|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Baiosso www.juzaphoto.com/p/Baiosso  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 60D Pros: wonderful sensor even at 6400 iso .. adjustable display , function ring lock , resolute monitor , 1/8000S , video Cons: disastrous focus with cheap optics , then with the Stm reached the bottom .. basically every new lens forced me to send it to calibrate with the 60D.. absence of calibration af fine of the 50d / 7D ,, dark viewfinder ... Opinion: it did not have the fine af adjustment of the older sister, nor its robustness .. yet he accompanied you without hesitation everywhere.. I bought it new , and apart from the problem of focus with stm optics in the end it was my main camera for so many years .......... the central af point was more reliable than the 7D of which I had 2 specimens.. unlike the 7D the live view during focus was disastrous.. actually compared to the little sister lacked a processor , but compared to the latter up to 6400 I snapped without hesitation .. the sensor was newer and treated better than the 7D.. Undoubtedly.. .. and it was sharper at low iso.. .. this I noticed right away .. I think the filter in front of the sensor is thinner than the 7D.. with this and the 55-250 is 2 I made photos that I remembered sharp only with the CCD ... .. .. it was a body defined by many meaningless being already present the 550d and the 7D .. but in the end it was a marketing bet.. because of its video function and the adjustable display .. it was a mini camera.. used by so many professional photographer friends for years .. which is why I think it was built even lighter.. in fact it was polycarbonate .. although it had tropicalization.. something that the middle ground of today do not have .. sent on July 20, 2021 |
 | Sony SLT-A77 Pros: iso 50, excellent focus even with little light, tested even in pitch dark, thanks to its illuminator af .. speed compared to the cheapest slt , wonderful viewfinder , fine adjustment af ... weight.. low iso sensor quality .. first electronic shutter curtain that guarantees 0 moved at night on tripod .. 1/8000s .. real and working gps .. 12 frames per second that can be set in a breath from the ring... automatic functions to iosa .. and very comfortable also present on the nex Cons: castrated firmware , in fact for example does not allow you to disable noise reduction even on raw , photos in extrafine jpeg only in jpeg mode .. noise not so annoying but its reduction not deactivatable makes the photos from 800 iso onwards watercolors .. even with the raw that was almost useless .. delicate stabilizer , build quality of its painful electronics.. in fact I have desoldered the processor for defective soldering.. and on the minolta sony club forum I found out that it wasn't just my problem.. stabilizer on the sensor that does not stabilize before shooting by blocking the maf .. Opinion: the stabilizer was the exact same as the A55 .. in fact when mine broke I took that of the A55 to which he had given the shutter and I changed it on the a77 .. https://postimg.cc/gallery/87Pc5zY .... it still works.. at one point I had 2 .. one of these pulled green lines until it no longer showed a tube .. And I found out that it had the processor desoldered as it happens to laptop video cards.. stuff you can't believe.. yet despite the serious flaws for me ... I would still include it ... it is the reflex (or rather Slt, not really reflex) that you miss even when you are using a 7D .. you had many limits to get around.. yet you took the photos home anyway.. too bad only for the noise reduction on the raw not deactivatable.. sent on July 20, 2021 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: excellent handyman, you leave it attached to the SLR and you forget for years to change optics, especially if you use the camera for walks with friends, successful stabilizer, sharp in the norm .. but closed by one or two stops is better . Cons: stabilizer stopped after 1 second from the maf, typical of economic objectives,if you shoot suddenly the stabilizer does more damage than well .. sharpness and focus go hand in hand.. often from experience who complains about the quality of the photos is because he does not notice that the photo is blurry .. the old camera bodies like 60D, 7D mk1 and company of those dark years do not know how to exploit it well .. in fact it is the best of itself with camera bodies from the 70D onwards and with the new sensors af .. maybe also because of the stm engine.. I for example with the 7D every now and then we quarrel .. but when I use it with the 80D it changes the world.. the old version not stm was more precise with the old camera bodies.. remember if you are looking for optics only for photos and not for videos .. otherwise make the jump to the usm version ... Opinion: I paid him 100 euros for a 7D on which to glue it paid just as much .. it is very ergonomic with the 7D.. it works quietly and if you know how to get around its few limits considering the cost of used you have a lot of fun .. I leave it attached on the 7D since I bought it .. and I don't want anything else.. at least for my Sunday outings and walks.. remember that with special adapter can be used in a complete way on the M .. sent on July 20, 2021 |
