|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Alemaff www.juzaphoto.com/p/Alemaff  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Viltrox AF 16mm f/1.8 Pros: Excellent sharpness already at full aperture, metal construction and very solid, very useful display, possibility to mount screw filters (77MM) fantastic focus memorization function for night use, well-controlled coma and very good backlight seal if you do not necessarily look for the glow. Cons: Average hood Opinion: Ordered with much perplexity but at the same time very curious ... I was absolutely impressed by this optics, very sharp ALWAYS at all openings plus at 1.8 even the edges are more than good, it becomes a razor from 2.8 to 8. Nothing to envy to top lenses with regard to truly incredible optical performance, for landscape and night use a lens to have for strength. I use it on A7RII and III for day and night landscapes and it left me stunned. Moreover, screw filters can be mounted... Unmissable at the proposed sale price... If you have prejudices about the brand (As I had) you will change your mind after trying it. Highly recommended sent on September 13, 2023 |
 | Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 Di III RXD Pros: Size and weight, filterable (Common filters with 28-75 2.8 from 67mm), center/edge sharpness also at TA, resistance to Flare Cons: Limited range, Non-TOP materials, lack of distance scale Opinion: Used on both a7III and A7RII, I was amazed by the sharpness center/edges even at 2.8 I also had the 16-35 F/4 zeiss and this is best in everything except for the more limited focal points. Compared to a fixer like the Zeiss Distagon 21mm 2.8 and the Zeiss Loxia 2.8 it is difficult to understand with which lens the photo was taken and this I never expected (Cromie apart) on 42Mpixel at the extreme edges some small difference in sharpness is barely noticeable on the 24 absolutely not. Maximum sharpness between F/5.6 and F/8 is great anyway up to F/11. Light and portable in combos with the 28-75 offers quality and lightness at the same time, excellent combined with the A7. At night it behaves great so absolutely recommended for this purpose, well controlled coma and vignette and a rather uniform yield at 2.8. Lens above expectations with excellent value for money, sure it had started from 16 mm would have been stratospheric but you are satisfied! sent on January 29, 2020 |
 | Canon EF 135mm f/2.0 L USM Pros: High sharpness even at TA, contained dimensions, excellent construction, used price, colors and superb yield, very high contrast Cons: Focal non generalist and not for every occasion Opinion: Taken used in excellent condition (paid €500.) and I use it on A7III + Sigma MC-11 and it works great, I was really impressed by the optical rendition and the high contrast even to really gorgeous TA. In my case for portrait use and some landscaping detail is perfect, I would not do sports events but for the rest (at least on A7III) is perfect and the eye focus mode works perfectly even at great distances. Really a superb optical rendition despite the project's company! Highly recommended! sent on October 03, 2018 |
 | Tokina AF 17mm f/3.5 AT-X Pro Pros: - Used price (I paid € 160. Used to canon) rn- graniticarn- construction Filter diameter 77mmrn- Ultra Compact High-yield generalern- Cons: - Chromatic aberrations to bordirn- AF ultrasonicorn Opinion: I found this lens for canon used at 160 €. and I got to use ND filters 77mm. I have Deire that the overall performance is not bad, the copy that I found I was like new and constructive level is really a rock. rnLeggermente annoying unlocking AF / MF pump, but otherwise nothing to say, compact and yield more than good, I recommend it if you find one used ... sent on September 29, 2014 |
 | Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM Pros: -Nitido Already in F / 2RN-Great costruzionern-Light Cons: Levelling-manual focus difficult Opinion: A must for anyone who owns the EOS-M lens really indispensable for quality and consistency ... Highly recommended for all those who seek quality and compact size, this way you can take with you anywhere "quality" even when you leave the camera at home! rnNon will make you regret the quality of an SLR, to be left in your bag / backpack for all giorni.rnOttima portraits diaphragms perti, for street and also for night shots on a tripod ... sent on August 28, 2014 |
 | Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Pros: - Sharpness very high in all focali/aperturern- Great costruzionern-Stabilizer very efficacern-speed AF Cons: - Lack of Hood debolucciorn-limiter setup fuocorn slightly short-handle to carry it well Opinion: I was looking for this lens for a long time but I had never found a copy as you deve.rnFinalmente I bought a used perfect and I'm happy! RnPremetto I also owned the 300 2.8 L (First version) and I have tried along the IS version In addition I also have the 400 5.6 L (Light and versatile). rnrnLeggo that many complain of a lack of clarity in the TA, which I have not encountered in my version vramente sharp even at 300mm f/2.8. rnLavora fine with multipliers, with the 'Sigma 1.4x EX DG is fine the loss of sharpness very limitata.rnCon 2X (EX DG Sigma) is necessary to pay more attention, but the results are very good and fully exploitable as long as close to F / 8 - F / 9 . rnrnConsigliatissimo without reservation, but I recommend you try it first! The variability in this lens is very high! Rnrn sent on April 23, 2014 |
 | Samsung EX1 / TL500 Pros: Construction egregious, double ring time / diaphragms, swivel screen excellent optics very bright, gorgeous 24mm 1.8 raw files very good, good AF, Optical Image Stabilizer very effective. Cons: Lentina in raw, autonomy is not a record, not exactly lightweight, removable lens cap odious! Opinion: Compact excellent, I use it a lot in the mountains for scenery thanks to the 'quality of the lens and the beautiful wide angle, I love his swivel screen really eccellente.rnConsigliata to anyone who wants a good quality with an acceptable weight! RnDa use in RAW the differences is quite marked between RAW and JPEG (Still good) rnNon recently but if you find a used one at a good price ... sent on August 23, 2013 |
 | Sigma 24mm f/1.8 EX DG Pros: Very light, sufficiently clear, very bright, distortion acceptable, affordable, excellent value for money, minimum distance of focus very low, ability to mount filters (77mm). Cons: Plastic does not just TOP, sticker lot, some chromatic aberration (Problem marginal) Finish Sigma bad in early versions, completely revised and excellent of the latest versions (which I own) Opinion: Perfect lens for the 'night-time use, given the great brightness and focus, I'm really glad I bought this lens that is giving me great satisfaction at TA 5DII.Davvero consigliato.rnVisto the price is really a "must" for those who has no desire / ability to spend crazy amounts of a lens that maybe does not use much. I recommend the latest versions because it is completely revised level of finish. sent on June 25, 2013 |
 | Sigma 500mm f/4.5 EX DG HSM Pros: -Excellent image quality, Excellent value if closed one stop-Very contrasty and saturated colors-No chromatic aberration-Fast and precise AF (Thanks also to the limiter of 'AF)-Affordable price-Relatively easy to handle and very portable thanks to handle-Good yield multipliers kenko (1.4x DGX and DG) Cons: Lack-stabilizer-Finish improved Opinion: I bought the EX version not DG and I immediately felt great! Truly magnificent lens optical quality is very high. Very lightweight and portable weighing bearable for this kind of lens. A blade F / 5.6 up but already usabilissimo or TA (4.5). I use it often freehand with good results. If he had the stabilizer would be a dream lens! With the many Kenko DGX 1.4x Bolto goes well with both 7D that with the 5D Merk II and closed to F / 6.3 to 7.1 is very sharp el 'AF remains fast and precise. Absolutely recommended, sadly very rare on the market for 'used. sent on August 21, 2012 |
 | Canon 7D Pros: Construction, fast performance, iso to medium / high sensitivity, ergonomics, AF, personalization, image quality with appropriate lenses Cons: Iso intermediate quality not great (400/800), ISO auto is not configurable, AF configuration rather tricky .... Opinion: Excellent machine, in almost all shooting situations, excellent value for money, well built and very efficient. Not perfectly suited to the novice photographer that might remain puzzled by the numerous settings and configuration options. Mandatory for use with lenses of high / very high level for non incorerre in mediocre results. Personally, I am very satisfied (I come from 40D/50D and also 5D MK2) and absolute nothing to say the car is great, I noticed a certain unpredictability of results depending on the usage conditions, it happens to be displaced for good or evil on image quality than expected (again for better or for worse). Consigliatissima. sent on August 25, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
