it can certainly have its say in the naturalistic field reducing volumes and weights costs. Otherwise mounting a pancake like this on an m43 for size (e.g. to make street) doesn't make any sense. You get the same or even better photos with a cheap smartphone (or with a compact... they still sell).

Vaake

sent on September 09, 2019

Pros: Compactness even in full extension, lightness, good optical performance if the right specimen happens, unexpected resistance to flares

Cons: The construction is acceptable but I would have preferred it all metal type the 12mm f2 or the 17mm f1.8, electronic zoom speed (still improves a lot by setting "High" from Menu), difficulty docking and unhooking from the bayonet due to the ridiculous thickness the die

Opinion: I have the zoom 2.8 triad but I was looking for something extremely compact and light: considering the very low cost I tried this zoom of which I had read unencouraging opinions. I must say that I was surprised, sharpness not at the level of the Pros but very good also at the corners, both at 14 and 42mm. I believe that being a cheap production there is variability between the specimens, if the edges do not satisfy you I recommend you to try with another copy because mine has a definitely appreciable yield

There are 14 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ

Three Peaks + the paternal mount

by Albieri Sergio
217 comments, 10132 views

HI RES 6.4 MP

A little 'chatter

by Marco Brunetti
102 comments, 15449 views [editors pick]

HI RES 4.7 MP

The charm of the fog

by Maxlazzi
66 comments, 7558 views

Last light in Vernazza

by Cosmosub
58 comments, 13044 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Untitled Photo

by Donatellabreschi
90 comments, 3146 views

HI RES 6.9 MP

A world of illusions

by Federico Controni
231 comments, 10943 views

HI RES 15.4 MP

Lost in the Light

by Testarossa57
101 comments, 6833 views

HI RES 9.9 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

High altitude selfies

by Albieri Sergio
126 comments, 4869 views

HI RES 4.7 MP

Loneliness

by Diamante_P
81 comments, 5814 views

HI RES 4.1 MP

Untitled Photo

by Donatellabreschi
90 comments, 2483 views

HI RES 10.7 MP

Milan Linate

by Carcat
92 comments, 4599 views

HI RES 10.8 MP

San-Pietrini

by Zen56zen
64 comments, 4178 views

HI RES 10.3 MP

Blue waves

by Fonzie
91 comments, 6970 views

HI RES 4.3 MP

It's a Rainy Day

by Gift Of Faith
57 comments, 4012 views

HI RES 6.2 MP

... I was 10 ...

by Diamante_P
69 comments, 5682 views

HI RES 19.0 MP

Tribute to Dad.

by MassimoViacava
122 comments, 2665 views

HI RES 13.3 MP

San Lorenzo della Costa (Caligo)

by MassimoViacava
131 comments, 3800 views

HI RES 11.4 MP

Reflections...

by Zen56zen
56 comments, 3911 views

HI RES 6.4 MP

The shadow to know your smartphone

by Testarossa57
55 comments, 3490 views

HI RES 6.9 MP

Sunbeam Drzewiczka

by Andrzej Kocot
42 comments, 2732 views

HI RES 15.9 MP

September

by Ilariaci
18 comments, 2080 views

HI RES 13.4 MP

Holy Spirit Church

by Marilù 04
105 comments, 4942 views

Untitled Photo

by P.a.t 62
63 comments, 2872 views

HI RES 19.6 MP

Interior structure of the Fuksas cloud

by Nonno Baker
62 comments, 2159 views

HI RES 4.4 MP

The prompter

by Yago
34 comments, 2631 views

Eyes look at me from a filthy courtyard

by Emmegiu
29 comments, 421 views

HI RES 6.8 MP

Staircase of Honor Caserta...

by Marilù 04
67 comments, 2171 views

Blessed are you farmer..

by Gift Of Faith
28 comments, 799 views

Acquatino, Spello

by Diamante_P
43 comments, 3427 views

To.. One Step from Heaven 7

by Gift Of Faith
39 comments, 1278 views

Winter sea....

by Marilù 04
60 comments, 1596 views

The Garden of Wonders

by Federico Controni
122 comments, 3948 views

HI RES 14.1 MP

Unrivaled beauty

by Federico Controni
73 comments, 3301 views

HI RES 15.9 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

La Dacia with blue bins (St. Petersburg)

by Diamante_P
30 comments, 2234 views

HI RES 24.9 MP

Lübeck

by Ivano58
28 comments, 1821 views

HI RES 14.9 MP

Like a Painter..

by Gift Of Faith
35 comments, 742 views

Palace of Cracow Bishops in Kielce

by Andrzej Kocot
37 comments, 2313 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Olympus » Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