|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Smorf www.juzaphoto.com/p/Smorf  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM C Pros: price if taken used, stabilization, still sharp to take away some satisfaction Cons: bracket for small easel. Opinion: bought used, but plastered, did not disappoint me. For those who want to make birds without spending too much, taking nice photos, it's fine. excellent stabilizer (at 600 you also shoot freehand at 1/125 or so). Good contrast and colors. I use it in combination with multiplying 1.4 EX DG (the oldest one of the TC1401) and that's fine. I find myself an 840mm a f/9 (for the sick of photography the light and focal length are never enough); loses something in contrast but little stuff. The autofocus perhaps suffers a little level of ..."indecision" (e.g. cloudy skies having to photograph a ash heron on the river edge near rocks and boulders, better sewing in manual). Without multiplier the autofocus is precise. Like all zooms to the extreme focal it loses in sharpness, but nothing special, and shooting from f8 onwards recovers well. Mounted on the stand the stirrup is a little small and if you do not have a pesantuccio easel there is always the risk of moving. The mount on 5dsr with satisfactory results in terms of sharpness (making large crop of the image is difficult given the micromove always lurking; the easel and the open locked mirror are a must). Greetings. sent on October 31, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 24mm f/1.4 L II USM Pros: one and only. worth all money it costs. Cons: costs for what it is and is not very accessible for the cost. E 'useless for those clicks only landscapes to f5.6 / f8. Opinion: for me, photography and 'play with light and this is the wide angle perfect: bright and sharp even at 1.4, off the subject that seems out of the frame. Fantastic! But just because you have to get the hang of using it bright at RT. Perhaps this and 'why many believe that the money to buy it not worth the expense. But no. 1.8 and up 'almost perfect. Even for a fotocazzeggiatore like me who prefer to use the photos as they come out of the car without retouching in post-production. Well, perhaps if you love this post production ob is useless. sent on January 10, 2015 |
 | Canon EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Pros: sharp images, good stabilization. Cons: cumbersome and impractical to unlock it and use it. Opinion: It really looks like the 10-22. Good quality of the shots, very sharp, excellent performance at all focal lengths. Ideal for EOS M or for travel. In hand looks solid because of the metal construction. Generally use the 22/f2 because of less space but you have to have to have a zoom lens or a longer focal open aperture and a more 'closed, I highly recommend it instead of 18-55. chromatic aberrations contained and still easily erasable with DPP. Deserves a 9 in relation to the M series and its use with this system. sent on June 02, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 L IS USM Pros: Color fidelity, accurate, excellent general construction, functional stabilization. Cons: It does not go unnoticed, expensive, makes me scoliosis. Opinion: In relation to the 35-350 has made a great leap forward. There is everything from wide angle to telephoto. Obviously the focal length optics weighed and then you get tired to keep him in the neck. Already at room temperature and 'edgy, moving up a couple of diaphragms is a perfect blade. It 'a little' soft to 300mm, but recovers easily in post production. The other focal photos do not need retouching. Colors faithful. E 'in the pump, and then the dust and' lurking. I used it for sports photography, a field in which it is born, producing perfect images (paired with a 7d). It is also suitable for reportage (I pissed you 5dII with good results), but a day with ilo 28-300L neck imposes an orthopedic control. At the end I keep it in my arms, 'cause to remove it is not talked about. Who speaks of evil and 'envy of not having it. The stabilization allows handheld photography without problems. It 's not luminossimo and does not let you "play with light as an f 1.2" but the 28mm diaphragm TA than enough, however, to 300mm off the subject from the background. Great goal. sent on April 29, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM Pros: solid construction, good sharpness in the center, color fidelity. Cons: very soft on the sides, chromatic aberration, flare, it tends to overexpose. Opinion: It 's not a blade: the shots are quite soft with only the central part really nitida.Devo always retouch the photos with DPP to make it pretty clear. At that point, it enhances the yield and good color fidelity. Tends a bit 'to overexpose, but with a little' practice, you learn to handle the situation, as well as chromatic aberrations (though solvable in post production). Changing the diaphragm does not vary much the situation remains soft for my taste. The version II and 'much better. rnL'ho bought used for a long time and now I know how to get the best and the limits of optics. I do not think I will never part, because I use it too spesso.rnLa use even on a 7D and it becomes almost a 24 mm, thus eliminating the vignetting at room temperature (about FF easily removed by using DPP). sent on April 29, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 400mm f/5.6 L USM Pros: Lightweight, sharp enough, good contrast, almost excellent AF. rn Cons: nothing Opinion: If we add the built-in hood, price and 'more justified and affordable. rnSi uses freehand (which means a lot). rnHo also the 28-300 stabilized and the weight difference of feeling, especially collo.rnLo to use especially when I walk in the mountains and 'maneggevole.Consigliatissimo for fotocazzeggiatori like me. rnPorterete home of the excellent scatti.rn sent on October 14, 2013 |
 | Canon EOS M Pros: solid does not look like a toy plasticky, same menu 'of SLR, even at high ISO shooting, excellent video (especially for possibility of changing the focus point with a touch screen), light to carry around without too much trouble. Cons: lack viewfinder but you do get used to, battery that lasts 150/200 shots (without video). Opinion: C but with the adapter ring distorts the function slim ergonomic eos M. We say that if I had to introduce my son to photography, without using an SLR, the EOS'd take the M. sent on August 06, 2013 |
 | Canon 5D Pros: Right pixel ratio for full-frame sensor. Ideal for still images or portrait. Excellent color rendering. Canon Pro for free recall "the mirror" (a sign of seriousness). Cons: Not suitable for photos .... "movement" because no precise autofocus. If not the caution (always free) to Canon to fix the mirror, scollerà inevitably. Opinion: In the run-up to the irrepressible pixels inside the sensor, this reflex has nothing to envy to the most noble mark II and III. Obvious after the iso 800 purists complain noise, but I took even at 1200 iso no problem retrieving the files in post-production (with the proper proportions). I would say excellent for the surrender of the photos and the strength of the body. I would think before changing over, I do not think that technology Canon has baked for sensational news photo-amateur. sent on March 28, 2013 |
 | Canon 1Ds Pros: perfect exposure, always, color fidelity, accuracy and speed autofocus. Cons: small screen, weight; Opinion: A tank, in all senses. Robust, highly reliable, intuitive, disruptive but heavy. I used coupled to the 28-300 IS: a mega compattona! If it was not for the weight and length of small batteries, I would never have sold. I do not know if Canon and 'more able to realize a digital SLR that level in relation to contemporary technology. Who is used, you do not regret the purchase. sent on March 28, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