 | Nikon D300 Pros: heavy , wonderful af even today in 2021 .. sensor that makes you enjoy every poor optics ... because of the few megapixels , ergonomics at the highest levels , better lighting recovery for me than the recent apsc models Cons: heavy when unfortunately you carry it around your neck and you are sewn up from side to side , on tripod everything moves in any case .. even doing macumba.. the shutter when you operate confuses the stabilizer as happened with the 55-210 vr 2 nikon ... often in good light I have to disable it ... is0 max 500... after they are pains Opinion: I had 2 .. and still with an 18,300 would be a great travel companion .. serves to photograph .. no frills various .. videos including .. ... the only frustrating thing are the photos with easel.. practically to use it at night I have to rest on a wall .. otherwise the shutter moves everything .. I kid you not.. I had similar situations with the 7d but not always and only in particular situations .. the d300 instead is made for good light and often the shutter sends me tilting the stabilizer making it operate during the shots in an unpredictable way ..... other thing that has always struck me .. of 60 and over cameras owned .. I've never seen the sensor of the d300 attract dirt.. never.. I think they treated the low pass filter in front of the sensor .. which in those years was still feasible .. now instead they are all at the savings .. already his heir .. the d300s had a cheaper low pass filter to the point that the photos looked less sharp put next to each other.. even today I look for a nice 18-400 or 16-300 to glue .. so much with those few megapixels everything goes into the background .. optical qualities included sent on July 20, 2021 |
 | Sony SLT A57 Pros: small, full of functions "set and forget" also present in the sisters nex ... with very comfortable electronic viewfinder ... although compared to the next a58 it was less contrasted and not led... present the electronic level very important for me that due to two serious interventions to the heart I always have dizziness since then and I make a mistake continuously tilting the photos to the right .. Cons: the first distinguishes all slt and nex under the a99 .. i.e. the castrated firmware .. many functions blocked from one model to another... the second serious flaw is noise .. indeed the noise reduction unfortunately present ( unfortunately ) even on the raw that can not be turned off .. and tends to make photos above iso 400 of watercolors.. from 1600 iso files are unusable .. long ago I took a picture at sunset and having the automatic iso the sony even with good light tend to raise the iso to 1000 and up .. well.. there was a giant crucifix on a hill in my country.. it was gone haahha.. pretty much the nr had mistaken it for a noise artifact . .boh .. literally disappeared .. only the A700 had the NR settable to off.. after only trouble .. 3 frustrating flaw is the ability to focus .. ranging from decent with sunlight.. to the useless and frustrating already with particular contrasts or in low light .. guys you get to the point that at sunset does not focus on the trees with the sun behind .. or in church begins to go back and forth until you give up and blur everything .. Opinion: apart from the pros and cons listed, I must say that with the possibility of removing the noise nr would have been an excellent travel companion .. as well as the a77 with the same strengths and weaknesses. I paid her 90 euros new for a defect in the flash .. for me useless ... I would have liked to have the nikon cleaning with the same sensor but with its same functions as the slt and nex menus .. because with an 18-200 I covered everything .. I still use it .. as long as his lens lasts ... Another peculiarity is in the sensor .. despite having the same resolution as sister A55 .. I don't think it was the same sensor.. the a55 and the C3 nex had broadly the sensor of the d7000 and I noticed having had them both .. from the a37 onwards they changed something I think because of the overheating of the sensor itself .. in any case at high iso I noticed obvious differences .. With the 18-55 standard weighs a nothing ... it is one of the few that with the electronic shutter on the first curtain manages to make a decent night photo on the mini stand of the manfrotto without the slightest choppy .. ( the d5300 with the 18-55 afp for example fails and moves everything because of the standard shutter ) .. another peculiarity the ring has preset the program for quick shots (12 ) but unlike the sister a77 that I also own .. they are only at 8 megapixels in jpeg fine .. but I assure you that for photos on the fly to seize the moment is a must.. another note of merit on this and on the slt in general until the a77 mk2 was the stabilizer based on the sensor in motion .. if you suffer from dizziness like me avoid the stabilized sensor that does not intervene when you press the shutter button in half .. because with a tele from 200 mm onwards will vomit .. guaranteed.. the a77 mk2 and the a68 had partly solved although at the expense of some overheating .. sent on July 20, 2021 |
