RCE Foto






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD : Specifications and Opinions


Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD

The Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2012 to 2018 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 889 €;
256 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10.


If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.

Sony A-mount: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Sony A-mount.



SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuySample Photos




 Specifications
 Focal lenght   24-70 mm
 Angle of view   84.1 - 34.4°
 Format   FF, APS-C
 Max. aperture   f/2.8
 Aperture blades   9
 Lenses/Groups   17 elements in 12 groups
 Min. focus distance   0.38 meters
 Reproduction ratio   0.20x

 Features
 Zoom type   Ring, external
 Stabilization   Yes (built in lens)
 Focus   Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
 Internal AF   Yes
 Full Time MF   Yes

 Built and notes
 Tripod ring   No
 Extenders   No
 Filters   82 mm
 Lens hood   Yes, supplied
 Weather sealing   Yes
 Weight   825 g
 Dimensions   88 x 108 mm
Buy Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD, buy on Ebay


Reviews



What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 186000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on March 30, 2019

Pros: Blurred sharpness to onion

Cons: MAF not really a lightning, rubber ring

Opinion: I have used this optics in different services, the sharpness that pulls out is impressive as the Nikon, if not higher.. The stabilizer works well even if with quick shots it is better to put it on off, the tires of the ring nuts come off easily., take it into account the MAF is not lightning but it is quite fast then it depends on which machine you mount it. Recommended

avatarsenior
sent on February 23, 2019

Pros: Sharpness, AF, solidity, price, quality/price ratio, resistance to all weather conditions, stabilization

Cons: Hood, Nuts tires

Opinion: Now I use it for 5 years Best Buy in absolute is the only lens that I have not dared to change and sell, I was never disappointed in any condition he used (in the rain, under the snow, extreme temperatures both cold and hot) has never Missed a shot, only note that this summer in Sicily (after 5 years and temperatures of almost 35 ° C) after a day practically constantly under the sun the ring of MAF has slightly low but honestly can also stay. Af for me very fast never suffered from Front/back focus ever had to calibrate it and I used it pretty much as the only lens on D90 and on d610. Suffers a little bit of distortion at 24mm on FF but nothing so serious that you can not correct with a click in PP. In short, a really exceptional lens in relation to the price, so much so that now, I was so satisfied that I do not believe (after using it) is less in any way "to the original" Nikon 24/70 2.8. Also as a weight in relation to the latter I think is a feather considered the focal aperture. Yes the lens hood makes you laugh but despite all I found it solid I still have the original and it took a beating and falls but without ever making a fold. In short, how you could understand me the Straconsiglio.

avatarjunior
sent on February 23, 2019

Pros: Sharpness, stabilizer, fluency ring, solidity, zoom lock

Cons: Lens hood, 82mm filters, locknuts tires, Canon USM slower USD

Opinion: I purchased it after using for a year the Tamron of a friend of mine three years ago. Heavier than the Canon 24-105 that I used until recently, but it is a burden to which I am accustomed; Sharper already at 2.8 and with a better stabilizer. The AF ring is small but smooth, that zoom is harder, but in this way it makes the presence of the zoom block almost superfluous because the barrel does not go down with the lens downwards. As soon as you take it in your hand it gives you just the idea of solidity and good overall construction. The construction is however in two particular places: the AF and zoom rings that are consumed, discolour and quickly detach and the lens hood that is very light, fragile and small, is just a piece of plastic. Among the cons are the 82mm filters not so much for the magnitude itself but because it does not share the same diameter as the Tamron 70-200 2.8 of the same series. The autofocus is pretty fast, but not like the Canon USM, and it does fatigue when it lacks light.

avatarjunior
sent on January 23, 2019

Pros: Sharpness, construction, Autofocus

Cons: Maybe the weight, AF ring a little bit small

Opinion: I start the review by talking about the specs of this lens. 24-70 f 2.8. At first I had several doubts: there will have been a few 70mm ones on the long side? Would the 2.8 be enough to freeze the action? How useful would the stabilizer be? What portraits could have come out? After a little ' experience but I realized that a 24-70 f 2.8 allows you to really do everything, addiritutra with a thread of planning you can also do shots that could be done with fixed F2.. In short, a 24-70 is a lens that aspires to always be glued to the machine body. Could the Tamron Mark 1? The answer to all these questions is yes. First, the AF, to be a third party lens, at least in my specimen is very good and reliable. Then the sharpness is there and it is very good always. Maybe it's not a 50art, but still has a lot of it. Then if one is sick can try to pull out that fraction of roughness with a dash of sharpening. I haven't extensively tested the stabilizer, photographing people shooting often at less than 1/50. But to have it and know that it can give you 2.3, or 4 stops in the landscapes, however contributes to the judgement of lens in the round. Finally the construction is very solid. The only faults I have found are a little weight a high cicinino (which discourages to keep the reflex on the neck all day) and the ring nut for the full time manual focus a small thread and placed in the middle of the barrel, a position that requires a bit ' of habit. But the rest is a lot of stuff. A must for full frame

avatarjunior
sent on December 27, 2018

Pros: Construction, stabilization, overall performance

Cons: None, the tele side is slightly poor, filters 82 mm.

