JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM is a wide-angle lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2012. The focus is done by Stepper Motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 221 €;
51 users have given it an average vote of 9.3 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EOS M: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Canon EOS M.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 207000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Size, weight, focal equivalent to 35mm, brightness, metal construction.
Cons:Nobody. Comparing it to 35 mm huge and expensive makes little sense.
Opinion:In my opinion it is the lens to have of the M. system fully reflects its philosophy of compactness, transportability and value for money. The equivalent 35 mm focal makes it the perfect lens for street for which it is not necessary to enlarge 100% to make fleas on extreme sharpness or other similar meads. Mounted on the M50 it is a pleasure to carry it with you, practically in your pocket or in a small pouch, a perfect set up to always have the car with you. The image quality is good, I see a slight dark red dominant but nothing worrying, very little distortion, few aberrations (try the sigma for Canon m, however spectacular, to see real aberrations). And then it's F2, so you shoot even with little light. I also have the lampshed (sigh... a ring, there will be 10 of us in the world to have it) and a protective filter, always mounted, and I can still place the cap without any problem. Absolutely recommended!
Pros:Optical and construction/weight quality and footprint/cost
Cons:... Not stabilized?
Opinion:It looks born on purpose x M bodies without efv.... It's really all in your pocket - good yield even in macros with extension tubes - essential optics in construction, standard in focal and brightness (a classic 35mm), Lilliputian and very affordable - compared to the 35 f 2 is I find it "anonymous" in the yield, but less critical in the transition from TA to diaphragms - closed, where, however, the 35 is chromatically -pleasant and -engraved (reporting sensations not direct comparisons) - ultimately, if 15/45 is the "disinfected" handyman, the 22 is the "meditated" handyman, which does not even require too much care in the composition (distortion in the norm), with the plus of the brightness of the "disinfected"
Opinion:I really can't find a flaw in this lens. Besides being a faster stop I also find it optically superior to its cousin 24 STM EF-S, it is very fast in focus, it is practically welded on the M50 which becomes a premium compact usable anywhere, with a 35mm equivalent. It's sharp, it produces photos with beautiful colors, minimum footprint. Perfect.
Pros:Sharpness, size, definition, color rendition, price
Cons:Manual MAF ring A little too small, light chromatic aberration
Opinion:Bought used with a one-year warranty from a well-known retailer, and is currently the optics I use. Being a lover of the philosophy of traveling light this lens turned out to be the most apt choice. Ridiculous footprint and weight that make it pretty much a compact unit combined with my Canon EOS M100, an excellent construction entirely in metal (bayonet included) and too good for the price to which it is today. On the optical side you can not say anything against it if compared to the price below €250: sharp as a small razor already from ƒ/2.8 where from its maximum splendor to ƒ/5.6 and ƒ/8, color rendition surprising and well balanced , minimum focus distance I would say more than good to take home some nice macro, TA lo blurry is pleasant and creamy. The maximum aperture of ƒ/2 makes it ideal even for night shots where I have not encountered many difficulties, no shortage of defects of course: Personally I found the manual MAF ring a little too small for my hands, I noticed a slight aberration Chromatic when shooting in certain situations of light (nothing serious, a click in Lightroom or rawtherapee resolves). We are not on the same quality of goals well more expensive of course, but I can say that the price to which is sold is perhaps one of the best goals and remains my recommended for those who want to start photographing being a great handyman.
Opinion:Taken to pull out of a drawer an Eos M that I could not sell, excellent lens, if foced at the right distance the blur to TA is pleasing. Only negative the focus ring really small. I think I'll only use EOS m + 22 in the next few trips to stay light. I would be curious to know the yield of this lens with one of the last m present on the market
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