 | Nikon D5300 Pros: sensor up to 800 iso, easel detail, exciting GPS (but consuming batteries like a Libyan mig 23 chased by the Americans). Cons: if you have to use it at easel you have to select the self-portrait with each shot ... in the end you feel like crying... battery when inserting gps, autofocus with little light, useless wifi for shots... it freezes, you lose, etc.... Opinion: I dedicate a review to her because she is one of the few who took home the photos in any condition... it hadn't happened to me in a long time.. I bought it broken on ebay and with a weld I found myself a gorgeous sensor.. which I think is that of the D7100 .... the af points during the day allow you to use it in an emergency as a tip and shoot... the perfect flash exposure.. and GPS is a convenience i've been used to since the Sony A77. sent on October 27, 2020 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: quiet, and within certain limits sharp even at F4.5 (see cons), optical stabilizer L series , with eos 60d and 7D matched very well Cons: plastic construction that at one point created problems even of decentralization lenses , dust that you found everywhere and unfortunately (unfortunately ) also in the rear lens Opinion: I loved it literally , with the 7D accomplice the double processor in live view looked like a compact. a lot of fun walking around the village, with the 60d the live view was obviously slower. he was in the room service because the autofocus was on and it was dirty with dust inside after a few months of the new purchase. the problem I started to hate was the construction speech, at one point he started out of the blue to decentralise some lenses without even bumping into him or anything like that. (I am a technician who repairs them and disassembles them for years now on his own), so one side of the photo was useless if not printing it in 10x15. and not even ... then I realized that he had the bad habit of attracting dust especially in the rear lens and at that point I said stop , after a send to the service room I resold it . A positive note to the stabilizer... It was something phenomenal... believe me on the word. I would take pictures in the evening at 1/5 of a second with the 60d and they were trestle photos. if only they had taken better care of the construction ... too bad for real.......... If you pay 50 -70 euros you risk as well ... otherwise buy it again, for what it costs...!!! I just got out I paid him 240 euros on ollo store. and I'm talking about 2014. now they should give it away or almost seeing the quality XXXX with which it is built. here is one of the many photos taken together with 60D with this toy https://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=1970107&l=it sent on July 11, 2019 |
 | Canon 7D Pros: When you hold it in your hand, you realize what a real prosumer must be like... as well as with the d300 nikon. they don't do that anymore. buy it if you can. to give you an idea of what an 80d in your hand is and this. the 80d will look like a plastic toy. as well as the d7000 that I also had ... they are personal experiences... two processors that compared to the 60d I owned in the same period seemed to compare a 530d bmw series with a 400 hp m5. especially with the live view. who tells you it's not fast ... especially with the live view then you don't have to be a photographer. and buy yourself a compact.. because it has too many expectations. Cons: autofocus at disastrous stage with cheap optics. to say the least... this wanted optics of a certain value at the light level. at least 2.8. with the stm you conclude something good in terms of quality. but with autofocus you were punching. sensor full of dead pixels when used for video continuously.... without the possibility of a solution if you do not send it to the service room that simply turns them off. was the reason why I traded it for an eos m3. Opinion: a tank... I know colleagues who did maintenance to specimens with over 700,000 shots without yet touching the shutter. was tropicalized from head to toe. better than the second version I have in the house disassembled because it took water during a snowfall... If you use L-series optics or cannons like those of football matches take one with your eyes closed... I of 60 machine owned bodies bought broken or new ... and then repaired ... etc., etc. is the one I regret the most. Believe me.. I used to fight for autofocus. then I realized that I'm as poor as the m... I mistook it for a new eos m3. and I held my 60d. isos up to 6400 were very usable. and if someone complains about the noisy photos and then use them right on facebook. advise them to find a girlfriend.... or something like that. as long as they mate later. and let off sit. I printed a book with photos all at iso 4000 or 6400 ... with that sensor. and it's magnificent despite the years. the live view compared to the 60d sister. it was lightning to the point that in case of important and unrepeatable photos I used it as a mirrorless . sure he wasn't wrong a shot... with the 10-18 stm was a blast. and with the engine stm a lightning with the autofocus in always live ... the weight just wonderful. the only real problem that no one mentioned before ... were the dead pixels. many sold are taken from hours and hours of video. and that was the real problem.... mine had 8000 shots. but on the raw you couldn't watch. then I realized that whoever sold it to me only used it for that... Too bad.. before you buy one, send a 10-second closed cap raw to 1600 iso. noise reductions. sent on June 27, 2019 |
