|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Dreu1981 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Dreu1981  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Cost; dimensions; stabilizer; definition and sharpness in the center. Cons: Undeniably dark; sharpness at the edges; autofocus does not always engage and slow down, with little or too much contrast. Opinion: My example, like many others, is well made and its sharpness in the central part is really good. I compared this 70-300 with the 70-300 USM "old" and 70-300 L Series of the Canon and I noticed that the sharpness in the middle is right in the middle between the two models. On the sides the old 70-300 canon is identical to this if not inferior, while the L series is better as you hopefully seen the 1000 euro that you spend more to get it. I tried the new Canon 70-300 USM II and it is better, but the difference is not so noticeable.rnSu APS-C this lens is perfect, because the loss of sharpness at the edges does not bother me because the lens portion is not used from the sensor, while on full frame you notice a little. I must say that most likely those who have had problems in general has not raised the doubt that it is a star model, as it also happens for lenses series L or Nikon pro (denigrate as always a lens just because it is not prodeight from the renowned I do not go down) .rnIo recommend it especially now that used has reached 200 euros and with this price is really the barrels.rnStabilizer effective 4 stops, clear and well contrasted .. these pros are enough for me and who it is not a pro or who does not need a quick connection. I would only change it for a 70 200 f2.8 only for the brightness in the interior. sent on March 13, 2018 |
 | Canon 6D Mark II Pros: Image file well malleable; AF lightning and impeccable even at very low brightness; high ISO hold impressive; adjustable screen; touch screen; weight; handling; AWB accurate in the vast majority of cases. Cons: AF a bit 'too condensed at the center of the frame; lack of selection of AF cases and AI Intelligent Servo mode at least as the 5DIII. Opinion: The strengths that have made me propose for purchase are certainly the lower cost compared to other full frame pro, the swivel screen, the image file and the high ISO.rnrnHo purchased the 6DII and immediately it was demonstrated an impressive leap in quality compared to what I had in my hands before. Used with and without Battery Grip, the handling is really optimal; without BG weighs too little, with the BG is perfect to balance even portrait lenses a bit 'heavier than the average. The battery seems to me very high performance and capacious. I have not tried to use the flash yet, let's say I forgot it ... the files even at 40 thousand (QUARANTAMILA!) ISO impressed me for how little they ruin with my usual post production, as well as the grain that although present is much lighter than the ISO 3200 of the 40D. Actually I made a comparison, 40k ISO of the 6DII roughly corresponds to the 12800 of the 7DII and 3200 of the 40D ... I'm really impressed.rnThe AF & e moduleserious; a splinter, almost always hooks if you use at least good quality optics like the 100 macro f2.8 USM because with the 50 f1.8 II, however, it is slightly more effort and you understand that the optics is the culprit.rnI had to admit that sometimes I am forced to reassemble, while with the 5DIV that I tried with the 6DII at Canon Day, I recomposed a number of times less, almost half, but it costs 1000 euros more and has no adjustable screen: infact I could do straight photo already thanks to the adjustable oschermo, which with the 5DIV I could not do ... I took pictures with the family "playful" with the screen facing the contrary and spot on the first shot without having to do 3 or 4 to choose the one that best suited the situation as a composition.rnAnother point that they say is a problem is the joystick, but I do not feel so much the lack ... being very ergonomic, get used to using two ring nuts instead of ring and jo ystick was not so & igravis; difficile.rnrnResoconto: my photographic experience has really changed, I can immediately make a certain type of photos saving time in post production thanks to the adjustable screen, weighs less than a pro even if the weight is well balanced with medium zoom lenses size and weight. With the BG it is well balanced up to a higher weight target, the heaviest I have weighed on 900g and does not balance 100% the weight of camera plus BG and 2 batteries. The screen is really a plus that before having it "every day" I did not make a big worry, now I do not see how I could do without it without having to give up taking some more photos or position myself in "artistic poses" to get a shot that comes close to what I can do much more comfortably now. The image files are really professional range, I tried to make of all and are always outputs winning images.rnAvendo seen and could try the previous model I confirm that they are not comparable, are two totally different machines like the 7D andthe 7DII. sent on March 01, 2018 |
 | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Sharpness, stabilizer, cost, tropicalization Cons: AF is not always lightning Opinion: At the end of several months of indecision I opted for the Tamron at the expense of Canon 24-105 f4 IS and Canon 24-70 f4 L IS L.rnA front of several readings on the internet and magazines, compared to tests performed on the field, the My reasoning was as follows: rn1. I need a lens to do everything, to APSC, to momento.rn2. If and when I pass to FF (or buy a FF body if I take this occasion there's a 5D old say) I wish I could use, wide angle and portraits, handyman secundis.rn3. I like the opening of f4 canon, soft and creamy bokeh, but the f2.8 aperture gives me more detachment in photos taken in the family (home mostly), then lower PDC with the background in distance is not always so high be excluded with a f4.rn4. I like a lot of the f2.8 Canon 2.8 mkII, I do not like that the canon f2.8 mkI continues to cost as a goal, and then again with warranty 4-5 anni.rn5. the stabilizer would save me on many occasions taking home with the not always long enough even to f2.8rn6. I like less bokeh Tamron, more nervous and less creamyCanon's 2.8 mkiirn7. I like that costs 1000 euro less and have the stabilizer best I provatornrnAlla end I acqusitato the Tamron. All my expectations were abundantly ripagate.rnLa my review is as follows: rn- The sharpness is very very high, I made the shots at home, my granddaughter with shower heads and behind the other nephew ... you see it detachment at large, so do not ask for more from a apsc.rn- As for the hood I have not tried in a state of having to use the lens hood, but with bounce flash on the ceiling I had no problem to flare or altro.rn - The vignetting I do not appear at all or in any case is not very evident, I immediately put a filter and lens hood slim hoya .. I want to emphasize because of interneto I found the review of a person who has tried and found vignetting inhomogeneous, is left up to the right and then not be changed automatically .. to me it is a lens flawed and / or tarare.rn- The stabilizer is outstanding, I took in 1,6s 2.8 sat with folded arms andthe photo does not seem moved. I did not open the file at 100% because I do not enlargements of this photo, but the data I need to understand that I can feel comfortable up to 1 second. I saw the test of outdoor photographers that follow and in fact they too were able to 1 second to shoot. No Canon or Nikon permit it unless it was with a tripod ovviamente.rn- The tropicalization did not try it yet, but I've seen people in Groellandia have this lens ... we go on trust by, so do not ever under Scatterò the flood without tricks because I have a sore body pro.rnrnNota: sometimes the af takes longer than it should (not lightning) when the contrast is not high. NB: I had the same problem with the Canon 24-70 f4 IS L is that 24-105 ... I do not think I have had this problem with the canon 24-70 2.8 mkiirnrnSono still really pleased, they did a really good job ! rnrn sent on February 27, 2015 |
 | Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II Pros: Quality / Price - usability is light and unbalances the little body - good for portraits at 70mm a good bokeh and blur pleasant - closup good, too bad the minimum distance is too high. Cons: Motor too slow in sporting occasions and birds - for a hundred euro more the Tammy 70-300 has the Ultrasonic Motor and 45mm more, even if the focus is more raw and less pleasant - maximum aperture too high, it would have been better at least to 2.8-3.5 to 55mm for best blurred. Opinion: I bought this lens on the advice of a friend who owned it. It is an amateur photographer and there has always found good. Using it in AF of birds and insects is too slow, you can not focus on them. In manual mode, of course, well behaved, in practice the focus makes clear photos, but not razor sharp: croppando 100% sharpness is not as pretty. The contrast and the color does not convince me always, with a good light works well. I recommend it to those who have a low budget, although other objectives would estimate used. sent on June 19, 2012 |
 | Canon 550D Pros: Quality / Price - ability to use both EF EFS - shoot in RAW - excellent images both with the basic objectives with professional lenses - lightweight body, manageable and pleasant grip - use high ISO up to 3200 - attack goals steel - protection against dust - countless customizations for a entry level body. Cons: Body robust little machine - manual focus selection button slow and easy to reach while shooting - a few shots per second - at the time nothing more. Opinion: I bought this camera body kit with 18-55 IS II and 55-250 IS II. With both goals I noticed that the pictures come out very well if you fall in the excellent range of objectives, unfortunately I lack the test with a real bright lens. After six months of use and after having honed knowledge on photographic technique, just this weekend I was able to pull out the images really beautiful. I am very happy to have bought this car, but I do not deny that in the future buy a FF. Forthcoming I want to see the difference with the 650D, especially for the sensor "hybrid" and the orientation features. I would highly recommend it especially after the release of the 650D just those who want to spend relatively little and have a great product in hand. Of course, to consider the "used guaranteed" a model like the 50D or 60D, always reported to the budget. sent on June 19, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
