|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Paoligno82 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Paoligno82  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon Z 50mm f/1.2 S Pros: Bokeh monstrous, colors, three-dimensionality, construction, AF Cons: Large, heavy, expensive Opinion: Like the other owners, I can only talk about it well, it is a monstrous optics the colors that returns, the bokeh at 1.2 make you forget the weight and size. It is certainly not a lens to take on a trip, or rather at most to combine with another lens beyond your back suffers. As cons precisely, dimensions and weight are very limiting at times and remains at home preferring 2.8 zoom. But if you want the highest quality and maximum aperture this lens is from another planet. sent on October 03, 2022 |
 | Sony A9 Pros: Light, gust, AF speed, high ISO hold, batteries Cons: Comparison to the RIV that I own the handle that does not drive me crazy, but with the grip resolves, slower in the reflexes when turning on and ready to shoot, double slot snot UHSII otherwise I do not know Opinion: I wonder why they didn't call it A10, that's the vote I give them. Beaten aside, I come from over 10 years of Nikon, and my last reflex was a D5 so top of the range. I switched to Sony because neither Canikon house wakeup to do a mirrorless with these features and I didn't want to wait anymore. I just say that I have never tried it before buying it obviously I informed myself by reading a lot of reviews and opinions on forums but on the operating side I threw myself a little blind. My first outing was to make the martin that dived without even reading the manual, look at my galleries will not be works of art but the hook that has this machine in AF is stunning. The burst then from 20fps in electronic without blackout is really super, I also used the RIV but with the blackout obviously it is not the same thing. The menu is actually not as easy as Nikon you have to like all things read the manual and take our hand. I was afraid of batteries, when the D5 had infinite range, well with two batteries that weigh less than a battery of a reflex flagship, I make 1500-2000 shots so more than enough. The grip without the grip, for me that I have quite big hands, would be really difficult, on the RIV for example is already much better the grip has improved by far. On the other downside they could put the double UHS-II slot did not cost him anything and would certainly have been very useful. I took pictures of 20,000 iso that with topaz are photos as at 3200iso so also from this side test passed, other positive side READ READ READ MORE, this is the biggest strength of this system its lenses are half the weight compared to reflex is tut another life now I can take them anywhere. sent on February 03, 2020 |
 | Nikon AF-S 35mm f/1.4 G ED Pros: All Cons: The hood and the building a little plasticky Opinion: I had the 35 1.4 Nikon then sold and I got the Sigma, and now I got the Nikon. The quality of this lens for me doesn't even come close to the Sigma and don't speak of sharpness I talk about nuances, color rendition. I have other lenses Sigma Art but then again, to me it's just like the Nikon 35 24. If you take Import you save quite a bit. Autofocus a bit slow, but still allows you to focus actions without problems. sent on April 17, 2018 |
 | Nikon D850 Pros: Body, XQD Cards, Resolution, Burst (with integrated grip), dynamic range, AF, Tilting Monitor Cons: Heaviness of files, NOISE, cost Opinion: I made about 2000 shots, a few on the whole to judge I reserve the right to add this review later. From what I've seen is an enhanced D810 although I think it has more noise (obvious with an increase in MPX) I over 3200 ISO I find it hard to bring it for my taste. The AF hooks well, but it is not like the D5. I was in Poland to photograph the eagles and I joined the same optical 400 2.8 and the docking of the D5 is really instantaneous. The gust of 9fps with grip and battery of the D5 is excellent everything is done. Good crop DX in the room you still have 24mpx usable for other crop. The price is very high, then the grip is really exaggerated, not to mention that to insert the battery of the D5 must buy another accessory (40 € on amazon) otherwise it is not usable. With what you pay could have included in the package .... Finally the monitor tilt and touch! For now I can say that I'm almost a little sorry to have sold the D810 for this, which had not happened when I sold the D800for the D810. I reserve the right to update this review later. sent on February 01, 2018 |