 | Sigma 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM C Pros: Very ergonomic, autofocus that does not mistake a shot... on any Sony body.. Be it SLT or a classic mirror and if not enough with the USB Dok adjusts to thousandth, silent except at 300mm, up to 135mm some sharp shot you pull it out Cons: Built in C... # # # # #zzo of dog, not sharp at the edges... sometimes on Sony SLT goes haywire resulting in manual focus even if it is autofocus... front lens protection 0, nightmarish sticker.. At minimum filter the edges are black... Even with the SLIM is not OS like the old 18-250 that even on Sony had the stabilization for the MAF... 16 megapixels in then forget slower pics of 1/100 without the right light.. And for right light I mean the one at noon in July... after only micro-moved stabilizer on two SLT in steadyshoot error after prolonged use chasing birds with burst shot.. Opinion: I use it on Sony SLT, it also works on old A100 and so on.. The autofocus has never missed a shot... believe me.. Never.. Without the slightest adjustment.. But I do not guarantee that on Canon and Nikon or Pentax either uguale...su some programs and sites like Flickr is seen as a Sony DT-18-300.. Careful to choose the lens profile correctly unfortunately it has its faults.. Until F14 forget the uniformity between the center and edges... add also the chromatic aberration at the edges at 300mm which is disgusting to the point that I often have to cut a part of the frame because the difference at some point is horrible.. Here An example of quality at the edges and abberration at F10: https://i.postimg.cc/NF8x5Zdx/herhrehe.jpg a few days ago I cleaned the lens as I do with each lens.. i.e. liquid clean anti-reflective glasses and microfibre cloth... almost after 10 minutes I found the lens in front of all matted.. Do you know why? Because it does not have the slightest shred of protection from infiltrations on the front lens and a part of the vaped liquid was finished behind.. Also the kits have a mini rubber sheath or sponge... this No... I had to run home to disassemble and clean it properly.. A nightmare.. And thank goodness that being technical I am prepared for these eventuances.. Thank goodness.. In fact in 15 minutes of work I was again outside the house taking pictures.. But I honestly fell from my heart.. Never in 20 years that I do photos had happened to me something like this especially at temperatures of more than 20 degrees in the sun... The HSM is slow.. I was expecting more.. Also the AF at 300 mm becomes noisy with time.... PS with two different SLT bodies do not know why often it was more advantageous to remove the steadyshot that leave it active.. Does damage.. Perhaps they do not dialogue as it should but there are currently firmware for models with A-mount Bayonet.. .. Insisting CMQ at some point have gone the stabilizers to both the camera bodies if you are going to buy it for the trips let loose... the first humidity or drizzle will betray you.. I enclose instead some good shots with this lens circumventing its limits.. https://www.flickr.com/photos/71735589 @ N02/31101418978/In/dateposted/https://www.flickr.com/photos/71735589 @ N02/30009322998/In/photostream/https://www.flickr.com/photos/71735589 @ N02/43083942261/In/dateposted/https://www.flickr.com /photos/71735589 @ N02/41328062865/In/dateposted/ sent on November 13, 2018 |
 | Canon EOS M10 Pros: With the 22mm lens it is like a compact camera that has a built-in or almost almost all-in-one quality, sensor quality up to 3200 ISO, but for images to be published on social applications, the 6400 iso can be quietly used without noise reduction, Autofocus with multiple maf point not so bad as reviewed, hdr function almost at sony nex and slt levels. Touchscreen display is a joy to use, other than Sony with the nex with 230,000 pixels and flicker (see slt a37, alpha a3000), copyright included such as the highest class Canon, 3-color focus and peak intensity, shutter noise Which for many would be a defect, no shock shutter like on the Olympus em 5 and pen models Cons: Non-existent grip, a display that reverses only useful to selfie or blogger mania, I would have preferred to rotate like the g1x even down, to use it over the crowd while watching the live view comfortably. Somewhat difficult focus with single point of maf, room correction options such as photo straightening or basic corrections such as those on the 60d, for example, completely absent, are just those that simulate those idiotic effects such as a toy camera, watercolor that is Welcome as a disk hernia, art effect, etc. ... the only one that does not blossom is the granular bw or what's his name .. that's nice .. Opinion: For what concerns me this mirrorless has been criticized for no reason, I had 40 machine bodies of which over 16 mirrorless, and frankly I really like it, the sensor has pretty much the same output as my 7d and 60d with the advantage of not having to send it In assistance to calibrate af or use fine AF tuning in the case of 7d .. I use it safely at 6400 ISO .. and I like the opposite of who says that at ISO 1600 it's worth ... if you are the guys that They make the photos with the apsc to iso 25,000 and then look at the monitors at all magnificence I sincerely hope to find you a girlfriend .. and buy a full frame .. if you are the big iso manias. The display is of praise quality .. and the touch works fine, the videos do not tell me why it does not come out .. but apart from the s5 sister's view i do not see big flaws, at most if we want to be tricky the electronic shutter is totally missing. Rnrncmq for reasons that are not I'm explaining , A spectator I found a few days after this review having to photograph a baptism in the eveningMade