Opinion: Honest lens from the price contained in the used, offers so much yield at a price that is half the original Nikon 24-70 G. also offers stabilization. I can't complain about anything. With regard to surrender, compared to the Nkon d800 I realize that the tele side is qualitatively less performanant than the wide side. In essence it does well what you expect, without smeing. At 24 mm The distortion is visible but not excessive (the Nikon AFS 20 1.8 Despite being wider has less distortion-but it is a fixed, I know...). It offers saturated colors, maybe it is slightly warm in yield, I find the Greens a yellow thread and I find myself often change on LR the green slide when I click with this lens. My lens has no front/back focus problems, the AF is always very accurate fast enough for generic use. From 24 to 35 mm, comparing the yield with the Sigma 24-35 f\\2 Art which I also own, the Sigma is better in all, except for the distortion, visible on both at 24 mm. On the Nikon D800 F/11 is already excessive, at 100% there is a loss of sharpness in the finer details due to diffraction. I have not so far detected any particular problems of flare or ghosts with strong lights in the frame. Like all 24-70 f/2.8 It has on its side the versatility in the generic use, embellished in its case by the presence of the stabilization. It works well with Nikon flashes (used with sb700 and sb900) and therefore communicates smoothly with the Nikon CLS. It is a safe purchase with the only unknown common to all independent manufacturers: Future compatibility with Nikon\\canon camera bodies to come. In conclusion: I am very satisfied with the purchase and use that I make. I've never had the original Nikon 24-70 in any of its variants so I can't make comparisons but I don't feel the need to change the Tamron. When I need something more I know that I have to use a fixed. Recommended.




Photos taken with Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD

Foto
Lower manhattan by night
by Thomas Farina
140 comments, 39643 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The sunset dreamed of a life
by Gianluca Lombardi
100 comments, 16028 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Eclipse
by Tore Serra
113 comments, 22391 views  [editors pick]
Foto
After the storm
by Marco Paradiso
135 comments, 9021 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Lunar sunrise on Lake Federa
by Alberto Parolin
105 comments, 11166 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 4.4 MP

Foto
Waiting for something
by Giovannigenzini
85 comments, 25185 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Mom but what's in the washing machine?
by Daniele Quaranta
269 comments, 31834 views  [editors pick]


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Crampie 10-11-2017
by Sergio60
128 comments, 8314 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Argentine Patagonia
by Mapik
81 comments, 13709 views
Foto
The Exit
by Baribal
129 comments, 15185 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 24.2 MP

Foto
Reflexes
by Gianluca Lombardi
38 comments, 6636 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The golden light of the Dolomites
by Andrea Sagui
59 comments, 3950 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Brick factory
by Nicolas Brunetti
74 comments, 5721 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 20.0 MP

Foto
The hands of the weaver
by Marco Misuri
78 comments, 5957 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The world in a room
by Sguazzo
50 comments, 5778 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The Magical world of dance
by Sguazzo
71 comments, 4979 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Monty
by Andrea Ceroni
62 comments, 6266 views  [editors pick]
Foto
From Fermignano dressed at the party............
by Fragarbo
182 comments, 5987 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 3.8 MP

Foto
The last outpost before the storm
by Ulpio
77 comments, 2089 views  
HI RES 9.3 MP

Foto
Boston parking
by Thomas Farina
38 comments, 12231 views
Foto
Roberta # 2
by Claudio Carpinato
64 comments, 31335 views
Foto
Untitled Photo
by Giovannigenzini
53 comments, 19233 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Romantic full moon Crampiolo
by Gabriele Prato
83 comments, 10731 views
Foto
Space traveler
by Baribal
106 comments, 5628 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 20.0 MP

Foto
Fox at dusk
by Rufinus
57 comments, 8956 views
Foto
We serve?
by Waltertrevisan
36 comments, 12666 views
Foto
On the beach of Myrdalsjokul.
by Fiorenzofanton
202 comments, 6405 views  
HI RES 24.0 MP

Foto
The house with the grassy roof.
by Fiorenzofanton
150 comments, 3054 views  
HI RES 16.7 MP

Foto
Squero San located in Venice.
by Fiorenzofanton
127 comments, 1925 views  
HI RES 24.2 MP

Foto
Giorgiomilone.com
by Giorgiomilone
51 comments, 7334 views
Foto
Family Vocabulary
by Sguazzo
58 comments, 2007 views
Foto
Windy city blue hour
by Thomas Farina
30 comments, 10452 views


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Www.truelovefotolab.com
by Claudiophotoroma
28 comments, 21604 views
Foto
Among Friends
by Waltertrevisan
54 comments, 10917 views  
HI RES 12.4 MP

Foto
Autumn 2016 to Sangiatto
by Sergio60
56 comments, 4883 views
Foto
Aunt Isa and the cat
by Sguazzo
50 comments, 3468 views
Foto
The violet city
by Daniel Maran
68 comments, 3326 views

Next Page »




The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me