 | Nikon AF-S 105mm f/1.4 E ED Pros: Sharpness, Bokeh, Af Accurate, color rendering Cons: Do not have it! If we want to be precise the lens really ridiculous for the lens that is ... and on some occasions the AF is slow and does not immediately hook Opinion: It's a wonderful optics I also own the 85 Art but this is wonderful .... It has a creamy focus and is the focal length for me perfect for portrait or fashion photos. I also had the defocus, but this has 2 or 3 more marches. It is quite heavy and cumbersome but I have to say that on machines like D5 it is a wonder. Absolutely recommended this is a Nikon masterpiece. sent on January 07, 2018 |
 | Nikon AF-S 400mm f/2.8E FL ED VR Pros: Lightness (to be a 2.8), AF Speed, Sharpness, Blurred, Contrast Cons: No counter if not the price Opinion: I go from the opposite to the only one, the price this lens costs as a car ... if it is used it makes a good deal as I did. The quality is spatial, at every focal length and distance. The slimming treatment to which they have undergone is remarkable and now you can even mark your own free-hand. Even with the converter keeps an awesome sharpness, so is that I sold the 500 and I think I will only use this canvas from now on. sent on August 03, 2017 |
 | Nikon D810 Pros: Dynamic range, shutter speed comparison of the D800, detail and color of the files Cons: Slow, obviously huge files, an XQD slot would be a must, a few FPSs Opinion: I have this machine since 2014 for me a record I usually change cars! It's a formidable machine, a landscapist or a portraitist should have it. Awakening outstanding file recovery in shadows and high outstanding lights. You have to use it with glass of a certain size otherwise it suffers. Great crop possibilities even in DX format we still have 16megapixels perfectly usable. It can also be used in naturalistic, the files will be great, in contrast it is very slow and the shots per second are not too many. The next D8XX hope I have more FPS, XQD slot and AF of the D5, 4K. Already with these improvements might be upgrading. But surely I will think well if you leave me alone! sent on July 04, 2017 |
 | Nikon D4s Pros: Operating Speed, FPS, Autofocus, XQD Slots, Building, File Quality Cons: Price also in used, shooting noise! Opinion: I took it as second body to side the D5. The quality of the files that it sucks is excellent, with the robustness that the nails can plant in the wall. Lightweight, very workable but excellent quality is the non plus ultra for sports, nature, wedding, concerts. The high iso hold is monstrous and the autofocus does not mistake a shot. The cost also in the used is kept high, but it is the only rival in the Nikon D5 home! Noisyer than the D5 looks like a minigun! sent on July 04, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S 200-400mm f/4 G ED VR II Pros: Clarity, versatility, build quality, made with TC Cons: Unbalanced compared to the 300 2.8, cost (as new) in fact is not a 2.8! Opinion: Got it used in excellent condition, viable alternative to 300 for versatility but still possess even the 300 2.8 for its luminosity, this 200-400 is a boon for travel where you want to go with a single optical (see safari) but have the highest quality. And if you also own a DX body the focal length is reached without moltplicarlo is already 600mm F4. Tested so far only with the TC14 maintains excellent speed AF (with D500 and D5) and an excellent sharpness, smooth instead is a knife. Honestly I would not push him over with the TC17 and the TC20 remember that it is always a zoom. Great fixed the F4 at all focal lengths, which is obviously a 200-500 dreams. Built like a tank can face any storm! The price is really high, but you pay for !! sent on February 20, 2017 |
 | Nikon D5 Pros: Speed, iso estate, jpeg file ready to use without the need for retouching, infinite battery, AF Cons: Weight and dimensions (for me are not a defect indeed) dizzying price Opinion: I had them all, D2x-D3-D4 and D3s now taking up the D5 I can only confirm that Nikon has made huge strides on the flagships. D5 This is really a bomb files that churns are ready, even the B has an exceptional cleaning that you just convert it to jpeg and you have the picture ready. I tried to shed the D5 with 500 mounted on f4 and I had the D500 with 200-400 with ISO 4000. Well approximately the same between the two really can not compare the D5 shredded files are cleaner and more workable. The AF engages anything and allows to work in very low light conditions. The flurry of 12fps is outstanding, not to mention the buffer that is infinite. Take only the XQD model to benefit from the maximum operating speed. The weight and size are important, but also having a D810 with battery grip, I can say that despite being lighter than the D5, I get tired much less to challenge the D5 especially with paintings of a certain caliber as 2.8 and 300 200-400 you can slewing freehand. Batteryyou forget to charge it, but do not forget the price that you have shelled out for this machine, really challenging but you know this is really a professional tool in the round. sent on February 17, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