with this camera and a 60d with very little illumination, and if I say very little believe me .. photos printed from 1600 to 5000 iso perfect with so much thanks to everyone, no photo out of focus while maybe with the 60d i have thrown some .. show that When I was blocked by looking at the perfect shot preview .. while with the 60d I had to fix some photos .. I was so good only with the lumix g1 and g5 .. only those were inguardable from 1600 iso up .. the g1 Already from 800 iso .. rnrnps for those used to making photos cXXXo and playing home shading up and shining lights, this is not for you .. when is a canon and if you miss the show after teasing, that's why I would recommend a nex or a fuji.rnrnse you want to take curiosity this is the file at 6400 iso as it is taken from the raw without corrections: https://flic.kr/p/UkyM2L look at the detail of the wood so you will understand why i appreciate it very much sent on April 12, 2017 |
 | Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM Pros: Good resolution in the center already at 3.5, lightness though at cost of mediocre, stabilized and silent autofocus, with the stabilizer i made 0.5 second free-of-the-go shots at 6400 iso without the slightest sign of move .. And if I say no, believe me since I counted the minutes of the clock on the wall clock in one of these .. Cons: 15mm visible vignetting, distortion, bayonet plastic attachment, tendency to collect dust in the back lens as well as other cheap stms, mediocre edge at all openings ............... ........ a shameless distortion in my opinion I just show you a photo without corrections so you realize it yourself: https://500px.com/photo/212442489/giandomenico-graziano-italy-roma-by- giandomenico-graziano? ctx_page = 1 & from = user & user_id = 4860680 Opinion: If you find it attached to a m10 I can understand it, otherwise stand out if you have to pay more than 100 euros and look for the 18-55 ef-m stm is that it was in kit with the previous eos M ... which is slightly better built , Starting right from the metal bayonet.rnrnho had several stm optics like the EF-S 18-55 AND 10-18 EF-S, 55-250 is stm. And in all I noticed the bad tendency to accumulate dust on the back lenses after a few hours of use, which as a technician always forces me to disassemble them and blow away the dust. The old 18-55 is ef-s for example i never presented this problem .. just like the old ef-s 55-250 is 2 .... This is to say that the overall design quality compared to old optics kits has been slightly shrinking. But obviously it is just my humble opinion of computer technician and graphic artist who has been taking photos for 20 years. Rnrnps not that other manufacturers are better, as a kit of kit optics. The canon is currently the one with the best compromise. The stabilizer works well and the%3Bautofocus is silent, which is especially appreciated in videos. 15mm vignetting and distortion feel when you are photographed in raw, so it's worth finding an adapter from ef-s to ef-m and buying an ef-s 10-18 is stm It goes much better at the same price almost. A novice or a Sunday user does not realize anything, especially in jpeg.rnrn In addition to reducing the size, they used the system used in the first series of olympus 14-42, you have to move a lever and extend the target first To be able to use it, therefore useless for the photo on the fly removing it from the pocket ,,,,, rnrna 45mm not known obvious defects of distortion rn sent on April 12, 2017 |
 | Olympus PEN E-PL3 Pros: I do not know why but for the HDR still prefer to APSC sensor ... rndensità which allows for low iso ... razor-sharp pictures even if the previous series it seemed to piùrnse used with the right optics, or 2.5 1.8 produces pictures scary day because of the density sensor .. Cons: compared to the previous series I noticed a noise filter too aggressive ... enlarging a dark frame I noticed that instead of dead pixels o bianchi hot noise filter put a black spot like a patch ... rnse do not use optical msc previous provide no advantage in terms of speed af rnrumore already at 200 iso evident if one is accustomed to APSC sensor rnrispetto to EPL1 owned previously did not have a socket sicura..rnil metal case provoked changes in temperature so high as to cause the continuous misting sensor ... we had gone in paranoia..persino when I took the parcel steamed up ... thing with the other three previous non accadeva..rngamma dynamic ridiculous ... if not used on a tripod riprendevi evening very little compared to the other sensors sony or canon APSC time Opinion: I've had 4 Olympus .... and then with the same sensor also panasonic g1 cousin ... I love a day at low iso ... for jpeg ready (less for g1) RNLA old EPL1 seemed to have + sharpness comparing shots with epl3 ... but the advantage of the three in terms of autofocus was pauroso..sopratutto under low luminositàrnla thing left in my mind of this model was the trend of winter to cool even in your pocket or pouch ... and just returned home with 9 degrees difference steamed up everywhere ... with previous models has never happened even after being under the nevernnon had the defect that long exposures created white pixels for the entire frame as the EPL1 old ... but I noticed that put as patches of color instead of these ... enlarging photos 1: 1 rnle still prefer to hDR and panoramic .... sent on August 12, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
